<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Budweiser" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/bud240.jpg" />Teams have been preparing their game plans and it's time to see which of the 60 teams will win. No, not the <a href="http://www.packers.com/">Packers</a> or <a href="http://www.steelers.com/">Steelers</a> -- Go Pack! -- but PepsiCo (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>), Anheuser-Busch (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-inbev-sa-nv/bud/nys">BUD</a>), General Motors (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-mtrs-co/gm/nys">GM</a>) and all the other companies competing for the best spots in one of TV's most expensive marketing moments, costing an estimated $3 million dollars per 30 second spot.</p>
<p>For those not into football, the ads in the Super Bowl game can be more amusing than the game itself as advertising teams compete for attention, show their best efforts and even get rated by numerous <a href="http://superbowl-ads.com">online sites</a>. Last year, Doritos (owned by PepsiCo), and E-Trade (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) did well, and Anheuser-Busch seems to always have a Clydesdale horse in the running.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/">Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19829949/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1984 Macintosh ad</category><category>AAPL</category><category>advertising</category><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>Apple</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BUD</category><category>Budweiser</category><category>Budweiser frogs</category><category>Chevy</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Doritos</category><category>E-Trade</category><category>E-Trade babies</category><category>ETFC</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Godaddy.com</category><category>Justin Bieber</category><category>KO</category><category>Mean Joe Green ad</category><category>PEP</category><category>PepsiCo</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>Super Bowl commercials</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: The World Cup and Video Replay]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/vuvuzela240.jpg" alt="World Cup FIFA" />So, I am not much of a soccer fan. I far prefer football to soccer (you know, having played and coached football). That said, I was sucked into the World Cup thanks to national pride. I watched the U.S. lose to Ghana and beat Algeria; but I also watched the referee blow a call against Slovenia, forcing the game into a tie.</p>
<p>I said, I am not a huge soccer fan; but it sure seems that this World Cup is fraught with refereeing problems.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: The World Cup and Video Replay</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/">JockStocks: The World Cup and Video Replay</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19536824/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/jockstocks-the-world-cup-and-video-replay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american football</category><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>BUD</category><category>fifa</category><category>fifa world cup 2010</category><category>football</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nike</category><category>referee</category><category>referees</category><category>soccer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sam Adams May Lose 'Artisan Beer' Label]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tap/" rel="tag">Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/samadams.jpg" alt="" />In the business world, there's rarely a thing as growing too big. But unfortunately for Sam Adams brewer Boston Beer (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-boston-beer-company-inc/sam/nys" class="inlinked">SAM</a>), the price of success could be higher costs and the loss of its label as an "artisan" craft beer.</p>
<p>That's not to say a cold bottle of Sam Adams Summer Ale will taste any different to consumers. But according to the <a href="http://www.brewersassociation.org/pages/business-tools/craft-brewing-statistics/market-segments" target="_blank">Brewers Association</a>, "artisan" brewers include small outfits that put out less than two million barrels of suds a year. That means the brewer that almost single-handedly sparked interest in smaller batch brews with more flavor could be pushed into the same category as the big beer vendors like Anheuser Buch Inbev (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-inbev-sa-nv/bud/nys" class="inlinked">BUD</a>) and Molson Coors (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/molson-coors-brewing-company/tap/nys" class="inlinked">TAP</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sam Adams May Lose 'Artisan Beer' Label</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/">Sam Adams May Lose 'Artisan Beer' Label</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19516829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/sam-adams-may-lose-artisan-beer-label/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>beer</category><category>boston beer</category><category>bud</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sam adams</category><category>samuel adams</category><category>tap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Reeves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[7-Eleven's Brewing Ambitions No Threat to Budweiser, Coors or Miller]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/7-eleven-sign.jpg" />A couple of days ago, my colleague Jeff Reeves took a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/" target="_blank">7-Eleven's decision to enter into the beer game</a>. Yes, 7-Eleven -- the sultan of Slurpees, the high priest of week-old hot dogs, the convenience king -- is going to throw its proverbial hat in the ring, looking for your beer bucks.</p>
