<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/ballmer.jpg" width="200" height="203" alt="" />Although it has gotten wave after wave of bad press recently, is Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) really on the ropes in terms of not having a vision or executing a mission? Far from it. Competitors like Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Google, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) have taken the limelight away from the world's largest software company in recent years with flashy products, sales numbers that would make any CEO grin and general rich tech-worthiness in terms of press coverage and upwardly mobile stock prices. At the same time, Microsoft has had one thing go well for it -- the recent launch of the Windows 7 operating system.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/">Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10419508-16.html?tag=inside>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19289414/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft CEO</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/billgates.jpg" alt="" />It's easy to save the world when you've already taken care of yourself. But, we rely on these mavericks -- the wealthy who realize they can make a difference -- to do what we cannot on our own. So, it comes as a relief that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a>, founder of Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) believes <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/executivecompensation/">executive compensation</a> is still too high. </p>
<div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"> </div>
<p>It's a murky topic, and some forms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/regulation/">regulation</a>, Gates believes, won't help. In a discussion on philanthropy at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/92ndStreetY/">92nd Street Y</a> in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a>, where many of the people Gates criticized send their kids for early education, the former CEO and still rich guy cites the $1 million executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/salarycap/">salary cap</a> required by law in 1993 as a big mistake. While compensation has to be controlled,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112"> he believes this measure backfired and thinks that other, similar efforts are doomed to fail now</a>. </p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/">Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>92nd st y</category><category>92ndStY</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>compensation</category><category>compensation caps</category><category>CompensationCaps</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>ExecutiveSalary</category><category>gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkNewYork</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>salary cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/steve-jobs.jpg" width="220" height="150" alt="" /></div>
Those with aspirations of unfettered wealth look for clues everywhere. From top schools to unique talents, they build profiles of what it takes to become absurdly wealthy ... as though the process can be blueprinted. Well, if you're looking for answers, the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/400richest/" target="_blank">Forbes 400</a> list is a great place to start. If anyone has mastered the art of making money, it's this collection of billionaires. They have the answers, and you are ready to learn.
<p> </p>
<p>A look at the lives of the Forbes 400 implies that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/" target="_blank">the most important attribute is the ability to sift through ambiguity</a>. Contradictions abound, meaning that shades of gray hold the answer to your burning desire for riches. Should you go to a great school? Well, yes ... but only if you're going for an MBA and plan to work for a major financial firm. But, you can still go to an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/IvyLeague/">Ivy League</a> school if you're not studying finance but join <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SkullandBones/">Skull and Bones</a>. Of course, dropping out of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Harvard/">Harvard</a> can be a great way to launch a career in the technology field.</p>
<p>It's tricky. There are no easy answers. But, the road to billions is littered with the corpses of aspiring magnates who thought it wouldn't be difficult. So, don't just read the seven attributes after the jump. Understand them. Read them twice. Then, your future financial situation will be assured. </p>
<p>Or, you can just do one of those chain e-mails and wish for wealth. </p>
<p>[Thanks, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/400richest/" target="_blank">Forbes</a> and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/" target="_blank">MSNBC</a>]</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/">Seven characteristics of the rich and famous: A blueprint to uber-wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110048/ns/business-forbescom/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/seven-characteristics-of-the-rich-and-famous-a-blueprint-to-ube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>columbia</category><category>columbia university</category><category>ColumbiaUniversity</category><category>dell</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>forbes</category><category>forbes 400</category><category>forbes magazine</category><category>forbes.com</category><category>Forbes400</category><category>ForbesMagazine</category><category>goldman</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group gs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>goldmansachsgroup</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroupGs</category><category>gs</category><category>harvard</category><category>harvard business school</category><category>harvard university</category><category>HarvardBusinessSchool</category><category>HarvardUniversity</category><category>inc.