<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aauky/" rel="tag">Anglo American (AAUKY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rds-a/" rel="tag">Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/verizon-logo-black-240.jpg" />Can you hear me now? Well listen closely, Verizon Communications (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) is going to get a bounce from the Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iPhone in 2011. Nothing you don't already know. Is there a more sure thing in the coming year? Long term it will fade some, but in 2011 the pent up demand has to have a positive impact.<br />
<br />
<strong>Communications:</strong> The telephone companies everywhere are going to have a good year. Verizon is a great stock for Roth IRA's, paying a 5.41% yield. The dilution of the iPhone market may hurt AT&amp;T, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) some, as VZ is helped, but it too is a good long term hold and pays an even higher yield at 5.76%.<br />
<br />
If you want to diversify internationally there are multiple good choices and they pay even higher yields.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/">Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19780507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AAUKY</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>BCE</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>COP</category><category>CVX</category><category>FDX</category><category>featured</category><category>iPhone</category><category>oil speculation</category><category>presidential campaign</category><category>PTR</category><category>RDS.A</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>SYY</category><category>T</category><category>TEF</category><category>tina fey</category><category>TLSYY</category><category>UPS</category><category>VZ</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: The Last Word on Apple]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/gala-apples-240x160.jpg" alt="Apples" />Well, maybe not the very last word ever, but for now this is it. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/27/chasing-value-questions-about-apple/">poll results on eight key questions</a> are in. Although such a small sampling is not conclusive, it may be broadly indicative of investor sentiment.</p>
<p>Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) is among the most admired, talked about and intriguing companies in the investment world. This story is the fifth in a series that started off pondering <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/">Apple's cash stash</a> and what good it was, and leading up to this polling review.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: The Last Word on Apple</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/">Chasing Value: The Last Word on Apple</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19692759/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/chasing-value-the-last-word-on-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Dividends</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>featured</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>Stock buybacks</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Apple's Cash Is Different]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xrx/" rel="tag">Xerox Corp (XRX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oln/" rel="tag">Olin Corp. (OLN)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/bank.earnings.stacks-of-dollars.getty2.jpg" />When you write about Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/financials/apple-inc/aapl/nas/key-ratios">AAPL</a>), you inevitably hear from some naive person informing you that, <em>"You just don't get it; Apple is different." </em></p>
<p>There are certainly many things about Apple that are very different, but in the context of the "you just don't get it" crowd, it is absolutely not. The same was said about Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/financials/google-inc/goog/nas/key-ratios">GOOG</a>) only a short while ago, Xerox (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/xerox-corporation/xrx/nys">XRX</a>) three decades ago and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_rifle">Winchester</a> -- now part of Olin Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/olin-corporation/oln/nys">OLN</a>) -- rifles 125 years ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Apple's Cash Is Different</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/">Chasing Value: Apple's Cash Is Different</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19686783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/25/chasing-value-apples-cash-is-different/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>ADBE</category><category>Adobe</category><category>Altria</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>divindends</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MO</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Olin</category><category>OLN</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Xerox</category><category>XOM</category><category>XRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Apple Does Not Need $50 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><img width="202" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="138" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/steve-jobs.jpg" alt="" />Steve Jobs, the illustrious CEO and the heart and soul of Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) would have you believe that Apple cannot issue a dividend to shareholders because of the scary competitive business environment. He conveys to us that they need the money to overcome hardship and if the right opportunity comes along make key acquisitions.<br />
<br />
This is utter nonsense, a supreme untruth, wasted breadth and a failure to come to grips with reality. In the past quarter Apple increased its cash and short term investments to $50 billion <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/chasing-value-apples-holding-48-billion-for-what/">as I wrote it would</a> six weeks ago.<br />
<br />
