<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[AFL-CIO takes on Blackstone IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="102" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/workersunite.jpg" />Pushing for a higher minimum wage, looking for ways to protect workers from the pain of globalization: that's the stuff of American organized labor today. And with Democrats controlling congress, some say the labor movement is going to get what it wants. <br /><br />The AFL-CIO, the nation's largest labor group with 10 million members, on Tuesday made a bold move. It asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/27d5ae66-0321-11dc-a023-000b5df10621.html">stop the $40 billion Blackstone IPO</a>.<br /><br />The <em>Financial Times</em> reports that <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/26e5245a-0321-11dc-a023-000b5df10621.html">the request will stir political heat</a> on <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">private equity</a> firms and threaten efforts by other buy-out groups to go public. In a letter, seen by Financial Times reporters, the union argues that Blackstone's executives are trying to evade the coverage of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The article explains that the labor attack points up new concern among union leaders and elected officials over the wealth of executives who run private equity funds in a time of increased wage inequality. They argue that private equity firms apply their generous tax status to wildly enrich an elite few while taking away jobs from millions of American workers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AFL-CIO takes on Blackstone IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/">AFL-CIO takes on Blackstone IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 May 2007 16:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/897157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/afl-cio-takes-on-blackstone-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AFL-CIO</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BlackstoneGroup</category><category>income inequality</category><category>IncomeInequality</category><category>Private Equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>Unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Weld Royal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Business and labor unions facing off in renewed battle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/aflcio.gif" />With both houses of the U.S. Congress now in Democratic control, the battle of labor unions vs. business interests was bound to take center stage. And here we are -- business interests are raising millions of greenbacks to try and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117142616918208188-SNABdQiTTW3E7kJMW3tJcSuzJPQ_20080214.html?mod=blogs">defeat renewed labor union</a> efforts. No surprise here.<br /><br />A new U.S. House of Representatives committee working just this week on the "Employee Free Choice Act" would provide greater legal protection for union organizers. Do businesses with large amounts of labor-based employees want this? No, of course not. This battle will see the light of day again soon -- very soon -- as these two perennial enemies duel it out underneath the umbrella of this new committee.<br /><br />It's pretty easy to see that large leaders of the labor unions provided hefty sums to support recent democratic hopefuls in recent elections, and we all know the outcome as these unions now have Democratic friends in influential high places. A key driving stat that will be used over and over though? How about this: the percentage of wage and salaried workers in unions last year was 12%, compared with 20% in 1983 -- about 24 years ago.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/">Business and labor unions facing off in renewed battle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117142616918208188-SNABdQiTTW3E7kJMW3tJcSuzJPQ_20080214.html?mod=blogs>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/753812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/business-and-labor-unions-facing-off-in-renewed-battle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AFL-CIO</category><category>Business Labor</category><category>BusinessLabor</category><category>Corrupr labor unions</category><category>CorruprLaborUnions</category><category>Labor issues</category><category>Labor Unions</category><category>LaborIssues</category><category>LaborUnions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
