<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks 2007: My report card]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crox/" rel="tag">Crocs Inc (CROX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/opsw/" rel="tag">Opsware Inc (OPSW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/" rel="tag">25 Stocks for Next 25 Years</a></p><p> Next week marks the beginning of 2008 and my two high school kids will also receive their first semester report cards, the moment of truth for them. It got me to think perhaps it was time to grade my own performance for 2007 on BloggingStocks. So here goes, the A's to the F's...</p>
<p>The A's:</p>
<ul>
    <li> My recommendation of Aquantive Corp at $24 and stating that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) needed to buy this company. It did at $66.50. Many readers and members of my investment web site made a near three bagger in less than six months.</li>
    <li>Recommendation of Color Kinetics at $19 back in May to only watch it get bought out at $34 by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lg-philips-lcd-co-ltd/lpl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LG Phillips</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lg-philips-lcd-co-ltd/lpl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LPL</a>) of the Netherlands.</li>
    <li>Recommendation of Kyphon at $37 and have <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">Medtronic</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">MDT</a>) buy it at $71</li>
    <li>Recommendation of Opsware at $8 back in March and then again in May at $9 and have <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Compaq</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ)</a> buy it out at $14.50</li>
    <li>Recommending <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> ( NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) all year and re-iterating the buy since $80, now at $198 with a new price target at $300 for 2008</li>
    <li>Writing the exhaustive series of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/top-25-stocks-for-the-next-25-years-chipotle-an-update/">Top 25 Stocks for the NEXT 25 Years</a> back in May/June. Many of the stocks have been bought out and several are up more than 20%.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Picks 2007: My report card</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/">Top Picks 2007: My report card</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-georges-yared/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/top-picks-2007-my-report-card/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>bac</category><category>cost</category><category>crox</category><category>goog</category><category>msft</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>opsw</category><category>sbux</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><category>tgt</category><category>wfc</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/opsw/" rel="tag">Opsware Inc (OPSW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/" rel="tag">25 Stocks for Next 25 Years</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/clrk/" rel="tag">Color Kinetics (CLRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/zolt/" rel="tag">Zoltek Co (ZOLT)</a></p><p>In my book about Baby Boomer investing I highlight what I feel are the five major growth industries going forward. The industries are health care, alternative energy, technology, communications and lifestyle. I also mention 42 companies within those industries that could be the leaders, the game changers. Since the book has been published, five of the 42 stocks I wrote about are being acquired!<br /><br />The latest one to go is<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/checkfree-corporation/ckfr/nas"> Checkfree</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/checkfree-corporation/ckfr/nas">CKFR</a>).  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas">Fiserve</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas"> FISV</a>) has announced its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fiserv-to-acquire-checkfree/n20070802084609990003">$4.4 billion bid</a>. Checkfree made our banking-transactional life much easier. The other four that will be part of larger companies are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opsware-incorporated/opsw/nas">Opsware </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opsware-incorporated/opsw/nas">OPSW</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">Color Kinetics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">CLRK</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kyphon-inc/kyph/nas">Kyphon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kyphon-inc/kyph/nas">KYPH</a>). Other than aQuantive, the other three were also part of my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/">Top 25 stocks for the NEXT 25 years</a> series. </p>
<p>As the 42 companies are down to 37, it causes some reflection for the future. Great, emerging companies will always be on the radar screen of larger, well-financed suitors. If growth cannot be internally generated through research and development efforts, larger companies will need to acquire growth and next generation products or technology. With interest rates still historically low, the borrowing necessary to buy these young, up-and-comers is not a significant issue. Investors will reward mature companies if they acquire intelligently and strategically.</p>
<a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/">Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/956368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>chipotle mexican grill</category><category>ChipotleMexicanGrill</category><category>clrk</category><category>cmg</category><category>color kinetics</category><category>ColorKinetics</category><category>inthenews</category><category>opsw</category><category>opsware</category><category>zol</category><category>zoltek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Paris Hilton taking stock trading tips from Martha Stewart?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/imcl/" rel="tag">ImClone Systems (IMCL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/hlt.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In the past <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/hong-kong-couple-accused-of-insider-trading">Mike Fowlkes</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-we-know-how-to-pick-em/">Sarah Gilbert</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/3-4m-of-insider-trading-on-dow-jones-calls/">I </a>have pointed out what seems blatant illegal activity in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Aquantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>). Now there is activity in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Hilton Hotels</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">HLT</a>) worth taking a look at.<br /><br />Hilton Hotels closed up 9.34 to $45.39 today on <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/articles/390586">news</a> the company agreed to be acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Blackstone Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BX</a>) in a deal valued at $26 billion. A <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/#comments">reader </a>pointed out interesting activity on Hilton Hotels.<br /><br />With the stock up, let's look and see how many "lucky" traders picked up calls on the stocks. A call option gives the buyer the right to buy the stock at a set price. If you think a stock is going to go up you can buy the right to buy that stock at a set price, in the hopes that it does in fact go up, as you expect. <br /><br />The Hilton July 35 calls (HLTGG) had a volume of 3,660 Tuesday with a high price of $1.90. That is above the average volume of 314 calls per day since the options were issued and just above the previous record high daily volume of 3,616 on 5/31. Those calls are now worth about $10.50 a piece so a 450% gain over two days isn't bad. I have to say this looks suspicious; sort of like a man running from a bank with a bag of money. </p>
