<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) CEO and media baron Rupert Murdoch speaks, people in the media business should listen. The 77 year-old tycoon has built an impressive array of media properties and is one of the few who gets it when it comes to how media should be created, by whom it should be created, and how it's consumed by different consumer segments.<br /><br />Recently, Murdoch indicated that the deeply troubled newspaper industry can survive only if <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10098194-60.html">editors and writers throw their egos</a> out the window and regain the trust and loyalty of their readers. The once monopolistic newspaper industry now competes with the 24/7 internet news trade and its army of well-informed bloggers and citizen journalists. If the old guard doesn't believe this is the new competition, then I hope they have a second career all lined up.<br /><br />Murdoch's words appear uncannily prescient: "My summary of the way some of the established media has responded to the internet is this: it's not newspapers that might become obsolete. It's some of the editors, reporters, and proprietors who are forgetting a newspaper's most precious asset: the bond with its readers." He goes on to say that the "paper on the porch" might go away, but daily news will not.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/">Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10098194-60.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloggers</category><category>Editors</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Newspapers</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img width="240" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/computer-keyboard-by-bennylin0724.jpg" alt="keyboard" />I often spend a little time over at <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/03/13/blogging-and-newspapers-a-lesson-in-how-not-to-brand-and-market/">Blogmaverick.com</a>, where Mark Cuban recently sought to give the world of blogging a little of his insightful perspective. It seems that Mr. Cuban finds little to respect in the world of blogging, or at least in the world of slipshod ,cookie-cutter blogging. Though I found Mark's blog entry a trifle difficult to read, which is quite unusual coming from him, I nonetheless agree with most of the body of his post. I especially agree with his assertion that just because a blog is backed by the name of a well-known media organization does not in itself render that blog worthy of special notice.</p>
<p>Mark Cuban wrote, "<em>...newspapers having 'bloggers' is easily one of the many bad decisions that newspapers have made over the past 10 years."</em> If newspapers are going in a wrong direction by producing blogs, perhaps they need to reinstall the title <em>reporter</em> and drop the title <em>blogger </em>to give a different perspective to the reader. If newspapers are using the term <em>blog</em> simply as a culture hook, then they have it all wrong and they're just selling their reporters short. I believe that I'm in agreement with Mark Cuban when I say that true reporters should be releasing content within some format other than blogs. Blogging is what I do, and I'll be the first to tell you that I'm no reporter. The titles are <em>absolutely</em> <em>not</em> interchangeable, though they may sometimes be used correctly in tandem.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/">Billionaire Mark Cuban offers opinions on blogging</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/03/10/bloggers-in-the-mavs-locker-room/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1139990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/15/billionaire-mark-cuban-offers-opinions-on-blogging/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advice</category><category>blog</category><category>Blog Maverick</category><category>bloggers</category><category>blogging</category><category>branding</category><category>locker room</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>media</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NY Times</category><category>reporter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times hit-job on McCain hits stock more than McCain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/nytimes.jpg" alt="" />Yesterday's big lead <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=2&amp;hp&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1203678668-/w0HZ9Vqb8jqTquHaQVMZA">story</a> in the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">NYT</a>) questioning Republican presidential hopeful John McCain's ethics surrounding his relationship with a female lobbyist, was nothing more than a political hit job and not only did it backfire as McCain is raising money off this story but also sent shares of the Times' stock slipping    more than 6%.</p>
<p><em>The Times</em> stopped long ago being the paper that coined the phrase "all the news that's fit to print." The paper has turned into a mouthpiece of the far left wing in not just domestic but also foreign politics. Yesterday's article was a rehashed story from years ago that has been denied by everyone involved. How the editors of this story could have even published it is shocking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times hit-job on McCain hits stock more than McCain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/">New York Times hit-job on McCain hits stock more than McCain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=2&amp;hp&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1203678668-/w0HZ9Vqb8jqTquHaQVMZA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1121841/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative media</category><category>AlternativeMedia</category><category>bloggers</category><category>Hit job</category><category>HitJob</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>Rush Limbaugh</category><category>RushLimbaugh</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloggers sell their souls for free food]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>What's the price of a blogger's soul? In some cases, it's as little as dinner with a guest at a nice restaurant.</p>
