BarneyFrank posts
FeedPosted Jul 30th 2009 4:00PM by Jon Ogg (RSS feed)
Filed under: General Electric (GE), Amazon.com (AMZN), Exxon Mobil (XOM), Expedia Inc (EXPE), Harley-Davidson (HOG), Symantec Corp (SYMC)

Today was just one of those solid days. It seems that regulation over non-financial firms being looser is a huge relief. Even a
wider than expected seasonal weekly jobless claims report did not hurt the market. Yesterday we had a potential huge technical event in oil prices, but the news today remedied that. Oil was up almost $4.00 at over $67.00 late in the day. We even had
two IPOs trading today.
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:
Dow 9,152.19 +81.47 (0.90%)
S&P 500 986.40 +11.25 (1.15%)
Nasdaq 1,984.30 +16.54 (0.84%)
Top Analyst CallsContinue reading Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)
Posted May 18th 2009 4:40PM by Connie Madon (RSS feed)
Filed under: Politics
There are new regulations being floated about concerning how to handle a "big bank" failure. Barney Frank on the House side will take up debate on U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner's proposals for dealing with a new banking crisis.
The real elephant on the table is the fact that as it stands now, the largest banks are organized into bank holding companies, which stand outside current powers. Yes, at present the FDIC can move in and seize a bank, run it for a while before winding them down.The power to seize a major bank is so far not under FDIC authority. Under the Treasury's proposals, such authority would become law for what they call a "systemically important institution." Of course the key question is which banks would be termed "systemically important institutions."
Continue reading Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?
Posted Apr 22nd 2009 3:30PM by Connie Madon (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market matters, Personal finance, Politics, Financial Crisis
House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi wants a 1933 style investigation of Wall Street. She said that the American people are demanding to know the what and how of the Lehman, Bear Stearns and Merrill collapses. She wants to pattern her investigation after the Ferdinand Pecora hearings in 1933. The Pecora review "was probably the single most important congressional investigation in the history of our country, excepting the Watergate hearings. Congress is under public pressure to find out exactly what generated $1.3 trillion in financial industry losses, the details of the $700 billion dollar bailout and the $37 trillion destroyed in world markets. In response, John Larson, of Connecticut said: "We truly want to find out what happened to this country and level with the American people." Pelosi, in a speech on April 15 said: people need "to have a clear understanding as to how we got here and what the exposure is to the taxpayer to all this."
Continue reading House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street
Posted Apr 3rd 2009 12:30PM by Elizabeth Harrow (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals, Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Politics, Housing, Financial Crisis
According to a report today in The Wall Street Journal [subscription required], Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) -- those twin titans of mortgage mayhem -- are planning to dish out $210 million worth of retention bonuses over the next 18 months. James Lockhart, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, explained that $51 million in payouts were distributed in late 2008, with the rest of the bonuses to be disbursed through 2009 and into early 2010.
The news is already raising politicians' ire, since Fannie and Freddie are staying afloat only through the grace of government bailouts. The two lenders reported combined losses of roughly $108 billion in 2008, says the Journal, yet 80% of Freddie's employees and 61% of Fannie's payroll will score retention bonuses based on this bleak operating performance.
Continue reading Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses
Posted Jan 9th 2009 5:45PM by Todd Harrison (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC filings, Citigroup Inc. (C), Recession, Financial Crisis
This post was written by anonymous Minyanville contributor Minyan Peter.
Representative Barney Frank is reported to be recommending that $50 billion of TARP money be used to "alter" loans.
While the route may be circuitous and positioned as great for Joe Q. Public, I think it is important to recognize that the ultimate beneficiary is the banks.
Like the rumored tax carry-back benefit rumored on Monday, Representative Frank's proposal represents yet another potentially "non-dilutive" injection of additional government capital into the banks.
Given the United States' position as the global "capitalist" nation - and its symbolic importance in attracting global "entrepreneurial" capital, I expect that Congress will go through enormous (albeit often convoluted) steps to avoid the overt nationalization of the banking system that we are seeing in Germany and the UK.
This doesn't mean we won't see more marienette shows like yesterday's press conference with Citigroup, Inc. (NYSE: C) and the Senate, but given the public outrage to the government's overt bailout of the banks, going forward (if at all possible) I expect the means used will be far less obvious to the taxpayer.
Posted Jan 5th 2009 8:30AM by Peter Cohan (RSS feed)
Filed under: Market matters, Scandals, Recession
Today Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) will grill the SEC on why it missed the $50 billion Madoff Securities Ponzi scheme. After all, over the last 16 years, the SEC investigated Madoff eight times and each of those times, it failed to discover the scam. This -- and so much more -- means it's time for a change in the way Washington regulates Wall Street.
And Frank is sure to use today's stage to talk. Last Monday, I appeared on a TV program in Boston "with" Frank. I put "with" in quotes because when Frank arrived at the TV studio, he made sure that me and any other guests who were to appear got thrown out of the green room so he could have it to himself. And while I was on the set with Frank -- I was scheduled to go on the show right after him -- he never even looked at me -- by contrast, every other person I have appeared with was happy to introduce themselves.
Frank likes to talk -- he used 25 of the 30 minutes (he was supposed to take up about 15 minutes). (And in the four minutes Frank left me, I gave out a few Bernie awards for the worst financial foibles of 2008.) So when he chairs hearings today, Frank will no doubt do quite a bit of talking. And he'll probably ask why the SEC officials failed to discover the Madoff scandal after receiving emails from a New York hedge fund that described his business practices as "highly unusual." As I posted, I think Frank should focus on the village that enabled Madoff.
Let's hope things get better this year.
Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College. His eighth book is You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing.
Posted Sep 24th 2008 6:30PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Forecasts, Politics, Housing, Financial Crisis

