TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the rally hasn't been a sham, but a bigger pullback would be reasonable.

I love it! Suddenly it's S&P 900 or bust! Nothing underneath us. The rally revealed as a sham. Even better, a rally in a bear market!

Now we are talking.

A 45% rally in a bear market. Maybe China had an 85% rally in a bear market! We may have had a 7,500-point rally in a bear market since I started trading 30 years ago.

I am even thinking that we have never had a bull market!

The great debate: Have we reached bottom in the financial crisis, or is there more to come? It's a multi-million dollar question.

Reuters conducted a poll on April 21-27 to get feedback form analysts across Europe and the US. The sobering conclusion was that the recession could last a year or two more. Most said that the worst is yet to come. Their findings stated: "Financial and macroeconomic stability are still some way off and we don't yet have the foundation for a solid recovery."

Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics at New York University, was one of the first to predict the collapse of the U.S. banking system and the current financial crisis. Well, he's back in the news with his forecasts.

What does he see in our future? More bad news. The bear market is not over, says Roubini. The stimulus package will slow the rate of contraction, but that will take time. Macro news, earnings reports and financial shocks will be worse than expected.

Technicians continue to bemoan that, despite the oversold internal indicators and sentiment numbers that show record levels of fear, the market continues to sell off. Normally at such oversold levels of the key indicators we should expect a rally -- but not lately.

A rally may be overdue but, so far, all we seem to get is one or two days up and then down again. The mood is best described by a Standard & Poor's market strategist who on Friday said, "We think the market is in desperate need of a washout to at least turn the tide for awhile back to the upside. We have been looking for a counter-trend rally, but all we are seeing are one-day wonders."

So where is the bottom -- or bottoms?

One by one, the key indices appear to be breaking their support lines.

The Dow Industrials were the first to break, but the S&P 500 has also fallen through its support zone at 800 to 820, and so has the NYSE Composite. Only the Nasdaq is holding above its January low while the others are in a full test of their November bear market bottoms.

But despite the full attack on the bear market low, it would be dangerous to assume that a market sell-off is inevitable.

Typically, when the economy enters a recession, companies that are in the consumer non-durable sector, i.e., consumer staples, see their stocks trade higher as money flows into bulletproof subsectors of the economy that don't suffer from spending cuts.

Companies like Proctor & Gamble (NYSE: PG), Heinz (NYSE: HNZ), Hormel (NYSE: HRL), Kraft (NYSE: KFT), General Mills (NYSE: GIS), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Pepsi (NYSE: PEP), Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), Campbell Soup (NYSE: CPB), Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL) and even Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B), which was down a whopping 49% before getting a year-end bounce.

I think Warren needs to get off TV and get back to work.

My point here is that all of these fortress names got beat up to the tune of 30% to 50% when they were supposed to be the go-to names that would put in a stealth rally in a bear market.

Seems the kitchen and bathroom stocks didn't work this time around.

Bryan Perry is a contributor to OptionsZone.com.

I just spent the last hour or so looking around the market, trying to find something to buy. I haven't purchased a stock in a while. I'm in the mood. But, you know something, it's pretty tough out there, to state the very, very obvious.

I read a piece today by my colleague Sheldon Liber in which he takes Jim Cramer to task for being too bearish. Sheldon makes some great points. In fact, he inspired me to find something out there. Unfortunately, I came up empty. I mean, I was looking at adding some shares of Marvel (NYSE: MVL) to my existing position in that stock. To be honest, I felt more inclined to preserve the profits in that stock by selling out of the position. Yet, Marvel at under $30 isn't a bad buy, in my opinion. Still, I didn't feel like adding, and that felt completely anathema to my emotional mindset.

I then thought about Disney (NYSE: DIS) and General Electric (NYSE: GE). And Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO). Nothing felt right. Nothing. Why? Well, I just don't see the merit of adding to positions just yet. Simply put, I see us going down instead of up. The market action today in the major indexes is not encouraging at all.

It's funny, because this is a case of the two sides of the same story being right. Cramer is correct in that the selling is not over. Sheldon is correct about there being values out there. But things feel so troubled. I mean, why isn't Coke rallying with all the chaos? Yes, I know many investors are concerned about growth at the company, but shouldn't it be rocketing higher with a defensive premium? Puzzling.

