<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Futures Down As Investors Await Earnings Reports, Economic Data]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dd/" rel="tag">duPont(E.I.)deNemours (DD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/bell-red-240a050806.jpg" /> U.S. stock futures are lower Tuesday morning, as investors await <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> reports from several major companies as well as data on consumer confidence and housing prices. Futures on the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> fell 8 points to 11,922.00; S&amp;P 500 futures dropped 3.70 points to 1,284.80; and Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 9 points to 2,289.00.<br />
<br />
U.S. stocks closed higher Monday, with the blue-chip Dow index gaining 108.68 points, or 0.92%.<br />
<br />
The Case-Shiller home-price index for November is due at 9 a.m. ET and consumer-confidence data for January will be released at 10 am ET.<br />
<br />
President Barack Obama is scheduled to deliver the State of the Union address this evening.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Futures Down As Investors Await Earnings Reports, Economic Data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/">Futures Down As Investors Await Earnings Reports, Economic Data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19814109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/25/futures-down-as-investors-await-earnings-reports-economic-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>axp</category><category>barack obama</category><category>dd</category><category>eric</category><category>featured</category><category>premarket</category><category>stm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama cautions against double-dip recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/obama_speaking.jpg" />Although some members of his administration don't hold Fox News in too high of regard, President Barack Obama did sit down with the news outlet to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN188108620091118">discuss the economy</a>. In the interview, President Obama offered what some are calling his "sternest warning" about containing deficits. President Obama believes that a further compilation of government debt could lead to a double-dip recession. </p>
<p>The president believes that his administration faces a "delicate balance of trying to boost the economy and spur job creation," but the administration has to set the economy on "a path toward long-term deficit reduction." He noted that it is important "to recognize ... that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/">President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>double-dip recession</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffett's star shines brightest among world's financial gurus, poll shows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/buffett_186.jpg" alt="" />The housing bubble and subsequent "Great Recession" have tarnished the stars of a good many of the world's financial wizards, such as the former heads at Lehman Bros. and Merrill Lynch. But one respected image remains -- perhaps unsurprisingly -- on top: Warren Buffett, chairman and CEO at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>).</p>
<p>That's according to a recent quarterly poll of investors, traders, and analysts who subscribe to Bloomberg terminals, those somewhat cryptic news and data computers that are ubiquitous on Wall Street. Buffett, who received favorable nods from 25% of those participating in the poll, walked away with a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aXAO557NzJdg">plurality of the vote</a>, Bloomberg News reported.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buffett's star shines brightest among world's financial gurus, poll shows</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/">Buffett's star shines brightest among world's financial gurus, poll shows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19214758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/buffetts-star-shines-brightest-among-worlds-financial-gurus-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking crisis</category><category>barack obama</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>bill gross</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>ConocoPhillips</category><category>COP</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>GE</category><category>geico</category><category>geithner</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawrence summers</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>natural gas</category><category>oil</category><category>Oracle of Omaha</category><category>pacific investment management company</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Race to declare victory for stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />When you spend $787 billion, there's a lot of pressure to show results. So, there's no surprise that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-27-jobs_N.htm">success is being proclaimed across the country</a>. States are saying that they've used the federal <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stimuluspackage/">stimulus package</a> money to create or save more than 388,000 jobs this year. Teachers, construction workers and other professions have realized the upside of stimulus cash according to reports from 33 states and Puerto Rico, with the remainder of the results being released on Friday. </p>
<p>Of course, the numbers "should be taken with a grain of salt," says Ethan Pollack of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/EconomicPolicyInstitute/">Economic Policy Institute</a>. The states were tasked to count the jobs created or protected, but the results have been of dubious accuracy. This doesn't mean the stats can't provide fodder to people on both sides of the aisle. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Columbia/">Columbia</a> Business School's Frank Lichtenberg says the data shows a solid economic impact, and the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Obamaadministration/">Obama administration</a>'s <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CouncilofEconomicAdvisors/">Council of Economic Advisors</a> believes the stimulus spending has taken care of between 600,000 and 1.1 million jobs. </p>
