Earlier on The Fly and on bloggingstocks.com, we analyzed the "saving surplus" -- the plentiful global supply of capital -- and its obvious benefits for the U.S economy: Continued, relatively low interest rates for fixed-rate mortgages, among other instruments.

In other words, the savings surplus has created a sort of a unconventional "mortgages on sale" condition for the U.S., and we also noted that the favorable condition is not likely to disappear soon, unless investors, particularly foreign institutions, lose their appetite for U.S. Treasuries and other debt instruments.

However there is another down-side dimension to the large and increasing pool of capital that's spanning the globe in search of return and yield: Emerging market bubbles and speculative excesses.

Emerging markets, particularly in China, India, Brazil, and Russia are helping fuel a global growth rate of better than 4% -- a robust rate that's increasing trade, earnings, and jobs worldwide -- but analysts caution that within this macro-picture growth story there will be speculative excesses -- commonly referred to as "bubbles."

The thesis that the global economy is moving toward a multi-polar world, as opposed to one driven primarily by U.S. economic growth, was reinforced Wednesday when the International Monetary Fund lowered its 2007 U.S. GDP growth forecast to 2.2% from 2.9%, while underscoring that it expects the global economy to grow at a much higher 4.9% rate.

For much of the modern industrial area, slow growth in the U.S. meant slow growth for most of the developed world. The relationship helped spawn the economic adage, "When the U.S. economy catches a cold, the world catches pneumonia."

That adage is being tested today, at the dawn of the globalization era, because in 2007 the IMF predicts that every major economic zone in Europe and Asia will grow faster than the U.S. economy in 2007.

The global economy will remain resilient, despite an economic slowdown in the U.S, the International Monetary Fund concluded in its semi-annual World Economic Outlook, released Thursday. The IMF expects the global economy to grow about 5% in 2007, which is a healthy economic expansion rate.

Further, the IMF report argued that concerns about a global recession triggered by a substantial slowdown in the U.S. economy were not supported by historical evidence, if previous global recessions are any indicator of the phenomenon.

Global growth typically declines sharply when there are synchronized adverse events that affect many countries at the same time, said IMF Chief Economist Simon Johnson. None of the three major economic regions of the world: the U.S., European Union, and Japan-China is in recession, a strong argument against any conclusion predicting a global slowdown, let alone a global recession.

From the international-news-that-could-very-well-be-pertinent-to-your-financial-future department, Sweden has announced that it plans to abolish its decades-old wealth tax.

Does that sound moot? At first glance, perhaps. After all, Sweden is far away, and Swedish tax policy is not directly relevant to U.S. taxpayers.

However, a more critical look reveals that Sweden's move underscores an ongoing global trend toward privatization, markets and investment, and away from policies that restrict capital inflows, investment, and, more generally, commerce.

U.S. readers are familiar with investment conditions stateside in the last two decades, during which federal income taxes have been reduced and the nation has pursued a more business-friendly regulatory policy.

But what some readers may not be readily aware of is that the lower-tax/encourage-commerce trend has also been a feature of economic policy in Europe and Asia. To be sure, Europe's income-tax rates, in general, remain higher than those in the U.S., and many states in those regions have more-extensive social welfare states than the U.S., but the move toward investment, commerce and markets is clear, and Sweden's wealth-tax abolishment is further evidence.

The European Union Thursday fired the latest shot in the Airbus (FR:EADS) vs. Boeing (NYSE:BA) joust by accusing the United States of giving Boeing $24 billion in state aid. The claim was included as part of written evidence to a World Trade Organization panel probing the EU's complaint against the U.S., the BBC News reported.

Boeing's shares were down 40 cents to $90.40 in Thursday afternoon trading. EADS shares closed Thursday up about 41 cents to Eur22.19.

Airbus is publicly subsidized, but the company is also attempting to transition to a more-private, for-profit corporate structure: the company has often been criticized by the U.S. as not conforming with WTO bylaws. Among other points, the U.S. lists "launch aid" to Airbus since its birth in 1970 as a $16.7 billion European subsidy.

The EU has countered that Boeing benefits from U.S. Department of Defense contracts [which some view as a de-facto subsidy], and hidden state subsidies, including $4 billion in tax breaks and exclusive infrastructure work from the State of Washington.

On a day when Airbus (FR:EADS) test-landed its next-generation super jumbo jet, the A380, at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, in a media-oriented/promotional flight, The Boeing Company (NYSE:BA) registered a public relations coup of its own.

Boeing said Monday it expects the first flight for its 787 Dreamliner to occur in late August 2007, as scheduled, and that it still expects to build 112 Dreamliners in 2008 and 2099.

