AlanMullaly posts
FeedPosted Jun 27th 2008 3:00PM by Georges Yared (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, Ford Motor (F), General Motors (GM), Toyota Motor Corp. (TM), Boeing Co (BA)
This post is part of my series featuring established companies and the smaller, more aggressive or innovative rivals that may eventually succeed them.
This may be perhaps the most surprising article in this series as few investors realize how huge Toyota Motors (NYSE: TM) is, especially when compared to Ford Motors (NYSE: F). Toyota sports a stock market valuation of $168 billion, 12 times the size of Ford's market cap of $13 billion. In fact, an even more surprising statistic: Toyota is 8 times larger than Ford and General Motors (NYSE: GM) combined!
Toyota has recently surpassed GM in annual unit sales of cars and trucks. Toyota sold over 9.3 million units in 2007 and has 16% market share in the United States. In spite of the difficult environment that all auto makers are facing with the economic slowdown, Toyota is poised for future growth with its cutting-edge line-up of hybrid autos and trucks. But, not too far behind Toyota is Ford. The company has perhaps a much brighter future than its main U.S. competitor GM. Ford has taken the necessary steps these past 21 months under the leadership of CEO Alan Mullaly. He was the president and CEO of Boeing's (NYSE: BA) commercial plane division.
Mullaly brings experience to Ford, but more importantly, he has a fresh approach and ideas from the aerospace industry. He has quickly retooled Ford by closing unproductive plants and expanding manufacturing in expense-friendly nations such as Mexico. Mullaly embraced hybrid technology and has positioned Ford as the American hybrid alternative to Toyota.
Continue reading The next Toyota is Ford
Posted Apr 24th 2008 1:22PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Ford Motor (F), Boeing Co (BA), Economic data

Shares of
Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:
F) are soaring today after the automaker reported the best kind of earnings -- an unexpected profit.
The automaker earned $100 million, or 5 cents a share, compared with a loss of $282 million, or 15 cents, a year earlier. Wall Street had expected the company to lose money. Revenue was $43.5 billion, up slightly from a year earlier. Excluding discontinued operations and one-time items, profit was $525 million, or 20 cents.
"The results of this quarter are encouraging, particularly our outstanding performance in Europe and South America," said CEO Alan Mulally i
n the earnings release. "We believe this is an indication that our
efforts to leverage Ford's global assets across the world will bear fruit."
Cost cutting certainly helped. The company's North American Automotive business had a pre-tax loss of $45 million, down from $613 million a year earlier, as it slashed $1.2 billion in costs. But that's still not enough, and the company knows it. More layoffs are looming,
according to the Detroit Free Press.
Continue reading Is the Ford turnaround for real?
Posted Jan 9th 2008 9:05AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Industry, Ford Motor (F), Economic data, Housing
The CEO of Ford (NYSE:F) may be the last to know. An economic downturn is likely to hurt car sales. The company stock is near a 20-year low. But Alan Mulally elected to state the obvious. "For us, any slowdown in the economy -- the housing industry, financing of vehicles, tightening of credit, housing starts -- it puts a lot of pressure on consumer confidence to buy big-ticket items," he told Reuters.
What Mr. Mulally did not say is that cutting production may not be enough to save Ford. With its shares near $6, it trades where it did about two years ago when there were rumors that the company might go bankrupt.
Ford may not have enough capital on hand to handle a sharp and prolonged recession in the US. Its market share is already down to about 15%, and there is no guarantee that Japanese competitors will show it any mercy.
While Ford is not likely to see protection from the courts, it may have to raise additional capital to cover losses. If so, the dilution could take the company's shares down much further.
Perhaps that is Mulally's real concern.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Posted Aug 6th 2007 11:52AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Rants and raves, General Electric (GE), Ford Motor (F), Home Depot (HD), Boeing Co (BA)
In Monday morning news that had me scratching my groggy head, BusinessWeek reports that fired Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) CEO -- and General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) alum -- Bob Nardelli is in charge of fixing Chrysler. If someone can explain to me why this makes sense, I would like to hear it.
That's because during his tenure as CEO, Nardelli systematically destroyed Home Depot's greatest strengths -- its expert sales staff and ability to supply products that customers needed in the stores. Moreover, he has no experience in the automobile industry, which depends heavily for its success on developing cars that consumers want to buy at a price they can afford.
Nardelli is not the first manager from outside the auto industry to be parachuted in to save the day. Consider Alan Mullaly, who was passed over for CEO of Boeing Company (NYSE: BA) for another GE alum, James McNerney. Mullaly took over at Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) in September 2006.
Continue reading Why did Cerberus ask fired Home Depot (HD) CEO Bob Nardelli to run Chrysler?
Posted Jul 26th 2007 8:45AM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: International markets, Earnings reports, Good news, Products and services, Ford Motor (F)
Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) actually made money in the second quarter, shocking Wall Street which had expected a loss. The automaker also confirmed media reports that may sell its Jaguar and Land Rover businesses.
The company made $750 million, or 31 cents per share, compared with a loss of $317 million, or 17 cents, a year earlier, its first profitable quarter in more than two years. Revenue rose 6% to $44.2 million. Wall Street had expected Ford to lose 35 cents on revenue of $37.5 billion. Click here for the earnings release, here for the Wall Street Journal story, and here for the Bloomberg News story.
Posted May 29th 2007 5:30PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: International markets, Deals, Management, Competitive strategy, Ford Motor (F), Private equity, Boeing Co (BA)
Though Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F) is denying media reports that its Volvo unit is for sale, I doubt that the company will hold onto the Swedish automaker for much longer.
BMW AG (FRA: BMW) signaled earlier this year that it would consider buying a stake in Volvo though its interest has apparently cooled lately, according to the Wall Street Journal. The reasons for the German automaker's change of heart aren't clear. Odds are good that the companies couldn't come to terms.
If BMW won't pay Ford's price for Volvo, other public and private buyers will in the not-too-distant future.
Ford Chief Executive Alan Mullaly would be glad to sell Volvo or other assets such as Ford Motor Credit though he's probably playing his cards close to the vest to try and not appear too much like a distressed seller like DaimlerChrysler AG (NYSE: DCX) did with the Chrysler sale.
Shares of Ford have climbed almost 12 percent this year on expectations that Mullaly will bring the automaker kicking and screaming into the 21st century. If people let the former Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) executive do his job, he'll do just that but it may take longer than people would like.
Posted Jan 25th 2007 8:00AM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Before the bell, Earnings reports, Bad news, Competitive strategy, Ford Motor (F)
Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) posted fourth-quarter results that were even worse than Wall Street's already-low expectations. In fact, on an annual basis the loss was $12.7 billion, or $6.79 per share, the worst in the company's 103-year-history.
The company's net loss widened to $5.8 billion, or $3.05 per share, from $74 million, or 4 cents, a year earlier, according to a press release. Revenue fell to $40.3 billion from $46.3 billion. Excluding one-time items, the loss was $2.1 billion, or $1.10. The results were worse than the $1.01 loss Wall Street analysts had expected though revenue came in ahead of the expectations of $34.67 billion.
The picture in North America was particularly ugly. The company posted a pre-tax loss of more than $2.8 billion in the quarter and $6.1 billion for the year. Sales plunged to $15.1 billion from $24.1 billion in the quarter. On a yearly basis, they plummeted to $69.4 billion versus $80.6 billion.
Investors weren't pleased with the results. They sent Ford's stock tumbling 10 cents to $8.10 in pre-market trading,
Under Chief Executive Alan Mullaly, Ford is cutting auto production and jobs to make the company more competitive. He doesn't mince words about the automaker's problems. Whether investors give him a chance remains to be seen.
Posted Nov 15th 2006 5:15PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Rumors, Products and services, Management, Industry, Ford Motor (F), General Motors (GM)

