<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[A Bailout for Credit Unions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/07/brokenpiggybank.jpg" alt="" />In a complex set of arrangements, the federal government has stepped in to stabilize the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Credit%20Union" class="inlinked">credit union</a> industry, as reported by the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499604575512254063682236.html?mod=WSJ_hps_MIDDLETopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. The bailout involves wholesale credit unions. They invest money for retail credit unions and provide them with check-clearing services.</p>
<p>During the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Housing%20Bubble" class="inlinked">housing bubble</a>, these wholesale credit unions invested in subprime mortgages, and guess what? They lost a bundle of money for their clients, who are retail credit unions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A Bailout for Credit Unions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/">A Bailout for Credit Unions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19648870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/a-bailout-for-credit-unions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>National Credit Union Administration</category><category>wholesale credit unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Roubini: Rising Sovereign Debt Will Lead to Defaults]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/1-roubini.jpg" alt="Nouriel Roubini" />Financial guru, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-29/roubini-says-rising-sovereign-debt-leads-to-defaults-update3-.html">Nouriel Roubini foresees</a> rising sovereign debt leading to defaults.</p>
<p>Roubini predicted the U.S. financial collapse at least a year before it happened. Now he is predicting sovereign defaults for European Union (EU) nations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Roubini: Rising Sovereign Debt Will Lead to Defaults</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/">Roubini: Rising Sovereign Debt Will Lead to Defaults</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 02 May 2010 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19459659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/02/roubini-rising-sovereign-debt-will-lead-to-defaults/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>EU</category><category>euro</category><category>European Union</category><category>Greek debt</category><category>IMF</category><category>inthenews</category><category>junk bonds</category><category>Roubini</category><category>sovereign debt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The federal budget year ended in October. The October deficit number set <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BU69E80.htm">a record of $176.4 billion</a>, which was higher than the $150 billion economists had predicted. </p>
<p>For the budget year 2009, the deficit reached $1.42 trillion. That too was an all-time record. This year's deficit was $958 billion above the 2008 deficit. October was the 13th straight month to show a deficit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/">Federal deficit sets October record of $176.4 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BU69E80.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/federal-deficit-sets-october-record-of-176-4-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>budget deficits</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tax receipts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will private equity take down the economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bx-blackstone-logo.jpg" width="160" height="28" alt="" />Over the past decade we seen at least <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125676804216914301.html">$1 trillion dollars spent by private equity firms</a>. These firms have taken over companies for a pittance and then pillaged them by slashing employees and cutting costs. They then used the money to pay down debt rather than rebuilding the company.</p>
<p>Now all of the debt thrown on the acquired companies is coming due and it could cause another economic disaster, even bring down the economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will private equity take down the economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/">Will private equity take down the economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19214383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/will-private-equity-take-down-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>Blackstone</category><category>BX</category><category>CIT</category><category>Hilton Hotels</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Josh Kosman</category><category>next criisis</category><category>private equity debt</category><category>Travelport</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taxpayers are, once again, the biggest losers in the CIT bankruptcy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c-i-t-group-inc-a/cit/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/cit_group_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />CIT Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c-i-t-group-inc-a/cit/nys">CIT</a>) has filed for bankruptcy -- which will lead to the wipeout of the United States taxpayers' $2.3 billion "investment" in the company.<br /><br />At least, <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/cit/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20081223005550&amp;newsLang=en">it was billed as an investment at the time</a>, which it was, in the same way that lending your crack junkie cousin beer money is an investment.<br /><br />"The decision to proceed with our plan of reorganization will allow CIT to continue to provide funding to our small business and middle market customers, two sectors that remain vitally important to the U.S. economy," Jeffrey M. Peek, CIT's Chairman and CEO, <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20091101005053&amp;newsLang=en">said</a> in a statement. "This market-based solution allows CIT to enter into the reorganization process well-prepared and positioned for a swift emergence."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Taxpayers are, once again, the biggest losers in the CIT bankruptcy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/">Taxpayers are, once again, the biggest losers in the CIT bankruptcy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-11-01-cit-bankruptcy-restructure_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/taxpayers-are-once-again-the-biggest-losers-in-the-cit-bankrup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>Bankruptcy</category><category>CIT</category><category>CIT Group</category><category>CitGroup</category><category>featured</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #8 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame9.jpg" width="160" height="213" />In the past, the government has increased spending and cut taxes to spur spending during times of economic crisis.</p>