Apple currently has 914 million outstanding shares. With the stock trading around $300 per share, a 2% dividend yield would require $6 per share or, $5.5 billion dollars annually to cover the distribution.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Apple Does Not Need $50 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/">Chasing Value: Apple Does Not Need $50 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19682969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/chasing-value-apple-does-not-need-50-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple inc.</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>Boeing</category><category>BRK-A</category><category>brk.b</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Dividends</category><category>featured</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Earnings Soar, Topping Estimates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/apple_ibook_creepy.jpg" alt="apple third quarter earnings" />Shares of Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" class="inlinked">AAPL</a>) traded sharply higher in after-hours trading Tuesday after the company posted <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/apple-earnings-surge-jobs-says-amazing-new-products-still-on-tap/36959">strong quarterly results</a> for its third quarter.<br />
<br />
Analysts had been expecting to see the company post earnings of $2.84 a share, but Apple easily beat that estimate with a reported $3.51 a share. During the same period last year the company had earnings of $1.35 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Earnings Soar, Topping Estimates</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/">Apple Earnings Soar, Topping Estimates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19562024/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/apple-earnings-another-solid-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>computers</category><category>featured</category><category>iPad</category><category>iPhone</category><category>itunes</category><category>mac</category><category>mac computers</category><category>tech</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple: Repeating the Mistakes From The 80s?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/aapl-1279134239.jpg" alt="" />Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" class="inlinked">AAPL</a>) may be in the midst of a PR crisis with its newest iPhone, but that doesn't mean the company isn't stronger as it's ever been. The company's release of the iPhone 4 makes that device quite possibly the fastest-selling in the company's history. Every time Apple thinks it cannot outperform itself, it does. Still, will this euphoria be short-lived? If so, one company will reap the benefits: Google.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple: Repeating the Mistakes From The 80s?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/">Apple: Repeating the Mistakes From The 80s?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970203296004575351032162702178.html?mod=BOL_hpp_popview>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19550245/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/apple-repeating-the-mistakes-from-the-80s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>featured</category><category>MacOS</category><category>MacOSX</category><category>MacOsX10.6</category><category>MacOsXSnowLeopard</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Apple Closing in on Berkshire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/applestorelogo240.jpg" alt="" />About five weeks ago, I posted <a target="_blank" title="View Chasing Value: Berkshire Eating Up Apple -- Can It Continue? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/chasing-value-berkshire-eating-up-apple-can-it-continue/">Chasing Value: Berkshire Eating Up Apple -- Can It Continue?</a> Today I thought I would take another peek to see how Berkshire Hathaway (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>) and Apple Inc.(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) compare now.</p>
<p>Both companies are led by much-admired iconic figures who standout for their extreme success and business leadership. Both Warren Buffett and Steve Jobs are practically worshiped by their shareholders, and for good reason -- both companies have added value during the past ten years, a time when most companies have not, and some are just not -- they're gone.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Apple Closing in on Berkshire</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/">Chasing Value: Apple Closing in on Berkshire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19429280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/chasing-value-apple-closing-in-on-berkshire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>featured</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pending Apple iPad Release Requires Leap of Faith from Consumers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/ipad.jpg" alt="" />Here we are on the eve of the Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iPad release. Though not as revolutionary as the iPhone was almost three years ago, the iPad will succeed just because it has Apple's name on it. Beyond that, the device could once again fit the need for an "in-between" device for internet access and multimedia outside the handheld phone and in lieu of yet another laptop-type computing device. But, the question remains: will customers go ga-ga over this device starting tomorrow?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pending Apple iPad Release Requires Leap of Faith from Consumers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/">Pending Apple iPad Release Requires Leap of Faith from Consumers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-01/apple-s-bet-on-ipad-requires-buyers-to-take-leap-of-faith-.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19423168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/pending-apple-ipad-release-requires-leap-of-faith-from-consumers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>Apple ipad</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPad features</category><category>iPad launch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Optimistic Economic View]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" height="154" width="154" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/lunati-pacaloy-beehive-valve-springs-ls1-ls2-ls6thumbnail.jpg" alt="" />The negativity in the market place has been palpable for several years and is only thawing out now, in some people's view, while others rant about a "double-dip" or "W-shaped" recovery. In contrast to those who shun the market, I have been buying stocks at bargain basement prices over the past year with a return on investment that is "staggering," to quote a Wells Fargo Financial Consultant familiar with my account.