<p>Looking at the Hilton August 40 calls (HLTHH) it becomes a little more obvious. Tuesday there were 5,844 contracts for 0.85 cents or less. In the past three weeks -- since the options came out there were only a total of 70 contracts traded. The contracts bought Tuesday are now worth about $5.80 a piece. A 582% gain in two days, representing about $2.8 million in profits. </p>
<p>If that isn't enough money ...there is more. The July 40 calls (HLTGH) saw 3,312 contracts trade Tuesday for less than 0.40. Now at 5.50 it is a 1,275% return for another $1.6 million in profits. </p>
<p>While I do not know who made the trades, their intentions and what they knew when; I am betting they will soon be getting a call from the SEC. In all fairness, just because I see a man wearing a black ski mask running out of the bank carrying a bag of money and a gun doesn't mean he is a bank robber. These trades could be legit, but they trades have all the tell-tale signs of insider trading. By the way has anyone been following Paris recently? Has she been meeting with Martha Stewart?<br /><br /><em>Kevin Kersten is an Options Analyst with </em><a href="http://www.investorsobserver.com/aolblogkk"><em>InvestorsObserver.com</em></a><em>. Do you have any deadwood in your portfolio? Check out the </em><a href="http://www.iotogo.com/18waysaola"><em>18 Warning Signs That Tell You To Dump A Stock.</em></a><em> <br /><br />Disclosure note: Mr. Kersten owns and or controls a diversified portfolio of long and short positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/">Is Paris Hilton taking stock trading tips from Martha Stewart?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/is-paris-hilton-taking-stock-trading-tips-from-martha-stewart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BlackstoneGroup</category><category>BX</category><category>DJ</category><category>HLT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Yahoo! get FTC review of online ad purchase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>Google's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) deal to buy DoubleClick seemed certain to get a government review. Google is too dominant in text advertising and DoubeClick too big in display ad serving and targeting. Of course, competitors like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) said it would put too much online advertising power in one set of hands.</p>
<p>Now the eyes of the Federal Trade Commission have turned on Microsoft and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Their respective deals to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and Right Media are going to get the antitrust once over, at the very least.</p>
<p>Right now, the FTC's review of the Google deal is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118185342365535771.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">more formal</a> [subscription required] than the other two, but that could change. More than one industry association has asked that the government to take a close look at all three transactions.</p>
<p>Although the odds are that none of the M&amp;A activity that is designed to bring advertising targeting under the umbrellas of big web portals will be stopped, perhaps the FTC work will be more than a formality. When these three transactions are added to AOL's ownership of Advertising.com, the concentration of private data about individual's web habits will be in very few corporate hands.</p>
<p>Perhaps there should be a divide between those that have the information and those who have the advertising inventory. But, that would be in a too perfect world.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/">Microsoft and Yahoo! get FTC review of online ad purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118185342365535771.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/918630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advertising.com</category><category>AOL</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Right Media</category><category>RightMedia</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Cramer begs for Yahoo! &amp; eBay to merge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>Jim Cramer proposing on CNBC's <em>Mad Money </em>that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">eBay </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) should get together and merge. He is calling for this because the growth is slowing for both companies, and a merger could jump start it. Cramer contends that companies with slower growth have to do something to get their sizzle back. Cramer said that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was reportedly in talks to buy Yahoo! and that the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) buyout signals it is willing to do deals. If these companies had better areas to invest in they wouldn't be propping shares up with buybacks. A merger would allow Yahoo!'s massive users to use Skype and PayPal to buy goods. Cramer thinks this would bring back growth, and would <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_2.html">finally get Semel out</a> of Yahoo!</p>
<p>This is just after Yahoo!'s <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/05/yahoo_loses_its.html">chief technology officer bailed out of the company</a> today. As Cramer is long Yahoo! in his charitable trust and as he's been touting ideas for something like this, this "call to merge" is hardly a surprise to me or to others. The market caps are very similar, although eBay is the larger company. You should know that if you are playing these stocks based only on Cramer's comments, then know that you are buying what is probably his third or fourth round of recommendations calling for this. This is the first time he made an entire segment on this would-be merger, but this is best defined as "re-information."</p>