Top executives from General Motors, Daimler-Chrysler and Ford met with President Bush to discuss the state of the American auto industry in light of all the recent financial mishaps and
pension situations that continue to drain cash from the industry and starve it of profits, while foreign competition -- without all this baggage -- continues to design better-looking vehicles and sell their image of reliability more effectively than ever.
President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and other administration officials met in the Oval Office for just over an hour with top executives of Ford, General Motors, and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group yesterday to talk about what to do as U.S. automakers continue to face obstacles that don't make for a level playing field in a global automobile selling and manufacturing economy.
Execs from the "Big Three" told reporters they'd had a good meeting. Newly minted Ford CEO Alan Mulally stated "The president clearly understands the importance of the business to the United States and the global economy." The auto executives
heavily emphasized their concerns on health care and trade issues but also stated that the troubled American auto industry does not want a federal bailout like what has happened in the airline industry recently. If not, big solutions should be just around the corner.
Posted Sep 6th 2006 12:23PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Products and services, Management, Insiders, Consumer experience, Internet, Competitive strategy, Ford Motor (F), Employees

Bill Ford, Jr. was at the helm of the company his great-grandfather founded at the turn of the 20th century for five years. In that time the name "Ford" leading the company was not only a matter of pride for probably thousands of employees, but it carried some significance of ownership in the company from a founding relative. When
Jacques Nasser was booted Ford stood at a crossroads. Ford vehicles were perceived as unreliable, GM and the recent Daimler Chrysler were beating it to the punch, and Ford looked like a flailing giant.
Bill Ford restored much order and semblance to the American automaker, but even he was unable to completely correct so many problems with production techniques, marketing events, and stoic designs although progress was being made. Five years at the helm, in my opinion, was not enough time to literally try and re-invent the global automaker from one form to another. But Ford had a duty to shareholders who had significant holdings in the company and who wanted gains among other things. Nobody is in the market to lose, correct?
With an
outsider now coming in to lead Ford, will the internal Ford population be able to rally around the new leader and start making things happen faster? Ford is already changing with better marketing and designs from what I have seen. Although Ford needs to stay on its toes in the face of Toyota and even Nissan, with Carlos Ghosn being the Nissan leader extraordinaire that he is.
Alan Mullaly, Ford's new CEO, comes from a hefty background at Boeing. Industry-wise that seems like a good fit for an automaker. The question if is he can turn Ford around to a point where it is the first or second name off customer's tongues when a new vehicle is considered. Mullaly has the right attitude when he said this about what Ford will need: "a portfolio of automobiles that is world class and customers really want to have".