<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Cablevision's Triple Play doesn't play]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-cablevision-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>Blending cultures is a particular challenge for advertisers. How do they appeal to one culture without offending others, who may misunderstand references and not recognize noted figures featured in ads? These are questions that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">Cablevision</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">CVC</a>) is probably asking. </p>
<p>To market its "Triple Play" offering (bundled cable, broadband, and telephone), the company hired <a href="http://www.globalworks.com/work_portfolio.asp?cablevision">globalWorks</a> to create ads featuring the music and stars of reggaeton. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggaeton">Reggaeton</a>, urban music that became popular with Latin American young people in the 1990s, is a fusion of Caribbean reggae and Latin forms such as salsa with rap and hip-hop.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ptlJYFWDfig&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ptlJYFWDfig&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Cablevision's Triple Play doesn't play</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/">Ads Gone Bad: Cablevision's Triple Play doesn't play</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-cablevisions-triple-play-doesnt-play/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>bad ads</category><category>cablevision</category><category>CVC</category><category>Daddy Yankee</category><category>Ramon Ayala</category><category>reggaeton</category><category>reggaeton ads</category><category>triple play</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Calvin Klein's amateur porno marketing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-ck-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a> </strong>series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>In 1995, Calvin Klein had clawed back from the verge of bankruptcy and was poised for expansion, hoping to jump into the top tier of mass-merchandised high fashion. Apparently, somebody forgot to tell the marketing department, which was happily rolling out yet another <a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,338077,00.html">over-the-edgy ad campaign</a>. When the offal hit the fan, it covered the whole company with a foul stench.</p>
<p>The campaign in question featured videos set up to resemble screen tests for low-budget skin flicks. Young men and women stood in front of cheap wood paneling, the kind one might find in the rec room of an 8mm director wannabe. These kids are interviewed by an unseen older adult, who asked them <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/107315?tid=relatedcl">provocative questions and made suggestive comments about their physiques</a>. </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vZVk21Pco-c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vZVk21Pco-c&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Calvin Klein's amateur porno marketing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/">Ads Gone Bad: Calvin Klein's amateur porno marketing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-calvin-kleins-amateur-porno-marketing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>Calvin Klein</category><category>PVH</category><category>WRC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Six Flags not so much fun]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>Thanks to our unfortunate history with slavery and the subsequent economic slavery imposed on minority Americans, we as a nation are very sensitive to charges of racism. So sensitive, in fact, that advertisers are often accused of such transgressions for the slightest intimation. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/six-flags-inc/six/nys">Six Flags</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/six-flags-inc/six/nys">SIX</a>), the amusement park chain, found this out recently.</p>
<p>The park created what I thought was a clever series of ads contrasting the humdrum routine of ordinary life with the thrills to be found at a Six Flags park. For example, one ad showed a lumpy teen attempting to dance, another a chortling woman teasing her cat with a laser pointer, both compared to gleeful coaster riders at Six Flags.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CPL6IIi5HeU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CPL6IIi5HeU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Six Flags not so much fun</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/">Ads Gone Bad: Six Flags not so much fun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1296618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/10/ads-gone-bad-six-flags-not-so-much-fun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>amusement parks</category><category>bad ads</category><category>bad advertisements</category><category>more flags</category><category>more fun ad</category><category>six flags</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Public Storage anti-semitic -- 'the worst ever']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/psa/" rel="tag">Public Storage (PSA)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>I have watched this controversial advertisement for the Public Storage Co. over and over and I take no offense. Spike has portrayed it as <a href="http://www.spike.com/video/for-your/2936021">the most anti-Semitic "worst ever"</a> commercial, but I do not see it that way. Given my father is a survivor of the Holocaust (Warsaw Ghetto and all) and I have grown up with many accounts of murderous atrocities and learned of, and experienced, many more anti-Semitic accounts, I think Spike is way off base with this one.</p>
<p> </p>