<p><em>Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/">Jim Cramer begs for Yahoo! &amp; eBay to merge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>charitable trust</category><category>CharitableTrust</category><category>CNBC</category><category>eBay</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>mergers</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>PayPal</category><category>share buybacks</category><category>Skype</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! left to fend for itself as Microsoft shuns it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p>Was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) looking for a complete toolkit to compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) on the internet advertising front?  The company doesn't need <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) to get there. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/">Doug noted earlier</a>, Microsoft now says it has "all the pieces" it needs to build a successful ad business -- without even giving a shout out to Yahoo! This is true -- Microsoft has used a little of its war chest to make several acquisitions and partnerships that it will use as the basis for quite a large assault in the world of internet advertising (from the ground up, in a manner of speaking).<br /><br />The purchase of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) was the final arrow in Microsoft's quiver that gives the software giant everything it needs to take on Google successfully -- and all of it was at a price premium to acquiring Yahoo! -- something Microsoft easily knows. Buying Yahoo! would have given it instant customers, but Yahoo!'s advertising strategy is still a little shaky -- and aQuantive's was not. In other words, Microsoft was <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+has+all+it+needs+for+ad+business/2100-1024_3-6186131.html">looking for the bargain here</a>. It found all the bargains it could.<br /><br />Did Microsoft  need the "instant scale" it would have received from an acquisition like Yahoo!? Some analysts still believe that, although perhaps Microsoft saw that its immense resources could be best used to grow its own scale organically, rather than just to buy it for instant gratification. This news, though, <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+has+all+it+needs+for+ad+business/2100-1024_3-6186131.html">dampens the outlook for Yahoo! terribly</a>, as the company now is on its own to compete against Google for ad dollars (which it has not being that successful at), as well as the immense capability of Microsoft -- which is its second-largest competitor. YHOO shareholders, get out that rabbit's foot and start rubbing now.<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/">Yahoo! left to fend for itself as Microsoft shuns it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+now+has+all+parts+for+ad+business/2110-1024_3-6185996.html?tag=nefd.hed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft walks away from Yahoo!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) made it clear, once and for all, that it does not need <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) to be successful with its internet advertising strategy. Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi, the head of ad strategy at the world's largest software company <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117994469207212364-search.html?KEYWORDS=yahoo&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month">said that</a> [subscription] its current internet products plus customers and tech it will get from buying aQuantive (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) round out the arsenal that it needs to compete for online advertising. </p>
<p>The announcement leaves Yahoo! in a a difficult position. With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) purchase of DoubleClick, Yahoo! does not have a large presence in the internet ad serving business. Its share of the search market is still dropping <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/search-engines-april-2007.php">according to Hitwise</a>, and there is still little evidence that the company's Panama advertising search product is bringing in a large slug of new revenue. Yahoo!'s top line only grew about 10% in the last quarter.</p>
<p>Yahoo!'s shares jumped from $28 to over $33 when the press published reports that Microsoft was interested in buying the web portal. But, the stock has sold off to $28.60 since then. Investors are likely to do very little with the shares until Yahoo!'s next quarterly earnings report. If it is weak, and Panama has not produced a quarter of solid results, it will be a long year for Yahoo! shareholders.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/">Microsoft walks away from Yahoo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 May 2007 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117994469207212364-search.html?KEYWORDS=yahoo&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 5-22-07: AQNT, GSK, LMT, MSFT and SNDK]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/at/" rel="tag">ALLTEL Corp (AT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sndk/" rel="tag">SanDisk Corp (SNDK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong>  GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), SanDisk Corp (SNDK), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT) and aQuantive, Inc (AQNT) were today's noteworthy downgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Deutsche Bank and ABN Amro cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc-adr/gsk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GlaxoSmithKline </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc-adr/gsk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GSK</a>) to Hold from Buy following the New England Journal of Medicine warnings from Avandia. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SanDisk </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SNDK</a>) to Neutral from Buy due to concerns that oversupply in the industry will extend through next quarter. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Cowen downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LMT</a>) to Neutral from Outperform based on slower 2007-2008 EPS growth and less cash redeployment upside than General Dynamics Corp (GD) and Raytheon Co (RTN). </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) to Neutral from Buy and RBC Capital cut shares to Sector Perform from Outperform after the Microsoft (MSFT) acquisition... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Piper Jaffray downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Cytyc Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CYTC</a>) To Market Perform from Outperform. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/net-bank-inc/ntbk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NetBank, Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/net-bank-inc/ntbk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NTBK</a>) was downgraded to Underperform from Market Perform at Friedman Billings. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Aeropostale, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ARO</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>AG Edwards downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BHP Billiton Ltd</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BHP</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Gabelli downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alltel-corporation/at/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Alltel Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alltel-corporation/at/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AT</a>) to Hold from Buy.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/">Analyst downgrades 5-22-07: AQNT, GSK, LMT, MSFT and SNDK</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 May 2007 10:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/901419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aeropostale</category><category>alltel</category><category>analyst</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>aro</category><category>at</category><category>bhp</category><category>cytc</category><category>cytyc</category><category>downgraded</category><category>glaxo</category><category>gsk</category><category>lockheed</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>netbank</category><category>ntbk</category><category>rating</category><category>sandisk</category><category>sndk</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ValueClick gets even more value]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/vlck.bmp" alt="" />Today (around 1 p.m.) <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">VCLK</a>) stock is up a healthy 15% to $34.50. Back in January, the stock was trading at about $23.<br /><br />Of course, the betting is that this online advertising operator will get scooped up like its peers, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>), and DoubleClick. Hey, why not?<br /><br />The problem is that the mega cap internet players such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) have already made deals in the space. Instead, the suitors that are left can't really muster the premium pricing. These companies include the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IAC/InterActieCorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>).<br /><br />While Microsoft or Google may want to bulk up even more, the fact remains that this is pure speculation. In fact, ValueClick is a hodge-podge of different sites and is more a technology play. It's like 24/7 Real Media, which didn't snag a big premium on its deal.<br /><br />So, as always, investors need to be very careful on this one.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/">ValueClick gets even more value</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/valueclick-gets-even-more-value/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>Buyout rumor</category><category>BuyoutRumor</category><category>goog</category><category>iaci</category><category>msft</category><category>Online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>tfsm</category><category>twx</category><category>vclk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 5-21-07: AQNT, CCU, CI, CFC and WMG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ci/" rel="tag">CIGNA Corp (CI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ccu/" rel="tag">Clear Channel Commun (CCU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intu/" rel="tag">Intuit Inc (INTU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>ValueClick, Inc (VCLK), aQuantive, Inc (AQNT), Cigna Corp (CI), Warner Music Group (WMG), Clear Channel Communications, Inc (CCU) and Medtronic, Inc (MDT) were today's more notable downgrades:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Baird cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ValueClick Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">VCLK</a>) to Neutral from Outperform, citing the FTC inquiry. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Buy after the company was acquired by Microsoft (MSFT) and because aQuantive no longer trades on fundamentals.  Kaufman and Gabelli also cut aQuantive to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cigna </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CI</a>) was downgraded at Prudential to Neutral from Overweight on valuation.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-music-group-corp/wmg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Warner Music Group's </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-music-group-corp/wmg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMG</a>) downgrade to Sell from Neutral at Pali Research was based on the lower industry outlook, which Pali believes revenues are likely to fall at least 10% for the industry in 2007, along with the company's release schedule. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Clear Channel Communications</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CCU</a>) to Peer Perform from Outperform on the acceptance of the higher bid.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Medtronic Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MDT</a>) was downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/georgia-gulf-corporation/ggc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Georgia Gulf Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/georgia-gulf-corporation/ggc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GGC</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Hold at Matrix USA. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Stifel cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/core-laboratories-n-v/clb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Core Laboratories</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/core-laboratories-n-v/clb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CLB</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Intuit Inc </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">INTU</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Occidental Petroleum Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">OXY</a>) was removed from Goldman's Conviction Buy list. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Friedman Billings downgraded downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capitalsource-inc/cse/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CapitalSource, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capitalsource-inc/cse/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CSE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Countrywide Financial Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CFC</a>) to Market Perform from Outperform.