<p>However, Uncle Sam is now in so much debt that this is no longer a serious option. And it looks like we are going to spend another $900 billion-plus on health care reform over 10 years (a lot of money, sure, but about a third less than what Wall Street will spend on bonuses).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/">Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What if bankers were paid in toxic assets?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />There's a new day dawning out there. Some analysts are proposing that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/32837003">bankers should be paid in toxic assets</a>. Among the chief proponents of this idea are Vince Farrell of Soleil Securities and Jim Rodgers of Rodgers Holdings.</p>
<p>Now this seems to be a fine idea. The bankers, with their greed and excess speculation, took down our financial system. The U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve had to pledge <strong>$12.2 trillion of your money</strong> to bail out these ... (you finish the sentence as you see fit). Can you imagine what $12.2 trillion is like? Do you have any idea what this money could have done for our country?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What if bankers were paid in toxic assets?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/">What if bankers were paid in toxic assets?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/32837003>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19160503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/what-if-bankers-were-paid-in-toxic-assets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>bankers</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>toxic assets</category><category>ToxicAssets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM insists it will repay taxpayer funds -- oh, really?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-gm-200cs080708.jpg" />The Congressional Oversight Panel reported on Wednesday that most of the $23 billion in taxpayer funds provided to General Motors and Chrysler is unlikely to be repaid. The Congressional Budget Office estimated in June that taxpayers would lose $40 billion of the first $55 billion provided to the auto industry.</p>
<p>The Treasury Department acknowledges that most of the $23 billion provided by the Bush Administration is likely gone forever, but added that there is a "reasonably high probability of the return of most or all of the government funding" provided by the Obama administration.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM insists it will repay taxpayer funds -- oh, really?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/">GM insists it will repay taxpayer funds -- oh, really?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19156905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/gm-insists-it-will-repay-taxpayer-funds-oh-really/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>CBO</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Greg Martin</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Treasury Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are the bailouts making taxpayers rich? Not so fast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/cash-lender-200-041007.jpg" alt="" />Bailout coverage has taken on a celebratory tone in recent days as a slew of banks including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) have repaid TARP money, leaving taxpayers with what looks like a handy profit. In addition, equity stakes in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) are sitting on a handsome paper profit.</p>
<p>The only problem is that <a href="http://bailout.propublica.org/main/list/index">hundreds of banks have received TARP money</a>. Of course, the most healthy ones are paying it back quickly. The rest are still in limbo, and the result is that the Treasury Department is realizing plenty of gains while all the losses -- investments in companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>), General Motors, and Chrysler -- remain unrealized and largely ignored.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are the bailouts making taxpayers rich? Not so fast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/">Are the bailouts making taxpayers rich? Not so fast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/are-the-bailouts-making-taxpayers-rich-not-so-fast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bailouts</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>General Motors</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Federal court order forces Fed to release details of $2 trillion dollar bailouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bernanke_ben.jpg" />August 25, 2009. Ben Bernanke is nominated to serve a second term as Federal Reserve Chairman.</p>
<p>August 25, 2009. Ben Bernanke and the Fed are ordered by a federal court to disclose details of their bailout transactions during the financial meltdown last year.</p>