</category><category>ivy league</category><category>IvyLeague</category><category>larry ellison</category><category>LarryEllison</category><category>mark zuckerberg</category><category>MarkZuckerberg</category><category>michael dell</category><category>MichaelDell</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>skull and bones</category><category>SkullAndBones</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>university of pennsylvania</category><category>UniversityOfPennsylvania</category><category>wharton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/ms.jpg" alt="" /><a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was hung out to dry back in 2002 when the U.S. government slapped it with all kinds of fines and limits based on its anti-competitive behavior in the PC market. Although Microsoft financially overcame all that was set against it, the company has not really wilted in terms of its software products or even the use of its market-leading internet browser, Internet Explorer.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/">Microsoft set to escape government oversight in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200908131430DOWJONESDJONLINE000588_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19129299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/14/microsoft-set-to-escape-government-oversight-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anti-trust ruling</category><category>Anti-trustRuling</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft anti-trust</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftAnti-trust</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFDT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Gates reports 5.2% stake in Kodak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ek-eastman-kodak-logo.jpg" alt="" />An investment vehicle owned by Bill Gates <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/31235/000110465909009635/a09-5175_7sc13g.htm">reported a 5.2%</a> stake in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) this morning. The investment was disclosed in a form 13-G filed with the SEC, which indicates that the investment is passive in nature: Cascade Investment LLC does not have plans to become involved with the company's operations, or press for governance changes.<br /><br />Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ae5ayfK67YxY&amp;refer=us">reports</a> that the Kodak stake is Cascade's ninth-largest investment.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bill Gates reports 5.2% stake in Kodak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/">Bill Gates reports 5.2% stake in Kodak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ae5ayfK67YxY&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/bill-gates-reports-5-2-stake-in-kodak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kodad</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/symc/" rel="tag">Symantec Corp (SYMC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" /> President Obama is now searching for a third candidate to fill the Commerce Secretary position now that Senator Judd Gregg has <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123447333424979131.html" target="_blank">withdrawn his name from consideration for the position</a>. Scouring the Intrawebs, it seems that the word that most people are using for this rebuff is "embarrassment." While I am a dyed-in-the-wool Republican, I don't know if I would go as far as saying this is an embarrassment - the President tried to reach across party lines and got bit. In fact (and I am watching out for lightning here), Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel hit the nail on the head when he said, "It's better we discovered it now than later ... If I said it wasn't a disappointment, that would lack credibility."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/">Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459402/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Thompson</category><category>JohnThompson</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>Secretary of Commerce</category><category>SecretaryOfCommerce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://?">MSFT</a>) today joined the ever-growing parade o<a href="http://?">f companies firing employees. <br /></a><br />The world's largest software maker is laying off 5,000 people, about 5% of its staff, in its first company-wide dismissal of workers. The move is not surprising.<br /><br />Though the Redmond, Washington-based company is a cash-generating machine, investors are worried that it will be hurt by the slowdown in corporate IT spending. Last month,<a href="http://www.cio.com.au/article/270315/forrester_slashes_it_spending_forecast_recession_deepens?fp=39&amp;fpid=25880"> Forrester Research</a> projected that spending by businesses on technology would rise 1.6% in the U.S. That's down from a projection of more than 6% made in August.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/">Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a8nC10FfiQF8&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437488/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>featured</category><category>Goog</category><category>IBM</category><category>INTC</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Nintendooo</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[In new Windows ad, Bill Gates shakes his other moneymaker for Seinfeld]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p>Have you seen the ads? If not, you can watch the first one below.<br /><br />My first reaction was -- 'Huh? What was that all about? What is it trying to say?' And it seems I wasn't alone. One <a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/story/473631.html">review</a> after <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080908/BLOG01/80908018/1011/NEWS09">another</a> says pretty much the same thing: Just as <em>Seinfeld </em>was a show about nothing, so are the ads. Or as my fellow blogger Jonathan Berr said: "<span id=":1iz" dir="ltr">It was like a bad <em>Seinfeld </em>episode."