<p>I did not know this, but 7-Eleven is the third-largest beer retailer in the United States. Perhaps my ignorance is born from the fact that there are no 7-Elevens in my hometown.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>7-Eleven's Brewing Ambitions No Threat to Budweiser, Coors or Miller</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/">7-Eleven's Brewing Ambitions No Threat to Budweiser, Coors or Miller</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19448440/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/7-elevens-brewing-ambitions-no-threat-to-bud-tap-sbmry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-Eleven</category><category>7-Eleven beer</category><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>breweries</category><category>brewery</category><category>BUD</category><category>Game Day Beer</category><category>KR</category><category>Molson-Coors</category><category>private label</category><category>private label beer</category><category>SAB Miller</category><category>TAP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[7-Eleven Private Label Beer May Drain Big Brewers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tap/" rel="tag">Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/beer-head.jpg" />Though by some estimates, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jon_markman/articles/consumer-spending-gd-txt-ita.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=investorplace">consumer spending has topped its 2008 peak (really!)</a> there is no denying that many businesses are still offering rock-bottom prices to lure shoppers out of their shells. You can now add convenience store chain 7-Eleven to the list.</p>
<p>The company just announced that it will be offering a lower-priced private label beer in an effort to connect with Americans looking for a cold brew this summer. The label is called "Game Day," and will be produced by City Brewing of Wisconsin -- a facility that joined up with Boston Beer (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-boston-beer-company-inc/sam/nys">SAM</a>) in 2007 to craft its flagship Sam Adams lager.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>7-Eleven Private Label Beer May Drain Big Brewers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/">7-Eleven Private Label Beer May Drain Big Brewers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19444644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/7-eleven-private-label-beer-may-drain-big-brewers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alcohol</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>beer</category><category>boston beer</category><category>bud</category><category>featured</category><category>inbev</category><category>inthenews</category><category>molson coors</category><category>sam</category><category>sbmry</category><category>tap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Reeves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/superbowl-logo.jpg" />Who's ready for some football? The Super Bowl is this weekend, and you know what that means -- commercials that we will all be talking about on Monday morning. In fact, we all know someone who says they watch the game for the commercials.</p>
<p>CBS announced earlier this week that it <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/inc/quickread/e3i5b66cf410765355130f4355ab772b5b7?KeepThis=true&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=310&amp;width=600" target="_blank">sold out all the in-game spots</a>, but a few pre- and post-game spots remained. How much money did this make for CBS (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>)? Roughly $200 million, and that is a low-end estimate. We all know why advertisers flock to the Super Bowl, as more than 98.7 million viewers tuned in last year. No matter who is in the Super Bowl, people watch the game and the commercials -- and eventually they may buy the products from the ads.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/">JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>BUD</category><category>Budweiser</category><category>CBS</category><category>Doritos</category><category>DPS</category><category>Dr Pepper</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>GoDaddy.com</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsico</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>super bowl advertising</category><category>Tim Tebow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Super Bowl Ads: Only Three Left!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/cbs-logo-240.jpg" />Despite the media slump that's been running alongside the worldwide <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a>, CBS (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys" target="_blank">CBS</a>) isn't having any trouble moving ad space for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SuperBowl/">Super Bowl</a>. </p>
<p>The event is still more than a month from now, but the network reports having only a few commercial slots left for the big game. In fact, 95% of its 62 slots have moved, even with two of the most committed Super Bowl advertisers -- Pepsi (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys" target="_blank">PEP</a>) and General Motors (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-motors-corp-1-5percent-prf-ser-d/grm/nys" target="_blank">GRM</a>) -- bowing out of the action. The first half is already sold out completely.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Super Bowl Ads: Only Three Left!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/">Super Bowl Ads: Only Three Left!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19301551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/super-bowl-ads-only-three-left/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ad sales</category><category>advertising</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>careerbuilder.com</category><category>CBS</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>General Motors Corp.</category><category>gm</category><category>grm</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KO</category><category>media</category><category>PEP</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>super bowl commercials</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AB InBev hangs on to Beck's brand ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1133/1323928867_4e7484dc50.jpg"><img hspace="4" height="163" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/1323928867_4e7484dc50_m.jpg" alt="Beck's beer" /></a>First brewed in 1873, Beck's beer is crisp, fresh, and "full of character." It's also still part of the growing AB InBev family. Anheuser-Busch InBev, which is of course the Belgian-based parent of Anheuser-Busch (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-inbev-sa-nv/bud/nys">BUD</a>), has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/11/28/business/business-us-anheuser-busch-inbev-becks.html?_r=1">abandoned plans</a> to sell the German beer brand to Bain Capital. <br /><br />According to a German magazine, citing financial sources, this was really an eleventh-hour decision, as the contracts were already drawn up and Bain had secured $2.54 billion in financing. <br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AB InBev hangs on to Beck's brand </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/">AB InBev hangs on to Beck's brand </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/11/28/business/business-us-anheuser-busch-inbev-becks.html?