<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[In farms, as on Wall Street, prices drop]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/farm_wheat.jpg" alt="" />Farmers whose families have been working the land for generations should be called in to advise new Wall Street traders every year. Because in farm life is the hardscrabble reality of boom-and-bust cycles. When prices went sky-high for wheat, corn and soybeans over the past years, you did not see growers spending their wealth on fast pickup trucks and fancy overalls; no, they kept telling reporters and economists that this wasn't going to last.<br /><br />They were right. Wheat, which had hovered for years around $4 a bushel, had risen to $10 and is now flattening at $5; less than the current cost in fuel, seed and fertilizer to grow it. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/21farm.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">Farmers like Jimmy Wayne Kinder</a>, who held back their wheat hoping to sell at the top of the market, are "kicking" themselves, and demonstrating that they, too, have an emotional connection to their holdings and have trouble letting go even in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's time to sell. As the prices fell, farmers waited for a rebound that never came.<br /><br />Farmland was hot, too, with speculative buyers purchasing Midwest real estate for prices nearing $1,000 an acre, the record set in the 1970s. Now they're back around $500 and farmers are recalling lessons the traders never have time to learn: patience. If automakers, mortgage lenders, and Wall Street firms could learn this lesson; scrimping and saving in the down economies but not behaving like kings in the boom times; perhaps bailouts wouldn't be required.<br /><br />It's interesting, too, that the article doesn't mention another reality of the farmers' market forces; as demand for conventionally-grown wheat, corn and soy drops, demand for organically- and sustainably-grown meats, produce and grains is rising. I plan to stand in line at 9 a.m. Sunday morning with my three boys for the chance at paying $60 for an heirloom turkey raised by a farmer I know; I've cut out breakfast cereal and alcohol from my budget so I can pay more at the farmer's market. Perhaps the American economy isn't collapsing, but returning back to a more sensible place; where friendly, interdependent, local, sustainable economies thrive and the global economy is a distant memory.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/">In farms, as on Wall Street, prices drop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/business/21farm.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/in-farms-as-on-wall-street-prices-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corn</category><category>farm</category><category>farmers</category><category>farming</category><category>soy</category><category>wheat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Ken Lay]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><div class="tmbholder"><em><img vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-ken-lay.jpg" alt="" id="img1" /></em><em>This post is part of a feature in which we wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial felons. <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">See all 17</a></em>.<br /></div>
<br />In my 20-year career as a financial writer, there have been a number of times when I've been truly shocked by news events. This year has had more than its share -- with Lehman's bankruptcy and Merrill Lynch's forced sale and Eliot Spitzer's prostitution scandal at the top of the list. <br /><br />But in 2006, probably the biggest shock was when Enron founder <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/ken-lays-death-provides-shocking-moral-lesson/">Ken Lay died suddenly of a heart attack</a>. He had been convicted just six weeks earlier of 11 counts of securities fraud and related charges. At age 64, he seemed destined to spend the rest of his life behind bars. His sentencing was set for Oct 23.<br /><br />But Lay died on July 5 while vacationing at Snowmass, Colorado. George H. W. Bush was among the 1,200 guests at his funeral.<br /><br />Lay's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/ken-lays-death-provides-shocking-moral-lesson/">detractors howled in protest</a>. Some thought he had somehow faked his death. <br /><br />Others knew instantly that this meant his conviction wouldn't stand. And, indeed it was vacated a couple of months later. The law dictates that when someone dies before using up all their available appeals, the conviction doesn't count. <br /><br />According to the letter of the law, Ken Lay 'got away' with his Enron crimes. But it took his death for that to happen. And his name certainly wasn't cleared. For most Americans, Ken Lay  still stands for the worst in corporate corruption and greed.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/">Financial Felons: Ken Lay</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1372439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-ken-lay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial felons</category><category>Ken Lay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stock picks and pans for troubled times: RIMM, ED, ISRG, GLW, LEA, SLB, GOOG ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/slb/" rel="tag">Schlumberger Limited (SLB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ed/" rel="tag">Consolidated Edison (ED)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/glw/" rel="tag">Corning Inc (GLW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/isrg/" rel="tag">Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/noc/" rel="tag">Northrop Grumman (NOC)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/picks-and-pans.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />The question on everybody's mind this week was when will the declines end? Was that the so much talked about capitulation? Have the stock markets bottomed?<br /><br />Well, I can't answer that, and suffice it to say that many market analysts, fundamental and technical, are still quite gloomy. Pretty much all we can do in this time is hope for flat performance from a few select stocks, which perhaps would yield good returns once the economy starts rebounding and the bear market has completed its course.