Is the market getting you down? You want it to go up, right? Well, you better settle in and brace yourself for even harder times as an individual investor. That is, if some pundits are correct about the direction of share prices. According to this CNBC page, a Dow of 8,000 is now in play, and gold might be set to strap a rocket on its back and propel itself up to $1,500 per ounce over time. I'm not sure about the gold, but a Dow of 8,000 almost feels like a logical rest stop at this point (but that might be emotion talking). In the end, none of us can tell the future.

I can, however, share with you a wish. And it isn't just my wish. I'm sure there are others out there who have already said this. And, yes, this wish is coming from someone who owns The Walt Disney Corporation (NYSE: DIS), The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO), and General Electric (NYSE: GE). I own them for the long term (except for a separate trading position in GE which completely failed and may turn into another long-term asset), so maybe this wish isn't so mysterious. I want to go back to that "happy" time of October of '87. I want to see the Dow drop over 20% in one day. Preferably, I'd like to see it drop 25%, on Cloverfield-monster-sized volume. How many points would that be? As of this writing, it would be roughly 2,670 points.

What, am I insane? About as insane as the idiots who decided to become risk sponges, I suppose. In all seriousness, we need a crash. We need a reset, a reboot. We need a lot of panic on the street, and a spiking VIX ($VIX.X), to at least begin a bottom formation. If you think we're going to form a bottom without pain, you're wrong. And if you think, at this point, that we can form a bottom without a crash, well then, I won't say you're completely wrong on that count, but I will say that a crash would be better.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the stock market finished the second quarter just above Bear market territory. Does that mean everything's great or that things are going to get worse from here? I think the worst is yet to come and that investors should hold onto their stocks unless they and/or the companies they've bought are going bankrupt. And they might look to buy stocks in the coal and fertilizer industries.

The Journal reports that the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) began its march downward, ending the quarter (including Monday's slim 3.50-point gain) with an overall loss of 912.88 points, or 7.4%, at 11350.01 -- and perilously slightly less than the 20% decline from a recent high that is considered the start of a bear market. It was the third straight quarterly decline and the worst second quarter since 2002.

I think the 20% decline that designates a Bear market is pretty arbitrary. People know that the market has been a disaster. And if earnings matter, it's likely to get worse. The Journal notes that analysts expect earnings at S&P 500 companies to be down 11% for the second period, led by a 60% plunge in financial-sector earnings. Estimates fell sharply as the quarter progressed. On April 1, analysts were expecting a 2% drop in S&P earnings and a 31% decline in the financial sector.

Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

Of course they can. But they can also get much better. While the stock market, as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average, has rallied from its lows, can it sustain the gain or will investors take this opportunity to reap smaller losses (who has profits these days?) or step up and buy? Here's what will influence them.

It seems all economic news is bad. "Credit crunch" is more common than Captain Crunch around the breakfast table. Banks are hemorraging from bad loans. They're reluctant to make new ones unless the credit is so good and the loan so small that it would be impossible to lose money on it. Most likely the best terms are for those borrowers who deposit all the money they need in the bank first, then borrow it back, but not all of it. The banks want that extra cushion of safety these days. Don't look for the banks to change lending habits soon. More losses are coming. Until they stop, banks will keep credit tight.

We've been on the phone a lot with investors over the past few weeks. I don't know about you but from where we sit, there is a lot of fear in the market. Investors are worried: worried about what's going to be, how low the markets can go, how the dollar will continue to drop, inflation, etc. There's what to worry about.

But, there is a counter-Chicken Little story setting up behind the backdrop of fear. Bloomberg has an interesting piece out this morning entitled "Buy Signals Abound in U.S. Stocks Shadowed by 1970s". Bloomberg reporters draw comparisons with the almost 20% drop in the S&P 500 (Amex: SPY) we've seen since the October highs.

So, are things any different this time?

Well, for one, Bloomberg claims companies in the S&P 500 are trading at their cheapest levels in more than 18 years to forecasted profits. That means investors believe that forecasted profits are going to fall way short of projections. If the world doesn't come to an end, Bloomberg thinks there may be an opportunity here.

Secondly, valuations versus 10 year Treasuries are also lowest in at least two decades.

Investors don't want to hold stocks. I can't blame them. Anyone who's been trying to pick up some value has probably seen their trades go against them.

Today's markets were foiled with worries of counter-party risks, and even the "denying of rumors" didn't manage to help. You know that headlines of "Oil Nearing $108" isn't a huge help there. On the economic front, we saw some old data on January Wholesale inventories being +0.8%, above a forecast of +0.5%.

