<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Does Bank of America have enough capital?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/bank-of-america-bac-logo.jpg" />Bank Of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) now stands as a symbol of the U.S. banking system, so it better not fail. Its CEO Ken Lewis decided <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/07/business/pay.php">not to take a bonus</a> after taking <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D95I9DM80.htm">$15 billion</a> worth of taxpayer money from the TARP -- not to mention the <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/07/business/pay.php">66%</a> decline in its stock in 2008. Last month it closed its purchase of another icon, Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., and today it sold a $2.83 billion stake in a Chinese bank. Does it have enough capital now? It's hard to know.
<p> </p>
<p>Today's capital raising move looks good on the surface. Bank of America sold 5.62 billion Construction Bank shares at 3.92 Hong Kong dollars -- that amounted to $2.83 billion in proceeds and a profit of about $1.13 billion on the stake sale, based on Construction Bank's initial offering price. (Bank of America now holds 16.6% of the Chinese bank.) But Bank of America sold that stake at a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/business/08chinabank.html?_r=1&amp;hp">12%</a> discount to the stock's Tuesday close -- and that makes me nervous.</p>
<p>Why? Because it ought to be able to sell at the market price by breaking that sale into small lots and executing it over a relatively long period of time. Its decision to sell at such a huge discount hints at desperation. It is difficult to know what kind of financial shape Bank of America is in because it has not released financial statements following its merger with Merrill Lynch. At the end of September it had $11 of assets per $1 of equity, but when it bought Merrill it probably added a significant amount of debt and the potential for big asset write-downs.</p>
<p>I'd guess that Bank of America could use much more capital -- but just how much more it needs and where it will get that money is hard to know.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a><em> and edits</em> <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2009/01/cohan-letter-15-in-2008.html"><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font><the cohan="" letter=""></the><font color="#888888">.</font></a> <em>He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/">Does Bank of America have enough capital?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421524/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/does-bank-of-america-have-enough-capital/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Ban</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Chinese stake</category><category>ChineseStake</category><category>Construction Bank</category><category>ConstructionBank</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Manhunt 2 shelved by Take-Two's Rockstar Games]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/aol-fly-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last week I blogged on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/">Britain banning Rockstar's <em>Manhunt 2</em></a>, owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">Take-Two Interactive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">TTWO</a>) for the game's "unremitting bleakness and callousness of tone." I said that banning games stifles creative freedom and has the ability to destroy an industry -- from game makers to retailers, and, most importantly, consumers.</p>
<p>Well that's exactly what has happened folks.</p>
<p>Following bans in Britain and Ireland, as well as an "Adults Only" rating in the United States, <a href="http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=26025">GamesIndustry.biz</a> has told us that Take-Two temporarily shelved <em>Manhunt 2</em>.</p>
<p><em>Manhunt 2 </em>was scheduled for release on July 10 on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sne/nys">Sony Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sne/nys">SNE</a>) PlayStation 2, PSP, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-adr/ntdoy/nao?tabs=quotesandnews">Nintendo</a>'s (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-adr/ntdoy/nao?tabs=quotesandnews">NTDOY</a>) Wii consoles. However, both Sony and Nintendo <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/6172830.html">carry an Adults Only policy</a>, which leaves little room for compromise. Even if the game were to ship with the AO rating, many retailers -- including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Wal-Mart Stores </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMT</a>) -- will not put <em>Manhunt 2</em> on the shelves.</p>
<p>Take-Two could still appeal the rating of a more toned-down version that fits the "Mature" rating for players 17 and older. However, the AP's Matt Slagle reports that the decision to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8PUDIP00.htm">suspend distribution of <em>Manhunt 2</em></a> could actually boost demand, according to industry analysts. Colin Sebastian, an analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, tells Slagle that he doesn't believe the game will hurt Take-Two's bottom line in the long term, and he considers the recent controversy over the game to be great exposure. "It's free publicity," Sebastian said. "Consumer backlash is a risk, but at the end of the day if it's rated 'M' the retailers will take it."</p>
<p>Investor's didn't seem phased on the news. Shares of Take-Two Interactive were up for the week and closed +1.02% on Friday, to $20.82.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/">Manhunt 2 shelved by Take-Two's Rockstar Games</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924431/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/manhunt-2-shelved-by-take-twos-rockstar-games/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adult only</category><category>AdultOnly</category><category>ban</category><category>games</category><category>gamesindustry.biz</category><category>lazard</category><category>manhunt</category><category>nintendo</category><category>ntdoy</category><category>playstation</category><category>segastin</category><category>slagle</category><category>sony</category><category>take-two</category><category>ttwo</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wii</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