<br /> <br /> I am well aware that the record deficit spending in the United States is even more staggering. Everyone knows about the high unemployment rate, foreclosure rate, bank failure rate, and tepid consumer confidence. So why am I so optimistic about the economic recovery? Here's why, as simply as I can state the case:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Optimistic Economic View</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/">Serious Money: Optimistic Economic View</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19417528/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/serious-money-optimistic-economic-view/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BERK.B</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>brk.a</category><category>BusinessTravel</category><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>CSCO</category><category>DJIA</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>GM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Nostradamus</category><category>Serous Money</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffetts' Berkshire vs Jobs' Apple for 2010?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><font><strong><img width="245" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="167" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/steve-jobs.jpg" /></strong>Yes I am picking </font>Berkshire Hathaway (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>) over <font>Apple Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) </font>in 2010.<br /><br /><font>Last week I suggested in tw</font>o<font> separate p</font>o<font>sts that Apple invest</font>ors potential gains going forward in 2010 would be far less rewarding than in 2009. The issue first came up in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-9-apple-blah-blah/" title="View Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 9 + Apple on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 9 + Apple</a> where I was simply reviewing Apple for inclusion in the ten but some of the faithful (sometimes over zealous) took exception to this.<br /><br />The stock having reached an all time high last month was part of what lead me to write, <em>"</em><font size="2" face="arial" color="black"><em>Sure it is possible that Apple comes out with another winning product but that rampant speculation is among the things that have driven the stock price to where it is. I think the downside outweighs the upside by a large margin so I will pass on this one."</em><br /><br /></font>Some of the comments I received only made my case stronger.<br /><font><br /></font><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buffetts' Berkshire vs Jobs' Apple for 2010?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/">Buffetts' Berkshire vs Jobs' Apple for 2010?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19276613/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/buffetts-berkshire-vs-jobs-apple-for-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyx/" rel="tag">NYSE Euronext (NYX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nyse.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The future investment stars are already with us. The <a href="http://www.bkfk.com/financialfuture/" target="_blank">NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a>, operated by the <a href="http://www.nysefoundation.org/" target="_blank">NYSE Foundation</a>, <a href="http://www.bkfk.com" target="_blank">By Kids for Kids</a>, <a href="http://www.K12.com" target="_blank">K12 Inc.</a> and the <a href="http://www.uiausa.org" target="_blank">United Investors Association</a>, is in full swing, with five finalists just identified. To reach this level, the participants had to develop a new product, idea or process that would "excite, educate and motivate their peers" to become interested in the financial marketplace. The eventual winner lurks within this subset and will receive a $2,500 prize -- a great way to get that portfolio started. And, he or she will be feted at a closing bell ceremony at the NYSE (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyse-euronext/nyx/nys" target="_blank">NYX</a>) on January 11, 2010.</p>
<p>The finalists presented a variety of ideas which are sure to generate some buzz. Kelsey Foss, a 12-year-old from Mountainville, NY, proposed a new television show, "Stock Market Tycoon Idol," which would harness the popularity of reality TV while amping up the content. The program would involve the journeys of 10 kids as they seek to make money or lose it, with the possibility of becoming virtual millionaires along the way. The show would be set at a mock NYSE studio on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WallStreet/">Wall Street</a>, and exports would be brought out to mentor the contestants. The reality TV reach would help engage a younger audience.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/">Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>anf</category><category>apple</category><category>apple inc.</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple ipod</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>chicago</category><category>chicago illinois</category><category>ChicagoIllinois</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hershey</category><category>hersheys</category><category>hsy</category><category>illinois</category><category>iphone</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>k12</category><category>k12inc.</category><category>lrn</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>nyse</category><category>nyse euronext</category><category>NyseEuronext</category><category>nysegroupnyx</category><category>nyx</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>sapphire energy</category><category>SapphireEnergy</category><category>six flags</category><category>six flags inc.</category><category>SixFlags</category><category>SixFlagsInc.</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>texas</category><category>virginia</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>walt disney</category><category>walt disney co.</category><category>WaltDisney</category><category>WaltDisneyCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" />Brokerage firm Barclays this morning raised its price target on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) from $188 to $208. The new target represents a premium of 25.8% to AAPL's closing price on Wednesday. Additionally, Barclays reiterated its <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Barclays+Lifts+Target+on+Apple+%28AAPL%29+from+%24188+to+%24208/4872381.html">upbeat Overweight rating</a> on the shares.</p>
