<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Did Google try to buy Twitter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" width="160" height="59" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SergeyBrin/">Sergey Brin</a> claims that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) didn't try to buy <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. The co-founder of the search engine giant <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/23/googles-brin-clears-the-air-sort-of-on-twitter/" target="_blank">made a surprise appearance</a> at Web 2.0 Thursday, where organizer John Battelle asked point blank if he'd made a move for the popular <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/microblogging/">microblogging</a> website.</p>
<p>Of course, Brin revealed his fluency in corporate speak, continuing, "But if companies approach us we definitely consider any opportunities to buy," <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/23/googles-brin-clears-the-air-sort-of-on-twitter/" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>. A denial doesn't always mean a denial, especially if there were agreements to keep negotiations confidential.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Did Google try to buy Twitter?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/">Did Google try to buy Twitter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19208514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>america online</category><category>aol</category><category>aol search</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john battelle</category><category>microblog</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search engines</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>tim armstrong</category><category>time warner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>web 2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/time-warner-media-logo-design.jpg" width="160" height="87" />Eventually, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) will just be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE58P1JK20090926" target="_blank">Warner Brothers, HBO, and Turner Networks</a>, says Gordon Crawford, managing director of The Capital Group. </p>
<p>Why does this guy's opinion matter? Well, his company is Time Warner's biggest shareholder. He sees the coming divestiture of <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a> (to which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> belongs) as part of a broader effort that will eventually include the sale of its print division.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/">Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19175280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>america online</category><category>aol</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine industry</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>publishing</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to Time Warner: Please buy your AOL stake back]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/aol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is hearing a margin call of sorts from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Google, which bought a 5% stake in AOL years ago for a cool billion, would like AOL's parent company to buy back this stake. Currently, Google's estimated stake is valued at under $300 million. In other words, Google will be the loser in this deal.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to Time Warner: Please buy your AOL stake back</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/">Google to Time Warner: Please buy your AOL stake back</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2009/02/02/daily61.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451055/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/google-to-time-warner-please-buy-your-aol-stake-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steve Case's Revolution Money offers lower fees to online merchants]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/revolution-money.jpg" alt="Revolution Money" />AOL founder Steve Case may have left <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and AOL, but he isn't out of the web space entirely. His latest venture, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSN2543203820070926?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=businessNews">Revolution Money</a>, promises to lower transaction fees on the Web. And he has an interesting new partner in the venture: his old friend, AOL.<br /><br />Revolution Money, still in its pilot stage, will let users transfer money to individuals and merchants for free through its Revolution MoneyExchange service. AOL will be a launch partner, and will allow users and customers to make payments and fund transfers through its AOL instant messaging service, AIM, for free. It will also offer RevolutionCard, a credit card with an interchange fee of 0.5%, which is below the average of 1.9% for other cards.<br /><br />The truth is that you and I will win from this venture because this will help drive fees down. The bad news is that as transaction fees move closer and closer to zero, so do the profit margins. Whether the margins are enough to keep these operations viable is an open question.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/">Steve Case's Revolution Money offers lower fees to online merchants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSN2543203820070926?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=businessNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/998440/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/revolution-money-steve-case-to-the-rescue-of-online-payments/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIM</category><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>Revolution Health</category><category>Revolution Money</category><category>Revolution MoneyExchange</category><category>RevolutionMoneyexchange</category><category>Steve Case</category><category>SteveCase</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and AOL sign browser deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/hewlett-packard-hp-hpq-logo.jpg"  alt="Hewlett Packard NYSE:HPQ logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) has inked a deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) AOL unit to install AOL's web browser start page, toolbar and search on HP personal computers sold worldwide. This may not sound like a big deal, but it is, since the vast majority of computer users never change the default start pages that load when their Internet Explorer web browser starts up. Having AOL's search engine, which is powered by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), as the default is a biggie as well. HP, after all, sells more desktop and laptop computers than any company on the planet at this time.