<p>Two reporters from Bloomberg News filed suit in federal court under the Freedom of Information Act and won a case that "ruled against the U.S. <a href="http://newsfeedresearcher.com/data/articles_b35/federal-banks-reserve.html">Federal Reserve's attempt to block disclosure</a> of companies that participated in and securities covered by a series of emergency financial programs as the global credit crisis began to intensify."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Federal court order forces Fed to release details of $2 trillion dollar bailouts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/">Federal court order forces Fed to release details of $2 trillion dollar bailouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19140489/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/federal-court-order-forces-fed-to-release-details-of-2-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>bailouts</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bailed out businesses slash lobbying budgets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aHKcprgv8WPU">Bloomberg reports</a> that "<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), General Motors and four other bailed-out firms subject to U.S. pay reviews cut 2009 lobbying costs 37 percent as pressure mounts from Congress and the public to rein in outsized bonuses, records show."<br /><br />In a way, it's not so surprising: Now that they've gotten their handouts, they don't need to buy off public officials anymore. But what's appalling is how much -- even after the drop -- taxpayer money these companies used to lobby the government for more gifts.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bailed out businesses slash lobbying budgets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/">Bailed out businesses slash lobbying budgets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aHKcprgv8WPU>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19128600/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/bailed-out-businesses-slash-lobbying-budgets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>Lobbying</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GDP falls 1% in second quarter -- where is the growth?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" />What happened to the economy in the second quarter? While the numbers show that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56U1I220090731">the contraction in GDP was only 1%</a>, it nevertheless was a negative number.</p>
<p>Here is a breakdown of some key numbers:</p>
<ul>
    <li>GDP fell 1% in the second quarter after falling 6.4% in the previous quarter. </li>
    <li>Residential investment fell 29.3%, after falling 39.2% in the first quarter. </li>
    <li>Business investment dropped 8.9% after a slide of 39.2% in the first quarter.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GDP falls 1% in second quarter -- where is the growth?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/">GDP falls 1% in second quarter -- where is the growth?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19115397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/gdp-falls-1-in-second-quarter-where-is-there-no-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bailouts could cost taxpayers $23.7 trillion?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aQEI97EY.fs0">Bloomberg reports</a> that "U.S. taxpayers may be on the hook for as much as $23.7 trillion to bail out financial companies, according to Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program."<br /><br />$23.7 trillion? That's an amount so large that it's almost meaningless. To put it perspective, think of it this way: There are approximately 300 million people in the United States. My dollar store calculator couldn't handle an equation that big so I had to type it into Google but it works out to $79,000 per person.<br /><br />Not per family or household. Per person. If you have a kindergartner, call him in and explain that he now owes $79,000.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bailouts could cost taxpayers $23.7 trillion?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/">Bailouts could cost taxpayers $23.7 trillion?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aQEI97EY.fs0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/bailouts-could-cost-taxpayers-23-7-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Stimulus</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The oligarchy of bailouts, and why we all lose]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/nyse-protest.jpg" alt="" /> With all the bailout money circulating through the system, the U.S. government is fundamentally altering notions of competition. Mainly, companies that are receiving bailout funds are finding themselves with a distinct competitive advantage.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124501974568613573.html#mod=todays_us_page_one"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) reports that "Since the onset of the financial crisis nine months ago, the government has become the nation's biggest mortgage lender, guaranteed nearly $3 trillion in money-market mutual-fund assets, commandeered and restructured two car companies, taken equity stakes in nearly 600 banks, lent more than $300 billion to blue-chip companies, supported the life-insurance industry and become a credit source for buyers of cars, tractors and even weapons for hunting ... Increasingly, companies big and small are competing on the basis of their ability to tap government money."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The oligarchy of bailouts, and why we all lose</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/">The oligarchy of bailouts, and why we all lose</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124501974568613573.html#mod=todays_us_page_one>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19067296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/15/the-oligarchy-of-bailouts-and-why-we-all-lose/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>competition</category><category>inthenews</category><category>TARP</category><category>zombie banks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can I claim AIG as a dependent?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/irs.jpg" alt="" />As people work on their taxes, they always look for creative ways to cut their tax bills. Some of our readers think they've got a perfect new write-off -- claiming <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) as a dependent.<br /><br />One reader, Rick, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/25/AIG-exec-donates-bonus/15#comments">wrote</a>, "I hope to keep my job, I still have to provide for my family and AIG. I wonder if I can claim them on this years tax return?"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can I claim AIG as a dependent?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/">Can I claim AIG as a dependent?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502119/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/can-i-claim-aig-as-a-dependent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>bailouts</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM's UAW buyouts not that different from AIG bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) has convinced 6,000 of its UAW employees to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aSyD1Z8dpimk">take buyouts</a> of their contracts, more than doubling Barclays Capital's estimates.