<p>In a note to clients, analyst Ben Reitzes cited Apple's solid product pipeline and strong free cash flow outlook. "New products should begin to flow again within a few weeks," said Reitzes. "We are more upbeat about the long-term prospects for the iPhone &amp; Mac lines with potential new products."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/">Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19128145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>analyst</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>Barclays</category><category>inthenews</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple sets sights on North Carolina, scores Buy recommendation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/aapl-apple-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Last night, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) announced plans to build its <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=969947&amp;Category=Breaking%20News">first East Coast data center</a>. The facility will be located in North Carolina, which recently enacted tax breaks to lure the popular tech company, but no specific site has yet been selected. Apple is expected to pour more than $1 billion into the project over the next nine years.</p>
<p>Apple spokeswoman Susan Lundgren declined to say how the data center will be used. In a statement, the tech firm said only, "We're looking forward to building a new data center in North Carolina, and we appreciate the efforts of Gov. Perdue and state lawmakers who helped make it possible." Construction is expected to begin soon.</p>
<p>In other Apple news today, the company is attracting bullish attention from Societe Generale. The brokerage firm <a href="http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&amp;articleid=7355196&amp;subject=markets&amp;action=article">started coverage of AAPL with a Buy rating</a> and a $160 price target. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple sets sights on North Carolina, scores Buy recommendation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/">Apple sets sights on North Carolina, scores Buy recommendation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/apple-sets-sights-on-north-carolina-scores-buy-recommendation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>featured</category><category>north carolina</category><category>NorthCarolina</category><category>options</category><category>societe generale</category><category>SocieteGenerale</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Quick take: Williams or Apple or Google or Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmb/" rel="tag">Williams Companies (WMB)</a></p><em><span class="symbol"></span></em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/wmb-logo220.gif" />This is a follow-up on the short term results comparing the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-williams-companies-inc/wmb/nys">Williams Companies Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-williams-companies-inc/wmb/nys">WMB</a>) to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) , <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>).<br /><br />I wrote a series of stories about why I thought WMB would outperform the other more popular stocks and two weeks is not much of a test unless you have been trading on my suggestions instead of investing.<br /><br />The final post was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/serious-money-better-than-apple-google-microsoft-and-berkshire/" title="View Serious Money: Better than Apple, Google, Microsoft &amp; Berkshire Hathaway, Part 5 on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Serious Money: Better than Apple, Google, Microsoft &amp; Berkshire Hathaway, Part 5</a> if anyone cares to go back and review that.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Quick take: Williams or Apple or Google or Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/">Quick take: Williams or Apple or Google or Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 May 2009 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1542348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/quick-take-williams-or-apple-or-google-or-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><category>value stocks</category><category>ValueStocks</category><category>Williams Co.</category><category>WilliamsCo.</category><category>WMB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: No secret for market turn-around -- AAPL, AEO, CISCO, &amp; ISRG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/isrg/" rel="tag">Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aeo/" rel="tag">American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/road.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Given the current state of the economy all would agree it's going to be a long road home. The market is up today on a few bits of news following what has been a dreadful last ten days. Maybe it's the merger and acquisition activity, maybe it's the news that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) "let slip" that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29612897/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol">they earned a profit the first two months of the year. </a>Perhaps the market was just due for a bounce before another slide?<br /><br />Every day we read various rationales for why the market may be undervalued, or as some believe, still has a long way to drop. We look at stocks of strong companies with historically low price-to-earnings ratios and think now is the time to get in. However, someone will be quick to point out that forward earnings are perhaps going to be less than projected.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: No secret for market turn-around -- AAPL, AEO, CISCO, &amp; ISRG</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/">Serious Money: No secret for market turn-around -- AAPL, AEO, CISCO, &amp; ISRG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/serious-money-no-secret-for-market-turn-around-aapl-aeo-ci/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AEO</category><category>American Eagle Outfitters</category><category>AmericanEagleOutfitters</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>C</category><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>CSCO</category><category>featured</category><category>Inflation</category><category>Intuitive Surgical</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Big Brown a sure thing at Belmont]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/big-brown.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The outcome of the <a href="http://sports.aol.com/story/_a/big-brown-falls-short-of-history/20080607181409990001">Belmont Stakes where Big Brown came in last</a> instead of first is just one more example of the difficulty one has in making predictions. I know little about horse racing, and the only thing I know about the Triple Crown is that there has not been a winner in 30 years (and counting). As irony would have it, the winner of the Belmont was the 38-to-1 long shot <em>Da Tara</em> that went wire to wire.</p>
