Time Warner closed at $16.42, down .01 at end of regular trading, but up .08 in after hours trading. The stock ended the week exactly where it began: $16.50.

This flat result came despite the fact that Time Warner announced several important strategies for the immediate future of AOL Video as a premier video search and view destination. Viewers will be able to access a virtually limitless array of amateur videos and video clips, as well as hundreds of hours of TV programming on demand. Additionally, AOL will offer downloadable movies on demand from 20th Century Fox, Sony, NBC Universal, and Time Warner's own Warner Brothers. Time Warner beat both Apple Computer Inc. and Amazon.com to the punch for video accessibility. Yet investors continue to flame Time Warne's efforts while Apple's lithium-ion battery powered notebooks are the fire hazard.

Time Warner unit CNN announced that on the five-year anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it will make available free of charge replays of its coverage of events on September 11, 2001. CNN Pipeline will provide live coverage of memorial services at Ground Zero in NYC and DC. Viewers can also access the replay feed of 9/11/2001 from 8:30 A.M. until midnight. For those still unable to watch events of 9/11/2001, CNN will also have a number of interactive but less graphic elements on its site.

Apple has finally found a product, in the iPod, that is an unqualified profit monster. The company is morphing from niche hipster to provider of music to the masses. And as part of the transformation they're making moves that never before seemed possible, like using Intel chips and (horrors!) Microsoft software on their computers. New strategies indicate that Apple is willing to be creative and do some interesting deals, like the one where the Red Hot Chili Peppers are selling advance tickets to their upcoming tour through the iTunes store.

The obvious next step? Porn, says Mark Gilbert (no relation to yours truly). If iPod owners will watch films on their 2.5" screens, surely they'll watch movies of an, umm, more lascivious nature. It's a huge money business; if Apple could get just a sliver of that $20 billion in adult video sales each year, they might continue their finally-respectable growth. But is growth respectable if it's (literally) made on the backs of the naked and promiscuous?

I love profits and all, but for the same reason I wouldn't invest in cigarettes, I'd feel very different about an Apple (fruit of the tree of good and evil) sinking its strategic go-juice into porn. Mark Gilbert doesn't agree, with the (flawed) rationale: "A search on Google Inc. shows a bunch of companies willing to sell the content and software needed to view erotic material on an iPod. Apple may as well grab some of that revenue for itself." With this logic, you could justify anything. I, for one investor, will pass.