<br /><br />Here are some picks and pans from the past week from BloggingStocks contributors:<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research in Motion</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/research-in-motion-rimm-a-buy-for-the-long-run/">Steven Halpern brought</a> a recommendation from one of The Forbes Wireless Stock Watch advisors, <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2556">Nikhil Hutheesing</a>. In Hutheesing's words: "In the long run, smart investments today will lead to profits down the road. One of those companies, that I now think looks attractive, is the Canadian maker of the BlackBerry." Not only is RIMM's corporate business strong, it is also working on getting its phones to consumers. In addition, it has lots of cash and little to no long-term debt and great prospects, what the advisor is looking for in addition to value and fundamentals in this environment.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys">Lear Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lear-corporation/lea/nys">LEA</a>) is an auto parts supplier. Jamie Dlugosch <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/bet-on-an-auto-bailout-lear-corp-lea/">bets on a bailout for the auto industry</a> here. Today, Lear has a $110 million market capitalization, down from its peak within the last 52 weeks of $2.6 billion. If the bailout finally happens, owners of LEA could benefit greatly.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stock picks and pans for troubled times: RIMM, ED, ISRG, GLW, LEA, SLB, GOOG ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/">Stock picks and pans for troubled times: RIMM, ED, ISRG, GLW, LEA, SLB, GOOG ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stock-picks-and-pans-for-troubled-times-rimm-ed-isrg-glw-le/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dell</category><category>ed</category><category>featured</category><category>glw</category><category>goog</category><category>isrg</category><category>lea</category><category>noc</category><category>rimm</category><category>siri</category><category>slb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Obama symbolize the start of a new economic era?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="288" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/barack-obama.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />One of the ironies of public officialdom is that those elected officials who deal with budgets and tax policy rarely fully grasp the economic sea changes when they occur in the nation.</p>
<p>Whether it's due to habit, tunnel vision, groupthink, arrogance, ignorance, surrounding yourself with sycophantic staff, or some combination, congressional lawmakers are often the last to notice economic shifts that occur cyclically.</p>
<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">January 2009: A new era begins?</span></p>
<p>One of the key economic questions for investors and other stake holders is whether <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php">President-elect Barack Obama</a> follows through with his campaign promise to be an eclectic, someone who tries <a href="http://www.epi.org/">a center-left policy here</a>, deploys <a href="http://www.aei.org/">a center-right policy there</a> because it works, and who does not implement typical party -- or partisan -- responses to problems; i.e., solutions from traditional sources of power in his party.</p>
<p>But an even more-telling economic question concerns what <a href="http://www.rnc.org/">the Republicans will do</a>. In November 2008, the Republican Party suddenly found out that it was very white, male, old, Protestant, and by-and-large economically and fiscally conservative. The aforementioned guarantees in the years ahead that they'll hold at least 20 or 25 Senate seats in a chamber of 100, and if they're not careful, about the same percentage of House seats. Meanwhile, the nation's electorate is increasingly nonwhite, female, younger, non-Protestant, and by-and-large economically and fiscally moderate, and in some cases, liberal/progressive.<br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Obama symbolize the start of a new economic era?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/">Does Obama symbolize the start of a new economic era?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/does-obama-symbolize-the-start-of-a-new-economic-era/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>gdp</category><category>Keynesians</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did stocks rise 494 points on the Geithner bounce?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>There is no way to know why stocks go up or down every day. That's why I always find it somewhat silly when I see simple explanations for the movement in prices. The explanation offered for today's 494 point rise is that investors are celebrating the rumor that <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/21/markets/markets_newyork/?postversion=2008112115">Timothy Geithner</a> will be the next Treasury Secretary. How does the media know that investors are only celebrating Geithner's appointment and not that of Bill Richardson as Commerce Secretary?</p>
<p>Make no mistake. I agree with the choice of Geithner and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/memo-to-obama-pick-geithner-for-treasury/">made a case</a> for him over former Harvard president, Lawrence Summers, and former Fed Chair Paul Volcker. My reasoning for Geithner was that he had excellent interpersonal skills and high energy coupled with an intimate familiarity with the current financial crisis. Unlike Summers, Geithner is highly unlikely to alienate people, and having picked <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/22/us/politics/22obama.html?hp">Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State</a>, President-elect Obama will have enough drama on his hands with both Clintons.</p>
<p>Geithner shares something with current Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson -- he graduated from Dartmouth. I hope that he makes far better use of that Ivy League education in the Treasury Secretary's role than his predecessor. While Geithner will be left with a huge mess that was not helped by his fellow Dartmouth alum, it will be difficult for him to do a worse job than Paulson. The world will be depending on him.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of <a href="http://petercohan.com/">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</a>. He also <a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236">teaches management at Babson College</a> and edits</em> <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html">The Cohan Letter</a>. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/">Did stocks rise 494 points on the Geithner bounce?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/did-stocks-rise-494-points-on-the-geithner-bounce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>bill clinton</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>hillary clinton</category><category>lawrence summers</category><category>paul volcker</category><category>Timothy Geithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone premium comes out of Apple stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hot-products-2007-200-iphone-cs111207.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />It wasn't that long ago that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) changed the way we think about phones. The exact date that Apple's CEO, Steve Jobs, unleashed the sleek design on the world was January 9, 2007. Since that day, Apple stock has been on a tear, and has not closed under $85. That is, until yesterday when the stock finished the day at $80.49, as <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B4C7F9E0C-028B-4824-83B6-70E3D8D6F221%7D">the stock has now lost all of its "iPhone premium."</a></p>
