<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Bulls Start the Week Off (CBOE, BP, LCC, FDX, VZ, IBM, GENZ)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Stocks were set to close almost at the highs of the trading day based upon a continued hope of solid earnings and a mixed housing market picture. Expected news also drove anticipations for the week.<br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow Jones 10,525.43 +100.81 (0.97%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,115.01 +12.35 (1.12%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,296.43 +26.96 (1.19%) <br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/07/26/top-analyst-upgrades-downgrades-aep-cedc-cboe-el-intu-kmb-pten-sny-slb/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Bulls Start the Week Off (CBOE, BP, LCC, FDX, VZ, IBM, GENZ)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/">Closing Bell: Bulls Start the Week Off (CBOE, BP, LCC, FDX, VZ, IBM, GENZ)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19569187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/closing-bell-bulls-start-off-teh-week-cboe-bp-lcc-fdx-vz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air travel</category><category>antitrust</category><category>CBOE</category><category>eu</category><category>FDX</category><category>GENZ</category><category>IBM</category><category>LCC</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Simon Properties Still Wants a Piece of GGP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="SPG makes another offer for GGP" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/ggp-logo.jpg" />Earlier this year, General Growth Properties Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-growth-properties-inc-de/ggp/nys">GGP</a>) <a href="http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/02/15/daily34.html">rejected a $10 billion buyout</a> offer from rival Simon Property Group (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/simon-ppty-group-inc-new/spg/nys">SPG</a>), but Simon Property is not giving up completely. Wednesday Simon Property announced it would up <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZb5L7DNTi3hKVVpXra86u9R7HUwD9F32CRO0">its offer to $10 per share for GGP</a> in exchange for 25% of the company.<br />
<br />
The offer that was quickly rejected a couple of months ago placed a $9 value on GGP stock, and rose some anti-trust concerns.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Simon Properties Still Wants a Piece of GGP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/">Simon Properties Still Wants a Piece of GGP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19440228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/simon-properties-still-wants-a-piece-of-ggp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>BPO</category><category>Brookfield Asset Management</category><category>buyouts</category><category>General Growth Properties</category><category>GGP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>malls</category><category>real estate</category><category>shopping</category><category>Simon Property Group</category><category>SPG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/giants-patriots.jpg" alt="" />I was checking out one of my favorite blogs yesterday (<a target="_blank" href="http://uniwatchblog.com">UniWatchBlog.com</a> - operated by the obsessive Paul Lukas) and I found myself with a subject for this week's JockStocks. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2010/01/14/nfls-latest-idea-psls-for-supreme-court-hearings/">Is the NFL a monopoly</a>? Should the league be exempt from the Sherman Antitrust Act? </p>
<p>This all stems from a suit by a company known as American Needle, <a target="_blank" href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/antitrust-case-has-implications-far-beyond-nfl/?scp=2&amp;sq=american%20needle&amp;st=cse">which sued the NFL in 2000</a> when the league selected Reebok to be the exclusive provider of licensed NFL apparel. American Needle sued the NFL, stating that the Reebok deal violated antitrust statutes becasue the league and Reebok "conspired to stifle competition and inflate prices." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/">JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Needle</category><category>antitrust</category><category>antitrust exemption</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>antitrust lawsuit</category><category>featured</category><category>monopoly</category><category>NFL</category><category>Reebok</category><category>Sherman Anti-Trust Act</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/amd_logo-200x150.jpg" />Advanced Micro Devices (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) soared to a new annual high Thursday morning after the chipmaker <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/business/nation/story/1329542.html">settled its antitrust case</a> against rival Intel (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>). Under the terms of the agreement, Intel will shell out $1.25 billion to AMD, and will abide by a new set of rules for conducting business. The pact also includes a renewed cross-license agreement between the two chip titans.</p>
<p>In prepared comments, AMD CEO Dirk Meyer called the settlement a game-changer. "We are optimistic that it will usher a new era for our industry," he said. "We recognize that it will take time for people to understand how the operating conditions in the processor business have changed. But make no mistake -- they have changed."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/">Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advanced Micro Devices</category><category>AMD</category><category>annual high</category><category>antitrust</category><category>Dirk Meyer</category><category>featured</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="186" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/intel-logo-blue.jpg" />The latest litigation has <em>Intel Inside. </em></p>
<p>The State of New York is going after <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) over antitrust allegations. State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is accusing the largest chip manufacturer in the world that it is <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33620538/ns/business-us_business/">trying to secure a global monopoly</a> for microprocessors. <br /></p>