<p>And, there are those who disagree. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Race to declare victory for stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/">Race to declare victory for stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-27-jobs_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>bush</category><category>bush administration</category><category>BushAdministration</category><category>columbia</category><category>columbia university</category><category>ColumbiaUniversity</category><category>council of economic advisers</category><category>CouncilOfEconomicAdvisers</category><category>economic policy</category><category>economic policy institute</category><category>EconomicPolicy</category><category>EconomicPolicyInstitute</category><category>george w bush</category><category>GeorgeWBush</category><category>obama</category><category>obama administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>school</category><category>schools</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimuluspackage</category><category>stimulusplan</category><category>teacher</category><category>teachers</category><category>teaching</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five signs that green is the next bubble]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/digital-sextant.jpg" />We're tired of bubbles, right? Anyone 30 or older has lived through two big ones so far, with a brief period of prosperity separating the decimation of dot-com largesse and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mortgage/">mortgage</a>-fueled paper wealth. It could take until 2014 for the jobs lost to be replenished, and there's little reason for optimism.</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Five_signs_that_green_is_the_next_bubble'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>So, with the economy in the tank, we can focus elsewhere -- maybe on saving the planet. If we can't put green in our wallets, maybe we can add some to our lifestyles. Or, you could do both. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Greentechnology/">Green technology</a> could be the next boom in the United States, even if we do lag some parts of the world, and investing in clean solutions is really nothing other than <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33198138/ns/technology_and_science-future_of_energy/" target="_blank">investing in the next big thing</a>. Even if you don't give a damn about climate change (or don't think it exists at all), the green market could likely become your employer -- or trigger the economic growth that will create your next job.</p>
<p>Some signs are visible already.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five signs that green is the next bubble</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/">Five signs that green is the next bubble</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19187352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/five-signs-that-green-is-the-next-bubble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>batteries</category><category>battery</category><category>boom</category><category>bubble</category><category>bust</category><category>clean</category><category>clean technology</category><category>cleantech</category><category>green tech</category><category>green technology</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama administration</category><category>solar cells</category><category>venture capital</category><category>venture financial</category><category>venture funding</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government poised to take charge of student loan business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/degree200x150.jpg" />A new bill that would revamp student loan programs in the United States <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2009-09-17-ed-bill_N.htm" target="_blank">passed the House of Representatives</a>. The proposed program, which would affect the largest change on college aid since they came into existence in the 1960s would push private lenders out of the business and put the U.S. government in control.</p>
<p>The new measure would end subsidies for private lenders, increase Pell Grants available for students in financial need, and create grants for community colleges. The proposal includes almost all of President Obama's key points on higher education from the campaign trail. It passed the House 253 - 171, with most representatives sticking to party lines.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government poised to take charge of student loan business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/">Government poised to take charge of student loan business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19167056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>congress</category><category>congressional budget office</category><category>education</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>pell grants</category><category>president obama</category><category>student loans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Please don't tax Coke!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/coke.jpg" width="220" height="179" alt="" />As a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) shareholder, I was quite unnerved by recent talk centering on the issue of a soda tax. I'm sure <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PepsiCo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) shareholders were likewise frightened. According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=aPJWTERKSn2M">Bloomberg</a>, President Barack Obama is apparently open to the concept. In theory, funds generated from such a tax could be used to help defray the costs associated with a new health-care paradigm.
<p><span style="MARGIN-TOP: 7px; FLOAT: left; MARGIN-RIGHT: 10px"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Please_don_t_tax_Coke_Or_Pepsi_for_that_matter'; </script><script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>Besides raising money, what would be the justification behind such a governmental strategy? Well, excess sugar consumption can be dangerous. It can lead to all kinds of complications. You know the drill: obesity, diabetes, etc. When health issues like those rise, the cost of health care increases as well. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Please don't tax Coke!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/">Please don't tax Coke!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=aPJWTERKSn2M>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19157237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>beverage industry</category><category>beverage stocks</category><category>beverages</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>Coke</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KO</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>soda</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>Amid the lamentable health care reform debate, one fact is incontrovertible: despite President Barack Obama's large 2008 presidential election victory, one in which the Democrats gained 21 seats (to 257-178) in the House and eight seats in the Senate (59-40, not counting the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy's seat), the Democratic Party's majority still is not large enough to pass progressive legislation.</p>