_r=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19257959/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/ab-inbev-hangs-on-to-becks-brand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>anheuser-busch inbev</category><category>Anheuser-buschInbev</category><category>Bain capital</category><category>BainCapital</category><category>becks beer</category><category>BecksBeer</category><category>bud</category><category>buyouts</category><category>inbev</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Anheuser-Busch to introduce new beer and plenty more commercials to combat slumping sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bud-anheuser-busch-logo.jpg" width="160" height="154" alt="" />I saw a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124991999282619827.html">story in <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>last week discussing what is being called a "rare" slump for Anheuser-Busch InBev. The company saw volume sales fall for Bud Light for the first time in the beer's 27-year history. Dollar sales of Bud Light dropped 2.5% (compared to a year earlier) in the U.S. during the 13 weeks that ended on July 12. Volume sales were 5.5% lower.</p>
<p>So, what can Bud do to rev up sales? How about a new advertising campaign with more than 15 new television commercials and new retail displays. When the American football season begins, the new ads will inundate our television screens and it will further the beer's "Drinkability" campaign that began a year ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Anheuser-Busch to introduce new beer and plenty more commercials to combat slumping sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/">Anheuser-Busch to introduce new beer and plenty more commercials to combat slumping sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19132508/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/anheuser-busch-to-introduce-new-beer-and-plenty-more-commercials/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>Anheuser-Busch Inbev</category><category>beer</category><category>Bud</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light beer</category><category>Miller</category><category>MillerCoors</category><category>Select 55</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Merger of beer giants all comes down to Rochester]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a></p><p>Who knew that the fate of world beer would one day be in the hands of the beer faithful in Rochester, New York? The tastes of this blue-collar town, along with neighbors Syracuse and Buffalo, are key in the pending acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) by Belgian giant InBev, SA. The three cities make up half of the U.S. consumption of Labatt Blue and Labatt Blue Light. Due to the popularity of Labatt brews and Budweiser brands in upstate New York, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122668923731229023.html?mod=testMod">U.S. Justice Department worries that beer prices might rise in Rochester</a>.</p>
<p>So, if the acquisition is to be approved, giving Europeans control over America's iconic beer brands, InBev is being asked to sell the Labatt USA subsidiary. Other major InBev brands, including Stella Artois, Becks, and Bass, are not considered competitive enough in any markets to reduce competition between beers and provide upward pressure on prices.</p>
<p>Nope, it all comes down to Rochester and its surprisingly European tastes. Who would have thought?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/">Merger of beer giants all comes down to Rochester</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1372795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/merger-of-beer-giants-all-comes-down-to-rochester/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>beer</category><category>bud</category><category>budweiser</category><category>inbev</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labatt</category><category>merger</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>rochester</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: How safe were BRK, BUD, PG, SO, &amp; UPS?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/budweiser_brian_teutsch.jpg" alt="" />The stock market was down yesterday and it is down again today. Bearish sentiment is roaming through Wall Street right now, so I thought I would look back on another occasion when the market was going through similar turmoil and I wrote about the following eight stocks, which I thought would be "safe havens" in such a storm.<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>Six of the eight did well and two did not, and of course one of those two was a disaster. Among the losers, I do not think anyone is fretting about UPS, which is still one of the few triple-A rated companies along with Berkshire Hathaway. It has been well reported that the slowing economy and higher fuel prices have been the major culprits affecting UPS's earnings. In the case of WaMu, it's demise has also been well reported, but at the time I recommended it WaMu had a stellar reputation of growth and high yield for over two decades. There is no hiding, it turned out to be a lousy pick and an ANTI-SAFE Haven<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p><strong>NOT SAFE:<br /></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys"><strong>United Parcel Service</strong></a> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys">UPS</a>)</strong> closed Monday at $65.30 <strong>down</strong> from $78.40; <strong>a 16.71% loss</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"><strong>Washington Mutual</strong></a> <strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>)</strong> closed Monday at $4.21 <strong>down</strong> from $45.50; <strong>a 98% loss.</strong><br /></p>