<p>For several years, Cuomo said that Intel has pushed the likes of <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) to agree to the exclusive use of Intel's gear in exchange for billions of dollars in payments. The hefty cash outlays have given what Cuomo called a "stranglehold" on the market.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/">Cuomo guns for Intel on antitrust</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33620538/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19224425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/cuomo-guns-for-intel-on-antitrust/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andrew cuomo</category><category>AndrewCuomo</category><category>antitrust</category><category>attorney general</category><category>AttorneyGeneral</category><category>dell</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hpq</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/intc-intel-logo.jpg" alt="Intel Anti Trust" />Chip maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) had some embarrassing emails published today by the European Union that show the company may have been <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/eu-gives-details-of-intels-sales-tactics/479694">strong arming its customers</a> into buying its products over competing chip makers.<br /><br />The emails were part of the evidence that led to a record EU fine set against the company last May of $1.45 billion, when it was determined that the company had used strong-arm sales tactics in its competition with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Designs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/">Some Intel (INTC) sales tactics exposed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19168471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/some-intel-intc-sales-tactics-exposed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>chip maker</category><category>ChipMaker</category><category>chips</category><category>Dell</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>HPQ</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>scandals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/orcl-oracle-logo.jpg" alt="" />On Thursday morning, European Union regulators announced the <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/eu-probes-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/653913">launch of an antitrust probe</a> into U.S. software maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) takeover of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a>. The regulatory group believes that the deal could lead to higher prices and limited choice for database software. Approval from this group is considered the main stumbling block for the deal, which has cleared the Department of Justice in the United States.</p>
<p>The final decision has a deadline of 90 days, or January 19, 2009. By this date, the European Commission can decide to clear or to block the deal. More often than not, the Commission will force companies to make changes that would eliminate any concerns over antitrust regulations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/">EU investigating Oracle's bid to buy Sun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19149698/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/03/eu-investigating-oracles-bid-to-buy-sun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>european commission</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanCommission</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>featured</category><category>regulations</category><category>regulatory</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/gavel.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>Christine A. Varney heads up antitrust at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofJustice/">Department of Justice</a>, and she's going hunting. She is the point person for a group consisting of the presidential administration and some Congressional <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Democrats/">Democrats</a> that is looking to put the breaks on large companies in several industries. </p>
<p>Already, airlines have run into roadblocks when requesting relief from antitrust regulations. Varney &amp; Co. are digging into complaints by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/att/nys" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/att/nys" target="_blank">ATT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys" target="_blank">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys" target="_blank">VZ</a>) that cable competitors - e.g., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys" target="_blank">Cablevision</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys" target="_blank">CVC</a>) - have locked them out of the market for cable company-produced programming. </p>
<p>(Imagine that, a phone company complaining! Usually, they're the objects of derision.)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/">Antitrust orgy coming: Airlines, tech and others in sights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32149153/ns/business-the_new_york_times/page/2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19109832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/antitrust-orgy-coming-airlines-tech-and-others-in-sights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>AntitrustLaw</category><category>antitrustregulations</category><category>att</category><category>cable television</category><category>CableCompany</category><category>cablevision</category><category>cablevisionsystems</category><category>cox communications</category><category>CoxCommunications</category><category>cvc</category><category>democrats</category><category>department of justice</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>obama administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>president barack obama</category><category>PresidentBarackObama</category><category>telecom</category><category>telecommunications</category><category>vz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Visa, MasterCard settle with Discover, but what about Morgan Stanley?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><p>Credit-card concerns <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">Visa, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) will be shelling out up to $2.75 billion to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-credit-card-cos-settle/rfid153033948">settle an antitrust suit</a> with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">Discover Financial Services</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">DFS</a>). Specifically, MasterCard will pay Discover $862.5 million in the fourth quarter, while Visa will fork over $1.89 billion over the course of 2009. Following the release of the settlement's details, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods is weighing in favorably on all three firms.</p>
<p>Sanjay Sakhrani called the news "a big win for Discover, as it provides an additional cushion to contend with the implications of a weaker U.S. economy." He expects the payments will add about $1.75 to Discover's earnings per share. However, he also cited the report as an upside catalyst for MasterCard and Visa, as it eliminates an overhang on shares of both companies -- an assertion supported by analyst Julio C. Quinteros, Jr., of Goldman Sachs.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, though, it's not all sunshine and rainbows in the credit-card group today. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) has filed its own suit against Discover in New York State Supreme Court, alleging that it's <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/mastercard-visa-settle-with-discover/">entitled to a chunk</a> of the $2.75-billion settlement. DFS was spun off from Morgan Stanley last year, and the latter company claims that it should receive a portion of the award under the terms of a special dividend agreement.</p>
