<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/fdic-logo-240.jpg" />During the 2003 -- 06 boom years, three agencies, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BONUSES_FOR_REGULATORS?SITE=RIPRJ&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">gave out millions of dollars</a> in bonuses to regulators of these agencies.</p>
<p>The bonuses were supposedly given out for "superior" performance. Records show that at least $19 million in bonuses was awarded.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/">Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BONUSES_FOR_REGULATORS?SITE=RIPRJ&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>FDIC</category><category>financial industry</category><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>office of the comptroller of the currency</category><category>Office of Thrift Supervision</category><category>regulators</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AIG to Pay Out $100 Million in Bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aig-flag-240.jpg"  alt="" />Can you imagine this! American International Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) is paying its employees $100 million in bonuses.</p>
<p>This is after AIG was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/business/03aig.html?ref=business">bailed out to the tune of $182 billion</a> by the U.S. government. The government owns 80% of  the insurance giant. AIG employees have agreed to a $20 million cut. However, some employees are screaming that that is not enough. They claim that their contracts dated earlier than the bailout must be honored.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AIG to Pay Out $100 Million in Bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/">AIG to Pay Out $100 Million in Bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19343186/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/aig-to-pay-out-100-million-in-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>bailout</category><category>bonuses</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Americans Still Support Pay-for-Performance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/citi_sign_240.jpg" alt="" />The lack of public outcry or protest regarding bank bail-out recipient Citigroup Inc.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) decision to allocate <a href="http:// http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/citigroup-still-paid-millions-to-some-top-execs-in-2009/19304923/">million-dollar pay packages to top executives,</a> albeit in stock, not cash, should not surprise investors. <br /><br />That's because, historically, the American people have never supported restricting individual bonuses or large compensation plans. The political science and public policy literature is voluminous on this subject -- I've worked with the data for more than 10 years -- and the stance over the years of the American people has been clear: high compensation -- base salary or bonus -- is OK.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Americans Still Support Pay-for-Performance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/">Americans Still Support Pay-for-Performance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19307443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/americans-still-support-pay-for-performance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>BankBailout</category><category>bonuses</category><category>citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/db-deutsche-bank-logo.jpg" alt="" />Is another round of continent-hopping banks (and bank services) up ahead? Perhaps, if the analysis of Josef Ackermann, CEO of Germany-based Deutsche Bank (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-bank-ag-germany/db/nys">DB</a>) is accurate. <br /><br />Ackermann said Germany has a "comparative advantage" over other financial hubs because it is not expected to tax bonuses as Britain and France have done, Bloomberg News <a href="http:// http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aLP_cZ3zUNw4">reported Sunday. </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/">Deutsche's Ackermann says Germany offers banks a 'comparative advantage'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19280826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/deutsches-ackermann-says-germany-offers-banks-a-comparative-ad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank consolidations</category><category>BankConsolidations</category><category>bonuses</category><category>deutsche bank</category><category>DeutscheBank</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>josef ackermann</category><category>JosefAckermann</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Salaries frozen, down at private equity firms this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/preqin-logo.jpg" alt="" />For more than a third of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/privateequity/">private equity</a> employees, employee compensation either stayed the same or declined. <a href="http://www.preqin.com/docs/reports/Compensation_Research_Report.pdf" target="_blank">A recent report by alternative investment research firm Preqin</a> estimates that 38% of private equity employees saw base salary freezes in 2009, and 6% of firms participating in the survey indicated that they were cutting salaries this year. Of course, this means that 56% kicked base salaries up this year, though the average increase was a mere 2%.</p>
<p>For the <a href="http://www.preqin.com/item/salaries-under-pressure-at-private-equity-firms/101/1867">employees of 22% of the firms</a> participating in the Preqin survey, the brush with a pay cut was close as these companies considered a freeze. But 40% haven't cut or never considered it.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Salaries frozen, down at private equity firms this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/">Salaries frozen, down at private equity firms this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261050/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/salaries-frozen-down-at-private-equity-firms-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alternative investments</category><category>bonuses</category><category>compensation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Preqin</category><category>Private equity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Get rid of performance-based compensation?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/golden-parachute.jpg" />In <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703294004574511223494536570.html#mod=todays_us_">a column</a> that would seem more appropriate for a left-wing college campus news zine than The Wall Street Journal, McGill University professor <a href="http://www.henrymintzberg.com/about.htm">Henry Mintzberg</a> offers a proposal for how to change compensation practices in America: get rid of bonuses.</p>
<p>Mintzberg offers some well-worn -- and completely valid -- criticisms of stock-based compensation: golden parachutes, retention bonuses, etc. He explains the problems that come with assessing performance and raises another question that isn't talked about nearly enough: just how much of a role do CEOs really play in determining a company's success or failure?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Get rid of performance-based compensation?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/">Get rid of performance-based compensation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19258589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/get-rid-of-perfomance-based-compensation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Henry Mintzburg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed telling banks to voluntarily adopt pay guidelines is not a good idea]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollars-pounds.jpg" alt="" />Against the backdrop of heightened public criticism, The U.S. Federal Reserve is trying to encourage banks to take the first step in controlling excessive pay and bonuses. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aee5a54a-c7f6-11de-8ba8-00144feab49a.html">Regulators have established broad guidelines for pay incentives and bonuses</a>. However, they are quite loose and do not nail down any specifics. Regulators are trying to coax compliance before the end of the year.</p>
<p>Britain has taken the lead and mandated that a percentage of bankers' bonuses should be deferred for a number of years.</p>