Further, customer demand for the 787 remains strong: Orders stand at 500 aircraft, which essentially means Boeing is booked through 2013. The company may increase production, if 787 order demand continues to be brisk. Boeing's shares moved 18 cents higher to $90.18 in afternoon trading Monday.

Most readers, and certainly trader/investors have heard of OPEC -- the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries that controls about 35% of the world's oil production.

On Friday, OPEC, as expected, voted to keep oil production at current levels. Analysts considered it a prudent move, given the fact that, despite a slowing global economy, demand for petroleum-based products remains strong, which has helped keep oil's price above the $55/barrel level.

Prior to the meetings, several price-hawk OPEC members had floated the idea of a production cut, arguing that the global economic slowdown could propel a substantial drop in oil's price, perhaps to below $40 per barrel. However, with no let-up in demand seen in either the Western or Eastern hemispheres, and oil showing few signs of falling below $50, let alone $40, the decision by OPEC to maintain the status quo regarding production was the appropriate choice, in the view of most oil analysts.

Still, the OPEC cartel has not been known for placing the interest of the global economy over the cartel's interest. OPEC was responsible for the devastating 1973 oil shock, and has not been too effective at reigning-in hawkish members, such as Iran, who helped precipitate the world's second oil shock, in 1979.

Crude oil's dip below $59 early in Monday's trading session gave oil bears -- those who believe the price of a commodity will decline -- some encouragement, but the bears' brighter day may be short-lived, and pyrrhic.

Since oil's drop from the July 2006 high of around $78 to about $60, each news item suggesting greater-than-expected-production has prompted renewed optimism regarding another price break, perhaps below $50 or even $40.

Monday was a classic case in point, with oil falling below $59 after Bloomberg News reported that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) won't reduce output at a meeting in Vienna this week.

If OPEC does not reduce output, that would be a bearish data point for oil, short-term. However, that one data point does not change oil's long-term supply and demand characteristics: Fed by large increases in demand from emerging market economies (particularly China) and by steady demand from other developed economies, global demand is increasing, and the cushion between global daily oil demand and daily oil produced (or supplied) is small.

Now that Airbus (FR:EADS) has posted its worst year in its history -- a $1.01 billion loss -- what's the likely next phase in the Boeing vs. Airbus commercial airplane competition?

Most likely, more of the same ... continued leadership by Boeing, that is.

The Boeing Company (NYSE:BA) leads the sector because it has been able to do the two things an aerospace giant must do to operate profitably: 1) Select the right product for the era and 2) Deliver planes on time. At the dawn of the 21st century, Airbus is earning a below satisfactory grade in each.

Airbus thought it had a winner in its next-generation A380 jumbo jet, designed as a competitor to Boeing's dependable and iconic 747. Airbus's design intentions for the A380 were good: More seats, more lounge/relaxation space, high-tech conveniences galore, and a longer flight range, but its manufacturing execution has been poor. Two production delays, an announced company restructuring and labor woes in France and Germany have caused the A380's development costs to skyrocket $18 billion to $20 billion. [On Friday Airbus' shares fell Eur1.09 to Eur22.60. Boeing's shares were up 45 cents to $89.34 in afternoon trading.]

Further, the production delays prompted major carriers to cancel A380 orders, with some opting for new 747s instead, even though the 747-8's capacity, 400-500 seats, is below the A380's 555-seat design. Given the uncertainty regarding Airbus' delivery date for the A380 -- carriers will believe the plane is ready for service when they actually see one -- carriers opted for the dependable and obtainable, if less glitzy 747 over a plane they haven't been able to roll to their gate at the airport.

Loyal bloggingstocks.com readers will recall the review of General Electric (NYSE:GE), the diversified industrial giant that, via its fundamentals and breadth of operations, serves as a "mini-mutual fund" in one company.

In other words, purchasing 50 or 100 shares of GE is tantamount to buying a mid-cap equity mutual fund, sans the load fee.

But are there any other stocks that rival GE's designation.? United Technologies (NYSE:UTX) is close. UTX is a multi-industry holding company that undertakes operations in six impressive business segments: Otis, Carrier, Pratt & Whitney, Sikorksy, Hamilton Sunstrand, UTC Fire & Security.

-Otis is the world's largest maker of elevators and escalators. Otis account for about 22% of UTX's revenue and has a solid international presence, with 80% of the divisions' revenue stemming from international sales.

-Carrier, 29% of UTX's revenue, is the world's largest maker of commercial and residential heating/ventilation/air conditioning systems, and also offers refrigeration and food service equipment.

-Pratt & Whitney, 22% of UTX's revenue, is one of the three-largest jet engine makers in the world, supplying engines to both Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Airbus, and to the U.S. Department of Defense [fighter jets and transport aircraft.]