<p>In all fairness, the recent drop in stock price can be attributed more to the overall market meltdown than Apple weakness. The company last reported earnings on the 21st of October, and blew away analyst expectations by posting <a href="http://earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=aapl" target="_blank">earnings per share of $1.26</a>, versus estimates of only $1.11.</p>
<p>As for iPhone sales, sales so far have been great for the company, despite the fact that almost all of its rivals have been moving as quickly as possible to imitate the iPhone. The company stated that it had <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10071819-37.html?tag=mncol;txt">sold 6.9 million phones during last quarter</a>, which was the first full quarter featuring the new 3G model. Based on that number, the company sold more iPhones last quarter than they had sold all together leading up to last quarter ... pretty amazing.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>iPhone premium comes out of Apple stock</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/">iPhone premium comes out of Apple stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379816/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/iphone-premium-comes-out-of-apple-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>iPhone</category><category>smartphone</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/berkshire-hathaway-brk.a-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Except for the chosen ones -- CEOs and the like who have outrageous salary and benefit packages -- almost nobody has been able to escape the financial pain in the world today.</p>
<p>'My pal Warren,' Chairman of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>), who only draws a $100,000 salary, has watched his net worth diminished by billions of dollars as his stock has unraveled like everything else. I last read Buffett had a 31% stake in Berkshire so he understands his shareholders angst, even if he does not feel their pain. The stock has dropped from a 52-week high of $151,650 to yesterday's close of $77,500 for a loss of 49%.<br /></p>
<p>Once again in quarterly SEC filings Berkshire's holdings were released and I could not help but wonder if this great holding company had not become one more giant index fund. There are a lot of quality names in the mix including: <br /></p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys"> BNI</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE; <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson and Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft Foods'A'</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter and Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">U.S. Bancorp</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">USB</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p>The above referenced stocks are all down with the market and there are still more that might be considered fallen angels or turn-around plays within Berkshire's holdings that include:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">Lowe's Cos</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to these publicly traded stocks Berkshire holdings include privately held Geico Insurance, See's Candies, Dairy Queen, Florsheim Shoes, and a multitude of others. Since so many stocks have been accumulated over the years I started to view BRK as a stock index and with that in mind did some comparisons between the Standard &amp; Poors 500 and BRK.</p>
<p>The following is a three-year chart that illustrates that buying BRK instead of the index anytime in the last three years would have been beneficial by a 30% margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/">Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1378029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AXP</category><category>BNI</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>COP</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>GS</category><category>HD</category><category>indexes</category><category>indexfunds</category><category>JNJ</category><category>KFT</category><category>KO</category><category>LOW</category><category>PG</category><category>recovery</category><category>Sheldon Lber</category><category>SheldonLber</category><category>SP Index</category><category>SpIndex</category><category>USB</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Torch Passing on a Friday Rally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Today's late rally tied to breaking news of President-elect Obama's naming Timothy Geithner as Treasury Secretary for the next administration, but there was also an end of week bargain-buying hunt. Today was also options expiration. Whatever the real determination was, at least it was not yet another miserable day of relentless selling.</p>
<p>Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:</p>