<p>According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "As <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119162341176250617.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal">online food sites become increasingly influential</a> in the restaurant business, chefs and owners are plying bloggers with free meals to get good write-ups. Some are also posting favorable reviews about themselves on popular Web sites or becoming Internet scribes."</p>
<p>This is as clear a violation of journalistic ethics as you will find. Real food critics dine anonymously and pay their own bills -- a known critic is likely to receive special treatment, which of course could make their experience less than indicative of what their readers can expect.</p>
<p>And then there's another problem: Is it really possible to be objective in a review when you aren't feeling the sting of having paid for it?</p>
<p>Blogs are certainly giving the traditional media a run for their money. But in order for the coup to be successful, they will have to adopt some of the ethical standards of the traditional media. For what it's worth, this is the policy for all blogs in the <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/">Weblogs Inc.</a> (owned by AOL; includes BloggingStocks) network:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Bloggers do not receive free products or services</strong> from the companies they write about. </li>
    <li>Bloggers do accept review units (e.g., a new cell phone at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a>, a video game at <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/">Joystiq</a>, or a week-long car loan at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/">Autoblog</a>); however, when they're finished reviewing products, they return these items to the manufacturers. If the manufacturers do not take the items back, we give them to our readers. This is the same editorial policy as the <em>New York Times</em> or <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/">Bloggers sell their souls for free food</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119162341176250617.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006833/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/07/bloggers-sell-their-souls-for-free-food/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Autoblog</category><category>Bloggers</category><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>blogs</category><category>Engadget</category><category>ethics</category><category>food reviews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>journalistic integrity</category><category>Joystiq</category><category>Weblogs Inc.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Democrats court bloggers -- Can we gain similar influence in business?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>Friday's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> talked about the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118610469823786919.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">efforts Democratic Presidential candidates are making</a> to gain favor with some of the blogosphere's most prominent Democrats. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, blogs really are that influential nowadays. Senator Hillary Clinton has even sent her communications director on television to support <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/">Daily Kos</a>, a liberal blog that has been highly critical of her campaign.</p>
<p>This got me to thinking: How much longer before lowly business bloggers like me can make an impact on corporate America? I've always wanted to launch a campaign against incompetent management at a company, and use the power of blogging to effect change. I've made several attempts at this here at BloggingStocks, but didn't generate much interest.</p>
<p>I believe that the internet, social networking, and blogging could be the catalysts for tremendous positive change in corporate governance -- something that I would argue is severely lacking at the majority of America's publicly-traded companies. I know of several small, grass-roots efforts that have generated some waves, but nothing major ... yet.</p>
<p>I believe that our day is coming though. Does anyone else here think bloggers are perfectly positioned to take on greedy and lackluster management?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/">Democrats court bloggers -- Can we gain similar influence in business?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/956965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/04/democrats-court-bloggers-can-we-gain-similar-influence-in-bus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloggers</category><category>blogosphere</category><category>business bloggers</category><category>BusinessBloggers</category><category>corporate governance</category><category>corporate greed</category><category>CorporateGreed</category><category>Daily Kos</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>incompetent management</category><category>liberal bloggers</category><category>Politics</category><category>presidential candidates</category><category>PresidentialCandidates</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's planned purchase of Feedburner could add new revenue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Several sources have confirmed that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is in the closing stages of <a href="http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/05/23/analysis-the-feedburner-google-deal-is-a-vote-of-confidence-for-the-blogosphere">buying RSS management company FeedBurner</a>. The start-up's traffic has increased over 200% in the past year, according to Hitwise. The company describes its business as Web-based tools to help bloggers, podcasters, and commercial publishers promote, deliver, and profit from their content on the Web.</p>
<p>Websites and blogs use FeedBurner to track RSS feeds and traffic to their sites. Google will pay about $100 million for the company.</p>
<p>The RSS feed business is one that has yet to be monetized, but FeedBurner does have a <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/advertising;jsessionid=F3CBB6ADAA2149867FBD7399BA4CD25B.app2">nascent advertising program</a>. With the use of Google's Adsense program, this revenue could almost certainly be pushed up sharply. </p>