<p>Not so fast, says Discover, which alleges that its parent company is in violation of their spinoff agreement, and "the amount of Morgan Stanley's special dividend is a matter of dispute." Morgan fired back that "there is absolutely no basis for Discover's claim that the agreement was breached." Stay tuned to see how this credit-card drama plays out -- in early trading, shares of all three credit card companies were higher.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/">Visa, MasterCard settle with Discover, but what about Morgan Stanley?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1355003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>credit card</category><category>CreditCard</category><category>DFS</category><category>Discover Financial Services</category><category>DiscoverFinancialServices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>ma</category><category>Mastercard</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>settlement</category><category>V</category><category>Visa Inc</category><category>VisaInc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple (AAPL) iTunes loses artists - an antitrust problem?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/itunes.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Since <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>)'s iTune virtually rules the music download business, it is not surprising that some people in the music industry would challenge its dominance from time to time. One of those times is now.</p>
<p>Artists are beginning to realize that the iTunes process of selling individual songs is hurting their album sales. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121987440206377643.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "Label executives, managers and artists chafe against the iTunes policy that prevents them from selling an album only." Indeed, some artists like Kid Rock have stayed away from iTunes and their sales have done quite well.</p>
<p>The plan of selling music without iTunes is only likely to last so long. Apple's 99-cents-per-song format has proved irresistible to most customers. Bands that make a great deal of money may be able to risk staying off iTunes, but if they have one or two albums that do poorly, they will come back.</p>
<p>Perhaps the only way that labels and artists will break Apple's hold on music is to bring an antitrust suit. Apple does control enough of the market to make a case. Who knows?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/">Apple (AAPL) iTunes loses artists - an antitrust problem?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121987440206377643.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1297602/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/28/apple-aapl-itunes-loses-artists-an-antitrust-problem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>antitrust</category><category>apple</category><category>featured</category><category>iTunes</category><category>kid rock</category><category>KidRock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMD lifted into earnings by Intel results, EU news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/InvestorRelations/0,,51_306,00.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="AMD logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/amd-advanced-micro-devices-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) shares are trading higher today after rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp.</a> (NASADQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) posted a second-quarter profit of $1.6 billion, or <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2008/07/14/daily27.html?ana=from_rss">28 cents per share, ahead of analysts' estimates of 25 cents</a> per share, reflecting strong demand for processors. AMD is also getting a boost into its earnings tomorrow from news that <a target="_blank" href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/85228-eu-regulators-may-seek-new-charges-against-intel?source=feed">INTC may face new charges from European antitrust regulators</a>, according to a report in<em> The Wall Street Journal</em>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on AMD.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $16.19 last July, the stock hit a one-year low of $4.53 yesterday. AMD opened this morning at $4.90. So far today the stock has hit a low of $4.68 and a high of $4.95. As of 1:55, AMD is trading at $4.93, up 21 cents (4.4%). The chart for AMD looks bearish and steady, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">covered call</a> at the $5 level. A covered call is an options position that combines the purchase of stock with the sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 30% return in just 6 months if AMD is above $5 at January expiration. AMD would have to fall by more than 21% before we would start to lose money. <br /><br />AMD hasn't been below $3.90, which would be the break-even point, at all in the past year and has shown support around $4.50 recently. This trade could be risky if today's encouraging Intel results are a result of them taking even more market share from AMD, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the 30% downside protection on this trade.<br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in AMD. He does control bullish hedged positions in INTC.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/">AMD lifted into earnings by Intel results, EU news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1258057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/amd-lifted-into-earnings-by-intel-results-eu-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>antitrust</category><category>earnings</category><category>EU</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel's really bad news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) delivered <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/intel-defies-skeptics-including-this-one/">extremely good earnings</a>, surpassing what most analysts thought the big chip company would deliver. Global notebook sales were the key source of the company's success.</p>
<p>With 80% of the world's PC and server chip sales, Intel has little to compete with but itself. That may prove to be its undoing. Late word is that Intel is about to be hit by major antitrust charges in Europe. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121617136257356471.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "European regulators are preparing to file new antitrust charges against Intel."</p>