<p><strong>DJIA:</strong> 8,046 (+6.5%) <br /><strong>Nasdaq:</strong> 1,384 (+5.2%)<br /><strong>S&amp;P 500:</strong> 800 (+6.3%)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/11/top-pre-mark-13.html ">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/11/top-pre-mark-12.html">Top Analyst Downgrades</a></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">Gap Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">GPS</a>) posted earnings at $0.35 EPS on revenue of $246 million. While other retailers are stinking up a storm, this compares to earnings of $0.30 EPS and revenue of $238 million last year. While sales did drop over 7% to $3.56 billion, analysts' estimates from Thomson Reuters (First Call) were only $0.34 EPS and $3.57 billion. Shares were up 21% at $11.62 right before the close.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) hired Sean Suchter, the former head of search operations at Yahoo! This could give them the brains and engine behind the search business without ever having to pay Yahoo! a dime. Shares were up 8% at $19.01 shortly before the close.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">Nike Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) managed a show of force when times are tough. The sporting apparel giant raised its quarterly dividend payout by 9% to $0.25. Shares were up over 6% at $46.41 right before the close.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usg-corporation/usg/nys">USG Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usg-corporation/usg/nys">USG</a>) shares surged after disclosing that Warren Buffett and Faifax invested a combined $400 million into the home building products maker. This was on top of their investments in the company in the past. Shares were up 24% at $7.04 shortly before the close.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) rallied after the board of directors elected Mike Duke to replace Lee Scott as President and CEO of Wal-Mart, effective February 1, 2008. Shares were up almost 2% at $51.55 right before the close.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/">Closing Bell: Torch Passing on a Friday Rally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379841/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/closing-bell-torch-passing-on-a-friday-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lee scott</category><category>LeeScott</category><category>mike duke</category><category>MikeDuke</category><category>msft</category><category>nke</category><category>Sean Suchter</category><category>SeanSuchter</category><category>USG</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>With credit markets remaining under stress, and with uncertainty growing regarding the status of megabank <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), the U.S. Congress may have to take more action to maintain financial system stability and prevent the U.S. economy from spiraling into a deeper recession, so says economist David H. Wang. <br /><br />"The U.S. Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,'" Wang told BloggingStocks Friday. "Whether Congress does it as part of a fiscal stimulus package, or separately, it is clear we will need more money to purchase toxic assets, improve bank capitalization and allocate funds for home mortgage refinance programs, and other financial stabilization measures. At this stage of the crisis, the $700 billion TARP is not going to be enough, in my interpretation."<br /><br /><strong>Bank sector stress remains</strong><br /><br />Wang said that if Citigroup, whose CEO Vikram Pandit said <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i1ZrQfzb7hmZ7eYis62LLRslMjHQD94JDTOG2">has adequate capital</a>, for some reason cannot, when needed, find additional capital in the private sector, then "the Fed and or U.S. Treasury will step in, and take necessary measures to stabilize the bank," Wang said. If the U.S. Treasury is the primary funder, "that action, and other forthcoming, planned actions by the Treasury may use up a considerable amount of TARP funds, requiring a TARP 2."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/">Congress may have to approve a 'TARP 2,' economist says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379622/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/congress-may-have-to-approve-a-tarp-2-economist-says/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>commercial mortgage backed securities</category><category>Congress</category><category>defaults</category><category>Fed</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>TARP</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup too big to fail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/c-citigroup-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />2008 will be the year of "too big to fail."</p>
<p>That ubiquitous phrase has captured the attention of Wall Street, Main Street and Washington, but what exactly does it mean?</p>
<p>Clearly, the market is grappling with that question, and therein lies a very big problem for investors. The lack of clarity on this issue has been stunning. As a result, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/ken-trester/gallery/ways-to-profit-from-volatility.html">volatility</a> is off the charts and stock values are plummeting. </p>
<p>This week has been bizarre, to say the least. Early in the week, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson let the markets and everyone else know that the original purpose of the Troubled Asset Recovery Program (TARP) was no longer a workable solution. In place of buying distressed assets, the Treasury is working to solidify the capital structure of the banking system. I won't criticize the government here, but the change of scope given the size and urgency of the original plan is a bit random.</p>
<p>It does not give comfort to the market.</p>
<p>Next we had the auto industry bailout hearings. With hats in hand, the leaders of the Big 3 automakers and their union bobo made an appearance in Washington. The highlight of the hearing had to be the acknowledgment that all arrived via private jet.</p>
<p>Talk about bad PR. It's like showing up to the soup kitchen in a limo. Good grief.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup too big to fail</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/">Citigroup too big to fail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/citigroup-too-big-to-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Annaly Capital (NLY): 'In the sweet spot for historic yields']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>"<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/annaly-capital-management-inc/nly/nys">Annaly Capital</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/annaly-capital-management-inc/nly/nys">NLY</a>) is in the sweet spot," says <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/">Steve Sjuggerud</a> in <a href="http://www.dailywealth.com/">Daily Wealth</a>. He says, "It borrows money at a low interest rate and invests it at a higher rate -- and earns the 'spread'."</p>
<p>"The cost of money is historically low, and it's headed lower. Meanwhile, relative to the cost of money, the return on money is higher than it's ever been. </p>
<p>"The ultimate way trade on this historic discrepancy, for high-returns with very low risk, is through shares of companies like Annaly, which is now s now paying a 16% dividend. </p>
<p>"In the latest-reported quarter, the company borrowed money at 3.5%. (The credit markets have calmed down a bit, so its cost of borrowing should be even lower next quarter.)</p>