<p>Because FeedBurner is an important source of traffic and data for blogs, it also fits well into the Google Blogger platform, which is used to create millions of blogs. Many of these blogs use Adsense to get their revenue. With Feedburner, Google will have "one-stop shopping" that will offer RSS feeds, audience data, and advertising.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) could have used FeedBurner to enhance their relationship with the blog and RSS communities, but that's another story.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/">Google's planned purchase of Feedburner could add new revenue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 May 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902793/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/googles-planned-purchase-of-feedburner-could-add-new-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adsense</category><category>bloggers</category><category>Feedburner</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Blogger</category><category>GoogleBlogger</category><category>Hitwise</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>podcasters</category><category>RSS</category><category>RSS communities</category><category>RSS feeds</category><category>RssCommunities</category><category>RssFeeds</category><category>Web content</category><category>Web-based tools</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bloggers: Get it first, get it fast. Beating old media at its own game]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/jobs.jpg" />When it comes to the reporting of real-time news, blogs and bloggers are -- as many of the media is finally finding out -- a force to be reckoned with. When the Apple iPhone was unveiled this past Tuesday, much of the tech and business world <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4252">was glued to the news</a> to find out what Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs had up his sleeve. Or <em>his turtleneck.</em><br /><br />Sometimes, "the Steve" can shake the fortunes of markets and companies just by announcing products. Apple fans everywhere make as much noise as possible and Apple again demonstrates that it is a company tuned into the needs of consumers like no other. <br /><br />But, MSNBC, Fox, CNN, the New York Times and other media outlets were not covering Apple's latest announcement in real-time that involved the long-anticipated mobile phone that may change several major industries this year and into the next. <em>Nope, it was bloggers</em> -- and the best one on the planet at covering live news like this is our sister blog over at <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a>, which covered the entire Macworld keynote address with Steve Jobs in perfect minute-by-minute fashion -- something standard news mediums could not (or would not) do.<br /><br />Is blogging changing the face of <em>media-n-things</em>? As an investor, if you were tuned into <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/09/live-from-macworld-2007-steve-jobs-keynote/">Engadget's coverage as the iPhone was announced</a> -- and bought AAPL shares as soon as that happened -- you'd be sitting on over 9% gains over a couple of days. 30 minutes later (for AP news releases, etc.) and you would have had less of a gain -- so who <em>rocked the foundation of short-term investing</em> this past Tuesday in San Francisco? <em><strong>The bloggers, that's who.</strong></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/">Bloggers: Get it first, get it fast. Beating old media at its own game</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=4252>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/734928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/blogging-a-major-force-in-the-real-time-news-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>Bloggers</category><category>Engadget</category><category>News Bloggers</category><category>NewsBloggers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Got perspective, passion and smarts? Bloggers wanted.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/about-the-stock-bloggers/" rel="tag">About the Stock Bloggers</a></p><img alt="all our blogs" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/04/Logos-200a042706.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Do you spend the day glued to the your favorite finance news source, waiting for breaking stories to brighten your day? Are the stock quotes for your favorite companies always an Alt-Tab away? Do you know the difference between P/E and EPS and MSFT? Most importantly, are you passionate? And can you write with wit, charm and a tad bit of snark?<br /><br />If this describes you, and you'd like to share your passion with the blogosphere,&nbsp;go to our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com">main site</a> and click&nbsp;on the "more info" button under the "<a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/#exp_bloggers">Bloggers</a>" tab. Don't forget to submit three samples of between 100 and 400 words.<br /><br />The stocks we cover now include:
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/">Apple Computer (AAPL)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/">eBay Inc (EBAY)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://ge.bloggingstocks.com/">Genl Electric (GE)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/">Google, Inc (GOOG)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/">Microsoft Corp (MSFT)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/">Time Warner (TWX)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://wmt.bloggingstocks.com/">Wal-Mart Stores (WMT)</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://yhoo.bloggingstocks.com/">Yahoo Inc (YHOO)</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Got perspective, passion and smarts? Bloggers wanted.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/">Got perspective, passion and smarts? Bloggers wanted.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 18:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/got-perspective-passion-and-smarts-bloggers-wanted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blog here</category><category>blogger</category><category>bloggers</category><category>bloggers wanted</category><category>BloggersWanted</category><category>bloggingstocks</category><category>BlogHere</category><category>finance blog</category><category>FinanceBlog</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 18:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