<p>The case against Intel -- the same as the ones being brought in the U.S. and South Korea -- is that the company took a number of actions to shut out sales of chips and computers with chips from smaller competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>).</p>
<p>Intel has begun to take on the role that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has a decade ago. It has become so big that authorities are questioning how it got to its place of dominance. In essence, regulators are saying Intel cheated.</p>
<p>While Intel may suffer fines and other sanctions, the cases against the company may be the only chance AMD has of surviving. With over $5 billion in debt, operating losses, and falling gross margins, reparations from Intel's antitrust cases are probably its only life preserver.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/">Intel's really bad news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121617136257356471.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1257437/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/intels-really-bad-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMD</category><category>antitrust</category><category>EU</category><category>INTC</category><category>intel</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Discover wants MasterCard and Visa to pay up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/discovercard.jpg"  alt="" />I love the long-term prospects of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">Visa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>), but I do have to concede that a pesky lawsuit by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">Discover</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">DFS</a>) is the one big fly in this story's soup. According to the following <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;storyID=2008-06-09T211245Z_01_N09260017_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-DISCOVER-LAWSUIT-DC.XML&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;imageid=&amp;cap=&amp;sz=13&amp;WTModLoc=HybArt-C1-ArticlePage2">article</a>, Discover wants both credit-card companies to pay $6 billion for perceived violations of antitrust regulations. Unfortunately, these damages could be tripled if Visa and MasterCard lose. One of the big problems here is that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) already won a settlement of $2.1 billion from Visa late last year and the company established an escrow fund worth $3 billion for litigation payments. </p>
<p>I'll admit, this lawsuit does give me and my credit-card investment thesis a little case of the shivers. After all, tripling $6 billion to $18 billion means that a huge amount of money is in play here, and a successful outcome for Discover would hamper the stocks of the two big card entities. When you read through the litigation risks in Visa's SEC filings (out of MasterCard and Visa, the latter is my favorite since it is still relatively fresh off its IPO and MasterCard has already had a big run), they are pretty scary. And the fact that the $6 billion figure just came to light this week has probably soured the perception of some investors and analysts. Nevertheless, all the previous litigation talk didn't stop Visa's stock from taking off after its IPO earlier this year.</p>
<p>. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Discover wants MasterCard and Visa to pay up</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/">Discover wants MasterCard and Visa to pay up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;storyID=2008-06-09T211245Z_01_N09260017_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-DISCOVER-LAWSUIT-DC.XML&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;imageid=&amp;cap=&amp;sz=13&amp;WTModLoc=HybArt-C1-ArticlePage2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1221881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/11/discover-wants-mastercard-and-visa-to-pay-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>antitrust</category><category>AXP</category><category>credit cards</category><category>CreditCards</category><category>debit cards</category><category>DebitCards</category><category>DFS</category><category>Discover</category><category>featured</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>MA</category><category>Mastercard</category><category>V</category><category>Visa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barnes &amp; Noble to book a buyout deal for Borders?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/bn.jpg" alt="" />When I go to a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>) or a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">Borders</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>) store, I really can't tell much of a difference. That's not a bad thing - at least for me. Hey, I have lots of choices - and not just books.</p>
<p>But for investors, the situation is a problem. So, instead of fighting, why not B&amp;N and Borders join forces?</p>
<p>Well, according to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121132903873408981.html?mod=wsjcrmain">Wall Street Journal</a></em> [a paid publication], there are signs of a possible deal as B&amp;N has put together a team to explore the option.</p>
<p>However, there is a big hurdle: antitrust regulators. The federal government will scrutinize the deal heavily given that Barnes &amp; Noble is #1 and Borders is #2 in the US marketplace. </p>
<p>Barnes &amp; Noble will argue that the market is much different now with online operators like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>).</p>
<p>And timing is another key. After all, if there's a change in the White House, antitrust enforcement is likely to get tougher. <br /><em><br /><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomtaulli">Tom Taulli</a> is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" alt="" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.mergerbook.com">MergerBook.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/">Barnes &amp; Noble to book a buyout deal for Borders?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 May 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121132903873408981.html?mod=wsjcrmain>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1201412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/barnes-and-noble-to-book-a-buyout-deal-for-borders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Antitrust</category><category>Barnes Noble</category><category>BarnesNoble</category><category>bgp</category><category>bks</category><category>Borders</category><category>inthenews</category><category>publishing</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/sirius-siri-logo.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) $5 billion acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) was cleared by the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001">U.S. Department of Justice</a>. Now, all eyes turn to Federal Communications Commission to determine if satellite radio lives or dies.