<embed width="448" height="365" quality="high" bgcolor="000000" flashvars="flvbaseclip=2936021&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.spike.com/efp" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" name="efp"></embed>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Public Storage anti-semitic -- 'the worst ever'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/">Ads Gone Bad: Public Storage anti-semitic -- 'the worst ever'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-public-storage-anti-semitic-the-worst-ever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ads</category><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>anti-semitism</category><category>bad ads</category><category>PSA</category><category>Public Storage</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>spike tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-go-daddy-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>In 2005, internet registrar GoDaddy.com made <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6930045/">advertising history</a> when its commercial showing a busty model struggling to keep her top on as she "testifies" before a group of politicians about the company's advertising plans proved too hot for the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>The spot was so racy and tasteless that Fox pulled it from its telecast of the game between the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles before it was shown a second time. How the network that brought the world such tasteful programs as "Married By America" had the nerve to pass judgment on GoDaddy is beyond me.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HhFMD6ybP2E&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HhFMD6ybP2E&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/">Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>Bob Parsons</category><category>Fox TV</category><category>godaddy</category><category>godaddy.com</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>Super bowl ads</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Miller Beer and Leather Week in SF]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>One day long ago I found myself standing in line at the unemployment office behind a man with a t-shirt that featured a version of Da Vinci's famous painting, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_supper">Last Supper</a>. However, in place of Jesus, Elvis sat in the center, surrounded, not by apostles, but country and western singers. Our society had been rather tolerant of <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://bp1.blogger.com/_JGjjFgv2WHE/RvvDyvzaCLI/AAAAAAAAAW0/6VUKdQHnaNQ/s400/fastfood-Supper.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://stray-thoughts--ruminations.blogspot.com/2007/09/last-supper-parodies.html&amp;h=259&amp;w=400&amp;sz=22&amp;hl=en&amp;start=6&amp;sig2=yhJehD_qbSszM2sLW70HaQ&amp;um=1&amp;usg=__m95kuf8CN3Evm_k3UrgF5shEKN4=&amp;tbnid=C8Z5Zt8yUc79XM:&amp;tbnh=80&amp;tbnw=124&amp;ei=EwG4SIyUMpjuiwGd-OGGAw&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlast%2Bsupper%2Bparody%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGLL_en%26sa%3DX">parodies of this iconic painting</a>, until the Folsom Street Fair went over the line, taking its sponsor, Miller Beer, with it.</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/56477019@N00/1409856773/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/folsomstreerfair.jpg" alt="" /></a>The San Francisco fair is the culminating event of "Leather Pride Week," and the poster advertising <a href="http://ponderingpastor.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/controversy-folsom-street-fair/">showed a group in Last Supper pose, garbed (scantily) in leather</a>, including dominatrix, a man in a leather dog mask, and many pec and bountiful bosoms. As you might imagine, the image didn't travel well beyond the SF city limits, and particularly offended the Catholic League, which launched a boycott of Miller Beer.</p>
<p>The League would not be appeased with a simple apology, either; it wanted contrition, for Miller to <a href="http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idCategory=33&amp;idsub=134&amp;id=11807&amp;t=Miller+beer+apologizes+for+supporting+gay+cause">issue a condemnation of the more unsavory activities</a> associated with the event. Miller moved quickly to remove its name from the poster and the event, and issued a statement, part of which read, "we are aware of other disrespectful activities, objects and groups association with or present at the fair which, like the promotional poster, violate our marketing policies."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Miller Beer and Leather Week in SF</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/">Ads Gone Bad: Miller Beer and Leather Week in SF</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1299120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-miller-beer-and-leather-week-in-sf/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>boycotts</category><category>Catholic League</category><category>Folsom Street Fair</category><category>Last Supper</category><category>Leather Pride Week</category><category>Miller Beer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Dog lovers not so fond of Verizon ad]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-verizon-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>Verizon made an ad this summer showing a guy scaling a junkyard fence to get his hands on an LG Dare phone, only to run into two junkyard dogs -- chained and snarling pit bulls. Pit bull lovers didn't like the casual depiction of animal neglect and cruelty. Animal rights groups have been working for a long time to stop people from <a href="http://www.helpinganimals.com/ga_chained.asp">chaining up dogs</a> in their yard, <a href="http://www.aspca.org/site/PageServer?pagename=cruelty_home">abusing them</a> and generally <a href="http://www.hsus.org/acf/">using them as a street weapon</a>.</p>
