<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Market not so scary any more ... or is it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a></p><p>Ninety days have passed since I posted<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/14/scary-market-any-safe-stocks/"><strong> </strong><font color="#0b497a">Scary market -- any safe stocks?</font></a> and <a title="View Still scary market -- more SAFE HAVENS on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/17/still-scary-market-more-safe-havens/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">Still scary market -- more SAFE HAVENS</font></a><font color="#0b497a">. </font></p>
<p>When I wrote these original posts the market was on shaky ground with higher fuel prices, interest rate uncertainty, housing market questions, common summer market doldrums, and concerns about upcoming earnings reports, consumer spending, and inflation. Well, we made it through this valley of worry with fuel prices declining, interest rates stabilizing, employment and consumer confidence robust, and reported earnings primarily to the upside. The stock market has been riding this wave upward with the DJIA hitting news highs.</p>
<p>I revisited the stock suggestions I made in these posts after thirty days and decided to continue to track them. I believe in some level of accountability if one is blabbing (or blogging) about a subject, and especially since I have been writing for the Blogging Stocks site. All of the stocks have moved up in the last sixty days, but since my original posts in July, the share prices of six have moved up and two have gone down. I have not changed my mind about any of these companies or their stocks during this period. </p>
<p>We considered buying some more United Parcel Service, Inc. (NYSE:UPS) and did not; we added to our position in the Southern Company (NYSE:SO) instead, which has done well, and Huaneng Power International, Inc. (NYSE:HNP) which has done even better; see: <a title="View GOOG is OK but HNP could be better! on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/02/goog-is-ok-but-hnp-could-be-better/" target="_blank"><font color="#0b497a">GOOG is OK but HNP could be better!</font></a> </p>
<p>They are listed in the order I mentioned them in my earlier posts.</p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</strong> (NYSE:BRK.B) closed Tuesday at $3,560 <strong>up</strong> from $2,995.</p>
<p><strong>Washington Mutual, Inc. </strong>(NYSE:WM) closed Tuesday at $43.00 <strong>down</strong> from $45.50.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market not so scary any more ... or is it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/">Market not so scary any more ... or is it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/690786/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/15/market-not-so-scary-any-more-or-is-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser Busch (BUD)</category><category>AnheuserBusch(bud)</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B)</category><category>BerkshireHathaway(brk.b)</category><category>Petro-China (PTR)</category><category>Petro-china(ptr)</category><category>Proctor and Gamble (PG)</category><category>ProctorAndGamble(pg)</category><category>Safe Investments</category><category>Safe Stocks</category><category>SafeInvestments</category><category>SafeStocks</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Southern Company (SO)</category><category>SouthernCompany(so)</category><category>United Parcel Service (UPS)</category><category>UnitedParcelService(ups)</category><category>Value Investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>Wal-Mart (WMT)</category><category>Wal-mart(wmt)</category><category>Washington Mutual (WM)</category><category>WashingtonMutual(wm)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[692 years strong: Citi, BUD, AT&amp;T, JNJ, &amp; UPS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a></p><p>This is <strong>my 100th story</strong> so it has sentimental value since I am not a writer by training. When I accepted a BloggingStocks position I was not sure I would be able to work it into my schedule, much less whether anyone would even care about what I had to say. But so far, so good. </p>
<p>I wanted my 100th post to have some meaning so I have decided to write about companies that have withstood the test of time. We are rapidly closing in on 2007 and United Parcel Service will be celebrating its 100th anniversary. In 2007 the cumulative histories of these five diversified companies will total 692 years of business success. Most of the histories have been gathered from other sites which I have included for those who want to learn more.</p>
<p><a name="top" href="http://www.ups.com/content/corp/index.jsx"><img width="56" height="71" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.ups.com/img/glo_ups_brandmark_v2.gif" alt="UPS" /></a></p>
<p><strong>United Parcel Service Inc. (NYSE:UPS) Started in 1907.</strong></p>
<p><a name="top" href="http://www.ups.com/content/corp/index.jsx"></a></p>
<span style="font-style: italic;">In 1907 there was a great need in America for private messenger and delivery services. To help meet this need, an enterprising 19-year-old, James E. (Jim) Casey, borrowed $100 from a friend and established the American Messenger Company in Seattle, Washington. According to accounts given by Jim there were quite a few messenger services already in the Seattle area, some of which he had worked for in the past.</span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>692 years strong: Citi, BUD, AT&amp;T, JNJ, &amp; UPS</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/">692 years strong: Citi, BUD, AT&amp;T, JNJ, &amp; UPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/699866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/692-years-strong-citi-bud-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser Busch (BUD)</category><category>AnheuserBusch(bud)</category><category>Citigroup (C)</category><category>Citigroup(c)</category><category>Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson(jnj)</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>United Parcel Service</category><category>UnitedParcelService</category><category>UPS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GOOG still FASCINATING: 90-day update on equivalency test]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p>Yes, Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) is still one of the most fascinating companies in the world, <strong>commanding a high price and superstar investor status.</strong></p>
<p>Google remains in the news with multiple stories broadcast on the web each day, and everywhere else: bonding with Apple (AAPL) and Time Warner (TWX), challenging Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo (YHOO), and eBay (EBAY), scaring newspapers and publishers, adding features to their line of products and services, getting tangled up in litigation here (<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_40/b4003001.htm">Click Fraud</a>) and abroad (<a title="View Google relents and posts Belgian court ruling on its website on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/google-relents-and-posts-belgian-court-ruling-on-its-website/" target="_blank">Google relents and posts Belgian court ruling on its website</a>), analysts speculation about GOOG's future share value and all this is just a partial accounting.</p>
<p><strong>90 days ago</strong> I posted <a title="View 10 Reasons I think Google is going down on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/21/10-reasons-i-think-google-is-going-down/" target="_blank"><strong>10 Reasons I think Google is going down</strong></a><strong>:</strong> and the following was reason number 10. This recap and update tracks current values holding myself accountable for my comments.</p>
<p><em>10. <strong>Does not pass the equivalence test.</strong> </em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GOOG still FASCINATING: 90-day update on equivalency test</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/">GOOG still FASCINATING: 90-day update on equivalency test</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/670913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/goog-still-fascinating-90-day-update-on-equivalency-test/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser Busch (BUD)</category><category>AnheuserBusch(bud)</category><category>Apple (AAPL)</category><category>Apple(aapl)</category><category>Black and Decker (BDK)</category><category>BlackAndDecker(bdk)</category><category>equivalency test</category><category>EquivalencyTest</category><category>Federal Express (FDX)</category><category>FederalExpress(fdx)</category><category>Google (GOOG)</category><category>Google(goog)</category><category>Harley Davidson (HOG)</category><category>HarleyDavidson(hog)</category><category>Intuitive Surgical (ISRG)</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical(isrg)</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Starbucks (SBUX)</category><category>Starbucks(sbux)</category><category>Time Warner (TWX)</category><category>TimeWarner(twx)</category><category>Yahoo (YHOO)</category><category>Yahoo(yhoo)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:56:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