<br /><br />AOL will use its custom "myAOL" homepage as the default website on all HP PCs, which will encourage new HP owners to use AOL's services like email, news, finance and weather. While some computer users complain of unwanted "bloatware" that ships on new PCs, the practice of providing new PC owners with default relationships to service providers such as AOL is likely to continue. <br /><br />Now, what is unanswered here is how this will affect <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/blog/2006/09/yahoo-inks-deal-with-hp-to-be-primary.php">HP's existing relationship</a> with internet portal <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) which has been in place for almost one year. Since HP did not make a single reference to this relationship, one must surmise that HP is dumping Yahoo! completely from its systems and replacing Yahoo!'s services with AOL's services. If that is the case, Yahoo! just earned a huge black eye and AOL came out very rosy. With HP competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) using Google services as the default on its PCs, this leaves Yahoo! in a tough position without a top-tier PC partner.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and AOL sign browser deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201807017>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/992106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/hewlett-packard-hpq-to-use-aol-on-new-pcs-but-where-is-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>default</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HP</category><category>HPQ</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>page</category><category>search</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New AOL software termed "badware" according to nonprofit watchdog group]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img id="vimage_2" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/img_americaonline_logo-(wince).jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />AOL, while making huge strides to change itself into a next-generation media company, must pay attention to details carefully these days. Sure, the <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3627546">company acted swiftly</a> in the light of customer data being released accidentally on the web, giving the company credibility on acting quickly -- an expectation that the net-connected world requires.<br /><br />AOL is making a huge change in its business model, as it recently announced that it would give away its services for free (no more $23.90 monthly bills) and make up the difference in advertising revenue. This was a pretty big bet -- but a needed one. AOL missed the boat completely by not investing in broadband Internet access until it was too late and the partnerships it did form fell on deaf customer ears. As a result, the company has been losing millions of dial-up Internet customers every year, taking revenues and profits away from the bottom line of Time Warner, AOL's parent company.<br /><br />So, has AOL's new "free access" software ready for prime-time? <a href="http://www.stopbadware.org">StopBadware.org</a> said Monday that it put the free version of AOL 9.0 on its "Badware Watch List" because it is bundled with several software programs -- including several media players, an AOL browser toolbar and an AOL "Deskbar" -- that are installed without proper disclosure or consent of users. <br /><br />Now, all in all, this software is not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware">malware</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyware">spyware</a> -- but without disclosing (easy to find, as well) that all this extra baggage would be installed as well as the newer AOL software, another hiccup has occurred that AOL could have avoided if someone was awake at the switch. In this case, no publicity (proper disclosure) would have been better than negative publicity (hard-to-find disclosures). AOL -- you're making great progress, but smaller details can sometimes come back to haunt you, as in this case.<br /><br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/">New AOL software termed "badware" according to nonprofit watchdog group</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B940755C9-960D-4A6D-A2F9-01D646F8BD5E%7D&amp;keyword=&amp;print=true&amp;dist=printTop>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/660690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/29/new-aol-software-termed-badware-according-to-nonprofit-watchdo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AOL should follow the Google ad model as it reinvents itself]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/aol_logo.gif" id="vimage_1" alt="" />With AOL having such a raft of announcements lately, what is the big strategy for the company? As it reinvents itself from a losing-proposition Internet access provider to a media and advertising company will advertising be able to make up for revenue generated by defecting customers over the long term? This is the billion-dollar question AOL execs must have had long staff meetings about recently. Yes, AOL will be able to survive by transforming itself now, but it <em>has to keep its customer eyeballs glued to its page</em>s.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/technet/10301945.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">Advertising that is relevant and hopefully unobtrusive</a> will accomplish this. Sound familiar? It's what I've said many times as the reasons for Google's advertising success where other large Internet companies have failed. Google's ad model of relevancy and presentation to the customer works -- it's a proven method. It also means something when Google invests $1 billion in AOL due to the lucrative advertising revenue it receives from AOL's customer base. That is one meaty customer base, in other words.<br /><br />Google's ad platform success is one that competitors Yahoo! and Microsoft are still, to this day, trying to duplicate. If AOL can do this and <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/technet/10301945.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">keep the lucrative customer and visitor base it has now</a> with its existing (but falling) customer base -- and recruit new customers -- it stands a good chance of making the leap from irrelevant Internet access and content provider to ad-supported content and free service provider.<br /><br /><font size="-0"><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000"><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/about-the-stock-bloggers-brian-white/" target="_blank"><em>Brian White</em></a><em> has worked in various executive positions in technology and telecommunications and now focuses on editing and writing.</em></font></font><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/">AOL should follow the Google ad model as it reinvents itself</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/technet/10301945.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/652091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/aol-should-follow-the-google-ad-model-as-it-reinvents-itself/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner investors keep the faith, at least for now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/dialup2.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" />With many media companies like Disney, ABC and even Comcast having stock parties as of late (shares have risen in the last six months), why hasn't TWX joined in on the fun? <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/20/commentary/mediabiz/index.htm">Time Warner shares have sunk 10 percent in the same period</a>, according to CNNMoney. That fact has some institutional investors thinking like Carl Icahn a little. They wonder if Time Warner should be split up to increase intrinsic shareholder value. For now, there is a nervous patience in the air. <em>For now...