<p>Verizon at first <a href="http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2008/08/07/video-is-verizon-wireless-lg-dare-pit-bull-ad-sick/">insisted that it would keep running</a> the ad. Then concerned dog owners got the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals involved. PETA first tried to talk with Verizon and explain why the ad annoyed people: the dogs in the commercial had ears docked in a "fight crop" and pit bulls are the most abused breed of dogs. </p>
<p><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/f7hiUrTy6vU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/f7hiUrTy6vU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></embed></object></p>
<p>Verizon refused to meet to discuss the situation, PETA says. So they put out an <a href="http://getactive.peta.org/PETA/alert-description.html?alert_id=28214509">action alert</a>. After Verizon got <a href="http://blog.peta.org/archives/2008/07/victory_verizon.php">7,000 e-mails</a> from angry animal lovers, they <a href="http://advertising.about.com/b/2008/08/04/verizon-puts-leash-on-pit-bull-ad.htm">took down the ad</a>.</p>
<p><em>See other examples of <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/">Ads Gone Bad: Dog lovers not so fond of Verizon ad</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-dog-lovers-not-so-fond-of-verizon-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>advertising</category><category>animal</category><category>bull</category><category>cruelty</category><category>dog</category><category>junkyard</category><category>PETA</category><category>pit</category><category>pitbull</category><category>verizon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ckr/" rel="tag">CKE Restaurants (CKR)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-carls-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>In 2005, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc-united-states/ckr/nys">CKE Restaurants Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc-united-states/ckr/nys">CKR</a>) outraged both social conservatives and lovers of music at the same time when its Carl's Jr. chain hired Paris Hilton to shill its new Spicy Burger. It set a new standard of tastelessness that will be difficult to equal.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P82hABWq1To&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/P82hABWq1To&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Conservatives -- most Americans actually -- find the fact that Paris Hilton is famous at all to be a offensive. Her main claim to fame comes from her appearance in a now-infamous sex tape. The appeal of her one-time hit show <em>The</em> <em>Simple Life</em> eluded me, but hey, I was not the target demographic. I am a 40-year-old married guy so I can't speak to her numerous other enterprises, such as the perfume <a href="http://www.bizrate.com/search__cat_id--1__keyword--paris+hilton.html">Heiress</a>. Her single "<a href="http://www.parishilton.com/">Stars Are Blind</a>" was not as awful as I thought it would be, but maybe I have gone tone deaf listening to too many Elmo songs. Parents of toddlers will understand.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/">Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ads</category><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>advertising</category><category>Carls Jr.</category><category>CKE</category><category>Hardees</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Nike hyperdunks its tolerant image]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/punks_jump_up.jpg" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>Bloggers weren't kind to Nike's campaign for its Hyperdunk basketball shoes in late July. Three printed ads produced by Wieden+Kennedy were blamed as fostering anti-gay messages. <br /></p>
<p>Most of the ads depicted one basketball player dunking over another in vaguely homo-erotic positions (mostly with one player's face in the other's crotch) with 'trash talk'-type slogans such as "Punks Jump Up," "Say Hello," "That Ain't Right." The hot-button line was from a popular 1992 rap song, "Punks Jump Up to get Beat Down," by Brand Nubian. The song was a good theme for basketball courts but for one thing; its lyrics, which advocated violence against homosexuals and featured the line, "I ain't down with gays."</p>
<p>At first, Nike supported the ad campaign. But when bloggers took the shoe giant to task for its "ethical sloppiness," Nike and its ad agency backed off and decided to withdraw the ads "to underline our ongoing commitment to supporting diversity in sport and the workplace." </p>
<p>Nike's move coincided with an ad-industry-wide debate about the use of gay stereotypes. Mars, Inc. also pulled an ad during the same week based on its criticism from national homosexual groups.</p>
<p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/#poll19024">View Poll</a></p><br /></p>
<em>
<p><em>See other examples of <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong>.</em></p>
</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/">Ads Gone Bad: Nike hyperdunks its tolerant image</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1303043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-nike-hyperdunks-its-tolerant-image/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>hyperdunk</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: What did McDonald's think 'I'd Hit It' meant anyway?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-mcdonalds-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>As a 40-something trying -- but hopefully not too hard -- to cling to an increasingly tenuous understanding of current youth culture, I can imagine how McDonald's ad execs made the perilous mistake that landed them on our list of Ads Gone Bad.</p>
