FeedPosted Jun 29th 2009 11:00AM by Elizabeth Harrow (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Bad News, Options
State Street Corp. (NYSE: STT) said today that its State Street Bank & Trust Co. unit received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The notice, which indicates that civil charges may be brought against the company, relates to disclosures and management of certain fixed-income strategies during 2007 and previous periods.
Some investors have accused State Street of misleading them about the risks involved in mortgage-related investments. A legal reserve fund worth $625 million was established in 2007 to cover investor claims, and $418 million has already been paid out. The firm says it is currently cooperating with the SEC, as well as state and other regulators.
Continue reading State Street unit slapped with Wells Notice
Posted Apr 16th 2009 4:00PM by Elizabeth Harrow (RSS feed)
Filed under: Major Movement, Earnings Reports, SEC Filings, Forecasts, Good news, Regions Financial (RF), Options, Financial Crisis
The shares of Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE: RF) surged this afternoon after the regional bank said it expects to report a first-quarter profit. In a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Chairman and CEO Dowd Ritter attributed the unexpectedly profitable quarter to recent strength in new account openings and customer deposit growth.
If Wall Street seems shocked by the news, it's because analysts were predicting Regions to swallow a quarterly loss of about $290 million, or 42 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters. Plus, with nearly 5% of the equity's float sold short, it seems that many investors were also betting on the bank to report gloomy earnings.
Continue reading Regions Financial draws heavy call volume after 1Q profit forecast
Posted Apr 1st 2009 1:10PM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Initial Public Offerings, Visa Inc. (V)
According to a report from PricewaterhouseCoopers, last year was horrible for IPOs. The number of deals plunged 80.7%, with the overall amount raised down 54.9%. In all, there were 57 IPOs and total proceeds came to $29.4 billion. Interesting enough, the Visa (NYSE: V) IPO accounted for $17.9 billion (it was the largest IPO in U.S. history).
Basically, the deal activity has been the slowest since the 1970s. In fact, there was only one public offering in Q1 of this year.
Unfortunately, the malaise could continue. After all, there are only a handful of filings in registration. Plus, it can easily take half a year to get an IPO through the SEC process.
Continue reading Is there hope for the IPO market?
Posted Mar 17th 2009 8:00AM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Walt Disney (DIS), Hershey Co (HSY), Amer Intl Group (AIG)
Another day, another item about excessive compensation. While American International Group (NYSE: AIG) pays out a ton of money to its own employees, the Hershey (NYSE: HSY) board has seen fit to bestow a rich compensation package to CEO David J. West.
Oh well, what can you do, I suppose. I always hate reading these reports. They always get under my skin. If you're a shareholder of Hershey, you're not doing that great right now. The stock will probably do well over the long term, but in the meantime, your shares are down over the last several years.
Continue reading Hershey's CEO makes out while shareholders lose out
Posted Jan 14th 2009 9:48AM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Products and Services, Nortel Networks (NT), Recession
Nortel Networks Inc. (NYSE:
NT), which has been floundering for years, put itself out of its misery today by filing for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
According to court papers filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, the Canadian telecom equipment maker owes bondholders $3.8 billion and was facing $107 million in interest payments this week. The company already was facing de-listing from the New York Stock Exchange. It has a $2.4 billion cash position.
Amidst all of the usual hopeful spin in the company's press release was this telling sentence: "The company commenced a process to turn around and transform Nortel in late 2005, and the company made important progress on a number of fronts."
That's right folks, Nortel has been in a turnaround since 2005. Then again, Nortel is not a typical company. Former Chief Executive Michael Dunn, former Chief Financial Officer Douglas Beatty and former Controller Michael Gollolgy are facing charges in Canada for manipulating earnings in the early part of the decade. Shares of Nortel hit $900 on a split-adjusted basis in 2000.
Continue reading Nortel files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
Posted Jan 9th 2009 5:45PM by Todd Harrison (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Citigroup Inc. (C), Recession, Financial Crisis
This post was written by anonymous Minyanville contributor Minyan Peter.
Representative Barney Frank is reported to be recommending that $50 billion of TARP money be used to "alter" loans.
While the route may be circuitous and positioned as great for Joe Q. Public, I think it is important to recognize that the ultimate beneficiary is the banks.
Like the rumored tax carry-back benefit rumored on Monday, Representative Frank's proposal represents yet another potentially "non-dilutive" injection of additional government capital into the banks.
Given the United States' position as the global "capitalist" nation - and its symbolic importance in attracting global "entrepreneurial" capital, I expect that Congress will go through enormous (albeit often convoluted) steps to avoid the overt nationalization of the banking system that we are seeing in Germany and the UK.
This doesn't mean we won't see more marienette shows like yesterday's press conference with Citigroup, Inc. (NYSE: C) and the Senate, but given the public outrage to the government's overt bailout of the banks, going forward (if at all possible) I expect the means used will be far less obvious to the taxpayer.
Posted Jan 8th 2009 1:34PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Scandals, Recession

If legendary comedian W.C. Fields were alive today, he would argue that there is a sucker born every second, particularly among investors looking for a quick buck. If you were shocked by the $50 billion
Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, get ready to hear more tales of investors wronged by scam artists.
Madoff and his ilk can keep their alleged frauds going as long as there is an endless supply of gullible individuals eager to make "fast money" without asking too many questions. It was only when the market tanked that investors started to withdraw money from the one-time Wall Street legend and that the scheme was therefore unraveled. The same scenario may have occurred with clients of
Joseph S. Forte of Broomall, Pa.
According to the SEC, Forte told investors that he would invest their money in an account that would trade in securities futures contracts including S&P 500 stock index futures.
Continue reading There are thousands of Madoffs waiting to be discovered
Posted Jan 3rd 2009 9:40AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Management, Law
Yesterday, word came out that Madoff took in a new investor for $10 million just six days before he revealed his fund had failed.
The SEC may have had limited resources to monitor the thousands of hedge funds operating in the U.S. It may not have had the manpower to look at every trade on every set of books to see if it was legal. But, it could have set up a system so that the funds had to show a government examiner the total value of a firm's portfolio.
With portfolio size data, there could have been simple rule. A fund would have to keep 10% or 20% of its capital in liquid financial instruments or cash in the event of large redemptions. If the market moved in a way that cut the fund's total value, it would at least have some "dry powder" to cover customer demands.
It is easy to say this would not have worked. Redemptions at some funds topped 20% of total assets. Funds like Madoff's could have committed fraud by showing the SEC fake books. But most managers would not have risked violating federal law.
Would a simple set of rules on redemptions have stopped the failure of some funds and the inability of other funds to return money? It may not have worked for all funds, but even if it made a few keep a buffer large enough to save some investor fortunes, it would have been worth the effort.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
« Previous Page | Next Page »