If a vote were held Thursday or Friday, the
U.S. Treasury's $700 billion bailout bill would probably pass both chambers of the U.S. Congress, but by narrow margins and with a) an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers for every company that receives assistance, b) a cap on executive compensation, and c) oversight provisions.
Once the bailout work is done, should the U.S. Congress also pass a homeowners assistance bill to help more homeowners with at-risk / burdensome mortgages refinance to secure a lower interest rate?
As BloggingStocks' Jon Berr
pointed out Monday, while lawmakers (and no doubt taxpayers) do not want to reward housing speculators, there's a large pool of borrowers who will be able to pay their mortgages if they can get out of high interest rate notes, and other burdensome adjustable rate mortgages, and refinance at a low, 30-year fixed rate.
While it's true the U.S. Government and taxpayers would end up subsidizing refinanced mortgages if the government receives interest that's less than it could by investing the money elsewhere, the costs of foreclosure - leading to bond defaults - leading to banking institution stress / systemic stress will undoubtedly be far greater, so says economist David H. Wang.
Continue reading Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?
Posted Jul 23rd 2008 8:50AM by Laurie Pasternack (RSS feed)
Filed under: Newspapers, Magazines, Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)
MAJOR PAPERS:
- The Wall Street Journal's "Fund Track" reported that some banks struggling to raise capital may sell their money management units. National City Corporation (NYSE: NCC) is selling its Allegiant Funds, Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ: FITB) is considering selling its Fifth Third Asset Management, and KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) will possibly sell its Victory Capital Management unit.
- The Wall Street Journal also reported that Andrew Cuomo, the New York state Attorney General, is preparing to file civil securities-fraud charges against UBS AG (NYSE: UBS), possibly as early as this week. Sources said the lawsuit may include allegations of malfeasance by senior UBS executives.
WEB SITES:
- Bloomberg reported that money manager John Paulson, the owner of Paulson & Co., is launching a hedge fund that will provide capital to financial firms which have been damaged by the housing crisis. Paulson, who wants to open the fund by December, used bets against the U.S. housing market to help him earn $3.7B in 2007.
- After U.S. lawmakers reached a deal on legislation to alleviate the housing recession, the House of Representatives will today vote on a rescue plan for Fannie Mae -- Federal National Mortgage Association (NYSE: FNM) -- and Freddie Mac -- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (NYSE: FRE). Representative Barney Frank said that the package, which increases the likelihood Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will get the authority to inject capital into the two, is "fully acceptable," Bloomberg reported.
- Oil trading losses forced SemGroup LP, which used to be America's 12th largest private company, to declare bankruptcy yesterday. Reuters noted that SemGroup LP's parent company is SemGroup Energy Partners LP (NASDAQ: SGLP).
Posted Dec 19th 2007 9:28AM by Lita Epstein (RSS feed)
Filed under: Money and Finance Today, Personal finance, Politics, Federal Reserve
Democratic congressional leaders do not think the Fed's new mortgage rules go far enough and have indicated that they are considering taking power away from the Fed when it comes to protecting consumers, according to a story in today's Wall Street Journal. Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and one of the key leaders on this issue, told the Journal that the Fed's moves are a "clear signal that legislation is necessary to help protect homeowners from abusive and predatory lending practices." He also indicated that he is considering reexamining legislation he introduced last week to take power away from the central bank when it comes to consumer protection.
Rep. Barney Frank, who is chairman of the House Banking Committee, wasn't any happier with what he heard form the Fed. He told the Journal, "We now have confirmation of two facts we have known for some time. One, the Federal Reserve System is not a strong advocate for consumers, and two, there is no Santa Claus. People who are surprised by the one are presumably surprised by the other."
Bankers, seeing the writing on the wall and hoping that the Fed's changes will pacify critics, primarily supported the new rules. According to the Journal, the American Financial Services Association called the Fed's rules "measured" and the Independent Community Bankers of America said it was "an important step." But, the powerful American Bankers Association still hopes it can sway the Fed to ease the rules. It said some parts of the proposal were too rigid and "could make it harder for bankers to tailor products for their customers."
Continue reading Lawmakers hostile toward Fed's new mortgage rules
Posted Apr 27th 2007 2:18PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Politics

Poker fans rejoice! House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Barney Frank, introduced a bill on Thursday that would allow Americans to gamble online once again. The bill would allow online gambling companies to apply for licenses to accept bets from U.S. citizens. Frank referred to the ban on gambling as "an inappropriate interference on the personal freedom of Americans" and called internet gambling a victimless crime. The WTO has previously declared the U.S. ban illegal.
Congratulations to Mr. Frank for standing up on this issue. I will give a piece of pie to anyone who can make a compelling case as to why it isn't hypocritical for states to offer lotteries while simultaneously cracking down on people who play online poker. How can you muster up moral outrage when you're selling the same product? This is like Hostess accusing McDonald's of marketing unhealthy foods.
If you're a political junkie closely following this issue and counting probable votes, here are a couple stocks that could be affected:
Cryptologic (NASDAQ: CRYP) - This company provides the software platforms for numerous online gambling ventures. The stock took a beating when Americans were banned from internet gambling, but has since recovered and is close to its 52-week high.
World Poker Tour Enterprises (NASDAQ: WPTE) - This company produces the World Poker Tour Series on the Travel Channel (soon to be moving to the Game Show Network) and also operates an online gambling site. While the company hasn't targeted U.S. consumers in the past, that could possibly change.