<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/symc/" rel="tag">Symantec Corp (SYMC)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Today was just one of those solid days. It seems that regulation over non-financial firms being looser is a huge relief. Even a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/weekly-jobless-claims-creep-back-up-toward-600k/">wider than expected</a> seasonal weekly jobless claims report did not hurt the market. Yesterday we had a potential huge technical event in oil prices, but the news today remedied that. Oil was up almost $4.00 at over $67.00 late in the day. We even had <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/two-ipos-hit-globe-specialty-metals-pennymac-gsmpmt/">two IPOs trading today</a>. <br /><br />Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,152.19 	+81.47 	(0.90%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	986.40 	+11.25 	(1.15%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,984.30 	+16.54 	(0.84%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/30/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-in-tech-telecom-akam-driv-ifx-leap-pcs-netl-sap-tel/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/">Closing Bell: A 1,000 S&amp;P scares the bears (AMZN, XOM, EXPE, GE, HOG, SYMC)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19114792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/closing-bell-a-1-000-sandp-scares-the-bears-amzn-xom-expe-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>GE finance</category><category>GeFinance</category><category>oil</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html">There are new regulations </a>being floated about concerning how to handle a "big bank" failure. Barney Frank on the House side will take up debate on U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner's proposals for dealing with a new banking crisis.
<p> </p>
<p>The real elephant on the table is the fact that as it stands now, the largest banks are organized into bank holding companies, which stand outside current powers. Yes, at present the FDIC can move in and seize a bank, run it for a while before winding them down.The power to seize a major bank is so far not under FDIC authority. Under the Treasury's proposals, such authority would become law for what they call a "systemically important institution." Of course the key question is which banks would be termed "systemically important institutions."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/">Will Congress pass new banking regulations this year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 May 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/16ccfcd6-4312-11de-b793-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1549104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/will-congress-pass-new-banking-regulations-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking reform</category><category>BankingReform</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Tim Geithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home">House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi wants a 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</a>. She said that the American people are demanding to know the what and how of the Lehman, Bear Stearns and Merrill collapses. She wants to pattern her investigation after the Ferdinand Pecora hearings in 1933. The Pecora review "was probably the single most important congressional investigation in the history of our country, excepting the Watergate hearings. Congress is under public pressure to find out exactly what generated $1.3 trillion in financial industry losses, the details of the $700 billion dollar bailout and the $37 trillion destroyed in world markets. In response, John Larson, of Connecticut said: "We truly want to find out what happened to this country and level with the American people." Pelosi, in a speech on April 15 said: people need "to have a clear understanding as to how we got here and what the exposure is to the taxpayer to all this."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/">House Speaker Pelosi wants 1933 style investigation of Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aE68O.jaWO4E&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1524223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/house-speaker-pelosi-wants-1933-style-investigation-of-wall-stre/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1933 style investigation of Wall Street</category><category>1933StyleInvestigationOfWallStreet</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>c</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>ChrisDodd</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pelosi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>We hear the name of Barney Frank quite often. He is Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. His <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home">latest mantra is for more transparency</a> in the recent bank "stress tests."</p>
<p>What is so hard to believe is how naive Barney Frank really is. Doesn't he know that we have an underground banking system that regulators do not even touch. The underground banking system is comprised of all the "off-the-books" transactions like CDSs, CDOs, CLOs and all means of convoluted deals that are losing money and do not even show up on "stress tests." For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is holding <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a96UdT6uCOcA&amp;refer=home">$87.7 trillion worth of CDSs</a> somewhere off the books.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/">Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1518149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block">
<div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/fre-freddie-mac-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
</div>