<p>Fortunately the remaining six picks have done very, very well. If you had bought the pool, the average gain over the last two years would have been 7.14%. Adding the dividends over the two years would have raised this to 13.14%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: How safe were BRK, BUD, PG, SO, &amp; UPS?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/">Serious Money: How safe were BRK, BUD, PG, SO, &amp; UPS?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1288481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/19/serious-money-how-safe-were-brk-bud-pg-so-and-ups/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>BUD</category><category>featured</category><category>PetroChina</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>PTR</category><category>Safe Havens Stocks</category><category>SafeHavensStocks</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>SO</category><category>Southern Company</category><category>SouthernCompany</category><category>United Parcel</category><category>UnitedParcel</category><category>UPS</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WaMu</category><category>washington mutual</category><category>WashingtonMutual</category><category>WM</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[InBev-Anheuser-Busch transaction will create an M&amp;A hangover?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a></p><img width="130" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="75" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/bud.jpg" alt="" />For hungry Wall Street investment bankers, the $45 billion merger of InBev and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Cos.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) is a nice relief. Yes, it means lots of juicy fees.<br /> <br />Another <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aGKsL_c2cuWQ&amp;refer=news">big winner</a> is Busch IV (the CEO of Anheuser). Apparently, he is negotiating a consulting agreement that may exceed $10 million (there will be a $120,000 monthly retainer through December 31, 2013). <br /><br />But according to a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSLD37752920080814">piece</a> in Reuters, the transaction may have a dark side. Simply put, it hasn't been easy to raise the debt financing. As a result, this may crowd out some of the financing of other M&amp;A deals.<br /><br />The high rates on the InBev financing is likely to push up other debt costs on other pending transactions. What's more, there will be a flood of bond issuances on the market, which will put further pressure on the debt markets.<br /><br />In other words, we may see a slowdown in M&amp;A activity for the rest of the year -- except for those buyers that have substantial balance sheets.
<p><em><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli">Tom Taulli</a> is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.mergerbook.com">MergerBook.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/">InBev-Anheuser-Busch transaction will create an M&amp;A hangover?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSLD37752920080814>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1286988/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/18/inbev-anheuser-busch-transaction-will-create-an-manda-hangover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>bud</category><category>inbev</category><category>MA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[M&amp;A activity back on the rise thanks to foreign companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p>New data from <a href="http://www.dealogic.com/">Dealogic</a> shows that July was the fifth straight month of growth in U.S. mergers and acquisitions activity -- and the highest total since a year ago.</p>
<p>But it's not quite as good as it looks. The data is skewed upward by <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D929OEPG0.htm">foreign bids for American companies</a> like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">Genentech</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">DNA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) and, according to the Associated Press, "the rise in M&amp;A ... more likely reflects foreign companies taking advantage of the weak dollar than it does a loosening of credit."</p>
<p>But from an investors' perspective, the cause of the increase probably doesn't really matter. Deep value investors <a href="http://www.tickerspy.com/member.php?pid=29278&amp;mid=-1173334&amp;refer=1291Y2&amp;pg=5">like Mohnish Pabrai</a> have been struggling to post strong returns of late, in part because the private equity funds that could be relied on to buy undervalued companies a couple years ago have brought their U.S.-based activity to a hault.</p>
<p>But now the foreign companies and sovereign wealth funds are in the game and, from an investors' perspective, that's just as good -- whoever will buy undervalued public companies at a premium will boost returns. The low price-book, low price/earnings, contrarian investment strategies that haven't worked lately could be ready to start working again, just as they have historically.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/">M&amp;A activity back on the rise thanks to foreign companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273498/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/manda-activity-back-on-the-rise-thanks-to-foreign-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Acquisitions</category><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>BUD</category><category>contrarian investing</category><category>Dealogic</category><category>DNA</category><category>Genentech</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MA</category><category>Mergers</category><category>Mohnish Pabrai</category><category>value investing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spokesperson fiasco #14: Slowhand pukes on Michelob]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a series on celebrity spokespeople who ended up doing serious harm to the brands they were hired to promote, or vice versa. See how we rank the 20 top spokesperson fiascos.</em></p>
<p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/endorsement-eric-clapton-200cs071508.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In 1987, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) was featuring renown musicians such as Stevie Winwood and Phil Collins in a "The Night Belongs to Michelob" ad campaign. I'm sure the ad hacks in charge thought they'd had a stroke of genius when they conceived of using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Clapton">Eric "Slowhand" Clapton</a>, performing <a href="http://www.retrojunk.com/details_commercial/6626/">his hit "After Midnight", as part of the series</a>. 1 a.m., guitar god, and Michelob; seems like a natural, right?</p>
<p>I can't help but think that someone should have checked on Clapton's habits before launching the ad. Having fought well-publicized heroin addiction and a taste for cocaine, Clapton revealed to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/10/17/8358063/index.htm">Rolling Stone that at the time of the ad's release he was in a detox facility</a>. Battling alcoholism. His nights belonged to imaginary snakes rather than dirty-dancing runway models.</p>