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/">Analyst downgrades 5-21-07: AQNT, CCU, CI, CFC and WMG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 11:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>capitalsource</category><category>ccu</category><category>cfc</category><category>ci</category><category>cigna</category><category>clb</category><category>clear channel</category><category>ClearChannel</category><category>core labs</category><category>CoreLabs</category><category>countrywide</category><category>cse</category><category>downgrade</category><category>georgia gulf</category><category>GeorgiaGulf</category><category>ggc</category><category>intu</category><category>intuit</category><category>mdt</category><category>medtronic</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>occidential</category><category>oxy</category><category>rating</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>valueclick</category><category>vclk</category><category>warner music</category><category>WarnerMusic</category><category>wmg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft bought aQuantive: Broadband users up 3 million this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/q/" rel="tag">Qwest Communications Intl (Q)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/att519.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />If anyone wonders why <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) paid $6 billion for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>), they need look no further than the <a href="http://www.centerformediaresearch.com/cfmr_brief.cfm?fnl=070518">report from Leichtman Research Group</a> for first quarter 2007. In these three months alone, 3 million people joined the broadband revolution. Read that as 3 million more potential YouTube visitors, Second Life devotees, advertisees. This represents almost 6% growth in this quarter alone, bringing the total of U.S. broadband subscribers to 56.2 million. </p>
<p>Of that audience, 55% buy through their cable company, while the telephone industry pulls in 43%. For this quarter, though, the telephone side accounted for 51% of the growth. In fact, the telephone companies have <u>led cable in acquisitions in each of the last 10 quarters</u>.</p>
<p>Leading the pack overall is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">T</a>) with 12.8 million subscribers, followed closely by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Comcast</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CMCSA</a>) at 12 million. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys?from=lookup">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys?from=lookup">VZ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWC</a>) both have more than 7 million subscribers. Others with over a million are Cox, Charter, Cablevision, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qwest-communications-international-inc/q/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Qwest</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qwest-communications-international-inc/q/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Q</a>) and Embarq. Top performer for the quarter? AT&amp;T, with almost 700,000 new subscribers.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/">Why Microsoft bought aQuantive: Broadband users up 3 million this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 May 2007 19:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/why-microsoft-bought-aquantive-broadband-users-up-3-million-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>broadband</category><category>broadband subscriber numbers</category><category>broadband subscribers</category><category>BroadbandSubscriberNumbers</category><category>BroadbandSubscribers</category><category>cmcsa</category><category>leichtman research group</category><category>LeichtmanResearchGroup</category><category>msft</category><category>q</category><category>t</category><category>twc</category><category>vz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 19:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Online ads' closed-loop solution]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/">Recent mergers</a> between traditional and online advertising firms suggest a deep flaw in the advertising business -- a flaw exposed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s evidently unstoppable technology edge. How so? While traditional advertisers deliver <strong>open-loop systems</strong>, Google delivers a <strong>closed-loop solution</strong>.</p>
<p>The reason that online advertising is growing is because it offers a <strong>closed-loop solution</strong> -- a notion that I first described in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Net-Profit-Compete-Internet-Business/dp/0787956872"><em>Net Profit</em></a>. By contrast, TV and newspaper advertising is an <strong>open-loop system</strong> -- one in which a company pays to reach a viewer without getting any specific feedback on whether the advertising money leads to increased sales.</p>
<p>By contrast, a closed-loop solution measures the specific response to the advertising dollar -- tracking whether a user clicks on an ad and whether that clicking leads to an online purchase. <em><strong>I call it a solution because it lets the advertiser measure the extent to which advertising expense leads to increased sales</strong></em>. The closed-loop solution's ability to <strong>measure return on advertising</strong> is an enormous breakthrough for advertisers.</p>
<p>As everybody knows, Google's algorithm for linking tiny text advertising to Internet search has boosted the online advertising business. According to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117948955764907440.html?mod=hps_us_pageone">Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required], those search-related ads now account for 40% of the $20 billion U.S. internet ad market. And internet-ad sales overall have nearly tripled in the past five years -- to 7% of the $286 billion overall U.S. ad market -- up from 3% in 2002.</p>
<p>Moreover, Google's success is coming out of the hide of TV and newspaper advertisers. For example, in 2006 <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) cut its TV ad spending 15% to $1.38 billion and reduced its newspaper advertising 60% to $232.1 million. Meanwhile, GM's online spending rose 16% to $130 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Online ads' closed-loop solution</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/">Online ads' closed-loop solution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 May 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>24/7</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>closed-loop</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Net Profit</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>open-loop</category><category>Peter Cohan</category><category>PeterCohan</category><category>Real Media</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>TSFM</category><category>WPP</category><category>WPPGY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive goes back in time - to 1999]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aqnt.bmp" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Back in the 1990s, a group of online ad players -- like Mediaplex, DoubleClick and 24/7 -- sported multibillion dollar market caps. Of course, it did not take long for the bubble to burst.</p>
<p>Funny enough, the conventional wisdom was that we would never see these kinds of valuations again.</p>