<br /><br />The acquisition -- not a merger -- has been held up for eons by phony arguments that combining these two floundering companies would limit choice. Terrestrial radio and consumer groups have been lobbying hard against the deal, arguing that anything that benefits Howard Stern can't be good for America.<br /><br />I can't see how the FCC can block a deal that the DOJ approved after examining the deal under and electron microscope. The medium won't survive if the companies stay separate. Even fans of satellite radio admit that it is a niche medium. Then again, so is cable TV.<br /><br />For me satellite radio is a godsend, particularly on long road trips. I enjoy listening to Sirius while tapping out my blog posts. I particularly like the commercial-free music channels. Regular radio has annoyed music fans by piling on commercial after commercial between tiny slivers of music. <br /><br />Satellite radio can avoid the fate of BetaMax by continuing to produce high-quality content that people want to buy. It's that simple and that complicated.<br /><em><br />Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog <a href="http://ketchupandeggs.wordpress.com">Ketchup and Eggs</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/">FCC now decides if satellite radio lives or dies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/tech-news/_a/justice-department-clears-xm-sirius-deal/20080324151509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1147856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/fcc-now-decides-if-satellite-radio-lives-or-dies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>doj</category><category>fcc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>satelliteradio</category><category>siri</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel (INTC) makes its case to Europe authorities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/intc-intel-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Intel </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) is finally making its case to European Union authorities, saying its practices in the region were not anti-competitive. It may be a hard sell.</p>
<p>The extent to which Intel has beaten rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) does not look good on paper. Intel has nearly 80% of the global chip market for PCs and servers. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120527847302528435.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal: "</em>The EU filed preliminary charges against Intel in July, alleging the company offered rebates to customers only if they didn't use AMD products; paid customers to delay the launch of AMD-based products; and sold its chips below cost to undercut AMD."</p>
<p>If Intel loses the case, it could face major fines and sanctions just as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) did recently when the EU ruled that its activity violated anti-trust laws.</p>
<p>There may be more riding on the outcome of the hearing for AMD than for Intel. The larger company can afford fines and probably live with some restrictions in the region. AMD may need chain on Intel to turn itself around. The company has over $5 billion in debt and recently took a huge write-off for the falling value of its purchase of graphic chip company ATI. The company's shares are down from over $36 less than two years ago to just above $6.</p>
<p>AMD may not be able to compete in an open marketplace. The courts may be its only refuge.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em><em> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/">Intel (INTC) makes its case to Europe authorities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120527847302528435.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1137940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/intel-intc-makes-it-case-to-europe-authorities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amd</category><category>antitrust</category><category>european union</category><category>EuropeanUnion</category><category>intc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: com:  Ford may not hold onto any portions of Jaguar, Land Rover]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120163969101526197.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that the FBI has opened criminal inquiries as part of an investigation over subprime mortgage issues. The probe into 14 companies will focus on accounting fraud, insider trading and securitization of loans.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120165519331327133.html?mod=todays_us_page_one"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck and Co Inc's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) osteoporosis treatment Fosamax is facing increasing scrutiny and lawsuits, as a growing number of patients allege the drug causes a condition called ONJ.</li>
    <li>According to a Federal judge, antitrust supervision of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) should be extended for two years longer than originally planned, until November 2009, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ab1c4100-cedb-11dc-877a-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> said. The supervision was imposed as part of its landmark settlement in 2002, when Microsoft was accused of failing to produce an adequate licensing arrangement for certain protocols essential for rivals to work their own products through the Windows operating system.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Auto/Tatas_may_get_full_control_of_Jag_and_Land_Rover/articleshow/2741740.cms"><em>Economic Times</em></a> reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) has decided not to retain any stakes in its Jaguar and Land Rover divisions after selling them to India's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tata-motors-limited/ttm/nys">Tata Motors Limited</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tata-motors-limited/ttm/nys">TTM</a>), according to sources.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/">Newspaper wrap-up: com:  Ford may not hold onto any portions of Jaguar, Land Rover</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1101494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/newspaper-wrap-up-com-ford-may-not-hold-onto-any-portions-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>F</category><category>FBI</category><category>Ford</category><category>Fosamax</category><category>Jaguar</category><category>Land Rover</category><category>LandRover</category><category>Merck</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MRK</category><category>MSFT</category><category>subprime</category><category>Tata Motors</category><category>TataMotors</category><category>TTM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Justice Department probes chocolate makers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a></p>Last month, Canadian regulators began an investigation into allegations of price-fixing involving <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-hershey-company/hsy/nys">Hershey Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-hershey-company/hsy/nys">HSY</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cadbury-schweppes-plc/csg/nys">Cadbury Schweppes PLC</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cadbury-schweppes-plc/csg/nys">CSG</a>) Mars Inc. and Nestl&eacute; SA (VTX: NESN).