</span><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is looking to counter the bad publicity of Windows Vista and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) successful commercials with this $300 million ad campaign (of which a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/08/microsoft-pays.html">cool $10 million</a> goes to Jerry Seinfeld himself), but many question if this is the right use of the money.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>In new Windows ad, Bill Gates shakes his other moneymaker for Seinfeld</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/">In new Windows ad, Bill Gates shakes his other moneymaker for Seinfeld</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1307607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/in-new-windows-ad-bill-gates-shakes-his-other-moneymaker-for-sei/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>jerry seinfeld</category><category>JerrySeinfeld</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Jerry Seinfeld improve Microsoft's brand equity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/jerryseinfeld.jpg" />According to <a href="http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page39?oid=221125&amp;sn=Detail">Moneyweb</a>, software giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is hooking up with Jerry Seinfeld. No, they're not trying to revive the comedian's sitcom career (although that would be cool). It seems Microsoft is feeling a bit blah about its brand equity, so it's looking to initiate a hip advertising campaign that will tout the company's image and its powerful Windows Vista technology.</p>
<p>No doubt, the advertising campaign from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) that makes fun of the PC-Windows platform has a lot to do with it. I love those commercials, and I think it's about time Microsoft came to its senses and decided to do something serious to answer them. A campaign with Seinfeld, if done with a maximum amount of creative wit, will work wonders. But of course, that's the point -- it has to be done right. Seinfeld is a big name, and his presence carries a lot of weight with consumers. <br /></p>
<p>Still, I have reservations about using him in an ad campaign. Am I the only one who wasn't impressed by his American Express commercials? I liked Seinfeld in his famous television show, but seeing him pitch charge cards didn't make me want to apply for one. I thought he was boring in the format. </p>
<p>Apparently, ad firm Crispin Porter + Bogusky will be doing the ads featuring Seinfeld, and they were the creative force behind the Burger King commercials with the creepy King mascot. Those commercials rock. It would be nice if the firm could do something as edgy with Seinfeld and Microsoft, but I'm not holding my breath. I'm not sure that kind of lightning could strike twice. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Jerry Seinfeld improve Microsoft's brand equity?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/">Can Jerry Seinfeld improve Microsoft's brand equity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page39?oid=221125&amp;sn=Detail>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1290736/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/can-jerry-seinfeld-improve-microsofts-brand-equity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>featured</category><category>iPod</category><category>Jerry Seinfeld</category><category>JerrySeinfeld</category><category>Mac</category><category>marketing</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>PC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo board is feeling the Icahn heat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/ichanpicture.jpg" alt="" /></a>It should be no surprise to anyone that despite all the ranting and raving to the contrary Mr. Carl Icahn, billionaire investor, shareholder white knight and corporate raider is heating up things in the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) boardroom.<br /><br />It has been reported that he purchased a sizable chunk of the company in the neighborhood of $25 per share, hoping to make another fortune pushing Yahoo back to the negotiating table with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>).<br /><br />This morning AP reported that Jerry Yang, CEO and company are <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/yahoos-board-takes-its-case-to/n20080630100609990023">lobbying major shareholders</a> to rally support for their position that Yahoo! should get a higher offer or stand alone as an independent company. It seems to me that they are standing on lose ground given that many large and small shareholders alike have already spoken, and they would have taken the deal.<br /><br />The market has spoken as well, with Yahoo stock losing over a third of it's value recently and nearing $20 per share this morning Icahn is losing 20% of his investment as things look today. This is turning into the battle of the billionaires.<br /><br />One small problem the billionaire boys in Redmond are not that hot on the deal any more because, as <a onmouseover="handleHeadlineHover(event, '11:57:58 AM','Last+Friday+marked+Bill+Gates%27+last+full+day+at+Microsoft.+','all','40')" onclick="javascript:openNewsWindow('http://www.marketingvox.com/gates-leaves-microsoft-calls-yahoo-deal-unlikely-039567/?camp=rssfeed&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink');return false;" onmouseout="hideHeadlines()" href="http://www.marketingvox.com/gates-leaves-microsoft-calls-yahoo-deal-unlikely-039567/?camp=rssfeed&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink" property="f:title">Gates Leaves Microsoft, he Calls Yahoo Deal Unlikely.</a><br /><br />I think this whole saga might make a cute Neil Simon play if they would let him into the meetings to take some notes.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. He writes the columns </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/"><em>Chasing Value</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/"><em>Serious Money</em></a><em>. <strong>Disclosure: </strong>I do not own shares in the stocks mentioned in this story.