<p>Well, never say never.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is going to pay $6 billion for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is buying DoubleClick for $3.1 billion.</p>
<p>We are going back to the future. So what does this all mean?</p>
<p>I had a chance to interview Dana Ghavami, who is the CEO of <a href="http://www.checkm8.com/">CheckM8</a>:</p>
<p><em>How about some background on your company?</em></p>
<p>CheckM8 has been in the business of online ad technologies for seven years. We service many leading online publishers and are backed by leading institutional investors, including SoftBank and CCI of Dentsu. The company is US-based, with offices in New York and R&amp;D facilities in Israel, in addition to sales and support offices in the UK, Spain, and Sweden. Customers include leading online publishers: <em>Business Week</em>, Nielsen, <em>Sports Illustrated</em>, Terra Networks, <em>Washington Post</em>, amongst many others. Our first product, called the Rich Media Manager, released four years ago, allows publishers to produce and manage premium ad formats for maximum-CPM opportunities online. Our flagship AdVantage product released two years ago allows publishers to manage their end-to-end ad, inventory, rich media needs in a single platform.</p>
<p><em>Does the Microsoft deal for aQuantive make sense in light of the high valuation?</em></p>
<p>We're looking at an industry that's going to drive $60B of advertising by 2010 and be the future medium of consumers and advertisers. So, if I had a major stake (like Microsoft) and the competition (Google) was one step ahead, I'd pull that kind of trigger too in hopes of having one of the seats at the small and priceless roundtable in the not-so distant future. These companies are looking at making multiples of what they're paying today in the foreseeable future.</p>
<p><em>Do you think we'll see more consolidation in the space, such as with ValueClick and private companies?</em></p>
<p>Very likely. However, the big media companies are increasingly looking for integrity and independence with their digital ad infrastructure and rapidly running out of options. At some point, there won't be enough established<br />and proven solutions to manage their critical needs and building their own solutions is not a practical option. Therefore, the need for reputable and trustworthy independent solutions will continue to exist.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the</em> Complete M&amp;A Handbook <em>and the</em> EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/">aQuantive goes back in time - to 1999</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899332/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>CheckM8:</category><category>Dana Ghavami</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT: Google</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive sale leaves ValueClick ripe for purchase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><p>I have been writing about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) for the past several months and thought that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) would buy them. It is, for a very hefty premium. Members of <a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/">my website</a> are thrilled as they got involved at $19 and MSFT is paying $66.50, or north of $6 billion in cash.</p>
<p>Who's next? With a garbage-like company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>) being bought for $650 million -- which proves the rising-tide-lifts-all-boats theory -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">VCLK</a>) is the last strong public player in the space. TFSM by the way is being paid a minuscule premium for its shares as compared to AQNT. My previous firm ThinkEquity Partners worked extensively with TFSM and they have been hoping for a buyer the past couple of years.That aside, VCLK is the one to focus on now.</p>
<p>ValueClick is headquartered in suburban Los Angeles and is a recognized leader in the website marketing/advertising/digital marketing sector, right behind AQNT. ValueClick is experiencing growth in the 30-35% sustainable range, similar to aQuantive. The most important factor is ValueClick is among the leaders in the new-age digital media space.</p>
<p>New-age digital media is a space that neither <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) nor Microsoft could master with their own research and development efforts -- they had to acquire it. Old-time advertising companies can play in the space around the fringes, but they do not have the necessary proprietary technology needed to dominate or impress their customers. They were buyers of the technology from ValueClick, aQuantive and DoubleClick.</p>
<p>The space is red hot and will continue so as traditional corporations keep moving bigger and bigger pieces of their advertising budgets to the internet. Congratulations to Microsoft -- they got this one right!!</p>
<p><em>Georges Yared is the CIO of </em><a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/"><em>Yared Investment Research</em></a><em> where he explores more growth stock ideas.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/">aQuantive sale leaves ValueClick ripe for purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>ValueClick</category><category>VCLK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$6.7M insider trading on aQuantive buyout?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aqnt.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Illegal insider trading has been rather active recently. When an offer was made for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Dow Jones</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DJ</a>) by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>), I mentioned some <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/3-4m-of-insider-trading-on-dow-jones-calls/">odd option activity</a>. It wasn't long before the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/">SEC was investigating</a> and a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/hong-kong-couple-accused-of-insider-trading/">Hong Kong couple was investigated</a>. Some estimates of the insider trading show that about 50% of buyouts and mergers have illegal activity. </p>
<p>This morning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) is up about 77% to 63.64 on a buyout from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>). It took me about 5 minutes to dig up some "unusual" activity. If you look at the June 40 calls (QBT FH) there is some "interesting activity."</p>