-Hamilton Sunstrand, 10% of UTX's revenue, is a leading aerospace and industrial products manufacturer.

The "Totally Informal Economics Roundtable" (TIER) met this week -- the esteemed Roundtable achieves a quorum whenever yours truly and my three astute economist friends from graduate school convene to discuss matters economic...or to celebrate the birthday of one our school-age children. This week the topic was Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F)

The TIER summarized Ford's circumstance: Intense competition, relatively high gas prices, huge legacy pension/health care costs, and sub-par brand image. Other than that, Ford has nothing to worry about, to paraphrase a one-liner from legendary comedian Groucho Marx.

The TIER agreed that Ford, which traded Friday afternoon up 10 cents to $8.69, although it faces a daunting task, can buy some time toward the objective of regaining its status as a force in the auto industry, if one of the following occurs:

Oil price decline -- A substantial, sustained drop in the price of gasoline via a crude oil decline will steer some gas-conscious consumers, who otherwise have abandoned Ford, back to F's showrooms. This would not be a flood tide of showroom traffic, but it would boost revenue slightly, and at this stage Ford will take all the feet in its showroom it can get.

Technology - If Ford can deploy a new technology quickly -- for example a new, consumer-attracting feature, a driving/safety feature, or an increase in the aforementioned fuel economy, that would also boost sales. The TIER agreed that one thing Ford should do is deploy its next-generation, more fuel-efficient transmission technology and composite (weight reducing) technology immediately.

About a decade ago a Pepsi advertising campaign boasted, "Pepsi: the choice of a new generation."

Well, it's the health conscious, globalized 21st century, and while PepsiCo's (NYSE:PEP) carbonated drinks may not be performing superbly, its international operation is faring well, and that may finally help PEP's stock break out of a year-long, range-trading pattern.

PepsiCo Thursday posted Q4 EPS of 72 cents, or in-line with the Reuters consensus estimate of 72 cents. PEP also said Q4 revenue totaled $10.38 billion, which was roughly in-line with the $10.40 billion consensus estimate.

For the highest average total return on equity over decades, no asset class outperforms stocks. Individual stocks, however, concentrate investment dollars, and in general carry more risk than mutual funds, which generally lower risk by owning many stocks/asset classes and/or by diversification.

Q: But are there any stocks that combine the best aspects of each?

A: General Electric Company (NYSE: GE) does, to a degree. GE is kind of a mini mutual fund in one company.

Diversified industrial giant GE's operations span the gross domestic product spectrum, and the globe: industry, infrastructure, media, health, commercial finance, and consumer finance. It's hard to believe that the same company that makes jet engines also produces television programs and finances the acquisition and renovation of office buildings and apartments.

In Wall Street parlance that's called a wide operational footprint and it in part accounts for GE's below-average 5-year EPS growth rate of 6.33%. Still, GE's 5-year average dividend growth rate is an adequate 9.81%, and its yield stands at 2.91%, based on Friday's closing price of $36.27. Meanwhile, GE's stock price has not ventured far from its 3-year range of roughly $30-$38, and has underperformed the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Just call Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) the Rodney Dangerfield of stocks.

For those younger investors & readers who don't recognize the reference, the late Dangerfield [1921-2004] was a stand-up comedian who built a career by lamenting that, "I tell you I get no respect."

Likewise, Caterpillar gets no respect. Despite solid growth and impressive earnings for more than 3 years, Wall Street has pummeled the stock, taking shares down from about $82 in May 2006 to below $60. This was done on projections that the global economic slowdown would hurt CAT, a maker of farm and construction machinery.

On Friday, however, CAT tried to reverse that sentiment by reporting Q4 EPS of $1.32, 2 cents below the Reuters consensus estimate of $1.34. CAT also posted Q4 revenue of $11 billion, well above the consensus estimate of $10.3 billion.

Prior to Friday, Wall Street had treated CAT the way Dangerfield felt he was treated: rudely - - taking CAT shares down despite repeated decent-to-good news reports and operational accomplishments.

Parsing Ford's press release for Q4, it's hard to discern any good news.

Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) Thursday posted a Q4 loss of -$1.10 per share compared to the Reuters consensus estimate of 95 cents. That brought full-year after-tax losses to $2.8 billion or $1.50 per share.

Ford also posted Q4 revenue of $40.3 billion per share versus the consensus estimate of $34.7 billion.

In its press release Ford also said that, as part of its turnaround effort, it would cease operations at 16 manufacturing plants through 2012, including 7 vehicle assembly plants, which would reduce operating costs by about $5 billion by 2008.