<p>It was probably a gathering of 40-something copywriters in a conference room in mid-town Manhattan. (I just finished reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Then-We-Came-End-Novel/dp/0316016381"><em>Then We Came to the End</em></a> by Joshua Ferris, so now I think I'm an expert in such things). They were no doubt tossing around the latest slang that might play off McDonald's winning slogan "I'm Lovin' It."</p>
<p>Someone threw out, "I'd Hit It," and everyone pounced on it as a sure winner. Perfect for banner ads on websites.</p>
<p>But did anyone dare ask what it actually meant?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: What did McDonald's think 'I'd Hit It' meant anyway?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/">Ads Gone Bad: What did McDonald's think 'I'd Hit It' meant anyway?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298439/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/ads-gone-bad-what-did-mcdonalds-think-id-hit-that-meant-any/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad parodies</category><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>banner ads</category><category>Id Hit It</category><category>Im Lovin It</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>McDonalds ads</category><category>MIT Brand Culture</category><category>Then We Came to the End</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Edison electrocutes Topsy the elephant]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><em><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-edison-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>At the start of the 20th century, two companies that would go on to dominate American industry were locked in a battle over which type of electrical current the country would embrace. The direct current (DC) champion in this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Currents">War of the Currents</a> was Thomas Edison and his company, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), while Westinghouse, now part of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), pushed AC, alternating current, made commercially viable by Nikola Tesla. </p>
<p>To make his case that DC was safer than AC current, Edison conducted a number of public exhibitions in which he <br />"Westinghoused" -- his term for electrocuted -- cats, dogs, and cows using AC. He also had constructed the first electric chair for New York, which was used in 1890 to attempt the execution of William Kemmler. Unfortunately, those in charge underestimated the current needed, resulting in what was described as a horrifying display of cruelty, leaving Kemmler alive but badly hurt.</p>
<p>Undisuaded, Edison continued his campaign of Westinghousing all sorts of mammals. Meanwhile, Coney Island's Luna Park was puzzling over what to do with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_(elephant)">its elephant Topsy</a>, who had killed three of her handlers in three years (one of whom had been trying to feed her a lit cigarette). When the ASPCA stepped in to protest plans to hang the animal, the owners struck on the idea of electrocuting Topsy. Edison made sure cameras were on hand to capture the tragic event on January 4, 1903 as <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/01/dayintech_0104">6,600 volts of AC dropped her in her tracks</a> He released the film under the title <em>Electrocuting an Elephant</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Edison electrocutes Topsy the elephant</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/">Ads Gone Bad: Edison electrocutes Topsy the elephant</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-edison-electrocutes-topsy-the-elephant/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>CBS</category><category>cbs corp</category><category>Edison electrocutes elephant</category><category>electrocuting an elephant</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>thomas edison</category><category>topsy the elephant</category><category>westinghousing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Dolce &amp; Gabbana proves (yet again) that sex sells]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-dolce-gabbana-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>One could question whether there could be an ad so controversial as to harm the fortunes of haute couture shops. Certainly, noted fashion house Dolce &amp; Gabbana has tested that hypothesis with <a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:http://www.watch-trend.com/watches-and-fashion/scandal-dolce-gabbana.html">an ongoing series of sex-charged ads</a>, one of which caused an Italian minister to <a href="http://soglamilicious.blogspot.com/2007/03/scandilicious-d-ad-scandal.html">accuse it of inciting gang rape</a>.</p>
<p>That particular shot, in which a nubile young lady is pinned down by her wrists by a virile male under the interested gaze of several other men, was singled out for its intimation of violence toward women. Other ads by B&amp;G have heavily <a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:http://www.watch-trend.com/watches-and-fashion/scandal-dolce-gabbana.html">homoerotic content</a>, and one, a tableau of soldiers posed around a particularly attractive male <a href="http://www.tempcity.com/bitchless/index.php?s=da9bb3a79096cc2cece543284b38ef40&amp;act=Attach&amp;type=post&amp;id=978">with a bullet hole in his forehead</a>, has even been <a href="http://www.tempcity.com/bitchless/index.php?showtopic=2805">thought by some</a> to play on the naughty joys of necrophilia.