<p>This event stands out in my mind because I am asked to predict future events on a regular basis (whether it makes sense or not), and because I am in the middle of reading <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Swan_(book)"><em>The Black Swan</em></a> about <a title="Randomness" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness">randomness</a> and <a title="Uncertainty" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty">uncertainty</a> by <a title="Epistemology" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology">epistemologist</a> <a class="mw-redirect" title="Nassim Taleb" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassim_Taleb">Nassim Nicholas Taleb</a>. I highly recommend the book to fellow investors and business leaders interested in getting some perspective on risk and the many fallacies we all overlook.</p>
<p>The number of variables that can affect a specific outcome like a horse race are significant, and in the case of the Belmont Stakes, on this occasion something was amiss. When Big Brown turned for home, something wasn't right. Jockey Kent Desormeaux knew the big bay colt was finished. <strong>Trainer Rick Dutrow Jr., who guaranteed racing's first Triple Crown in 30 years, knew it, too.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Big Brown a sure thing at Belmont</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/">Sunday Funnies: Big Brown a sure thing at Belmont</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1218918/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/sunday-funnies-big-brown-a-sure-thing-at-belmont/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>Belmont Stakes</category><category>Big Brown</category><category>DJIA</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Predictions</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>The Black Swan</category><category>Triple Crown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple, Oil, &amp; Steel were rays of light on gloomy market day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rs/" rel="tag">Reliance Steel and Aluminum (RS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vlo/" rel="tag">Valero Energy (VLO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pds/" rel="tag">Precision Drilling TR (PDS)</a></p><p><img alt="Anadarko Petroleum" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/anadarko_petroleum.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Today was a very gloomy day in the stock market with Oil reaching new highs and everything else losing -- <em>almost.</em> Among the few winners, and I mean very few,<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"> Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), oil, and specialty steel were up. I went through my watch list and found this very short list of winners:</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">Anadarko Petroleum</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">APC</a>) $<span class="price">78.49, up +</span>$<span class="change">0.95</span> or <span class="perc">1.23%</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) $<span class="price">185.90,</span> up +$<span class="change">2.30</span> or <span class="perc">1.25%</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/halliburton-company/hal/nys">Halliburton </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/halliburton-company/hal/nys">HAL</a>) $<span class="price">49.92, </span>+$<span class="change">0.85</span> up +$<span class="perc">1.73%</span></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/precision-drilling-trust/pds/nys">Precision Drilling TR</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/precision-drilling-trust/pds/nys">PDS</a>) $<span class="price">27.90,</span> up $<span class="change">1.13, or</span> <span class="perc">4.22%</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reliance-steel-and-aluminum-co/rs/nys">Reliance Steel and Aluminum</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reliance-steel-and-aluminum-co/rs/nys">RS</a>) $<span class="price">67.37, +</span><span class="change">0.$52,</span> or<span class="arrow"> </span><span class="perc">0.78%</span> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valero-energy-corporation/vlo/nys">Valero Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valero-energy-corporation/vlo/nys">VLO</a>) $<span class="price">50.12, up</span> +$<span class="change">0.43</span> or <span class="perc">0.87%</span></p>
<span class="perc"></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple, Oil, &amp; Steel were rays of light on gloomy market day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/">Apple, Oil, &amp; Steel were rays of light on gloomy market day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 May 2008 20:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1201303/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/20/apple-oil-and-steel-were-rays-of-light-on-gloomy-market-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Anadarko Petroleum</category><category>AnadarkoPetroleum</category><category>APC</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>HAL</category><category>haliburton</category><category>oli</category><category>PDS</category><category>Precision Drilling</category><category>PrecisionDrilling</category><category>reliance steel and a...</category><category>RelianceSteelAndA...</category><category>RS</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>valero energy</category><category>ValeroEnergy</category><category>VLO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[My best stock ideas: Looking through Q2 and into the second half of 2008]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a></p><img alt="Wall Street exchange" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/stockexchange.