<p>"It invests the money in government-guaranteed bonds. You remember how the Treasury bailed out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? It wiped out shareholders. But it explicitly guaranteed the bonds. </p>
<p>"In the latest-reported quarter, Annaly earned 5.6% interest on these risk-free bonds. Therefore, it earned a 2.1% spread. If the company uses seven times leverage, a 2.1% spread means a 14.7% return on its money.</p>
<p>"Analysts estimate the company will earn $2.50 per share next year. It pays out essentially all of its earnings in dividends. So that'll be a dividend yield of about 19%. This is ridiculous. An opportunity like this only appears during market turmoil like we're experiencing now.</p>
<p>"This is a historic moment. The difference between the cost of money and the return on money relative to that cost is at the most extreme levels I've seen in my career. Take advantage, and buy stocks like Annaly today."</p>
<p><em>Steven Halpern's </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em> offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/">Annaly Capital (NLY): 'In the sweet spot for historic yields'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/annaly-capital-nly-in-the-sweet-spot-for-historic-yields/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>annaly capital</category><category>AnnalyCapital</category><category>bankings tocks</category><category>BankingsTocks</category><category>daily wealth</category><category>dividends</category><category>finance stocks</category><category>FinanceStocks</category><category>financial stocks</category><category>high yield stocks</category><category>HighYieldStocks</category><category>income</category><category>nly</category><category>steve sjuggerud</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>SteveSjuggerud</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! gets boost from wireless provider T-Mobile]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/go.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) stock in the dumper, the CEO spot looking for a newcomer and musings about the future of the company underway, perhaps there is a small bright light for the internet pioneer. Wireless provider T-Mobile will use Yahoo!'s mobile search as the default on all its phones' mobile web browsers.</p>
<p>While that may not be the biggest victory one can think of, it does help. Mobile search and web browsing has been increasing in usage (though still small), and although T-Mobile USA is only the nation's fourth-largest mobile provider, just the fact that Yahoo!'s services will keep the largest wireless providers from using competitive mobile search products is a blessing for Yahoo!</p>
<p>Making money from mobile web search is another matter. Although Yahoo! and T-Mobile said they will share revenue from the new arrangement, the question is this: are any mobile search companies and wireless providers making any significant revenue from mobile search partnering? At this point in time, it's hard to see that just based on skimpy usage. While it may not be that way in the future. T-Mobile International, which replaced <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) mobile search with Yahoo!'s solution earlier in 2008 and Yahoo! also <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122714408318243085.html">has its fingers in mobile search</a> with the largest wireless provider in the U.S., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>). Perhaps Yahoo!'s rebirth will be around mobile technology after all. It's just a question of when.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/">Yahoo! gets boost from wireless provider T-Mobile</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122714408318243085.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1378049/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/yahoo-gets-boost-from-wireless-provider-t-mobile/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ATT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mobile search</category><category>MobileSearch</category><category>T</category><category>T-Mobile</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>Yahoo Mobile</category><category>YahooMobile</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Heinz rocks during Q2, but market doesn't care]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpb/" rel="tag">Campbell Soup (CPB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p>Well, it looks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys">Heinz</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/h-j-heinz-company/hnz/nys">HNZ</a>) put me and my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/earnings-preview-is-heinz-a-safe-stock/">earnings preview</a> to shame. The company delivered a great <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/heinz-reports-58percent-organic-sales/rfid160434062">second quarter</a>. The company, whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">Kellogg</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">K</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/campbell-soup-company/cpb/nys">Campbell Soup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/campbell-soup-company/cpb/nys">CPB</a>), grew its bottom line by over 22% on a per-share basis. Heinz scored $0.87 per diluted share in profit, enough to wallop the analyst community's estimate of $0.76 per share.</p>
<p>Heinz made sure to hedge itself in terms of currency effects. That helped drive the quarter. The company's strong brand portfolio delivered, on an overall basis, almost 6% in organic sales growth. Management was able to leverage the equity of its product line to enact favorable pricing measures. And one of my favorite parts of an earnings report is the statement of cash flows. Cash from operations rose almost 10%, and operating free cash flow by the company's calculation (Heinz adds back disposals of capital property/equipment) increased almost 9%. It would, of course, be nice to see the growth rate of cash flow be closer to the growth rate of earnings, but at least cash generation is trending upward. </p>