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/">Yahoo board is feeling the Icahn heat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=8578609&amp;nav=menu188_2_7>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1241079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/yahoo-board-is-feeling-the-icahn-heat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill GAtes</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>featured</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Bill Gates have to un-retire from Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/billgates.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) co-founder <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a> is <a href="http://blogsmith.aol.com/content/posts/edit/1238776/">riding off into the sunset</a> today, at least he sort of is. The man who made nerds and geeks "cool" is shifting his focus away from the world's largest software company to his philanthropic work.<br /><br />Gates contributions to modern society cannot be understated. When he gets older, my 20-month-old son will no doubt be surprised to learn that there was a time when computers were expensive, impersonal devices the size of several refrigerators. Gates helped make the computer personal. Of that there is no doubt. How he did it remains open to debate. The elite geeks despise Microsoft for developing expensive, inferior operating systems that are prone to crashes and computer viruses.<br /><br />The shift by Gates, which has been expected for some time, comes as the Redmond, Washington-based company is at a crossroads. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, Microsoft was the underdog that upended the tech establishment lead by<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys"> International Business Machines Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Bill Gates have to un-retire from Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/">Will Bill Gates have to un-retire from Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/technology/27soft.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1238776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/will-bill-gates-have-to-un-retire-from-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill GATes</category><category>BillGates</category><category>DELL</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>howard schultz</category><category>HowardSchultz</category><category>Michael Dell</category><category>MichaelDell</category><category>MSFT</category><category>SBUX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Steve Ballmer got his job]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p>In a bit of investigative reporting that no one will care about, <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>has discovered that a series of disputes between Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates eight years ago caused a changing of the guard at the company. The paper <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261241035146237.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">writes that</a> "The conflict between the two men paralyzed business-strategy decisions that the company still wrestles with today. Board members stepped in to try to mediate a truce."</p>
<p>The piece in the <em>Journal</em> is a nice human interest story, but that it would be the top story at the paper is a bit odd. That is until the reader considers that the cult of personality is still alive and well in American business. Chiefs like Lee Iaccoca and Jack Welch have written best-selling books. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) customers and shareholders worship Steve Jobs. </p>
<p>All of that, to a large extent, takes the eye off of the ball. The people who run large companies, even those that are fabulously successful, are only doing the jobs that the investing public expects of them. Even if they are founders. Gates and Jobs decided to take their companies public. After that, the only reasonable question is whether they made shareholders money. </p>
<p>In many ways, the transition from Gates to Ballmer has been a failure. Eight years ago, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) traded at $53. Now its stands at under $28. Gates may have turned the CEO job over to Ballmer, but neither has done the stockholders any favors.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/">How Steve Ballmer got his job</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261241035146237.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a></p><p>Recently I posted a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/serious-money-metrics-anyone-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-tw/">Serious Money metrics story</a> that included <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) comparisons along with six other stocks. Until now I have not felt very strongly about the merits of Microsoft's offer to acquire Yahoo! and merge assets and features.</p>
<p>I was leaning toward the <em>price is too high camp</em>, but now, after Microsoft has withdrawn the offer and I have looked at the current state of affairs of both companies, I think it did the right thing and may have avoided a nightmare.</p>
<p>To bring Yahoo! into the fold, Microsoft would have had to find enough cost savings by eliminating overlapping departments or it would have had to hope it could double Yahoo's earnings. If not, the acquisition would unduly weigh down the mother ship, because Microsoft's <strong>P/E Ratio</strong> of 17.08 is half that of Yahoo!'s 34.25.</p>
<div>When you look at the <strong>ROE,</strong> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) -- with its 45.28% -- has a four times greater return than that of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>)'s 10.96%. Yahoo looks like another drag.</div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/">Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 15:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1193514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>brk.a</category><category>carl icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forbes 400: As Buffett replaces Gates as richest man, age of software closes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/billionaires/2008/03/05/buffett-worlds-richest-cx_mm_0229buffetrichest.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/billgates.jpg" alt="" />According to</a> <em>Forbes</em>, Bill Gates of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is no longer the richest man in the U.S. The honor now belongs to Warren Buffett, the head of conglomerate <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BRK.A</a>). Buffett is worth $62 billion to Gates's $58 billion. </p>