<p>The solution to this is obvious enough: win more seats in the 2010 off-year congressional election, and then in the 2012 presidential/congressional election. And how does a majority party accomplish the above? By solving the nation's problems. These days, that means: 1) getting the U.S. economy growing again with robust job growth, 2) keeping the U.S. safe against international terrorism, and 3) ending the Iraq War successfully and making substantial progress toward victory in the Afghanistan War.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/">Economically, Democrats still don't have a large enough majority in Congress</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19154669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/economically-democrats-still-dont-have-a-large-enough-majority/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Charles Cook</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>elections</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Republicans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloomberg poll finds Obama popular with non-American investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-barack-obama-200x267.jpg" />Europeans and Asians have positive views of President Barack Obama, according to the latest <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aLCO_kfFLJag" target="_blank">Quarterly Bloomberg Global Poll of investors and analysts</a>. Americans, on the other hand, are split down the middle.</p>
<p>According to the study, 87% of respondents in Asia and Europe rate Obama favorably. In the United States, only 49% share this perspective -- a number that drops to around 25% when only his economic policies are considered. Much of this difference comes from an overseas distaste for the previous White House resident, but it seems people in this country are less interested in distinctions: 43% of respondents favored Bush's policies to Obama's (compared to 80% overseas). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bloomberg poll finds Obama popular with non-American investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/">Bloomberg poll finds Obama popular with non-American investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107165/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/bloomberg-poll-finds-obama-popular-with-non-american-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>gordon brown</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama</category><category>obama administration</category><category>s and p 500</category><category>vladimir putin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[G-20 split on stimulus program and financial reform]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/tvol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />The players at the G-20 summit have opened the curtain on Act 1. </p>
<p>First we have Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso. He holds the position that a strong stimulus program is the only means to pull Europe and the world out of the current crisis. He cited Japan's experience in the 1990s when Japan used a strong stimulus as a way to stimulate growth. He also cited Japan's current stimulus package, which amounts to $720 billion, and he even said that Japan would discuss further stimulus if the need arises.</p>
<p><a href="http://underline the wide differences among world leaders as they head to London for Thursday's G20 meeting on the global slump. ">Standing in opposition is German Chancellor Angela Merkel</a>. She is firmly opposed to more stimulus and demands to know why it is needed. She believes that excessive public spending will not assure a vital recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>G-20 split on stimulus program and financial reform</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/">G-20 split on stimulus program and financial reform</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bbfb0e9c-1e90-11de-b244-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=60a3db68-b177-11dd-b97a-0000779fd18c.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504764/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/g-20-split-on-stimulus-program-and-financial-reform/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Angela Merkel</category><category>AngelaMerkel</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>G 20 meeting</category><category>G20Meeting</category><category>global economy</category><category>GlobalEconomy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nicholas Sarkozy</category><category>NicholasSarkozy</category><category>Taro Aso</category><category>TaroAso</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six principles for saving American capitalism]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div class="tmbholder"><img id="img1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>The newspapers are looking ahead to this Tuesday's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/washington/29global.html?hp">G-20 summit</a> in London. Since the leaders who show up there represent countries that control <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/weekinreview/29burns.html?hpw">80% of the world's economy</a>, it could be an important meeting. If you live in the U.K. or U.S., your leaders will be attacked by those in other countries who believe that they should not be asked to bail out the errors of Anglo-American capitalism. Beyond that, little of substance is likely to be accomplished.</p>
<p>However, in an alternative universe, the G-20 meeting might actually accomplish something. Specifically, it could get agreement on six principles on which to rebuild American capitalism. Here's what I think those would be:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong>Grow through technology-based innovation.</strong> The United States used to be admired around the world for its ability to create new industries. In the 1990s, an Asian government wanted to emulate our success and asked me to discuss how the United States turns innovation into economic growth. Unfortunately, since 2000 our ability to take brilliant ideas from our top universities and turn them into venture-backed companies that sell their shares to the public to fuel the creation of new industries has largely been broken. If there is to be growth, it should come from reviving this process.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six principles for saving American capitalism</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/">Six principles for saving American capitalism</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1501448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/29/six-principles-for-saving-american-capitalism/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>capitalism</category><category>g-20</category><category>g-20 summit</category><category>GDP</category><category>gross domestic product</category><category>inthenews</category><category>post-bubble economy</category><category>technological innovation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/sams-chart.jpg" alt="" />Since Obama's inauguration, the market seems to have responded negatively to the president's rhetoric, and yesterday was no exception. Within seconds of a White House alert that the president and his chief economic advisers would make an important announcement, stocks headed south. <br /><br />And by the time that President Obama -- flanked by his team -- began the address at 3:50 p.m. Eastern, the Dow had given up more than 100 points, with investors fearful that the team had decided on a major policy shift.<br /><br />Despite the poor timing of the White House's news conference, which contained little new information and spooked traders into a flurry of profit-taking, Wednesday's small correction did little to change Tuesday's upside reversal and the probability of further buying.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/">Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>s and p 500</category><category>sam collins</category><category>SamCollins</category><category>SAndP500</category><category>standard and poors</category><category>StandardAndPoors</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[King had a dream, does Obama have a fantasy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/barack-obama.jpg" alt="" />Listening to President Obama's speech last night I was very impressed with his grasp of the vast number of difficult issues that face our nation. I support him in addressing these problems head on -- with optimism, energy and forthrightness. He said, "I get it" -- I believe him.<br /></p>
