<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Northwest cancellations: Will NWA be grounded?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img width="156" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="172" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/northwest-air.jpg" /></a>Since it came out of bankruptcy two months ago, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northwest-airlines-corporation/nwa/nys">Northwest Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/northwest-airlines-corporation/nwa/nys">NWA</a>) has canceled a significant amount of flights because of a pilot shortage. Over 147 Northwest flights were canceled over the past weekend and more than 60 were canceled on Monday. By mid-day today, 30 more were grounded.<br /><br />While these recent cancellations don't compare to the 1,000 flights that were cut in June, Northwest failed to meet the industry's target of 98.0% completed flights. The numbers are also worse than Northwest's rivals' performances. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2007-07-23-northwest_N.htm"><span style="font-style: italic;">USA Today</span> reported</a> that Northwest's 76 cancellations Sunday totaled 5.6% of the day's flights. In comparison, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">American Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AMR</a>) cut six flights, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation-new/uaua/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation-new/uaua/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">UAUA</a>) canceled 33 and Delta (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DAL</a>) cut four. All provide more daily flights than Northwest.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Northwest cancellations: Will NWA be grounded?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/">Northwest cancellations: Will NWA be grounded?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/948122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/northwest-airlines-cancellations-will-nwa-be-grounded/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline cancellation rates</category><category>AirlineCancellationRates</category><category>american</category><category>amr</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>flight cancellations</category><category>FlightCancellations</category><category>inthenews</category><category>northwest</category><category>Northwest Airlines cancellations</category><category>Northwest cancellations</category><category>NorthwestAirlinesCancellations</category><category>NorthwestCancellations</category><category>NWA</category><category>uaua</category><category>united</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Virgin America enters U.S. airspace -- What does that mean for U.S. airlines?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><img style="WIDTH: 90px; HEIGHT: 65px" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/virgin-tail.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />As of today, there's a new airline in the skies: <a href="http://www.virginamerica.com">Virgin America</a>. That's right folks: British Billionaire Richard Branson has expanded his Virgin Atlantic fleet across the pond. The new San Francisco-based start-up will use a fleet of Airbus A320's to fly two routes: San Francisco to J.F.K in New York and San Francisco to Los Angeles International. <br /><br />While Virgin America will only open with those two routes, they plan on ramping its schedule fast. In the next three months, Virgin will add Las Vegas and Washington Dulles to the schedule and move up to a total 10 U.S. destinations a year from now. The fleet plans to service 30 destinations within the next five years. <br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Virgin America enters U.S. airspace -- What does that mean for U.S. airlines?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/">Virgin America enters U.S. airspace -- What does that mean for U.S. airlines?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/944745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/virgin-america-enters-u-s-airspace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>american</category><category>amr</category><category>ARM</category><category>branson</category><category>cal</category><category>continental</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>first class</category><category>FirstClass</category><category>fleet</category><category>flight</category><category>jblu</category><category>jetblue</category><category>lcc</category><category>LCCC</category><category>luv</category><category>reid</category><category>southwest</category><category>uaua</category><category>united</category><category>us air</category><category>US Airways</category><category>UsAir</category><category>UsAirways</category><category>virgin</category><category>virgin america</category><category>virgin atlantic</category><category>VirginAmerica</category><category>VirginAtlantic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadian dollars and American dollars: A peso for your thoughts.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p>There is a bit of glee circulating on the frozen tundra amid news that the Canadian dollar has hit the equivalence of 92.34 American cents, its highest point in 30 years. TD Securities Inc. chief currency strategist Shaun Osborne states that it is possible that the Canadian dollar could reach a value of .96 cents by June. Analysts agree that if commodity prices continue to rise, there stands a good chance that the two currencies would equalize. I say if that point is reached the two currencies should be immediately put into lockstep and our fluctuating currency exchange on our northern border should end forever. Could it be done? Yes, it could. Will it ever happen? Probably it won't.</p>
<p>Personally, I think the benefits would far outweigh the temporary disadvantages. Granted, I expect there would be quite a tussle in the commodities exchange for a time but that's a self adjusting system anyway. NAFTA paved the way for the "free flow" of goods and materials across our borders. Currency equalization would take the teeth out of much of the damage that tilted document has inflicted upon the American economy. I suspect that Canadian manufacturers might get just a little testy about the idea, but I believe that in the long run it would level the playing field for them as well as us. I also think it would give North America a lot more leverage in the world markets.</p>
<p>Economic idealists and world view visionaries already have a name for a singular North American currency. Do a web search for the word "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Amero">Amero</a>" and you'll spend the rest of your week reading about it. You'll receive every point of view you could ever imagine. Some say it would be the next step to the "One World Government," some say it would be a protectionist move. I say it's the most logical step toward stabilizing two very powerful yet unsteady economies. I see it as a grand statement to the rest of the world that there's still a force to be reckoned with over here pinned between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.</p>