</em><br /><br />With Time Warner in the midst of a stock buyback program and with the looming takeover of some assets from bankrupt Adelphia cable company, are prospects looking up? Time Warner is making moves, but the drag on its shares continues to be AOL, which has just now starting to face up to the fact that the dial-up Internet access biz is drying up like a desert in Africa. It's 2006, and that kind of Internet access, in my opinion, died almost five years ago. <br /><br />AOL's mistake in not heading off that trend has mired it in issue after issue as it continues to re-invent itself. But as what? AOL may soon be giving away its access for free and making up the subscriber revenue difference with online advertising. That's a mighty risky move, but these are mighty risky times for AOL. It's a $2 billion bet that the company must make in my opinion to stop the slow bleeding of that arm of Time Warner. With the $1 billion investment recently from Google, AOL is lining up the efforts to make online advertising pay for, well, everything the company operates. Bold moves here, and I applaud them.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/">Time Warner investors keep the faith, at least for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/20/commentary/mediabiz/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/644995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/20/time-warner-investors-keep-the-faith-at-least-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can the BBC challenge entrenched companies like Google and AOL?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>According to this article at <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=409508&amp;in_page_id=2">ThisIsMoney.co.uk</a>, when the <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=409508&amp;in_page_id=2">BBC starts paying attention to you</a>, perhaps things are going well for what you are doing. With both AOL and Google in the cross hairs of the BBC (British Broadcasting Company), perhaps Europe is paying more attention to Internet firms that are in the midst of changing the world? I would say so. But how does the BBC plan on challenging Google and AOL --&nbsp;and in what ways with what tools?<br /><br />Without mentioning specifics, perhaps this is just brand <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=409508&amp;in_page_id=2">double-speak by the BBC chief</a>. He is correct in that the BBC brand is probably the only legitimate challenger to most of the American-based firms that are shaping and morphing the way people and businesses communicate in milliseconds across the globe. But with established brands such as Google and AOL, the fight to capture pieces of the business both companies now enjoy will be far from an easy affair, even for a large conglomerate like the BBC.<br /><br />Another nice piece of data here -- the BBC receives government subsidies that help it compete -- unfairly in many eyes -- with private companies. Even with that assistance, I highly doubt the BBC can easily challenge entrenched, global Internet companies like AOL and Google.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/">Can the BBC challenge entrenched companies like Google and AOL?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 May 2006 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=409508&amp;in_page_id=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/623515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/can-google-assist-with-the-possibility-of-the-bird-flu-spreading/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>BBC</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AOL hopes 'Saved' will be a 'Closer']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>TNT's is about to drop yet another original drama series on us. It's called <em><ahref="http://www.tnt.tv/title/?oid=2912">Saved</a></em>, and AOL products will be integrated into the actual show.</p>
<p><img height="171" alt="" src="http://www.rovix.com/images/tnt_logo.gif" width="160" /></p>
<p><em>Saved</em> will air Mondays at 10 p.m. starting June 12.&nbsp;The series launches with a commercial-freepremiere episode, sponsored by Quizno's and Dodge.</p>
<p>"Our integration with both <em>Saved</em> and [the TNT series] <em><ahref="http://alt.tnt.tv/tntoriginals/closer/">The Closer</a></em> -- an established hit -- allows us to tap into newaudiences and broaden our reach in a unique way," says Richard Taylor, senior vice president of brand marketingfor AOL. "We can showcase the value of AOL within the actual storyline, making it relevant to the characters'lives."</p>
<p>According to the press release, <em>Saved</em> focuses on a young, hip, directionless slacker named Wyatt Cole.Cole -- played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0779866/">Tom Everett Scott</a> (<em>Boiler Room</em>, <em>ThatThing You Do</em>) -- kicks around <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Portland,OR&amp;ll=45.523611,-122.675&amp;spn=0.037644,0.133209&amp;om=0">Portland, Oregon,</a> trying to figure out what to dowith his life and struggling to live in the shadow of his high-achieving parents. </p>
<p>The hook? He's a paramedic.</p>
<p>The catchphrase? "By saving other people's lives, he will be able to save his own."</p>
<p>I can only imagine how this one is going to work...</p>
<p><strong>SCENE</strong>: Burnside Bridge, Downtown Portland. Single-car auto accident. Cole is applying atourniquet.</p>
<p><strong>Cole</strong>: "I can't deal with all these pressures. They've been with me ever since childhood. Imean if only they'd placed PARENTAL CONTROLS on their expectations&nbsp;of me --"</p>
<p><strong>Auto accident victim</strong> [<em>suddenly coming back to consciousness</em>]: "You mean like thePARENTAL CONTROLS on AOL?!"</p>
<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/tnt-delivers-strategic-sponsorship/n20060427101709990019"></a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/">AOL hopes 'Saved' will be a 'Closer'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/tnt-delivers-strategic-sponsorship/n20060427101709990019>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/aol-hopes-saved-will-be-a-closer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America Online</category><category>AmericaOnline</category><category>AOL</category><category>Boiler Room</category><category>BoilerRoom</category><category>Burnside Bridge</category><category>BurnsideBridge</category><category>celebrity</category><category>Dodge</category><category>Parental Controls</category><category>ParentalControls</category><category>Portland</category><category>Quizno's</category><category>Richard Taylor</category><category>RichardTaylor</category><category>Saved</category><category>That Thing You Do</category><category>ThatThingYouDo</category><category>The Closer</category><category>TheCloser</category><category>TIme Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TNT</category><category>Tom Everett Scott</category><category>TomEverettScott</category><category>Wyatt Cole</category><category>WyattCole</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