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vxsT0Rrrtws&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vxsT0Rrrtws&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Dolce &amp; Gabbana proves (yet again) that sex sells</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/">Ads Gone Bad: Dolce &amp; Gabbana proves (yet again) that sex sells</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1296616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-dolce-and-gabbana-proves-yet-again-that-sex-sells/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>bad ads</category><category>controversial ads</category><category>Dolce and Gabbana</category><category>Sears</category><category>sex and advertising</category><category>sex in advertising</category><category>SHLD</category><category>sleazy ads</category><category>when ads go bad</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: The Taco Bell Chihuahua]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yum/" rel="tag">Yum Brands (YUM)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-taco-bell-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>Restaurant giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yum-brands-inc/yum/nys">Yum Brands</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yum-brands-inc/yum/nys">YUM</a>) owns and operates several popular fast food chains like Pizza Hut, KFC, A&amp;W, and of course Taco Bell. The Taco Bell chain features lower quality, packaged ingredients, frozen meats, and poultry, and all at low prices. Fair enough, it's a fast food joint and the food overall is okay-to-good -- depending on one's mood!</p>
<p>The Taco Bell dog featured in the advertising campaign that ended in 2000 was a Chihuahua, an almost rat-like creature. Cute? Yes. Annoying? Yes. I know because my family has a Chihuahua we call Gracie! The Hispanic community felt that the Chihuahua represented an ethnic stereotype. The dog was voiced-over with a Hispanic accent and the implication was very clear. Many Hispanics were especially annoyed because they do not consider Taco Bell's food authentic "home cooking."</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8sZ1DWsAHE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M8sZ1DWsAHE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: The Taco Bell Chihuahua</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/">Ads Gone Bad: The Taco Bell Chihuahua</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1299324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/06/ads-gone-bad-the-taco-bell-chihuahua/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>Chihuahua</category><category>Taco Bell</category><category>Taco Bell dog</category><category>YUM</category><category>Yum Brands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-sales-genie-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>If Americans are sensitive about racial issues, it's not without reason. Consider the Trail of Tears, or slavery, or the internment of the Japanese during World War II, and it's clear that we've breached more than our fair share of ethical boundaries. But, judging by the reaction to a Salesgenie ad that aired during Super Bowl XLII in 2008, we've also come a long way.</p>
<p>If the upset victory pulled off by the New York Giants in that game was shocking, so was the approach taken by Salesgenie.com's marketing masterminds. The commercial in question featured a pair of talking cartoon pandas, complete with Chinese accents -- a married couple, to be exact, and the apparent proprietors of Ling Ling's Bamboo Furniture Shack. (<a href="http://www.mahalo.com/SalesGenie_Panda_Bear_Super_Bowl_Ad">Click here</a> to watch the ad.)</p>
<p>The storyline of the commercial is not too shocking: business is bad; nagging wife doesn't want to move back to the zoo; husband turns to Salesgenie.com for free sales leads; now, business is great! In other words, it's not nearly as appalling as some old, World War II-era Looney Tunes clips (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_km9IFzzHo&amp;feature=related">don't click here</a> if you're easily offended).</p>
<p>However, there was something distinctly off-putting about the Salesgenie pandas, with their broken English and their misspelled "Sofaz" sign. I remember seeing it myself and thinking, "Well, that's bold." It turns out the rest of the viewing public was equally unsettled, and the negative feedback was sufficient to result in the ad being <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/business/media/06adco.html?_r=1&amp;th=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;emc=th&amp;adxnnlx=1219964448-bZFOOx3cC/0As1IfNFI6Ww">pulled from the airwaves</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/">Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298499/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>commercial</category><category>infoGROUP</category><category>IUSA</category><category>pandas</category><category>racist</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>vinod gupta</category><category>VinodGupta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-snickers-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mars.com/global/Who+We+Are/Global+Structure/Global+structure.htm">Mars Inc.</a>, has made not just one, but two ad campaigns for its popular Snickers bar seem to sneer at gays. Mars, one of the biggest privately held, family-owned companies, makes many of the world's most popular candies: Snickers, M&amp;Ms, Twix, Starburst (along with Uncle Ben's Rice and pet food like Whiskas), but both of the ads gay rights groups found offensive were for the Snickers bar.</p>
<p>The first gay-themed Snickers ad made a big splash in Super Bowl XLI in 2007. Two mechanics get so wrapped up in eating the opposite ends of Snickers bar that their lips touch, prompting them to decide to "do something manly" lest they accidentally catch gayness -- so they pull their chest hair out.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjuXbYW6KmE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjuXbYW6KmE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/">Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>advertising</category><category>gay</category><category>homophobia</category><category>homophobic</category><category>mars</category><category>snickers</category><category>super bowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