<p>Gotta tell you, though, it looks like the market could care less about Heinz and its nifty numbers. As I write this, the stock is down 0.8%. I would have figured on a little more excitement considering that today was something of a calm day in the markets at large. Apparently Wall Street doesn't feel a lot of confidence concerning Heinz and its ability to keep up the good work. All I can say is that no stock should be considered defensive, even Heinz. We're playing by a different rule book, one that was written by a crazy lunatic. It seems like every stock is a gamble. If you have extreme patience and can tie up money for a long, long time, Heinz is not a bad bet at its current dividend yield. Otherwise, you may want to hoard cash.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/">Heinz rocks during Q2, but market doesn't care</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/earnings-preview-is-heinz-a-safe-stock/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/heinz-reports-58percent-organic-sales/rfid160434062>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/heinz-rocks-during-q2-but-market-doesnt-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Campbell Soup</category><category>CampbellSoup</category><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>CPB</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>food</category><category>Heinz</category><category>HNZ</category><category>inthenews</category><category>K</category><category>Kellogg</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Web browser makeovers and why S&amp;P is bullish on Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img height="136" alt="Google Chrome comic book" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/2829827921_06bbb3cb98_m-(1).jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />My view of the world is partly framed by my computer screen, so I found it nearly impossible to ignore the clamor this fall about new Web browsers. At the end of August <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) released a beta version of Internet Explorer 8, which was followed a couple days later by an <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/">online comic book</a> that announced <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) launch of Chrome, for Windows only. <br /><br />And who could ignore the buzz in October about Microsoft's <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2008/10/01/earning-your-loyalty-one-search-at-a-time.aspx">SearchPerks</a>, an incentive program with prizes for those willing to sift the Web via its search engine Live Search? Or the fact that yesterday Google announced a new way for users of its search engine to <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/searchwiki-make-search-your-own.html">customize their results,</a> ranking and annotating them?<br /><br />I wondered why these big public companies considered browsers so important, why they had spent the money to update them and give them away for free over Labor Day weekend--and even to reward me to search online. So I rolled up my sleeves, downloaded, read some and talked to a stock analyst. <br /><br />I was not the only one to notice <a href="http://profy.com/2008/09/05/10-myths-about-google-chrome-browser">some similarities in the two new browsers:</a> Both offer private browsing (Web surfing without leaving any history) and crash recovery (so that only the specific tab involved in opening a faulty Web site fails not the whole browser application). <br /><br />Yet each browser has innovations. As <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/why-a-new-browser-from-microsoft-matters/">reporters</a> and <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/browsers/internet-explorer-8-beta/4505-3514_7-33232670.html ">reviewers</a> have noted about Internet Explorer 8, for example, Accelerators allow you to highlight a term to use it as a launch pad for such applications as mapping, translating and e-mailing. The Web Slices feature lets you plant a snippet of a favorite site atop your browser; you'll be alerted as it's updated. <br /><br />Chrome sports what Google calls a "streamlined" look. The browser is designed as a giant box, with its features tucked neatly inside for you to pull out. Chrome can also showcase within your browser screen <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/technology/personaltech/03pogue.html">nine small views of your most-traveled Web sites</a>. BusinessWeek points out that it's the "wizardry" under the hood that really matters and that enables this <a href="http://businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2008/gb20081112_082312.htm ">browser's applications to run fast</a>. <br /><br />These browser makeovers come, says Scott Kessler, senior director of information technology at Standard &amp; Poor's Equity Research, as browsers and search engines have increasingly become linked. "Companies are ... appreciating the increasing relevance of the browser and search in terms of how they communicate with the world, users, customers," he says. "A lot of applications that formerly ran on computers or desktops now operate within the confines of the browser itself."<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Web browser makeovers and why S&amp;P is bullish on Google</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/">Web browser makeovers and why S&amp;P is bullish on Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1340425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/web-browser-makeovers-and-why-sandp-is-bullish-on-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Android</category><category>Chrome</category><category>GOOG</category><category>IE</category><category>ie 8 beta 2.0</category><category>Ie8Beta2.0</category><category>Internet</category><category>Internet Explorer 8</category><category>InternetExplorer8</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search ads</category><category>search advertising</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchAds</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>Web browser</category><category>WebBrowser</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marjorie Backman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama team mulls prepackaged bankruptcy for automakers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p>Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adYuNmHciHJQ&amp;refer=home">reports</a> that President Elect Barack Obama's transition team is taking a hard look at the possibility of a prepackaged bankruptcy for the Detroit's troubled automakers.<br /><br />In a prepackaged filing, companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) would head to the bankruptcy court with agreements already worked out with the major constituencies: workers, suppliers and lenders. Going in with a plan could cut down on some of the fear and uncertainty surrounding the filing and cut down on the time it would take for the company to work its way through the courts.