<p>Then, if we could just annex Mexico... </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/">Canadian dollars and American dollars: A peso for your thoughts.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 May 2007 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/canadian-dollars-and-american-dollars-a-peso-for-your-thoughts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American</category><category>Amero</category><category>Canada</category><category>Canadian</category><category>currency</category><category>deficit</category><category>dollar</category><category>equalize</category><category>exchange</category><category>markets</category><category>Mexican</category><category>Mexico</category><category>peso</category><category>trade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BP receives approving nod from Department of Energy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a></p><p>A few days ago, the U.S. Department of energy has seen fit to throw its hat into a $40 million <a href="http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=3050551&amp;contentId=7030855">solar energy development project</a> launched by BP Plc ADS (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c-ads/bp/nys">BP</a>) BP Solar. A DOE Solar America Initiative grant of up to $7.5 million will be awarded to BP Solar for assistance in Phase 1 of the project. GreenProgress <a href="http://www.greenprogress.com/alternative_energy_article.php?id=687">reported</a> that BP America Chairman and President Bob Malone stated, "Our shared goal is to lower the cost and increase the supply of clean, renewable energy. BP is working with other companies, with leading research institutions and universities and with government... to make that possible."</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bpsolar.com/">BP Solar</a> program has identified a multi-tiered approach to making solar conversion to electricity a competitive adjunct to the current methods of producing electricity. BP seeks to increase the supply of solar grade silicon, reduce the amount of silicon required in the manufacture of solar panels and to increase the efficiency of those panels. BP also plans to pursue an aggressive program to reduce the costs associated with the manufacturing, distribution and installation of solar conversion equipment.</p>
<p> BP Solar President Lee Edwards is confident that the goals of the program can be fully realized, so that by 2015 solar produced electricity will be marketable in parity with electricity generated from other sources. BP seeks to reduce solar cell mass by 50% while at the same time increasing solar cell efficiency by 25%.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/">BP receives approving nod from Department of Energy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=3050551&amp;contentId=7030855>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/855547/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/19/bp-receives-approving-nod-from-department-of-energy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American</category><category>BP</category><category>BP Solar</category><category>BpSolar</category><category>conversion</category><category>DOE</category><category>Energy</category><category>grant</category><category>green</category><category>Initiative</category><category>progress</category><category>silicon</category><category>Solar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The economy is firm but changing: Listen to the railroads]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cme/" rel="tag">Chicago Merc Exch Hld'A' (CME)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rs/" rel="tag">Reliance Steel and Aluminum (RS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nem/" rel="tag">Newmont Mining (NEM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dow/" rel="tag">Dow Chemical (DOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jbht/" rel="tag">Hunt(J.B.) Transport (JBHT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/odfl/" rel="tag">Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL)</a></p><p>A brief look at railroad freight traffic numbers offers some tell-tale signs as to where our economy is heading. I like to review railroad loading statistics because they can give you a crystal-ball edge in guessing where the big money is leaning in the volatile economic food chain. Basically, right now the numbers are firm year over year, but the freight demographics are what I find interesting.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.aar.org/Index.asp?NCID=3958">Association of American Railroads:</a> Total rail freight volume is up 8.9% as compared to 2006, but while container volume is up about 14%, trailer volume is down 6.2%. That indicates that for the year so far, the railroads are probably moving more imported product than domestic product.</p>
<p>While total carload freight (not including inter-modal) was down nearly 1% this week as compared to the same week last year, total ton-miles increased 0.3%, indicating that less freight is moving but it is traveling more miles. That is clearly due to the decreasing inventories of manufactured product, which should bode well for manufacturers in the second and third quarters. That's assuming that consumer spending maintains current levels.</p>
<p>Nonmetallic mineral shipments have increased nearly 20% by volume over last year. This shows strength in base chemicals, base raw materials, glass, concrete, asphalt, industrial construction, and infrastructural improvements. Metallic ore shipments are down over 50%; I believe that shows weakness most especially in steel, tin, aluminum, and copper. Lumber and wood product shipments declined nearly 25% -- no reprieve for the home building market there! Petroleum product shipments are up 9.2% year over year, and coal shipments have increased 3.1%. Here's a tip, it looks like road building and resurfacing will be a big gainer this summer!</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The economy is firm but changing: Listen to the railroads</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/">The economy is firm but changing: Listen to the railroads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/855106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/18/the-economy-is-firm-but-changing-listen-to-the-railroads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aluminum</category><category>America</category><category>American</category><category>Canada</category><category>Canadian</category><category>coal</category><category>comodities</category><category>containers</category><category>copper</category><category>domestic</category><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>freight</category><category>imports</category><category>Mexican</category><category>Mexico</category><category>mining</category><category>railroad</category><category>railway</category><category>safety</category><category>shipping</category><category>steel</category><category>tin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's: airline stocks ready for takeoff?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a></p><p><img height="191" alt="american" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/101/257695003_a9c75f5712_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p>One thing about airline stocks: it's usually very good or very bad. Now, according to a cover story from <a href="http://www.barrons.com"><em>Barron's</em></a>, the sector may be very good.</p>
<p>Ironically, a big part of the puzzle is the wrenching problems over the years - such as union strife, security threats, rising energy costs, and intense competition from low-cost carriers. It's by going through restructurings - and bankruptcies - that airline companies end up in fairly good shape.</p>
<p>According to <em>Barron's</em>, the best values for shareholders may actually be the legacy carriers: US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE:LCC)<a href="http://www.usairways.com"></a>, <a href="http://www.united.com/">United</a> (UAL Corporation, NASDAQ:UAUA) and <a href="http://www.aa.com/">American</a> (AMR Corporation, NYSE:AMR). In fact, it looks like 2007 could see the highest profits in the industry's history -- as energy prices fall, travel continues to grow and capacity is stagnant.</p>
<p>There is also the potential for M&amp;A activity. One scenario is a merger between Delta Air Lines, Inc. (OTC:DALRQ) and Northwest Airlines Corporation (OTC:NWACQ). And, as I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/united-airlines-in-play/">wrote</a> about in BloggingStocks, there may be a deal with United.</p>
<p>True, if the economy slips into recession, things are likely to turn negative for the airlines. But, so long as this does not happen - and energy prices remain stable - investors may get a pleasant surprise.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/">Barron's: airline stocks ready for takeoff?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/barrons-airline-stocks-ready-for-takeoff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Airlines</category><category>American</category><category>Barron's</category><category>United</category><category>US Airways</category><category>UsAirways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