<p>A call option gives the purchaser the right (or option) to buy a stock at a set price. Each option contract gives the right to buy 100 shares of stock. For easy comparison to stock prices, option prices are always quoted in cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$6.7M insider trading on aQuantive buyout?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/">$6.7M insider trading on aQuantive buyout?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 11:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/6-7m-insider-trading-on-aquantive-buyout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive options</category><category>aQuantive, Inc.</category><category>Aquantive,Inc.</category><category>AquantiveOptions</category><category>insider trading</category><category>InsiderTrading</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>This morning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) announced that it's buying <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) for $6 billion, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/05/18/ap3735763.html">an 85% premium</a> to its market price. Why is this deal happening? To compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).</p>
<p>Last year my firm conducted a client-sponsored study of the email marketing industry. The top performing company in that research was AQNT. After interviewing the senior executives there, it became clear that email marketing offers a compelling benefit for a corporate advertiser -- the ability to measure return on advertising. </p>
<p>The reason Microsoft wants this ability is to help it compete with GOOG for online advertising dollars. That's because AQNT's technology enables companies to track what happens to their spam. Specifically, AQNT's Avenue A service targets emails depending on observed online behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/">Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>cookies</category><category>email</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>marketing</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft pays too much for aQuantive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is paying an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-aquantive-inc/n20070518080709990012">85% premium</a> to buy online advertising firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>). Yes, that's 85%. It is the price for being late to the dance.</p>
<p>After missing out on both DoubleClick and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>), Microsoft had few options left if it wanted a presence in the internet advertising brokerage business -- the intersection where markets buy ads and place them on websites. The companies in this business have huge amounts of data on internet use patterns.</p>
<p>So, Microsoft will pay about $6 billion for a company that had $143 million in revenue last quarter and an operating profit of $20 million. Doesn't Steve Ballmer keeps saying he won't over pay for anything? Before the DoubleClick deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), aQuantive sold below $30, so the real premium can actually be viewed as well over 100%.</p>
<p>Being so late, and paying so much is a huge strategic blunder, but it is the price for waiting</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/">Microsoft pays too much for aQuantive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-aquantive-inc/n20070518080709990012>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>24/7 real media</category><category>24/7RealMedia</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>doubleclick</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>tfsm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell 5-18-07: MSFT, AQNT, INTU, BAB, AAPL ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intu/" rel="tag">Intuit Inc (INTU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/bell-green.jpg" />Main market news <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-17-07-ge-plastics-and-earnings-brings-bulls-b/">here</a>.<br /><br /><strong>Microsoft Corp. </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) announced it is <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/18/technology/microsoft_aquantive/index.htm?source=aol_quote">buying online ad agency</a> <strong>aQuantive Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) in a $6 billion cash deal, in what could be argued as overpaying. The deal is for $66.50 a share, an 85% premium over Thursday's close for  aQuantive. It almost seems like a desperate move by Microsoft as it tries to follow the recent deals from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). AQNT shares are <strong>up 78.4%</strong> in pre-market trading (8:36 a.m.).<br /><br />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">VCLK</a>) <strong>jumped 8.5%</strong> in premarket trading  (8:41 a.m.) <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-online-advertisers/n20070518084009990003">following the deal</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas">Intuit Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas">INTU</a>) shares are <strong>up 11.11%</strong> in pre-market trading (8:09 a.m.) after it posted a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/intuit-3q-profit-surges-23-percent/n20070517215109990004">third-quarter profit surge of 23%</a>, cracking $1 billion in quarterly sales.  Excluding one-time charges, the company would have reported net income of $1.13 per share or revenues of $1.15 billion (a 21% jump compared to last year's period), beating the $1.08 per share average estimate by analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial and the $1.12 billion in expected revenues.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-airways-ads/bab/nys">British Airways</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-airways-ads/bab/nys">BAB</a>)  misbehaved and admitted to it. While reporting a net loss of 124 million pounds in its final quarter, the company revealed it has set aside 350 million pounds (US$690 million; &euro;510 million) to pay <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/british-airways-prepares-for/n20070518071909990002">possible fines for its admitted anticompetitive behavior</a>. The company discussed long-haul fuel surcharges with rivals. Investors, not surprising, weren't happy sending shares down 4% in London.<br /><br />AppleGate, that's what they now call the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/16/iphone-delayed-until-october-leopard-delayed-again-until-januar/"><em>false</em> reported delays in the iPhone</a>. <strong>Apple Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) shares have suffered a momentary lapse due to the report, wiping $4 billion in market cap before the stock recovered following the retraction. Engadget, our sister blog <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/05/17/regarding-yesterdays-apple-news/">responded to the allegations</a> against it. Not only that but Michael Arrignton of Techcrunch <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/05/17/applegate/">defended Engadget</a>'s decision to publish the story, and even bitter rivals Giszmodo <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/announcements/engadgets-response-to-applegate-261486.php">did</a>. There are still many unanswered questions regarding the original fake/false email that was sent. Some suspect that more than a harmless prank, it could have been an intentional foul play with vested interest in the outcome. It is eerily odd that a day after the false report, the FCC approval for the iPhone was announced and the stock rose nearly 2% and continues to <strong>gain another 0.9%</strong> in pre-market trading (8:24 a.m.).