<br /><br />It's good to see that Obama is taking a sane, realistic approach to an auto industry bailout. There has been concern that the new administration would be too generous in the terms -- and stones will fly if a GM workout is done with anything other than a bankruptcy filing. Bloomberg adds that "the president-elect earlier urged Congress to approve as much as $50 billion to save automakers, using the model of Chrysler's bailout in 1979."<br /><br />Right: because that one worked so well that they're coming back 30 years later -- billions in excess compensation later. It's true that the Chrysler loan was paid back quickly, but it allowed the company to buy time and not really confront any of the long-term problems that have proven to be its undoing.<br /><br />Hopefully Obama will listen to his more conservative advisors and push for the bankruptcy option. It's the only one that makes sense.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/">Obama team mulls prepackaged bankruptcy for automakers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adYuNmHciHJQ&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379535/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/obama-team-mulls-prepackaged-bankruptcy-for-automakers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>cars</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Mark Whitacre]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adm/" rel="tag">Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM)</a></p><em>
<div class="tmbholder"><img id="img1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-mark--whitacre.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>This post is part of a feature in which he wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial felons. <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">See all 17</a>.</p>
</em>
<p>How does the head of one of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/archer-daniels-midland-company/adm/nys">Archer Daniels Midland</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/archer-daniels-midland-company/adm/nys">ADM</a>) fastest-growing divisions, a virtual <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1995/09/04/205874/index.htm">shoo-in to be the company's next president</a>, end up embezzling $9 million dollars while simultaneously acting as an informant for the Federal Bureau of Investigation? And how does the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Whitacre">highest-level executive to turn whistleblower</a> receive a sentence much harsher than those of his co-conspirators despite pleas for leniency and clemency from everyone from the FBI and the Justice Department to congressmen, university professors, and even a baseball hall-of-famer? </p>
<p>Sounds like the stuff of motion pictures, doesn't it? And that's exactly what this true story will be in September of 2009 with the release of <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1130080/">The Informant</a></em>, a Warner Brothers film directed by Steven Soderbergh and starring Matt Damon as whistleblower turned felon, <a href="http://www.markwhitacre.com/index.html">Mark Whitacre</a>. The movie is based on one of several books written about the case.</p>
<p>When the FBI began an investigation of ADM in 1992, Whitacre admitted that he and other executives were involved in a multinational price-fixing scheme. For the next three years, he helped the FBI gather evidence. Despite that, however, Whitacre was convicted in 1998 for wire fraud, tax evasion, and money laundering. The sentence of more than 10 years in prison was considered excessive by many, given his cooperation with the investigation and the fact that he suffered from bipolar disorder (the pressure drove him to attempt suicide at one point). Whitacre served eight and half years, reportedly as a model prisoner. To this day, efforts continue to win a pardon for Whitacre.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Felons: Mark Whitacre</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/">Financial Felons: Mark Whitacre</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1366339/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/financial-felons-mark-whitacre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADM</category><category>Archer Daniels Midland</category><category>Cypress Systems</category><category>embezzlment</category><category>FBI</category><category>financial felons</category><category>fraud</category><category>Mark Whitacre</category><category>Matt Damon</category><category>Steven Soderbergh</category><category>The Informant</category><category>whistleblower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) cancer drug rejected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bmy/" rel="tag">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://investor.bms.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=106664&amp;p=irol-IRHome" target="_blank"><img height="30" alt="BMY logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/bmy-bristol-myers-squibb-logo.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a><a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bristol-myers-squibb-company/bmy/nys">Bristol-Myers Squibb</a> (NYSE: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bristol-myers-squibb-company/bmy/nys">BMY</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bristol-myers-squibb-company/bmy/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are falling today after <a href="http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=3685" target="_blank">the European Medicines Agency said it has rejected a request by BMY to market its breast cancer drug Ixempra</a>. The agency said the increase in survival rates using the drug was not significant enough to warrant approval. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BMY.<br /><br />This morning, BMY opened at $18.92. So far today the stock has hit a low of $18.12 and a high of $19.30. As of 12:15, BMY is trading at $18.60, down $0.68 (3.5%). The chart for BMY looks bullish and <a href="http:// www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives BMY a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a December <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $22.50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 8.7% return in four weeks as long as BMY is below $22.50 at December expiration. Bristol-Myers would have to rise by more than 21% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br />TGT hasn't been above $45 since early September and shown resistance around $21.50 recently.<br /><em><br />Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba" target="_blank">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in BMY.