<div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/fnm-fannie-mae-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>According to a report today in <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123876318076986497.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required], <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) -- those twin titans of mortgage mayhem -- are planning to dish out $210 million worth of retention bonuses over the next 18 months. James Lockhart, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, explained that $51 million in payouts were distributed in late 2008, with the rest of the bonuses to be disbursed through 2009 and into early 2010.</p>
<p>The news is already raising politicians' ire, since Fannie and Freddie are staying afloat only through the grace of government bailouts. The two lenders reported combined losses of roughly $108 billion in 2008, says the <em>Journal</em>, yet 80% of Freddie's employees and 61% of Fannie's payroll will score retention bonuses based on this bleak operating performance.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/">Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac planning massive retention bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1507139/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/03/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-planning-massive-retention-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>chuck grassley</category><category>ChuckGrassley</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>featured</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>james lockhart</category><category>JamesLockhart</category><category>mortgage</category><category>retention bonus</category><category>RetentionBonus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks benefit from TARP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><em>This post was written by anonymous </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>Minyanville</em></a><em> contributor Minyan Peter.</em></p>
<p>Representative Barney Frank is reported to be recommending that $50 billion of TARP money be used to "alter" loans. <br /><br />While the route may be circuitous and positioned as great for Joe Q. Public, I think it is important to recognize that the ultimate beneficiary is the banks. <br /><br />Like the rumored tax carry-back benefit rumored on Monday, Representative Frank's proposal represents yet another potentially "non-dilutive" injection of additional government capital into the banks. <br /><br />Given the United States' position as the global "capitalist" nation - and its symbolic importance in attracting global "entrepreneurial" capital, I expect that Congress will go through enormous (albeit often convoluted) steps to avoid the overt nationalization of the banking system that we are seeing in Germany and the UK. <br /><br />This doesn't mean we won't see more marienette shows like yesterday's press conference with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and the Senate, but given the public outrage to the government's overt bailout of the banks, going forward (if at all possible) I expect the means used will be far less obvious to the taxpayer.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/">Banks benefit from TARP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1424779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/banks-benefit-from-tarp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC is 0-8 on Madoff probes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/bernardmadoff.jpg" alt="" />Today <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=awtWspVB8cng&amp;refer=us">Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)</a> will grill the SEC on why it missed the $50 billion Madoff Securities Ponzi scheme. After all, over the last 16 years, the SEC investigated Madoff <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSBNG36015720090105">eight times</a> and each of those times, it failed to discover the scam. This -- and so much more -- means it's time for a change in the way Washington regulates <a href="http://money.aol.com/madoff">Wall Street</a>.</p>
<p>And Frank is sure to use today's stage to talk. Last Monday, I appeared on a TV program in Boston "with" Frank. I put "with" in quotes because when Frank arrived at the TV studio, he made sure that me and any other guests who were to appear got thrown out of the green room so he could have it to himself. And while I was on the set with Frank -- I was scheduled to go on the show right after him -- he never even looked at me -- by contrast, every other person I have appeared with was happy to introduce themselves. </p>
<p>Frank likes to talk -- he used 25 of the 30 minutes (he was supposed to take up about 15 minutes). (And in the four minutes Frank left me, I gave out a few <a href="http://www.necn.com/Boston/Business/2008/12/29/Wall-Streets-worst-ideas-of/1230602638.html">Bernie awards</a> for the worst financial foibles of 2008.) So when he chairs hearings today, Frank will no doubt do quite a bit of talking. And he'll probably ask why the SEC officials failed to discover the Madoff scandal after receiving emails from a New York hedge fund that described his business practices as <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUSBNG36015720090105">"highly unusual</a>." As I posted, I think Frank should focus on the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/print/">village that enabled Madoff</a>. </p>