<p>My suggestion? I'd steer clear of junkies as spokespersons, unless I was selling needles, smack or size 0 dresses. The image of spokespeople puking their guts out doesn't make me yearn for a beer.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/top-celebrity-spokesperson-fiascos">Read the entire series</a></em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/">Spokesperson fiasco #14: Slowhand pukes on Michelob</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1256351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after midnight</category><category>AfterMidnight</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>eric clapton</category><category>EricClapton</category><category>michelob</category><category>rock star</category><category>rock star spokespersons</category><category>RockStar</category><category>RockStarSpokespersons</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If the dollar was stronger would BUD buy InBev?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/buddog.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />We have posted numerous articles about the acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys"> BUD</a>) by InBev (NV) and it now looks like<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2008/07/14/2008-07-14_anheuserbusch_being_sold_to_inbev_for_52.html"> the deal has been done at a price of $70 per share. </a>However, what made this deal work for InBev might have been that the dollar has fallen so far.<br /><br />The exchange rate between the dollar and Euro gives InBev a 30% to 35% discount making the acquisition price <em>seem like a great deal </em>for BUD shareholders but an even better one for InBev shareholders. And if the the currency exchange rates shift back over time then all the shareholders win.<br /><br />This means that Americans will be answering to the <strike>Dutch</strike> Belgians. If the dollar had gained against the Euro instead of becoming weaker is it possible that Anheuser-Busch (BUD) would have bought out InBev (NV)? If the dollar stays down or drifts lower as seems likely right now look for more M&amp;A activity from abroad.<br /><br />In the mean time, since 'my pal Warren', is the largest shareholder of BUD through <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) and supports the deal, will he remain a shareholder of the new company? No doubt this increases the value of Berkshire, but does this set the stage for Buffett to enter the European market in a big way?<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. <em>He writes the columns </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/"><em>Chasing Value</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/"><em>Serious Money</em></a><em>. Disclosure: I own shares of BRK.B.<br /></em></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/">If the dollar was stronger would BUD buy InBev?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1254999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/if-the-dollar-was-stronger-would-bud-buy-inbev/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>BUD</category><category>dollar</category><category>featured</category><category>inbev</category><category>inbev nv</category><category>InbevNv</category><category>mergers and acquisit...</category><category>MergersAndAcquisit...</category><category>mergersandacquisitions</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bye Bye Bud]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a></p><p><img width="201" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="235" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/anheuser-busch.jpg" alt="" />It's official -- a company that has stood for generations of Busch's as an icon of the American beer industry is no more. <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-anheuser-inbev.html">Reuters</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-anheuser-inbev.html">Anheuser-Busch</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-anheuser-inbev.html">BUD</a>) has accepted a $50 billion offer to be acquired by InBev. Reuters reports that the combined company will be called <em>Anheuser-Busch InBev.</em></p>
<p>I have been watching advertisements from Anheuser-Busch for years and I think they have been the most entertaining around. InBev is known as an aggressive cost cutter and it's not clear whether these ads will continue into the future. One thing that would not surprise me in the least would be for the Busch family -- whose sons have run the place for generations -- to take their money and leave the business.</p>
<p>With Abu Dhabi buying Manhattan's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/nyregion/10chrysler.html?em&amp;ex=1215921600&amp;en=cb21def68246a02e&amp;ei=5087%0A">Chrysler</a> building last week, it will be interesting to see what other American icons get sold off to the highest global bidder before the next president takes office.</p>
<em>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p>
</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/">Bye Bye Bud</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1254279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/13/bye-bye-bud/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>inbev</category><category>inbev nv</category><category>inbev-budweiser</category><category>inbevnv</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option Update: Anheuser-Busch volatility flat; InBev increases offer to $70]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /><strong>Anheuser-Busch</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) is recently trading at $66.50 in pre-open trading, above its close of $61.21. <br /></p>
<p>The <em>WSJ </em>reported InBev has increased its offer to $70. <br /></p>
<p>BUD July and August option implied volatility of 26 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price movement. </p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com<br /></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/">Option Update: Anheuser-Busch volatility flat; InBev increases offer to $70</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1252544/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/option-update-anheuser-busch-volatility-flat-inbev-increases-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>bud</category><category>inbev</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: U.S. considering government takeover of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Rick Wagoner, the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), hit out against allegations that the auto maker may soon file for bankruptcy and said he believes the company's financial position will "remain robust" for the rest of the year. Wagoner also said, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121573308128544183.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported, that the company has no plans to sell or reduce more of its brands.</li>