<br /><br />Green gets in your eyes? <strong>Exxon Mobil Corp.</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/18/news/companies/exxon.reut/index.htm?source=aol_quote">gave more than $2 million</a> in 2006 to groups, that  Greenpeace says, are global warming skeptics. Yet, ExxonMobil constantly tries to convince us it is becoming more climate-unfriendly. While the company cut its donations to such groups by more than 40% from 2005, it still funds about 40 "skeptic groups."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/">Before the bell 5-18-07: MSFT, AQNT, INTU, BAB, AAPL ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/before-the-bell-5-18-07-msft-aqnt-intu-bab-aapl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>aqnt</category><category>bab</category><category>goog</category><category>intu</category><category>msft</category><category>vclk</category><category>xom</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.stockwinners.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/stockwinners.jpg" alt="" /></a>Online marketing is a hot topic, but the Internet is a specialized medium and success in that arena requires expert help. One of the industry's best known practitioners is headquartered in Seattle, Washington.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) is a digital marketing services and technology company, which aims to help clients acquire, retain and grow customers across all digital media. Its Digital Marketing Services division provides Web site development, interactive marketing, creative development and branding. The Digital Marketing Technologies unit offers advertisers online campaign management, search engine marketing and Web site optimization tools. The Digital Performance Media segment buys blocks of online media advertising to resell on a targeted basis. The aQuantive client list includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Adobe Systems Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ADBE</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Kellogg Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">K</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">McDonald's Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MCD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Pepsico Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PEP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Procter &amp; Gamble Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Nike Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NKE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Walt Disney Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>).</p>
<p>The firm became the object of acquisition speculation, after <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) recently strengthened their respective Web positions by purchasing aQuantive digital marketing rivals. Client <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) has been mentioned as a possible suitor.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/">aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a</category><category>adbe</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>dis</category><category>fundamental analysis</category><category>FundamentalAnalysis</category><category>goog</category><category>k</category><category>mcd</category><category>momentum</category><category>msft</category><category>nke</category><category>pennant</category><category>pep</category><category>pg</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Schutts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tuesday Market Rap: CFC, RIMM, X &amp; CSCO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/csco.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The market spent most of the day in the red finally pulling into a mixed close. It was a reminder to some traders that the market can still go both ways. With the recent run-up we have seen and new highs and records being broken going back to 1927, one should remember caution as the market can go both directions and may be due for a correction soon.</p>
<p>The NYSE had volume of 2.7 billion shares with 1,309 shares advancing while 1,927 declined for a loss of 37.06 points to close at 9788.03. On the NASDAQ, 1.9 billion shares traded, 1,255 advanced and 1,779 declined for a small loss of 0.80 to 2571.75.</p>
<p>Stocks moving today included <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Countrywide Financial Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CFC</a>) which rose $2.77 (7%) to $41.28 as congress debates mortgage reforms. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Research in Motion</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RIMM</a>) moved up $6.93 (5%) to $146.76 on analyst comments. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AK Steel Holding Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AKS</a>) rose $2.96 (9%) to $35.02 on a takeover bid which lifted the industry. The bid helped <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">United States Steel Corporation </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> X</a>) gain $4.85 (5%) to $110.63. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) jumped $3.51 (12%) to $33.22 on earnings.</p>
<p>In options there were 4.6 million puts and 5.7 million calls traded for a put/call open interest ratio of 0.82. Among the most active options today were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PFE</a>) which saw heavy volume on the May 25 calls (PFEEE) with over 217,000 options trading. The June 22.50 calls (PFEFX) also traded over 37,000 calls and this unusually high option volume is likely due to the dividend PFE pays tomorrow. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Cisco Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CSCO</a>) options were active on the May 30 calls (CYQEF) and the May 27.50 calls (CYQEY) both moving over 65,000 options trading. The June 30 (CYQFF) strike was almost as active crossing on the June 30.0 with over 62,000 calls. There will be some disappointed option traders as CSCO is trading 5% lower in the aftermarket after reporting earnings.<br /><em><br />Kevin Kersten is an Options Analyst with </em><a href="http://www.investorsobserver.com/aolblogkk"><em>InvestorsObserver.com</em></a><em>. Do you have any deadwood in your portfolio? Check out the </em><a href="http://www.iotogo.com/18waysaola"><em>18 Warning Signs That Tell You To Dump A Stock.</em></a><em> <br /><br />Disclosure note: Mr. Kersten owns and or controls a diversified portfolios of long and short positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/">Tuesday Market Rap: CFC, RIMM, X &amp; CSCO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/tuesday-market-rap-cfc-rimm-x-and-csco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aks</category><category>aqnt</category><category>cfc</category><category>csco</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nyse</category><category>pfe</category><category>rimm</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>x</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