<p>This says more about the shift in the American business landscape than it does about anything else. The Berkshire Hathaway stock is up 30% over the last year, while Microsoft's is flat. Since Berkshire owns an insurance company, it would make sense that the financial crisis would hurt its value, but Buffett has stayed away from the investments that have hurt other companies.</p>
<p>Microsoft may be a safe investment now with its large cash position and steady income from Windows, but it is probably no longer a growth stock. Microsoft software runs on 95% of the world's PCs and many of its servers. That leaves the question of what the company can do to expand rapidly again. The answer may be that it can't.</p>
<p>Buffett's company is in more than a hundred businesses. He can make the argument that diversification is the foundation of a successful corporation. The firm's operations make everything from uniforms for police to concrete block, roofing systems to fabrics. Berkshire also owns large parts of companies from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>). </p>
<p>The new <em>Forbes </em>ranking shows that a large bucket of good investments trumps owning a piece of one successful company in a market that is no longer growing quickly.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at</em><em> 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/">Forbes 400: As Buffett replaces Gates as richest man, age of software closes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/home/billionaires/2008/03/05/buffett-worlds-richest-cx_mm_0229buffetrichest.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1132958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/forbes-400-as-buffett-replaces-gates-as-richest-man-age-of-soft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>axp</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>brk.a</category><category>forbes 400</category><category>forbes 500</category><category>Forbes400</category><category>Forbes500</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mer</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Gates networks on LinkedIn]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/linkedin.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) loves social networking. No doubt, the company thinks there's a potential goldmine there. </p>
<p>Hey, the firm recently <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/facebook-takes-the-microsoft-money-and-runs/">invested $240 million</a> in Facebook -- at a whopping $15 billion valuation. In fact, Bill Gates even setup a public profile on the social network. But there was a problem; that is, too many people wanted to be his friend. Bill was actually getting about 8,000 requests per day.</p>
<p>As a result, he <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13860_3-9870284-56.html">shut down</a> his profile.</p>
<p>Well, Bill hasn't given up. He's now going to go on <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> and answer questions regarding his philanthropic efforts (this is according to a <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13860_3-9879618-56.html">story</a> in C/NET).</p>
<p>To me, LinkedIn's Q&amp;A feature is great (I've even used it to get sources for my stories). Although, as for Bill, I'm sure there will be a flood of questions. Keep in mind that LinkedIn has 19 million registered users.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com">DealProfiles.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/">Bill Gates networks on LinkedIn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1125991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/bill-gates-networks-on-linkedin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>LinkedIn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Bill Gates the next YouTube superstar?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p>Finally, a business parody worth featuring. Several videos have laid claim to the throne, there was ... uhhhh ... hmmmm and uhhhhh ... okay; maybe this is the first laugh-out-loud business parody, and it comes from none other than William Henry Gates III of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) from Redmond, WA:<br /><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ip_DEUuuy5M&amp;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ip_DEUuuy5M&amp;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object><br /><br />You want some market predictions, here you go: Bill Gates is the next YouTube superstar!<br /><em><br />Timothy Sykes writes the blog <a href="http://www.timothysykes.com/">timothysykes.com</a>, is a former hedge fund manager, the star of the TV show <a href="http://www.mojohd.com/mojoseries/wallstreetwarriors/characters/tim.jsf">Wall Street Warriors</a> and author of the book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0979549701/timothysykes-20">An American Hedge Fund: How I Made $2 Million as a Stock Operator &amp; Created a Hedge Fund</a></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/">Is Bill Gates the next YouTube superstar?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1081566/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/is-bill-gates-the-next-youtube-superstar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>microsoft</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Sykes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft tries to move beyond the PC -- again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/msft.jpg" />With the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in full swing this morning, yesterday's cream of the crop kickoff event featured a keynote speech from CES long-time keynoter Bill Gates, the founder of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). In his final keynote speech at the CES show before he drops his full-time gig with the world's largest software company, Gates introduced a prototype navigation device that stores photos, music and videos while also suggesting options for shopping and dining. Sounds pretty un-revolutionary for Gates' swan song, eh?