<p>Let's hope things get better this year.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a><em>. His eighth book is</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/You-Cant-Order-Change-Turnaround/dp/1591842395/ref=sr_1_2/002-0707230-7400838?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220097046&amp;sr=1-2"><font color="#0072bc">You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing</font></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/">SEC is 0-8 on Madoff probes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1418741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/sec-is-0-8-on-madoff-probes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>bernard madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>inthenews</category><category>madoff</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/foreclosure.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />If a vote were held Thursday or Friday, the <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/">U.S. Treasury's $700 billion bailout bill</a> would probably pass both chambers of the U.S. Congress, but by narrow margins and with a) an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers for every company that receives assistance, b) a cap on executive compensation, and c) oversight provisions. <br /><br />Once the bailout work is done, should the U.S. Congress also pass a homeowners assistance bill to help more homeowners with at-risk / burdensome mortgages refinance to secure a lower interest rate? <br /><br />As BloggingStocks' Jon Berr <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/22/where-are-the-homeowners-in-the-700-billion-bailout/">pointed out Monday</a>, while lawmakers (and no doubt taxpayers) do not want to reward housing speculators, there's a large pool of borrowers who will be able to pay their mortgages if they can get out of high interest rate notes, and other burdensome adjustable rate mortgages, and refinance at a low, 30-year fixed rate. <br /><br />While it's true the U.S. Government and taxpayers would end up subsidizing refinanced mortgages if the government receives interest that's less than it could by investing the money elsewhere, the costs of foreclosure - leading to bond defaults - leading to banking institution stress / systemic stress will undoubtedly be far greater, so says economist David H. Wang.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/">Should Congress fund a homeowners' refinance program after the bailout?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/should-congress-fund-a-homeowners-refinance-program-after-the-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>bailout bill</category><category>barney frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>Darwin</category><category>Economic Darwinism</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Housing Administration</category><category>FederalHousingAdministration</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>fnm</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>fre</category><category>free market</category><category>gdp</category><category>home ownership</category><category>House Financial Services Committee</category><category>HouseFinancialServicesCommittee</category><category>housing sector</category><category>interest rates</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Social Darwinism</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Some banks consider selling money management units]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121676894647675303.html?mod=sp_deals"><em>Wall Street Journal's</em></a> "Fund Track" reported that some banks struggling to raise capital may sell their money management units. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/national-city-corporation/ncc/nys">National City Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/national-city-corporation/ncc/nys">NCC</a>) is selling its Allegiant Funds, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas">Fifth Third Bancorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas">FITB</a>) is considering selling its Fifth Third Asset Management, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys">KeyCorp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys">KEY</a>) will possibly sell its Victory Capital Management unit.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121677389287975701.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news&amp;apl=y&amp;r=533073"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported that Andrew Cuomo, the New York state Attorney General, is preparing to file civil securities-fraud charges against <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS</a>), possibly as early as this week. Sources said the lawsuit may include allegations of malfeasance by senior UBS executives.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4CcrYaAt_vo&amp;refer=home"><em>Bloomberg</em></a> reported that money manager John Paulson, the owner of Paulson &amp; Co., is launching a hedge fund that will provide capital to financial firms which have been damaged by the housing crisis. Paulson, who wants to open the fund by December, used bets against the U.S. housing market to help him earn $3.7B in 2007.</li>
    <li>After U.S. lawmakers reached a deal on legislation to alleviate the housing recession, the House of Representatives will today vote on a rescue plan for Fannie Mae -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Federal National Mortgage Association</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) -- and Freddie Mac -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>). Representative Barney Frank said that the package, which increases the likelihood Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will get the authority to inject capital into the two, is "fully acceptable," <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aCy_Dl.5rdv0"><em>Bloomberg </em></a>reported.</li>
    <li>Oil trading losses forced SemGroup LP, which used to be America's 12th largest private company, to declare bankruptcy yesterday. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2227689520080723"><em>Reuters</em></a> noted that SemGroup LP's parent company is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/semgroup-energy-partners-l-p-common-units-representing-limited-partner-interests/sglp/nas">SemGroup Energy Partners LP</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/semgroup-energy-partners-l-p-common-units-representing-limited-partner-interests/sglp/nas">SGLP</a>).