<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks: Our future is dimmer than your future!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/starbucks_in_trash.jpg" />The new m.o. at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) seems to be: give 'em their dour forecasts, then celebrate if the future is not, after all, entirely decaffeinated. After all, the company's stock is already at a low not seen since November 2001; all of the respectable gains of the past seven years have been wiped away. Starbucks stores may be cheerily decked out in holiday colors and decorations, but its management is nothing but sad, downcast, despondent, glum.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Starbucks-warns-tough-times-ahead/story.aspx?guid={8478A985-A653-429E-A26D-C905E73F3AC1}">In the company's annual report filed yesterday after market close</a>, management provided a Santa-sized list of all the reasons its sales have been down and its expenses up, as well as providing a dim outlook for a future ravaged by poor discretionary spending, stiff competition from low-priced coffee at its fast-food rivals, nasty landlords who won't go gently into the goodnight of store closings, and to top it all off, financially anxious consumers. To blame for 2008: foreclosures, high food prices, and less generous credit card limits.<br /><br />At the end of this annual report, you have to wonder if coffee is the right business to be in. After all, the beverage isn't known for being a tonic for the depressed (when have you ever heard of a wronged hero drowning his sorrows in coffee?). Maybe Starbucks should look to add a line of moonshine to its offerings; offer it in Venti and "Jug" sizes and send free gift cards to the investors, who are the only people in America who deserve to be as solemn as Starbucks' annual report.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/">Starbucks: Our future is dimmer than your future!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1382829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/starbucks-our-future-is-dimmer-than-your-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>annual report</category><category>AnnualReport</category><category>featured</category><category>glum</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists' survey puts chance of 2008 U.S. recession at 50/50]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The U.S. economy will grow at a minuscule rate in Q1 2008 and the odds of a recession in 2008 stand at 50/50, according to a survey of economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aE.MQFrOAiTE&amp;refer=home">conducted by Bloomberg News.</a> <br /><br />The 62-economist survey expects the world's largest economy to grow just 0.5% in Q1 2008, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aE.MQFrOAiTE&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported.</a> Meanwhile, the 2008 recession probability was increased to 50%, up from 40% in January 2008.<br /><br />Economist Steve Affinito, who did not partake in the survey, told BloggingStocks Friday that 2008 looks like it will be the roughest election year, from an economic standpoint, since 1992.<br /><strong><br />Bearish, bullish forces</strong><br /><br />"We've got major contraction forces in the housing slump, the credit market crunch, and in high oil prices. Any one of those could cut growth substantially. Taken together, they can flatten economic activity," Affinito said. "On the stimulus side, we have 225 basis points of Fed rate decreases and a $168 billion fiscal stimulus package, so 2008 is shaping up to be a battle royal, economically speaking."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economists' survey puts chance of 2008 U.S. recession at 50/50</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/">Economists' survey puts chance of 2008 U.S. recession at 50/50</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/economists-survey-puts-chance-of-2008-u-s-recession-at-50-50/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1992</category><category>1992 election</category><category>2008</category><category>2008 election</category><category>bond market</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit markets</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MacWorld dispatches: Something in the MacBook Air?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="all the pretty black turtlenecks" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/macworld_all_the_black_people.jpg" /><br />Oooh, ahh, oh. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) announced its newest luscious piece of hardware, the <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/01/15/macbook-air/">MacBook Air</a>, today at the <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/01/15/the-macworld-2008-keynote-liveblog/">MacWorld conference</a>. Every one of my geeky friends on Twitter wants the newest, thinnest, most desirable piece of hardware since the iPhone (one of my friends <a href="http://twitter.com/ravenzachary/statuses/602588312">has already <em>purchased</em> one</a>, in fact) -- but most of us <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/why-the-market-hates-steve-jobs-macworld-speech/">can't afford it</a>.<br /><br />Could it be because we're just not Jobsian enough?<br /><br />I was ooh-ing and ahh-ing over the MacBook Air on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/15/apple-macbook-air-first-hands-on/">Engadget's hands-on photo gallery</a> when I saw this photo, above. Notice something? Each and every MacWorld attendee allowed to touch the super-light laptop is wearing a variation on Steve Jobs' trademark black mock turtleneck. Sure, there are a few button-up shirts, a sport coat, a crewneck or two, but all is a sea of black. Note to self: If I go to MacWorld next year, wear orange! And see what happens. All that conformity could be key to Apple's stock price (seriously!): Apple followers, both spiritual and financial, tend to behave a bit like lemmings.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/">MacWorld dispatches: Something in the MacBook Air?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1087629/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/macworld-dispatches-something-in-the-macbook-air/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>aapl</category><category>air</category><category>apple</category><category>conformity</category><category>featured</category><category>jobs</category><category>macbook</category><category>macbookair</category><category>macworld</category><category>macworld2008</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a></p><img width="228" height="NaN" align="right" alt="prospector" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/panning-for-gold-by-dbking.jpg" />I read a quote in an article recently which stated, "What Wall Street is about is smart guys thinking about ways to make money from dumb ones." That quote is attributed to one John E. Fitzgibbon, the publisher of an online newsletter, in an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31place.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">article from Eric Dash via <span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times</span></a>. While Mr. Fitzgibbon's remark might validate special investing skill on the part of some smart and timely investors, I take exception to the notion that all those investors who lost money in the markets over the past year are the dumb ones.