Continue reading Fed Profit Tops $50 Billion

Fed Profit Tops $50 Billion originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading Who profited from Bear Stearns' collapse? One insider did, and got away with it

Who profited from Bear Stearns' collapse? One insider did, and got away with it originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

August 25, 2009. Ben Bernanke is nominated to serve a second term as Federal Reserve Chairman.

August 25, 2009. Ben Bernanke and the Fed are ordered by a federal court to disclose details of their bailout transactions during the financial meltdown last year.

Two reporters from Bloomberg News filed suit in federal court under the Freedom of Information Act and won a case that "ruled against the U.S. Federal Reserve's attempt to block disclosure of companies that participated in and securities covered by a series of emergency financial programs as the global credit crisis began to intensify."

Continue reading Federal court order forces Fed to release details of $2 trillion dollar bailouts

Federal court order forces Fed to release details of $2 trillion dollar bailouts originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading What else was Jimmy Cayne doing as Bear Stearns imploded?

What else was Jimmy Cayne doing as Bear Stearns imploded? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading Book Review: House of Cards: A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street

Book Review: House of Cards: A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

There's been no shortage of heartstring-jerking reports from the current economic crisis -- seniors whose retirement accounts have been wiped clean; families relocating from homes to motels; MBAs forced to wear their resumes on sandwich boards.

However, in my humble opinion, today's news might be the most pathetic: Sesame Workshop, the nonprofit organization that produces the classic Sesame Street TV show, is slashing 20% of its 355-member workforce.

Continue reading Wall Street takes its toll on Sesame Street

Wall Street takes its toll on Sesame Street originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.

In 2008, many big names took big face plants. Since this is a blog about money, I ranked them based on how much they lost and how far they fell. As you can see, the method is not exactly scientific. Here are the five biggest falls from grace:

1. Richard Fuld, Lehman Brothers. The $639 billion bankruptcy is history's largest so far by a factor of at least six. And Fuld personally lost about $1 billion in his personal holdings of Lehman stock. And the repercussions of letting Lehman fail stretched from money market funds to Iceland. Ouch!
2. Jimmy Cayne, Bear Stearns CEO. Cayne lost plenty of his personal wealth when Bear Stearns stock stumbled. But at least shareholders were able to get out with something when JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) bought it.
3. Eliot Spitzer, New York governor. Spitzer destroyed his once promising political career by spending time with at least one woman other than his wife. He was trying to use his prosecution of Wall Street to boost his political career as Rudy Giuliani did. But his self-destructive urges got the better of him.
4. Sheldon Adelson, CEO, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS). Adelson, a colorful character who was a consulting client of mine, has lost $30 billion on paper thanks to his excessive debt load and a decline in gambling.
5. Jerry Yang, CEO, Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO). Poor Jerry Yang suffered from delusions about his ability to revive his creation. He lost a chance to boost shareholder returns by selling to Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) for $31 a share. With the stock at $11.51, he left big bucks on the table, and the board kicked him out of the big chair.

Let us know which one you would chose as the biggest fall of 2008.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Share the reasons for your Biggest Fall from Grace pick in the comments, or let us know about any contenders we overlooked. Also be sure to see the rest of the Best & Worst in Money 2008.

Best & Worst in Money 2008: Biggest fall from grace originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.

In a year of financial chaos, how can one even narrow the choice of most shocking financial collapse to just five candidates? Financial collapses took down venerable Wall Street firms and government enterprises. Even an entire country fell on the weight of this worldwide financial storm. There were so many financial casualties that the task to narrow this down to just five was difficult. We have chosen these five and placed them in alphabetical order.

Bear Stearns
Bear Stearns held a respected place on Wall Street dating back to before the Great Depression, but in March 2008, this once-respected Wall Street firm was bought by JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) for just $2 per share (or about $236 million). The stock price had been $36.75 on March 14, 2008 -- just two days before the JPMorgan deal was struck. Bear Stearns had been the most aggressive player in packaging and selling mortgage-backed securities, and their hedge funds were heavily loaded with the junk they sold. Many saw the fall of Bear Stearns as justice because it was the only major Wall Street bank that did not work with the Fed and participate in the $3 billion bailout of Long Term Capital Management in 1998. Payback is a bitch.

Continue reading Best & Worst in Money 2008: Most shocking financial collapse

Best & Worst in Money 2008: Most shocking financial collapse originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis

Waiting for the other shoe to drop: The looming credit crisis originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Thanks to what former Enron CEO, Jeff Skilling, called bad "optics", some top Wall Street executives announced that they're foregoing their normal seven figure bonuses. But I think I am being generous in estimating that those potentially symbolic gestures will only shave a few billion off the Wall Street bonus pool for 2008. We could still be paying $20 billion in bonuses this year.