<p>Now, having laid out a vision for all that ails us, I can't help but think that the president is going to be <strong><em>playing out a fantasy</em></strong>. His epic journey to the White House has reinforced the President's conviction that <em>'anything' </em>is possible, but the real question this morning is whether<em> 'everything' </em>is possible.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>King had a dream, does Obama have a fantasy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/">King had a dream, does Obama have a fantasy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/king-had-a-dream-does-obama-have-a-fantasy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bail outs</category><category>BailOuts</category><category>Balancing the budget</category><category>BalancingTheBudget</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>bi-partisanship</category><category>deficts</category><category>economy</category><category>Iraq War</category><category>IraqWar</category><category>Obama speech</category><category>ObamaSpeech</category><category>politics</category><category>presidents speech</category><category>PresidentsSpeech</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Post Q4 earnings preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img width="261" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="61" border="0" align="right" alt="Washingron Post Q4 Earnings Preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/wpo.jpg" />Tomorrow morning before the bell, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">The Washington Post Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>) will have its chance to impress Wall Street when it <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jmLe68kXvvC0gUiIXh6EDZsoNb8QD96HDU3G0">reports its fourth quarter numbers</a>.<br /><br />Going into tomorrow's announcement, analysts are expecting the company to show earnings on the quarter of $8.17 per share. Should the company hit this estimate, it would be a decline of 16.5% from <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wpo">its reported $9.79</a> during its fourth quarter 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Post Q4 earnings preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/">Washington Post Q4 earnings preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1470398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/washington-post-wpo-q4-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad revenue</category><category>AdRevenue</category><category>advertising</category><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>internet</category><category>marketing</category><category>newspapers</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures halted by two big banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" alt="moratorium on foreclosures" />The alarming rate at which foreclosures have been rising over the past year is definitely something to be concerned about. Today, some homeowners are getting a little breathing room as a couple of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/big-banks-announce-foreclosure/342619">biggest banks are granting a moratorium on foreclosures</a>.<br /><br />As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/lita-epstein">Lita Epstein</a> pointed out yesterday, last month was the tenth month in a row where foreclosures were in excess of 250,000 as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/more-than-250-000-homes-face-foreclosure-filings-for-10th-straig/">274,399 foreclosures were filed in January</a>. The foreclosure epidemic has been a serious drain on the overall economy, and it is hoped that the Obama administration is going to be able to develop a plan to help keep homeowners in their homes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreclosures halted by two big banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/">Foreclosures halted by two big banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>housing</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>judges</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Three use bailout bucks to sue state governments]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/gm-hq-detroit.jpg" alt="" />Looking over the recent history of America's automakers, one theme seems to stand out. Regardless of their situation, the economy, or the issue at hand, the Big Three have an almost preternatural ability to determine the most foolish course of action and pursue it with amazing vigor. <br /><br />Regardless of whether we're talking about the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Company</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) decision to focus its attention on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/ford-wont-back-down/">cars</a> (to the detriment of its truck lines), Chrysler's decision to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/chrysler-announces-plan-to-stuff-the-channels/">channel stuff</a> its dealerships, or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a>' (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) decision to sit on its fuel cell cars, Detroit seems determined to misjudge the economy and the customers. <br /><br />At their best, the three have minimized innovation while milking their successes. At their worst, they have spent time and money on expensive acquisitions or dead-end technologies, to the detriment of their bottom line.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Big Three use bailout bucks to sue state governments</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/">Big Three use bailout bucks to sue state governments</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/big-three-use-bailout-bucks-to-sue-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>chrysler</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>general motors</category><category>general motors corp.</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GeneralMotorsCorp.