<br /><br />The question now is, where is the smart money headed?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/">Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31place.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1074678/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>airlines</category><category>debt</category><category>drilling</category><category>electricity</category><category>expire-images:2008-1-31</category><category>export</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>government contracts</category><category>GovernmentContracts</category><category>import</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>invest</category><category>mining</category><category>ports</category><category>railroad</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>rice</category><category>shipping</category><category>supply-chain</category><category>water</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best Stocks for 2008: Transocean (RIG), Boeing (BA)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2008/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2008</a></p>Concerning top picks for 2008, those assertive investors who can tolerate moderate/high risk should consider <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transocean-inc-new/rig/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Transocean</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transocean-inc-new/rig/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">RIG</a>). Transocean is favored here because it fits the investment theme of well-capitalized, experienced companies with long-term global trends in the company's favor. Transocean offers deepwater drilling services in the world's major offshore oil-producing regions, including Africa, Asia, Brazil, Canada, India, Middle East, Gulf of Mexico, and the North Sea -- and demand for drilling services is unlikely to decline in the immediate years ahead. Sell / Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $84.<br /><br />For those in need of a safer, large-cap play, consider <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BA</a>), which boasts a solid commercial airline order book. Boeing is expected to win its global aviation battle with European rival Airbus, and in the process, transform flight as the 21st century progresses. Boeing's ace in the ongoing battle? The 787 Dreamliner, a super-efficient aircraft that will give airlines the profit margins they need and passengers the creature comforts/amenities they require in the digital age. Sell / Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $58.<br /><br /><em>DISCLOSURE: Joseph Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/">Best Stocks for 2008: Transocean (RIG), Boeing (BA)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/best-stocks-for-2008-transocean-rig-boeing-ba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>BA</category><category>best stocks 2008</category><category>Boeing</category><category>global oil demand</category><category>global oil supply</category><category>GlobalOilDemand</category><category>GlobalOilSupply</category><category>offshore oil exploration</category><category>oil</category><category>oil exploration</category><category>oil prices</category><category>RIG</category><category>top picks</category><category>Transocean</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tighten your belt for a rocky 2008]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bitterjug/870861414/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" title="Crystal ball " alt="Crystal ball " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/crystal-ball.jpg" /></a>The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/opinion/16recession.html">New York Times</a></em> asked six economists whether the U.S. is in a recession. Their conclusion seems to be that they don't know whether we're in a recession but that the housing market slowdown and the related debt bomb could lead us there. </p>
<p>I'm not an economist but I played one in 2004. That's when I worked with the John Kerry campaign and had a chance to meet one of the economists -- Jason Furman -- whose op-ed appeared Sunday. I also appeared opposite another of the contributing economists, Kevin Hassett, in an interview on <em><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wsw/tvprogram/20040730.html">Wall $treet Week with Fortune</a></em> the day after the Democratic National Convention.</p>
<p>I don't know what 2008 will bring. But I think it depends on two factors: whether the Bush administration decides to take any radical policy moves or just twiddles its thumbs until its term expires, and how deep and wide the global impact of the housing market slump and the related credit market freeze will be. To address the analysis behind this forecast, here are my thoughts on five key questions:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tighten your belt for a rocky 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/">Tighten your belt for a rocky 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/opinion/16recession.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1064112/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/tighten-your-belt-for-a-rocky-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>2008 economy</category><category>2008Economy</category><category>economic outlook</category><category>EconomicOutlook</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/bestbuyplasma01.jpg" alt="" />When I first read this article from <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/15/news/companies/walmart_obama/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote">CNN Money.com</a>, regarding the Obama/Edwards tag team against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), my brain yelled, "Huh? What? Who?"</p>
<p>What are two liberal socialist Democrats doing taking potshots at Wal-Mart of all things? Egads, couldn't they even wait until after Christmas before tossing their first '08 presidential campaign grenade? </p>
<p>Illinois senator Barack Obama(D) and former Democratic vice presidential hopeful John Edwards, drew the sword Wednesday along with Wal-Mart watchdog group WakeUpWalMart.com to denounce Wal-mart Corporation regarding the treatment of their employees. The two politicians had to "back door" their appearance by going through the union assembled public group because it is perhaps bad form and too controlled to directly address the union through normal channels. The entire event was obviously exploited by Obama and Edwards in an attempt to gain increased appeal to the minimum wage sector.</p>
<p>I'm not a big fan of Wal-mart, but I don't like this political pawn pushing either. If Obama and Edwards are looking for grassroots brownie points, they've picked a pretty rude way to get them.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/">Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/702240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>campaign</category><category>obama</category><category>president</category><category>presidential campaign</category><category>PresidentialCampaign</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:26:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