How so? After buying $159 billion worth of preferred stock in 24 banks, I have not seen any evidence that the Treasury required the banks to lend it out. There is nothing stopping the banks from using the money for paying bonuses. And while the original estimate of 2008 bonuses was down 20% from 2007 -- to $26.6 billion -- I am thinking that eliminating executive bonuses could lead to at least a $6 billion lower figure -- particularly if this cut provides bank CEOs leverage to reduce the amount of bonuses paid to lower level people.

So far, top executives from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), UBS AG (NYSE: UBS), Deutsche Bank, and Barclays have said they will skip their bonuses for 2008. Ironically, the ethically challenged UBS has the most interesting idea -- starting in 2009, it will be able to claw back bonuses in the years after their award with a third paid immediately, while the remainder will be put into a participant's account and can be reduced if there is a loss at the division or the whole bank. I started proposing an escrow account along these lines in October 2007.

Continue reading Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses?

Will our tax dollars pay $20 billion in Wall Street bonuses? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Former Bear Stearns chief risk officer joins New York Fed originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has been the premier investment bank in the world for decades. It has been the leader in underwriting fees, M&A, and proprietary trading profits for longer than many bankers can remember. It has also sent senior executive from the company to work in the highest level jobs in Washington.

But, the firm is not immune to the credit crisis. It earnings have been hurt, although less than those of most other financial firms. So, it comes as some surprise that it will cut 10% of its 32,000 person workforce. According to The Wall Street Journal. "The cuts, expected throughout the New York-based company, underscore how much even the mightiest securities firms have been shaken by the 16-month credit crisis."

The news may be bad for Goldman but it is awful for almost every one of the company's competitors, most of which are doing much worse than Goldman is. Some corporation in the industry have already lost people. especially Bear Stearns and Lehman. But, the cutting may have only just begun elsewhere. Several analysts recently put out reports saying Citigroup (NYSE:C) may not make money for over a year.

There had been some hope that the Paulson rescue would improve financials at big banks by enough so that they would not have to take drastic measures, but the capital may not be enough if mortgage markets get worse. If Goldman can cut over 3,000 people, its competitors are probably looking at much larger numbers. There are tens of thousand of Wall St. jobs at risk.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Goldman Sachs (GS) to cut 10% of workforce, may be worse elsewhere originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:18:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

With SEC Chairman Chris Cox using his light saber to battle the imaginary sith lord of naked short selling, SEC Inspector General David Kotz has released a fourth report criticizing the commission for its oversight of Wall Street over the past two years.

According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Kotz found that the SEC's Miami office dropped a case against Bear Stearns "and others despite negotiating a $500,000 settlement with the investment bank for failing to supervise a former employee. The case, which was described as 'strong' by at least three enforcement staffers, was dropped without being presented to the five-member commission for a vote."

The head of the Miami office, David Nelson, told Bear Stearns lawyers that "Christmas is coming early" this year, and "Bear Stearns can keep their money." The case involved an employee who was alleged to have given inappropriately high valuations to bonds and loans held by a Puerto Rican bank.

The SEC's enforcement staff responded to the report by saying that it is "misleading, and all too often relies on speculation and innuendo to support its harsh conclusions."

Harsh conclusions? You mean like the collapse of the financial sector and a $700 billion taxpayer funded bailout?

It's unclear whether a $500,000 settlement would have changed anything, but the announcement might have tipped off investors to the huge problems at Bear Stearns before it was too late.

SEC inspector says agency messed up on Bear Stearns regulation originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Continue reading The beggars of Wall Street

The beggars of Wall Street originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Let's just say they did spread the rumors, which I don't believe they did (and, as an aside: if a company can be brought down by the corporate equivalent of 7th grade girls passing notes in class, perhaps it doesn't deserve to be in existence anyway).

SEC focuses on rumors in probe of Bear and Lehman trading originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

The SEC has been accused of being flat-footed on the issue of short selling. The impression among the media and some politicians is that the agency has failed its charter to be the primary watchdog over markets on a number of occasions. John McCain even said he would fire Christopher Cox, the SEC chairman.

Adding to the disdain is a report from inside the SEC itself issued by the agency's monitor of internal controls. According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), "Inspector General David Kotz said it is 'undisputable' that the SEC 'failed to carry out its mission in its oversight of Bear Stearns.'" Kotz says the SEC was aware of the threats posed by subprime mortgages and did nothing.

The news adds to the perception that if the federal government had been on top of the credit crisis beginning in early 2007, a number of large banks and brokerage firms would not have failed or watched their shares lose 80% of their value. Based on this point of view, the government is liable for hundreds of billion of dollars loses suffered by common shareholders and bond holders.

