<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Play the Google game just for FUN!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>Yesterday I suggested&nbsp;Google buy Starbucks. I was very serious about that although clearly Starbucks would view that as a hostile takeover and would fight it every step of the way.&nbsp;If you missed it see, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/google-should-buy-starbucks-now/">"Google should buy Starbucks -- Now!"</a> </p>
<p>In the article I discussed my equivalency test and listed a group of stocks that combined would&nbsp;equal Google's capitalization of $127.5 billion. I added a resort hotel&nbsp; to the aggregated seven stocks just to round it out. My idea was to point out that you can own great companies with growth potential, strong brands, diversification,&nbsp;known risks (as opposed to unknown or minimally understood risks) and much more predictability. <em>Risk is NOT required for high reward! See any one of Berkshire Hathaway's annual reports.&nbsp;</em></p>
<p><strong>THE GAME</strong>: If you too believe that Google is way over valued, let me know what group of stocks you think best demonstrate this by your own selection of a crop of names worth equivalent valuation. </p>
<p>Here are some basic ground rules: </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Play the Google game just for FUN!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/">Play the Google game just for FUN!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/641405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/play-the-google-game-just-for-fun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AOL Stockblog</category><category>AolStockblog</category><category>GE</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>liber</category><category>MSFT</category><category>TWX</category><category>Value Investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>WMT</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