</category><category>gm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil moves higher despite bearish inventory report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" />Oil prices <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i5TtajgUpSm7KY5jf-lCJGHBB-tAD960C5H01">inched up slightly today</a>, despite the fact that inventories swelled much more than the market had anticipated last week. Going into today's inventory report from the U.S. Department of Energy, analysts had been expecting to see an increase in oil inventories last week. But, on average, analysts had been expecting that the increase would be around 3.4 million barrels, and the actual increase was much larger, with a reported 6.2 million increase: a very bearish indicator. <br /><br />Typically when we see inventories rise so much higher than expected, we would expect to see traders push oil prices lower, but not today. Instead, oil was able to move a bit higher on the day, trading up 58 cents a barrel to $42.16. Earlier in the session prices had been up as high as $43.60.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil moves higher despite bearish inventory report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/">Oil moves higher despite bearish inventory report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/oil-moves-higher-despite-bearish-inventory-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>government report</category><category>GovernmentReport</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil supply</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilSupply</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/lmt-lockheed-martin-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>) have moved strongly higher in today's action after the defense contractor put up <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZkhmKP6a2dr8IIcXjoRIBou_BSQD95S9UG80">better than expected numbers</a> for its fourth quarter this morning.<br /><br />Going into today's earnings release, analysts had been expecting to see the company show <a href="http://earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=lmt">$1.92 per share</a>, but the company came in well above those estimates, with a reported $2.05 a share for its quarter ending December 31.<br /><br />This morning's good news was slightly balanced by the company's announcement that its upcoming full year 2009 profit was probably going to be lower than it had previously forecast, a result of increasing pension expenses. The market was tough on the company's pension plan in 2008, and drove the plan's value down by 28%. The resulting increase in pension expenses forced Lockheed Martin to lower its full year 2009 profit guidance down to between $7.05 and $7.25 from a previous estimate of between $7.65 and $7.90 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/">Lockheed Martin rises on strong earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/lockheed-martin-lmt-rises-on-strong-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>defense</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>forecast</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel asks Obama administration for $2 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/katrina.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">Sprint Nextel Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>) has urged President Obama's administration to pony up $2 billion dollars to build and enable a nationwide emergency wireless network that could help response teams and first responders immensely when a disaster occurs. While that may not be high on the new President's priority list, it should fall in there somewhere in the next 18 months.<br /><br />There is still no nationwide advanced communications network to assist responders as soon and efficiently as possible in the wake of a terrorist or natural disaster. Thinking back to overloaded wireless networks (and non-functioning towers) during the Hurricane Katrina disaster, there's the proof that something like this is needed. Is Sprint the right company to build it? It says $2 billion and one year is all that it would take.<br /><br />Sprint's suggestion says the $2 billion -- which would come from the "bailout money" (whatever that is, heh) -- would make a <a href="http://sprintconnection.kansascity.com/?q=node/933">new emergency network operable for up to five years</a>. It would include 100 satellite-based cells placed strategically around the U.S. and 100,000 ready-to-use handsets to work on the new network. Perhaps this is Sprint's way to continue utilizing its Nextel assets for something other than a network that loses customers every quarter.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/">Sprint Nextel asks Obama administration for $2 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sprintconnection.kansascity.com/?q=node/933>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437209/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/sprint-nextel-asks-obama-administration-for-2-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>emergency wireless</category><category>EmergencyWireless</category><category>featured</category><category>first responder</category><category>FirstResponder</category><category>Obama</category><category>S</category><category>Sprint Nextel</category><category>SprintNextel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Congress let Obama's Treasury pick slide on taxes?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/theobamas.jpg" alt="" />The honeymoon between President-elect Barack Obama and the American people may end about the time crews finish cleaning up from tomorrow's inauguration festivities. For now, the American people and Congress are willing to cut the charismatic politician some slack, especially when it comes to his troubled nominee for Treasury Secretary.<br /><br />Priority number one for the first African-American leader of the free world is the U.S. economy. It's more important than the war in Gaza, more important than education and more important than the fight against terrorism. The U.S. economy is in its worst shape since the early 1980s. If the slump, which has already lasted 12 months, lingers for more than 16 months than it will equal the Great Depression, <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUKLNE50I01C20090119?sp=true">according to Reuters</a>.<br /><br />Obama is well aware of the challenges that lie ahead. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/19/obama.first.week/"> CNN reports </a>that he is planning to meet with his top aides Wednesday "to map out how to step up his personal lobbying efforts to get Congress to pass his stimulus plan, which has a price tag of $825 billion."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Congress let Obama's Treasury pick slide on taxes?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/">Should Congress let Obama's Treasury pick slide on taxes?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2009/01/early_notice_helps_geithners_t.html?wprss=washingtonpostinvestigations>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1433945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/19/should-congress-let-obamas-treasury-pick-slide-on-taxes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>taxes</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