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I've received a few chuckles for investment directions I've suggested in the past, but if you care to review a couple of my previous generalities, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/">I believe that my record has held up fairly well.</a><br /><br />I submit for approval the following investment angles for the balance of 2008 and possibly beyond:<br /><br />Have I suggested investments in water holdings? Yes, I do believe that I have. I believe that going long in water stocks could be an investment hedge of the decade. I also suggest a look into the desalination technology from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>).<br /><br />I'd think it's a good idea to stick with the railroads, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">BNI</a>). I claim that, with all things given, for now, railroads can't fail. Conversely, I think it's a good time to back away slowly from trucking. I think misery lies ahead there.<br /><br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>My best stock ideas: Looking through Q2 and into the second half of 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/">My best stock ideas: Looking through Q2 and into the second half of 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1176673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/25/looking-through-q2-and-into-the-second-half-of-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Altria</category><category>Altria Group</category><category>AltriaGroup</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>BNI</category><category>Burlington Northern Santa Fe</category><category>BurlingtonNorthernSantaFe</category><category>DELL</category><category>Dell Inc.</category><category>DellInc.</category><category>eggs</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>MO</category><category>oats</category><category>ore</category><category>OSTK</category><category>Overstock</category><category>Overstock.com</category><category>rice</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Starbucks vs McDonalds: an old story]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 333px; HEIGHT: 291px" height="289" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/starbucks_whole_milk.jpg" width="343" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />We have seen this play before, and there are two scenarios as to how it could end. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) is being challenged like never before, having saturated the market place in some locations it is now facing the challenges of selling expensive coffee in a slowing economy.</p>
<p>Would you rather pay $4 for a cup of coffee or a gallon of gas? You can find cheaper coffee but you have few options to find cheaper fuel. Amid the already difficult operating environment Starbucks is faced with competition from the largest restaurant chain in the world, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>). McDonald's is looking to steal its morning thunder with competitive offerings at a far lower pricing structure. The threat is very real no matter what spin Starbucks puts on it.</p>
<p>This brings to mind two similar situations both involving <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and past competitors. Early on there were two word processing programs that together probably had 90% market share. Those were Wordperfect and Wordstar. Both of them were fine programs offering strong features, and now they are nowhere. Microsoft displaced both of them with MS-Word integrated with their Office suite of products, and is now king.</p>
<p><em><span class="symbol"></span></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Starbucks vs McDonalds: an old story</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/">Serious Money: Starbucks vs McDonalds: an old story</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1157972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/serious-money-starbucks-vs-mcdonalds-an-old-story/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>ADBE</category><category>Adobe Software</category><category>AdobeSoftware</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>coffee</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>profit margins</category><category>ProfitMargins</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/isrg/" rel="tag">Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/logo-google.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/apple.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Towards the end of 2007 when the overall stock market was softening, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) were still soaring to new highs, and the optimism most assuredly reached euphoria and beyond. What is the next level beyond euphoria -- madness -- and that's the kiss of death!
<p> </p>
<p>When the notorious Henry Bloggett proclaimed that GOOG was destined to reach $2,000 I do not think there was a dry eye in the house, either laughing at this ridiculous comment, which by the way offered no time frame or reference point, or crying for the shame of it all -- that was the kiss of death.</p>
<p>When I read about this I could not resist tempering the madness and posted <a title="View Serious Money: Google (GOOG) $2,000? No way, it's too high now! on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/serious-money-google-goog-2-000-no-way-its-too-high-now/" target="_blank">Serious Money: Google (GOOG) $2,000? No way, it's too high now!</a> The madness produced many interesting metrics to prove a point, including that you could have traded Google for both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BRK.A</a>) and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas"> Intuitive Surgical</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas"> ISRG</a>), two of my favorites, as an even swap (in capitalization only). That would be a heck of deal don't you think?!</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/">Kiss of death: GOOG $2,000 &amp; AAPL $300</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1136126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/10/kiss-of-death-goog-2-000-and-aapl-300/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Inc.</category><category>GoogleInc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Intuitive Surgical</category><category>IntuitiveSurgical</category><category>ISRG</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
