<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oklahoma-city-oil-derrick.jpg" alt="" />It would appear to be axiomatic to say that there are few benefits from an oil price over $100 per barrel. Nevertheless, during <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil's latest climb to the stratosphere</a>, some have argued that a high oil price is 'net-positive for the global economy,' or 'a long-term good thing.'<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan has a word for insta-analysis like the above. "Misguided," he calls them. <br /><br />Not that Langan is an ardent advocate of oil use; hardly. Would that the developed and developing world could shift today to an alternate, renewable, and more environmentally-friendly energy form, he says. But the world can't, and as is some times the case in social science circles, "the normative influences the empirical," he says, and leads to curious conclusions like an 'oil shock being net-positive for the global economy.' <br /><br />For the record: an oil shock is never net-positive for the global economy, Langan argues.<br /><br />There are some benefits, to be sure, such as increased conservation, increased research on alternate/renewable energy forms, a transfer of some wealth to some developing nations and, of course, astounding increases in wealth in those connected to oil and oil services, but the overall effect is net-negative. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> traded Thursday up $5.46 to $121.42 per barrel.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/">An oil shock is hardly the global economy's best friend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1291212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/an-oil-shock-is-hardly-the-global-economys-best-friend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>alternate energy sources</category><category>Brazil</category><category>cars</category><category>China</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>EU</category><category>Europe</category><category>European Union</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>gdp</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>India</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>Russia</category><category>trade</category><category>transportation</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three nations that could really increase global oil supply]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oilpic.jpg" alt="" />Oil's record price rise in 2007-2008 rivals price increases during the two previous oil shocks, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis">1973-74</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis">1979-80.</a> <br /><br />Moreover, while we'll leave for sector analysts and economists to declare if <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil's 100% gain in 2008</a> and 400% gain since 2000 qualifies for an oil shock, those analysts and economists generally agree that the price rise has been driven by rising demand, particularly increased demand for oil in emerging markets, such as China and India. <br /><br />However, that's not to say that the weak dollar and speculators / institutional investors have not affected the price of oil to the upside: they have, economists generally agree. Further, most analysts also believe oil's price contains a 'geopolitical / civil unrest risk' premium, as well. But all of the aforementioned does not blot-out the primary driver: the fact that about 1 billion new consumers of oil in emerging markets (in the form of car owners, factories, and commercial trucks) are being incorporated into the industrialized world, as the initial decade of globalization progresses.<br /> <br />Given the demand characteristics, and ignoring. for the moment, conservation / efficiency issues and alternative energy sources, a natural question concerns supply. Are there any nations that could increase supply by large amounts? Indeed there are three, but the answer is not as simple as 1-2-3. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The 3 major oil reserve nations</span><br />
<ul>
    <li>Iraq - The possessor of the third largest proved reserves (115 billion barrels), Iraq's oil production has been depressed by the Iraq War, and delays in massive required repairs to its infrastructure. By extension, a sustained increase in production assumes a cessation of hostilities and a political solution, and these are not on the immediate horizon. But the point here is that Iraq is capable of producing 6, 7, even 8 million barrels of oil per day, given investment and a stable government. Iraq's current output is about 2.5 million barrels per day, <a href="http://www.mees.com/Energy_Tables/crude-oil.htm">according to the Middle East Economic Survey. </a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three nations that could really increase global oil supply</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/">Three nations that could really increase global oil supply</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1236995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/three-nations-that-could-really-increase-global-oil-supply/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>globalization</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iraq</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OilShock</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[That '70s inflation show: Surging oil reignites U.S. inflation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow.jpg" alt="" />The April 2008 producer price data indicated that inflation, as measured at the business or wholesale level, is accelerating. But investors and consumers shouldn't be surprised, so says economist David H. Wang. </p>
<p>"It's beginning to look like a re-run of a show we don't want to see, 'That 70s inflation show,' " Wang said. "Oil is increasing inflation throughout the U.S. economy and you can really see it at the producer level." </p>
<p>During the past 12 months, producer prices have increased 6.5% and the core rate has risen 3.0%, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm">according to U.S. Labor Department data released Tuesday. </a>Other producer price index surges occurred in 1974, 1980, and 1991. What do the three have in common? You guessed it. They were periods when the price of oil increased by a large percentage, Wang said. The 1991 event was more of an oil spike, but the other two were the first two oil shocks, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis">1973-1974</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis">1979-1980,</a> he said. </p>
