<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Paul Krugman argues,</a> in so many words, that, indeed, the United States must go back, to get to the future.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/opinion/10krugman.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">Krugman's advice</a> for President-elect Barack Obama? Think big. Contrary to selected, conservative arguments about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fdr">President Franklin D. Roosevelt's</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal">New Deal,</a> the reason the New Deal had limited, short-term success was the fact that FDR's economic policies were too cautious, he said. <br /><br /><strong>The New Deal: new life</strong><br /><br />The New Deal's long-term success and achievements, including the structural changes to the U.S. economy (including Social Security and bank deposit insurance), have proved to be both durable and essential, most economists, including Krugman, agree. <br /><br />Hence, President-elect Obama should think big from the get-go, Krugman says, and avoid the mistaken belief that 'government spending made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States">the Great Depression</a> worse,' and Obama should move forward with a large fiscal stimulus to put people back to work, for work that needs to be done in these United States.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/">NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1368796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1920s</category><category>1930s</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Democrats</category><category>FDR</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Franklin D. Roosevelt</category><category>gdp</category><category>Great Depression</category><category>Hoover</category><category>Keynes</category><category>Keynesians</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>pump priming</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Roaring 20s</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>World War II</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economist: March OPEC supply cut would be 'disruptive, scandalous']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>With oil treading-water well above the $90 mark, a production cut by the world's largest cartel, OPEC, at its March 5 meeting would be "disruptive and scandalous," according to one economist.<br /> <br />Economist Steve Affinito told BloggingStocks Monday the fact that oil surged more than $10 from a pullback to $86 after certain OPEC officials hinted at a spring production cut underscores the thin margin -- or safety cushion -- that exists between global oil supply and demand. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> closed Monday up 42 cents to $99.23.<br /><br />"OPEC says it's concerned about rising oil inventories this spring due to the sluggish U.S. economy but it conveniently forgets the small safety cushion. If markets were so well supplied as they say, oil prices wouldn't jump $5 or $10 every time an OPEC oil minister expresses the slightest concern about rising inventories," Affinito said. "The fact remains that although oil markets may be 'well supplied' there's very little margin for error or production break-downs in the international oil system."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economist: March OPEC supply cut would be 'disruptive, scandalous'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/">Economist: March OPEC supply cut would be 'disruptive, scandalous'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/economist-march-opec-supply-cut-would-be-disruptive-scandalou/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1920s</category><category>British pound</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflation hedges</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