<br /><br />Now our own Justice Department is looking into the issue as well. Chocolatiers have been battling with surging dairy prices and there have been allegations that various firms colluded to fix prices. Ontario's Superior Court of Justice has granted search warrants for the above candy makers, but no charges have been filed.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119818758342643053.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">According</a> (subscription required) to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, "It isn't clear precisely what the Justice Department is looking into or whether the preliminary inquiry will become a formal criminal investigation. Price fixing can be a serious offense, leading to heavy fines and, in some cases, jail terms for executives."<br /><br />The legal issues aside, does anyone really think that lack of access to affordable chocolate is a serious problem in the United States? Judging from The US of A's collective waistline, a little price fixing and consumer gouging could do our body mass indexes a bit of good.<em><br /></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/">Justice Department probes chocolate makers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119818758342643053.html?mod=todays_us_page_one>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1068438/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/justice-department-probes-chocolate-makers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>Cadbury Schweppes PLC</category><category>CadburySchweppesPlc</category><category>Chocolate</category><category>csg</category><category>department of justice</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>hershey</category><category>hsy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mars inc</category><category>MarsInc</category><category>nestle sa</category><category>NestleSa</category><category>ontario</category><category>vesn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shorts bet against Sirius]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shortstories/" rel="tag">Short Stories</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-screen/" rel="tag">Stock Screen</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/sirius-siri-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The short interest in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/12/nasdaq-short-in.html">spiked up</a> between November 15 and November 30 by 14.4 million to 113.4 million. </p>
<p>Sirius shares have been down over the last few days, and perhaps the market thinks they will go lower.</p>
<p>Many analysts expected that the Sirius merger with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>) would be approved by now. No such luck. The longer the approval drags on, the better the chance that it will get derailed by ranting congressmen of the Justice Department.</p>
<p>Then, there is the issue of the Sirius balance sheet. The company has long-term debt of about $1.3 billion and no way to repay it. With bad credit markets, it may not even be able to be refinanced. The company had an operating loss of $106 million last quarter on $242 million in revenue. And subscriber counts are not doubling year-over-year like they used to.</p>
<p>Sirius is in trouble. The market knows it. And it needs that merger and the savings it should bring to stay afloat.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/">Shorts bet against Sirius</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.247wallst.com/2007/12/nasdaq-short-in.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1060829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/12/shorts-bet-against-sirius-satellites-siri-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>AntitrustLaw</category><category>entertainment</category><category>media</category><category>satelllite radio</category><category>SatellliteRadio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PCs need unbundling from Microsoft (MSFT) Windows, says Europe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>It's hard to imagine a personal computer in 2007 shipping without <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Windows operating system. For many consumers and business users, the Windows operating system <em>is</em> the computer. If Ubuntu Linux or some other operating system arrived on that new PC, I bet hundreds of millions of PC buyers will start scratching their heads. That tells of the power Microsoft has over the PC market (and has had for years).<br /><br />But, don't tell that to an intellectual think tank in Europe, which has suggested that European Union members somehow <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,137519-page,1/article.html">unbundle the Windows operating system from PCs</a> in order to break the monopoly Microsoft has on the market. While I support this thinking in principle, Microsoft does not make a PC. Computer makers like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) do. Want that new PC to show up without Microsoft Windows? Talk to them.<br /><br />Now, in many cases, computer manufacturers have bowed into public pressure to have more than Microsoft's popular Windows operating system available on new PC purchases. Dell has offered Linux on its PCs for months now (though it's hard to find how to configure one with it), and Microsoft is facing more pressure from competition in many areas, including operating systems. <br /><br />However, the stranglehold Microsoft has on the operating system market has caused the average consumer to "get used to" using Windows. Do most people like change? Doubtful. But, if consumers want more choice, they should tell computer makers to offer more options and flexibility. Should governments step in and force them to offer the solutions if the consumer is not asking for them? That's never stopped the EU before. I'd like to see the data that supports this statement from the European Commission: "Microsoft's dominant position is not in the public interest. It limits the market and has slowed technical development to the prejudice of consumers."<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 10-1-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/">PCs need unbundling from Microsoft (MSFT) Windows, says Europe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,137519-page,1/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1001232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/pcs-need-unbundling-from-microsoft-msft-windows-says-europe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>Bundles</category><category>EU</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>PC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