New York's Governor Eliot Spitzer has been caught up in a prostitution ring, and even though he is no longer Attorney General this didn't even manage to cheer Wall Street up after years of having Spitzer take down insurance companies, Dick Grasso, and more. Below are the day's unofficial closing prices:

• DJIA 11,740.15 (-153.54; -1.29%)
• S&P500 1,273.37 (-20.00; -1.55%)
• NASDAQ 2,169.34 (-43.15; -1.95%)
• 10-YR T-Bond 3.438%; -0.1030 (bonds still trading)

There were a few major standout stocks today, mostly to the downside.

The market bears are looking for cover and one of their leading superstars, Jim Melcher, who runs the Balestra Capital Partners hedge fund, told The New York Sun today that he believes we are heading for the worst recession since the 1930s and thinks the Dow will fall to between 9,100 and 10,400 - another 20% to 30%.

He told the Sun, "I've never seen the market with more risk and what's significant is that the risk is not yet priced in." He believes an investor's stock portfolio should be half what it is now. He expects unemployment to grow dramatically as consumption slows. And, he things the housing market collapse has a long way to go. He told the Sun that with the "burdens of rising energy and food costs, and combined deterioration of the credit markets" average homeowners will not be able to withstand this recession he sees.

So where's he putting his hedge fund's money? He says it's pretty much devoid of stocks except for two ETFs - the Oil Services Holders Trust (AMEX: OIH) and the StreetTRACKS Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD). The rest of his fund management strategy is shorting stocks and certain bonds - mortgage-backed junk bonds. He's using derivatives, put options and credit default swaps. He is also short ABEX, which is an index of residential mortgage-backed securities.

Another key strategy he is employing is foreign currency trading. His favorite currencies are the Swiss franc and the Japanese yen.

Lita Epstein has written more than 20 books including the "Complete Idiot's Guide to Foreign Currency Trading" and "Trading for Dummies."

What happens when the stock market gets ugly and people start panicking? Once the logic prevails, investors gravitate toward defensive stocks. These are generally the ones you eat, drink, and smoke, or the drugs you need as well as the personal care products you use. Here are four of the top picks from my 17 defensive stocks, which are performing far better than the market today. These stocks have the lowest P/E ratios and the most stable income streams (in alphabetical order):

• Altria (NYSE: MO) ($67.83; -$0.44; -0.6%) has a 14 P/E ratio and a 4.4% dividend yield. This was also one of Cramer's TOP 2007 PICKS, but for different reasons.
• Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD) ($49.92; +$0.20; +0.4%)as the beer drinkers play -- don't people drink more beer when they are stressed? The 18.9 P/E and the 2.7% dividend yield are better than most beverage plays.
• ConAgra Foods (NYSE: CAG) ($25.53; -$0.04; -0.15%) has a 16+ P/E and its 2.8% dividend yield is higher than most food suppliers.
• Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) ($61.76; +$0.10; +0.2%) as one of the more beaten up drug and medical names, plus the personal care products angle. The 17 P/E and the 2.7% dividend yield aren't going to kill you.

We are now in the perfect storm for a rate cut after the jobs numbers this morning posted the first drop in four years. Why does the phrase "Be careful what you wish for ..." keep ringing in my ears for all those who wished for a employment poor report so it would compel the Fed into a rate cut. Probably because the DJIA is down over 200 points today -- all of a sudden the weak data is too weak for comfort levels.

There are always other choices in smaller cap names, but investor mentality tends to go for the strength in numbers. Small caps may also not be familiar enough and so most tend to flock to the go-to names that are more established, hence defensive.

Jon C. Ogg produces the Special Situation Investing Nesletter and he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

Wednesday the market spiked 150 points at the end of trading. Thursday, it rose 100 right before trading closed. But today that trick didn't work -- instead the Dow fell about 281 points, according to AP.

AP's explanation is that S&P downgraded the debt of The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. (NYSE: BSC) because of its exposure to the distressed mortgage and corporate buyout markets. And its Chief Financial Officer Sam Molinaro, described conditions in the credit market as the worst he'd seen in more than two decades.

Similarly bad credit news has been around the markets for weeks. But earlier in the week the market spiked at day's end, as I noted above. Today, not so much. Nobody really knows, except the traders, but my guess is that hedge funds have expected this bad credit market news to tank the market so they shorted it. When the market did not drop as much as expected, they decided to cover their short positions before the close of trading. This last minute buying drove up prices.

Maybe today the hedge fund managers left for their 5,000 acre Hampton estates early. So there was no short covering at the end of the day to give the market a pick me up. Something to think about as you cut your grass this weekend.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in Bear Stearns.