<p>Oil's current march higher, <a href="http://www.newyorkgasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx">up 100% in the past 12 months</a> to about $129 per barrel, and <a href="http://www.newyorkgasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx">up about 480% since 2002,</a> does not qualify as an oil shock just yet, but it's close and getting there, Wang said, and inflation has trended higher in tandem with oil's latest run-up.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>That '70s inflation show: Surging oil reignites U.S. inflation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/">That '70s inflation show: Surging oil reignites U.S. inflation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1201006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/that-70s-inflation-show-surging-oil-re-ignites-u-s-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>energy</category><category>featured</category><category>inflation</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>PPI</category><category>producer price index</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Just how high will U.S. gasoline prices rise?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" />With oil setting yet another record high Friday of <a href="http://www.nymex.com">$127.43 per barrel</a> and Goldman Sachs renewing traders concerns about inadequate oil supply growth, economists and business executives are becoming increasingly concerned about gasoline prices in the quarters ahead.<br /> <br />U.S. gasoline prices are already up more than 100% since 2004 to a national average of <a href="http://www.newyorkgasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx">about $3.78-3.83 per gallon.</a> (Many high-cost zones, such as New York, Boston, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, are already experiencing prices well over $4 per gallon.) By any gauge, gasoline's surge is one for the record books - - rapidly approaching percentage increases registered during the first two oil shocks, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis">1973-74</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis">1979-80. </a><br /><br />Given the run-up, how much higher can gasoline prices rise? <br /><br />First, some may ask, why the emphasis on gasoline prices? In a nutshell, economists obsess over gasoline prices because, unlike the rest of the developed world, the United States has out-sized per capita energy consumption. That's <em>econospeak</em> for 'Americans use many more gallons of fuel to commute to work, do errands, etc. than their counterparts in Europe and around the world.' <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Just how high will U.S. gasoline prices rise?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/">Just how high will U.S. gasoline prices rise?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1197844/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/just-how-high-will-u-s-gasoline-prices-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>Asia</category><category>cars</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>Europe</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>SUVs</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United announces third fare hike in two weeks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p>United Airlines, the second largest U.S. carrier, increased almost all domestic airfares by 3-5%, due to surging fuel costs, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-airlines-raises-fares-again/20080424220409990001">The Associated Press reported Friday.</a><br /><br />It was the third increase in the past two weeks, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-airlines-raises-fares-again/20080424220409990001">The AP reported,</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">United</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">UAUA</a>), which like the U.S.'s other major carriers, is struggling to maintain a viable business model amid the largest increase in aviation fuel costs since the world's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1979_energy_crisis">second oil shock</a> in 1979-80. <br /><br />Shares of United fell 82 cents to $14.58 on the news in Friday afternoon trading. <br /><br />United's latest fare hike takes place just two days after <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">Delta Air Lines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">DAL</a>) CEO Richard Anderson said domestic carriers will need to raise tickets 15-20% just to break even at existing fuel prices, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-airlines-raises-fares-again/20080424220409990001">The AP reported.</a> <br /><strong><br />Surging fuel costs</strong><br /><br />Independent stock analyst C. Leonard Bauer, formerly of Prudential, said cost factors affecting aviation will create a stark travel choice for business and leisure travelers, at least for the immediate future, including this summer: if you're flying a few months from now, there's an 80-90% chance you'll pay considerably more, he said.<br /> <br />"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United announces third fare hike in two weeks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/">United announces third fare hike in two weeks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1177846/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/united-citing-fuel-costs-announces-third-fare-hike-in-two-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979-80 oil shock</category><category>business travel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>leisure travel</category><category>oil shock</category><category>travel</category><category>UAUA</category><category>United Airlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Despite oil's climb, U.S. economy bends, but doesn't break]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img alt="Gas is advertised in Chicago last month. " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gas-unleaded.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Wall Street and academia are two fields that publish a great deal of research, albeit for different objectives and audiences. <br /><br />Wall Street has a tendency to emphasize mainline research, a process that produces a great deal of specialized, up-to-the-minute research, but one that also can sometimes overlook -- even intentionally exclude -- research by niche or lesser-known researchers. <br /><br /><strong>In focus: oil</strong><br /><br />One example: oil prices and the U.S. economy. Wall Street abounds in research describing oil's impact on U.S. GDP. As most investors/readers know, the current consensus holds that as oil prices rise, the U.S. economy slows, and if it rises too high it can throw the economy into a recession.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Despite oil's climb, U.S. economy bends, but doesn't break</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/">Despite oil's climb, U.S. economy bends, but doesn't break</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1053965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/despite-oils-climb-u-s-economy-bends-but-doesnt-break/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1973-74 oil embargo</category><category>1973-74 oil shock</category><category>1979 oil shock</category><category>economic growth</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>inflation</category><category>Leeb</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OPEC</category><category>recession</category><category>Steve Leeb</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