</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/">Newspaper wrap-up: Some banks consider selling money management units</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1264591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/newspaper-wrap-up-some-banks-consider-selling-money-management/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Andrew Cuomo</category><category>AndrewCuomo</category><category>Attorney General</category><category>AttorneyGeneral</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>Fifth Third</category><category>Fifth Third Bancorp</category><category>FifthThird</category><category>FifthThirdBancorp</category><category>FITB</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>Henry Paulson</category><category>HenryPaulson</category><category>John Paulson</category><category>JohnPaulson</category><category>KEY</category><category>KeyCorp</category><category>money management</category><category>MoneyManagement</category><category>National city</category><category>NationalCity</category><category>NCC</category><category>Paulson Co</category><category>PaulsonCo</category><category>securities fraud</category><category>SecuritiesFraud</category><category>SemGroup</category><category>SGLP</category><category>UBS</category><category>UBS AG</category><category>UbsAg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lawmakers hostile toward Fed's new mortgage rules]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>Democratic congressional leaders do not think the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119798901839036859.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">Fed's new mortgage rules go far enough</a> and have indicated that they are considering taking power away from the Fed when it comes to protecting consumers, according to a story in today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and one of the key leaders on this issue, told the <em>Journal</em> that the Fed's moves are a "clear signal that legislation is necessary to help protect homeowners from abusive and predatory lending practices." He also indicated that he is considering reexamining legislation he introduced last week to take power away from the central bank when it comes to consumer protection.</p>
<p>Rep. Barney Frank, who is chairman of the House Banking Committee, wasn't any happier with what he heard form the Fed. He told the <em>Journal</em>, "We now have confirmation of two facts we have known for some time. One, the Federal Reserve System is not a strong advocate for consumers, and two, there is no Santa Claus. People who are surprised by the one are presumably surprised by the other."</p>
<p>Bankers, seeing the writing on the wall and hoping that the Fed's changes will pacify critics, primarily supported the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/fed-expected-to-propose-new-mortgage-rules-tuesday/">new rules</a>. According to the <em>Journal, </em>the American Financial Services Association called the Fed's rules "measured" and the Independent Community Bankers of America said it was "an important step." But, the powerful American Bankers Association still hopes it can sway the Fed to ease the rules. It said some parts of the proposal were too rigid and "could make it harder for bankers to tailor products for their customers."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lawmakers hostile toward Fed's new mortgage rules</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/">Lawmakers hostile toward Fed's new mortgage rules</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119798901839036859.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1066532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/19/lawmakers-hostile-toward-feds-new-mortgage-rules/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>ChrisDodd</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgages</category><category>regulation z</category><category>RegulationZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The return of online gambling?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img width="214" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="179" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/aces_poker_chips.gif" /></p>
<p>Poker fans rejoice! House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Barney Frank, introduced a bill on Thursday that would allow <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/">Americans to gamble online</a> once again. The bill would allow online gambling companies to apply for licenses to accept bets from U.S. citizens. Frank referred to the ban on gambling as "an inappropriate interference on the personal freedom of Americans" and called internet gambling a victimless crime. The WTO has previously declared the U.S. ban illegal.</p>
<p>Congratulations to Mr. Frank for standing up on this issue. I will give a piece of pie to anyone who can make a compelling case as to why it isn't hypocritical for states to offer lotteries while simultaneously cracking down on people who play online poker. How can you muster up moral outrage when you're selling the same product? This is like Hostess accusing McDonald's of marketing unhealthy foods.</p>
<p>If you're a political junkie closely following this issue and counting probable votes, here are a couple stocks that could be affected:</p>
<p>Cryptologic (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cryptologic-inc/cryp/nas">CRYP</a>) - This company provides the software platforms for numerous online gambling ventures. The stock took a beating when Americans were banned from internet gambling, but has since recovered and is close to its 52-week high.</p>
<p>World Poker Tour Enterprises (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wpt-enterprises-inc/wpte/nas">WPTE</a>) - This company produces the World Poker Tour Series on the Travel Channel (soon to be moving to the Game Show Network) and also operates an online gambling site. While the company hasn't targeted U.S. consumers in the past, that could possibly change.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/">The return of online gambling?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/internet-gambling-would-legal-under/story.aspx?guid=%7BA8FF5AC4-8086-4683-BEE8-D14EEF05E1B6%7D&amp;dist=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/883705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/the-return-of-online-gambling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>cryp</category><category>Cryptologic</category><category>Gambling</category><category>Poker</category><category>World Poker Tour</category><category>WorldPokerTour</category><category>wpte</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