    <li>An independent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) would be better for the world, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) CEO Eric Schmidt said and the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a125210-4ef7-11dd-ba7c-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported. Yahoo! will be able to create more competition in the search market and other advertising markets if it stays independent, Schmidt contended.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to people briefed on the plan, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/business/11fannie.html?ref=business"><em>New York Times</em></a> reported that senior Bush administration officials are weighing a plan to have the government take over either <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Federal National Mortgage Association</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>), or Fannie Mae, or  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>), or Freddie Mac -- or both -- and place them in a conservatorship if their problems continue or worsen.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/business/worldbusiness/11anheuser.html?ref=business"><em>New York Times</em></a> also reported that people briefed on the matter said <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) is in active talks to sell itself to InBev in a friendly deal, despite previous hostility to the idea. One person said InBev indicated it may be willing to pay more than the $65 per share originally offered.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/">Newspaper wrap-up: U.S. considering government takeover of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1252467/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-u-s-considering-government-takeover-of-fanni/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anheuser</category><category>anheuser busch</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>AnheuserBusch</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>InBev</category><category>Rick Wagoner</category><category>RickWagoner</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Anheuser-Busch (BUD) sues InBev, what's next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bud-anheuser-busch-logo.jpg" />It seems that not a day goes by without some news regarding one of the largest deals Wall Street is following intently these days, InBev's $46 billion hostile takeover bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Cos Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>).<br /><br />Not long ago, Reuters <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-07-08T182124Z_01_N08277534_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-ANHEUSERBUSCH-INBEV-SUIT-DC.XML">reported</a> that Anheuser-Busch filed a suit Monday against InBev NV, calling the brewer's takeover attempt an "illegal plan and scheme" to acquire Anheuser "at a bargain price."<br /><br />It isn't surprising the Budweiser maker has filed a suit. Only last week, when A-B <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/anheuser-busch-vs-inbev-ready-for-a-bar-brawl/">officially rejected InBev's $46 billion offer</a>, the latter filed a suit of its own as well as launched a proxy battle, filing a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/inbev-to-file-consent-solicitation/rfid119222918">consent solicitation</a> with regulators seeking to replace Anheuser's board. Anheuser's suit seeks an injunction to stop InBev's attempts to replace its board. Anheuser says it wants first to make sure certain alleged false and misleading statements are fixed.
<p>From the <a href="http://www.unusualactivity.com/files/AB-InBev.pdf">lawsuit</a> (pdf file) it seems that some of the misleading statements Anheuser is complaining about have to do with InBev's financing possibilities and its plans for the company once it is taken over. I don't normally read litigation documents, but the language here seems quite strong with allegations even of rumor mongering. Judge for yourself:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Anheuser-Busch (BUD) sues InBev, what's next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/">Anheuser-Busch (BUD) sues InBev, what's next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1249231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/anheuser-busch-bud-sues-inbev-whats-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>bud</category><category>buffett</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>icahn</category><category>inbev</category><category>msft</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama opines on Anheuser-Busch sale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/barack-obama.jpg" />With Belgian-Brazilian InBev seeking to take over <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>), it's hard to see why it would have political ramifications: if BUD's shareholders and board determine that it's in their best interests to sell, isn't that a corporate decision? And don't politicians have better things to opine on?<br /><br />Apparently not. Democratic Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssBeveragesBrewers/idUSWBT00934320080707?dbk">told</a> Reuters that "I do think it would be a shame if Bud is foreign-owned. I think we should be able to find an American company that is interested in purchasing Anheuser Busch if in fact Anheuser Busch feels that it's necessary to sell."
<p>I'm an Obama supporter, but I'm not sure what the point is in wading into this one. Public companies have a responsibility to shareholders to be agnostic when it comes to foreign takeovers -- if that produces value, that's what they should do. When Barack Obama uses the pronoun 'we' to describe the strategic direction of a public company, I start to get a little worried.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama opines on Anheuser-Busch sale</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/">Obama opines on Anheuser-Busch sale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssBeveragesBrewers/idUSWBT00934320080707?dbk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1249080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/obama-opines-on-anheuser-busch-sale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>BUD</category><category>InBev</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:26:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