<br /><br />Many of Microsoft's CES introductions since 2000 have fallen flat in the real world, which is not surprising. By trying to keep customers entrenched in its proprietary Windows PC operating system, Ol' Softie puts millions of savvy consumers off its products. Now, there are many other companies guilty of this as well, but they're way better marketers -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"> AAPL</a>) is the best example.<br /><br />Microsoft, though, is realizing that Windows on the PC, along with its Office software franchise, can't sustain it forever. Gates told the audience that consumers want to "interact with digital devices in new ways, such as getting directions from their phones and speaking to their cars." This is true, and it's a reason why Microsoft's Sync <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/fords-sync-is-a-hit-the-new-focus-not-so-much/?KeepThis=true&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=400&amp;width=780">has become a hit</a> in some new <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) cars. Now that Apple iPhone owners are interacting with data on their portable devices more than ever, Microsoft -- of course -- wants to ensure that functionality lends itself to devices that feature . . . wait for it . . . software from Microsoft as well. This really is not a new fight for the software giant. It's hard, though, to tell what is different with this version of it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/">Microsoft tries to move beyond the PC -- again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aqzxdooZC3xU&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1079643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/microsoft-tries-to-move-past-the-pc-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>handheld computer</category><category>HandheldComputer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MSFT</category><category>PC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options update 12-28-07: Microsoft shares near six-year high into CES]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Microsoft</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) -</p>
<p>Bill Gates will give the pre-show keynote address at International CES on January 6 in Las Vegas. CES features 2,700 exhibitors spanning 30 product categories. <br /></p>
<p>MSFT is expected to report EPS on January 24th. <br /></p>
<p>MSFT overall option implied volatility of 27 is near its 26-week average of 25 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.</p>
<p><em>Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/">Options update 12-28-07: Microsoft shares near six-year high into CES</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/options-update-12-28-07-microsoft-shares-near-six-year-high-int/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>ces</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: MSFT, ETFC implied volatility elevated]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong><strong>Microsoft Corp.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) -- Bill Gates will give the pre-show keynote address at CES on January 6th in Las Vegas. CES features 2,700 exhibitors spanning 30 product categories. MSFT overall option implied volatility of 29 is above its 26-week average of 24 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E-Trade</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) -- ETFC is recently down 65 cents to $4.04. On November 29, ETFC announced a $2.5 billion cash infusion deal from Citadel Investment Group. Bank of America says: "Downgrade to sell (PT goes to $2) as we no longer believe the value of the ETFC's retail brokerage business, a dwindling asset (which has lost 17% of assets already), can offset negative value at the bank." ETFC overall option implied volatility of 111 is above its 26-week average of 72, according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.</p>
<p><em>Daily Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/">Option update: MSFT, ETFC implied volatility elevated</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1053506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/03/option-update-12-3-07-msft-etfc-implied-volatility-elevated/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>ces</category><category>Citadel Investment Group</category><category>CitadelInvestmentGroup</category><category>E-Trade</category><category>etfc</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Clockwise from upper left: Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen; Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak; HDNet Chairman Marc Cuban; Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/mosaic_ugly_men.jpg" />Hygenie.com</em> lists the <a href="http://hygenie.com/2007/11/11/top-10-dirty-businessmen/">Top 10 Dirty Businessmen</a> -- corporate executives whose conduct has, for one reason or another, raised serious questions about their personal hygiene. Here's the list:<br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer -- Check out the picture of him sweating: Yuck!</li>
    <li>Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky -- Face itcher!</li>
    <li>Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson -- Streaker!<br /></li>
</ul>
<br />
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/">Dirty business: Hygenie's list of the ten least sanitary CEOs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hygenie.com/2007/11/11/top-10-dirty-businessmen/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1037037/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/dirty-business-hygenies-list-of-the-ten-least-sanitary-ceos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>blogs</category><category>CEOs</category><category>hygeine</category><category>Marc Cuban</category><category>MarcCuban</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