Private enterprises rarely have any success suing government agencies. in many ways that is a practical way to keep the courts from being overwhelmed by people with grievances against federal authorities. But, the inspector general's comments do say that investors in the firms which failed were not fools. They simply never had the benefit of assistance from the one agency which should have protected them.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

SEC points a finger at itself originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

• Top 5 Contributors, 2003-2008: Citigroup Inc. $310,294, SAC Capital Partners $282,000, United Technologies $263,400, American International Group 224,678, Bear Stearns $205,600.
• Top 5 Industries, 2003-2008: Securities & Investment $,245,796; Lawyer/Law Firms 1,976, 063; Insurance $1,416,972; Real Estate $1,262,791; Commercial Banks $850, 544.

Continue reading $700 billion reprise: Conservative bankers? Surely you jest!

$700 billion reprise: Conservative bankers? Surely you jest! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Late Sunday night it was reported by the Associated Press that the Federal Reserve announced it had approved the request of the two investment banks, Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), to become commercial banks and to take deposits, bolstering the resources of both institutions.

Since Bear Stearns was acquired in a fire sale by J P.Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) in March both firms have been under increased pressure to show their financial strength, but the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings (NYSE: LEH) and the buyout of Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) last weekend have changed the playing field too much.

So what does this mean in short? It means the investment banks wanted the comfort and security of mama bear. They wanted the protection of the Federal Reserve, along with the ability to borrow from it at the discount window, and in a worst case scenario, to be bailed out like everyone else.

The Fed, from its perspective, knows this to be true and understands that if the investment banks -- now commercial banks -- can increase their reserves, then maybe a bailout will not be required, which is better for everyone. Along with this change will come additional requirements and regulation.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. DISCLOSURE: I owned BSC and now own shares in its acquirer JPM.

Goldman Sachs & Morgan Stanley to become commercial banks originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

I've put together a good-sized Enron memorabilia collection, inspired by the affordability. I was able to buy an Enron lunch bag on eBay for less than the cost of a similar nonbranded product at Wal-Mart.

The collapses of Lehman Bros. and Bear Stearns aren't anywhere near as interesting but the headlines have attracted a swarm of eBay listings. According to The New York Times, "When a big Wall Street firm goes belly up, one bet you can take to the bank is that memorabilia will be offered for auction on eBay within hours. "

If you're looking to support a charity instead of an opportunist -- or burned employee who, having lost his 401(k) grabbed a stack of mugs on his way out the door -- one seller sold a piece of toast with the initials "BS" and "LB" branded on each side. Proceeds benefit the Children's Diabetes Foundation in Denver. The price? A mere $15.50. A piece of toast that offers the ticker symbols of companies about to collapse would likely be worth far more.

As an investment, I don't think Lehman and Bear memorabilia are compelling: collectibles from the Enron and Worldcom blowups do not appear to have appreciated in value.

Lehman Bros. and Bear Stearns are toast -- and on toast on eBay originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LEH) is likely to file for bankruptcy today. The reason is that the Treasury and White House are smarting from criticism of their $29 billion bailout of Bear Stearns and the $200 billion to $800 billion Fannie and Freddie nationalization. Neither of these moves has stopped the serial sell off in the shares of investment banks and other firms saddled with crumbling real estate assets. So now the powers that be have decided that they'll tighten up their moral standards and refuse to bailout Lehman.

As I posted, the basic problem is that Wall Street thinks the Treasury will cave in and put money into the Lehman bailout. But despite reports of a proposal to hive off the good part of Lehman from the bad part -- financed by other Wall Street banks -- such a resolution does not appear likely. That's because Wall Street does not want to risk its slim capital shoring up Lehman's bad part -- $85 billion worth of commercial real estate and mortgage-backed securities (MBS). These banks rightly fear that they would lose their investments and sink the entire industry in the bargain. In addition, these bad bank financiers don't want to provide the backstop to enable the winner of the bidding on the good bank to surpass them by picking up Lehman's assets cheaply.

Assuming that plan does not work and that the government refuses to step in to finance the bad bank, this leaves two basic options: Lehman files for bankruptcy or other banks liquidate Lehman in an orderly fashion. Bankruptcy might be a relatively orderly process. According to FOXbusiness, "if Lehman entered into bankruptcy protection, the brokerage units would enter Chapter 7 liquidation and a court-appointed trustee would liquidate the firm's assets and give customers back their money. Generally, securities a customer holds at a brokerage firm are legally the investor's property, and aren't exposed to the claims of the firm's creditors." A bankruptcy would likely wipe out Lehman common shareholders.

Continue reading Let Lehman file for bankruptcy

Let Lehman file for bankruptcy originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.