<br /><br />The buyouts affect 10% of GM's UAW-represented workers and come at a steep cost: a $25,000 voucher to buy a new car and $20,000 in cash. Now it's not that I begrudge GM's hardworking employees who individually had nothing to do with the company's collapse, but I have to ask: Is it really fair to write them checks for $45,000, with payments made by the United States taxpayers who had nothing to do with GM's collapse.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM's UAW buyouts not that different from AIG bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/">GM's UAW buyouts not that different from AIG bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aSyD1Z8dpimk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1499086/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/26/gms-uaw-buyouts-not-that-different-from-aig-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>Bailouts</category><category>Buyouts</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Make bailed out companies hold meetings in Detroit!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/detroit_220.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I've recently been giving some thought to how we can help Detroit get out of its rut.</p>
<p>And what a rut it is: The average <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/03/10/investors-head-to-detroit-for-pinto-priced-homes/">home price is hovering around $6,000</a> and vacancy rates are soaring as everyone who can find somewhere else to go flees Detroit. I suggested making Detroit into a <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/03/10/make-detroit-the-next-retirement-community/">retirement community</a>, but now I have a better idea: Make <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) executives have their little conventions there.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Make bailed out companies hold meetings in Detroit!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/">Make bailed out companies hold meetings in Detroit!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1494716/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/22/make-bailed-out-companies-hold-meetings-in-detroit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bailouts</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>company meetings</category><category>conferences</category><category>Detroit</category><category>housing</category><category>junkets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rick Santelli blasts AIG bonuses, bailout]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p>CNBC commentator Rick Santelli is blasting the payment of $100 million plus in bonuses to executives at corporate train wreck <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>), but he's also drawing attention to what a side issue it is given the thousand-fold larger pile of cash we piled into that hellhole of a company.<br /><br />"I think it's reprehensible, but I think the bigger issue is we're giving a lot of talk to the $165 million towel rack . . . I would like to see greater scrutiny given to the $165 billion house we now own."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rick Santelli blasts AIG bonuses, bailout</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/">Rick Santelli blasts AIG bonuses, bailout</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1491065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/rick-santelli-blasts-aig-bonuses-bailout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>Bailouts</category><category>Rick Santelli</category><category>RickSantelli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Senator Shelby says we should let big banks fail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p>Republican Senatory Richard Shelby of Alabama says that it's time for the federal government to start letting some big banks fail instead of propping them up.<br />
<p>"Close them down, get them out of business. If they're dead, they ought to be buried," he <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/08/news/economy/banks_gop.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009030813">said on ABC's "This Week"</a> program. "We bury the small banks. We've got to bury some big ones and send a strong message to the market."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Senator Shelby says we should let big banks fail</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/">Senator Shelby says we should let big banks fail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/08/news/economy/banks_gop.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009030813>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1482081/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/senator-shelby-says-we-should-let-big-banks-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>Banks</category><category>c</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Richard Shelby</category><category>RichardShelby</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Electrolux CEO bashes bailouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/electrolux220.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Electrolux CEO Hans Straberg is taking a hard line against bailouts, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29550147">telling CNBC</a> that failing companies should not receive any more help from governments around the world.</p>
<p>"Let the businesses that are not fully functional, let the weaklings go in this, don't prop them up," he said. "I understand it's difficult to distinguish sometimes between good or bad businesses, but make sure that those who are not surviving the winter don't survive and instead focus on those who have the strength to grow bigger and stronger internationally."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Electrolux CEO bashes bailouts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/">Electrolux CEO bashes bailouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/29550147>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1481626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/08/electrolux-ceo-bashes-bailouts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailouts</category><category>Electrolux</category><category>Hans Straberg</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