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) cancer drug rejected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/bristol-myers-squibb-bmy-cancer-drug-rejected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BMY</category><category>breast cancer</category><category>BreastCancer</category><category>bristol-myers squibb</category><category>Bristol-myersSquibb</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>Ixempra</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If a stock's below $5, it's likely to dive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p>Have any of your stocks recently tumbled below $5 a share? If you own <strong><font color="#0072bc">Citigroup</font></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><font color="#0072bc"><strong>C</strong></font></a>) stock, then you know that it is among the former blue chips like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">General Motors Corp.</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">GM</font></a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) that have breached that $5 limit. They currently trade at $3.88, $2.84, and $1.45 a share respectively. And there's a good chance that if that company has breached $5 a share -- it will drop further.</p>
<p>How so? It turns out that under some circumstances, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10073049-92.html">big institutional investors</a> such as pension funds, endowments, and asset managers must sell a stock when it drops below $5. I have not been able to find out exactly why, however it's likely that these institutional investors owe their shareholders a fiduciary duty to act prudently to protect their investments. </p>
<p>So if there is not enough trouble as a stock approaches $5, institutional selling will make things worse -- and represents an obvious profit opportunity for short sellers. If a stock is dropping fast below $10, for example, a short seller can borrow the stock and sell it short -- which puts further downward pressure on the shares. If it then tumbles below $5, that represents a quick doubling if the short seller can buy back the shares and repay the loan as institutional investors dump the stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If a stock's below $5, it's likely to dive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/">If a stock's below $5, it's likely to dive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379388/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/if-a-stocks-below-5-its-likely-to-dive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>F</category><category>GM</category><category>institutional selling</category><category>InstitutionalSelling</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. 10-year bond quickly becoming an electronic 'mattress' for savers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>To look at it optimistically, it's a period of risk aversion. <br /><br />Economists, business executives, analysts, and certainly employees are hoping it doesn't become an 'era of risk aversion' - - a <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">longer</span> period where businesses shun expansions and new projects, and investors avoid stocks. <br /><br />Further, the risk-aversion theme is prompting investors large and small to flock to the 10-year U.S. Treasuries bond, also called 10-year notes, the yield for which was <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/index.html">3.05% on Friday at mid-day.</a> (Bond prices move in the opposite direction of yield. Hence, when demand is strong, such as now, a rise in bond prices pushes their yield lower.)<br /><br />Moreover the 10-year yield is likely to fall further in the next two quarters, as more investors flock to safe investments amid the U.S. recession, so says economist Richard Felson. <br /><br />"We're seeing the value of safety come to the forefront. In this climate, investors don't care about yield, their primary concern is capital preservation," Felson said. "And despite the increase in debt the United States is likely to record over the next two years, the lowest risk investment remains U.S. Treasury notes. It's quickly becoming a sort of electronic mattress, the way savers used to store money in mattresses decades ago. Investors are saying, 'Here, take my money and store it until conditions improve.' "<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. 10-year bond quickly becoming an electronic 'mattress' for savers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/">U.S. 10-year bond quickly becoming an electronic 'mattress' for savers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-10-year-bond-quickly-becoming-an-electronic-mattress-for/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-year note</category><category>10-year treasury</category><category>bond market</category><category>bonds</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>risk aversion</category><category>U.S. Tresasury notes</category><category>yield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The economy's so bad, people won't even buy books]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>One theory about a recession is that people will not buy cars or refrigerators, but they will buy beer, razors, soap and books. If you can't ride around in a new Chevy, at least you can read about someone who is.</p>
<p>That theory went out the window, at least in part, when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>) said its same-store sales were down -- a lot.</p>
<p>Last year, the nation's largest book seller <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122719431984444295.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">made a little money</a> in the quarter ending November 1. It was a very little, $4.4 million. This year, BKS lost $18.4 billion as same-store sales fell 7.4%. Barnes &amp; Noble also dropped its forecast for the next quarter.</p>
<p>The BKS earnings news is particularly bad as the holiday season begins. Companies that sell discretionary items for under $30 have probably hoped that they would benefit, perhaps only modestly, from consumers looking for relatively cheap gifts for grandpa and the kids.</p>
<p>Even cheap is looking expensive this holiday. Although there is Barnes &amp; Noble stock. It is only $12.25 a share.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/">The economy's so bad, people won't even buy books</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122719431984444295.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/the-economys-so-bad-people-wont-even-buy-books/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barnes Noble</category><category>BarnesNoble</category><category>BKS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:59:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>