Bank Stocks posts
FeedPosted Jun 11th 2009 11:00AM by Steven Halpern (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Newsletters, Stocks to Buy, Housing, Recession
"Hudson City Bancorp (NASDAQ: HCBK) is a fortress of safety with plenty of upside potential," says value investor Nathan Slaughter.
In his Half-Priced Stocks, he explains, "The 140-year old bank is a classic example of the tortoise and hare fable. Its slower, measured approach has paid off handsomely and keptit at arms length from the problems plaguing other banks."
"Hudson City manages a network of 130 bank branches spread throughout affluent regions of New Jersey, New York and Connecticut. At last count, the firm had over $20 billion in deposits and approximately $56 billion in total assets.
"According to an independent study, this tight-knit institution has been rated one of the nation's three strictest mortgage underwriters. So when most other banks relaxed their standards in recent years to attract riskier clientele, Hudson City stuck to its conservative roots and refused to budge.
Continue reading Hudson City (HCBK): 'Best in breed' bank bet
Posted May 5th 2009 8:16AM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Before the bell, Earnings reports

This morning, Swiss bank
UBS (NYSE:
UBS) reported a
first-quarter loss of roughly $1.75 billion, adding a warning that bad-debt charges could increase. UBS's loss of 1.98 billion Swiss francs was far better than the 11.62 billion Swiss francs that the bank lost a year ago.
While UBS saw improved sentiment during the quarter, the bank remains cautious about its immediate outlook, noting, "The strong influence that government policy has on the market environment was clearly demonstrated in the first quarter as investors became less risk averse. However, the real economy has continued to deteriorate, and this is expected to have negative implications for credit-related provisioning in coming quarters."
Continue reading UBS narrows quarterly loss after write-downs
Posted Apr 25th 2009 10:30AM by Ted Allrich (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Comfort Zone Investing
If you follow the bank stocks, you noticed the latest earnings were very good. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) showed earnings that almost tripled. Citigroup (NYSE: C) lost 18 cents a share, but that was much better than the 34 cent loss analysts expected, and way better than the $2.44 it lost in the last quarter of 2008. Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) pre-announced it would have great earnings. Then delivered record results. But all of these stocks are well off their recent highs. Why is that?
It has to do with the quality of earnings. In other words, what was the source of this new-found land of profitability or in the case of Citi, lower loss? Investors like ongoing, predictable earnings. In the case of banks, that means loans such as mortgages or credit cards to worthy borrowers. But that isn't where banks got their profits this quarter. Instead, they came from investment banking and trading.
Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Earnings are up, but stock price is down. So what's really up?
Posted Feb 21st 2009 6:18AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America (BAC), Politics
The market rallied yesterday when the White House said it supported the private banking system. According to Reuters, an official said "This administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is the correct way to go, ensuring they are regulated sufficiently by this government."
The statement caused a small rally in big bank stocks, which had been off over 20% much of the day. But, they did not rally back to where the traded at the middle of the week.
Why? Smart investors know that the statement did not mean much. If one of the large banks, probably Citigroup (NYSE: C) or Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) gets into real trouble, the government will still have to step in. If confidence in one of the banks erodes fast enough and other banks refuse to do business with it or customers begin to pull enough money out, the government will have to step in. If Citi's stock price drops below $1 and is still falling, the government will have to step in.
Continue reading What does 'supporting the private banking system' mean?
Posted Feb 9th 2009 8:48AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Citigroup Inc. (C), Barclays plc ADS (BCS)
Barclays (NYSE: BCS) posted earnings that would be the envy of almost any other global bank. In the process, it gave the troubled banking industry some hope that the future will not be one of ongoing losses stretching well into this year, if not into next.
The bank's second half surprised analysts. According to Bloomberg, "It looks like a pretty good underlying performance and start to 2009," said Michael Trippitt, a London-based analyst at Oriel Securities Ltd., who has an `add' rating on Barclays." A lot of the improvement came because many of Barclays large consumer and business service divisions did well when the effects of toxic asset where taken out.
Continue reading Barclays (BCS): Some hope for U.S. bank stocks
Posted Jan 25th 2009 12:00PM by Michael Shulman (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Citigroup Inc. (C), Recession, Financial Crisis
The banks are a wreck and now the pieces are beginning to fly apart, with Citigroup (NYSE: C) struggling the most and beginning to dismember itself.
Meredith Whitney, the uber-analyst who has been right about everything in banking for more than two years, said there were $2.4 trillion in asset downgrades at the end of last year by the credit agencies. This will really whack the banks' critical Tier 1 capital.
And even if you forget earnings problems, the banks will continue to have no money to lend, which will strangle businesses and the economy.
Be sure to read all 7 reasons the stock market isn't going up any time soon.
Michael Shulman is a contributor to OptionsZone.com.
Posted Jan 19th 2009 11:15AM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Politics, Financial Crisis
In the months, and perhaps quarters ahead, they'll be a great deal of talk about banking reform, in the context of financial services reform.
You'll hear much about the need 'to ban banks' or 'get control of commerce / economic activity out of banks hands' etc.
The fault, dear Brutus, is in ourselvesThese well-intentioned arguments are missing the point. The problem is not banks per se, but the abuse of the FDIC provision and related insurance protections. In other words, what has to end is not banks, but 'heads the bank wins, tails the U.S. taxpayer loses (and pays).'
And as I wrote earlier, one viable solution,
outlined by economist Richard Felson, is two-tier banking. An
interpretive report by Gretchen Morgenson in Sunday's
New York Times (NYSE:
NYT) basically describes the themes discussed in the two-tier banking blog, and what appears to be the likely direction for banking.
Briefly, in the future, Felson argues that there should be two levels of banks. The first: private banks that invest in commercial operations, offer higher interest rates and have other exotic investment products, but offer no government insurance on deposits.
The second level: community-based banks that invest primarily in conventional mortgages, offer very low interest rates on deposits, have no high-risk / high interest rate investments, but offer government insurance for depositors.
Continue reading The case builds in U.S. for two-tier banking
Next Page >