<p>Why is there such a public outcry to curb excessive bankers' pay and bonuses?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed telling banks to voluntarily adopt pay guidelines is not a good idea</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/">Fed telling banks to voluntarily adopt pay guidelines is not a good idea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/aee5a54a-c7f6-11de-8ba8-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19220092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/fed-tells-banks-to-voluntarily-adopt-pay-guidelines-is-not-a-goo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank pay guidelines</category><category>BankPayGuidelines</category><category>bonuses</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>gs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/rich-mean-money-finance-attitude-200cs0126.jpg" alt="" />We have a human disaster of enormous proportions. We have 15 million persons unemployed. Thousands are on the brink of losing their homes. As of this December, 1.7 million unemployed will exhaust their benefits. They may be homeless at this holiday time. Some 400,000 persons exhausted their benefits in the month of October.</p>
<p>Now, as reported in <em>BusinessWeek</em>, one lone economist, Katerina Alexandraki, is asking Wall Streeters to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/hotproperty/archives/2009/10/should_wall_str.html">give their bonuses to the homeless and unemployed</a>. She has set up a website, <a href="http://bonusforhome.weebly.com/index.html">Bonus for Homes</a>, and started a campaign to distribute the monies to low-income earners and the unemployed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/">Will the Scrooge bankers give their bonuses to the needy Bob Cratchits?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217883/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/will-the-scrooge-bankers-give-their-bonuses-to-the-needy-bob-cra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bonus for Homes</category><category>bonuses</category><category>give away bank bonuses</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>help the needy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Katerina Alexandraki</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank profits come directly out of your pocket]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wall-street-subway-sign.jpg" />The rally in the stock market and the return to profitability for some of the top banks has been hailed as a sign of a turnaround -- and proof that the interventionist financial policies of the past year worked.<br /><br />But not so fast. In reality, a huge chunk of the profits banks are earnings can be directly attributed to their ability to borrow money at artificially low interest rates.<br /><br />According to a report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research found that below market interest rates offered by The Federal Reserve accounted for 41% of JPMorgan's profits. At Bank of America, the number was 47%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank profits come directly out of your pocket</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/">Bank profits come directly out of your pocket</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/banks_profit_on_handouts_2x5SBVigXKHGVdza4QFAZO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19209340/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/bank-profits-come-directly-out-of-your-pocket/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bonuses</category><category>CEPR</category><category>featured</category><category>JPM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC warns brokers against big bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/seclogo.jpg" alt="" />If you've worked as a broker you know the game. The house sets quotas. You must meet the quotas or its good-bye.</p>
<p>As a broker, your first and foremost obligation is to the client. You can make recommendations, but in the last analysis, the decision to buy or sell a security rests with the client. Brokers, however, are often under the gun by management to tout certain securities to their clients that may not be in their best interests.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC warns brokers against big bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/">SEC warns brokers against big bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9AE61OG3.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19147088/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/sec-warns-brokers-against-big-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>brokers</category><category>churnings</category><category>commissions</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mary Schapiro</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs employees to receive record bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/goldman.gif" />Reportedly, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) staff will be receiving the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/21/goldman-sachs-bonus-payments">largest bonus payouts in the company's 150-year history</a>, thanks to a solid first half of 2009. This news has kicked off a bit of concern that large investment banks that survived the credit crunch would hamper any attempts at financial regulation reforms. The main reason that Goldman Sachs was able to perform well in the quarter was a general lack of competition and a surge in revenue thanks to the company's trading of foreign currency, bonds, and fixed-income products.</p>
<p>A week ago, the London staff of Goldman Sachs was told that they could expect larger bonuses -- as long as the company's predictions for its most profitable year ever come to fruition. Next month's second-quarter earnings report are expected to show a jump in profits. An example of how strong the quarter was, Warren Buffet spent $5 billion to purchase GS shares in January -- and the Oracle of Omaha has made $1 billion on this investment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs employees to receive record bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/">Goldman Sachs employees to receive record bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19074053/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/goldman-sachs-employees-to-receive-record-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus payment</category><category>bonuses</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>warren buffet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BofA under investigation by the SEC concerning Merrill Lynch bonuses totaling $3.6 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bankofamerica.jpg" alt="" />When the history of this financial crisis is written, this story story will be a contender as a standout example of its kind. It is one of the slickest, under the table, sleight of hand deals ever.</p>
<p>Picture this. The financial markets are falling apart right and left. Lehman, Bear Stearns and Merrill are going down for the count. In the midst of this confusion <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) is in the process of taking over Merrill Lynch. Merrill executives and employees are in a state of panic but at the last moment they regain their composure and have the audacity (word is too mild) <strong>to pay themselves $3.6 billion in bonuses just days before the BofA takeover.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BofA under investigation by the SEC concerning Merrill Lynch bonuses totaling $3.6 billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/">BofA under investigation by the SEC concerning Merrill Lynch bonuses totaling $3.6 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d3bcd4c4-2878-11de-8dbf-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1517003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/bofa-under-investigation-by-the-sec-concerning-merrill-lynch-bon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investigation of Merrill Lynch bonuses</category><category>InvestigationOfMerrillLynchBonuses</category><category>ken lewis</category><category>KenLewis</category><category>schapiro</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Connecticut AG says AIG bonuses higher than reported]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img height="101" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/10p42.jpg" width="217" align="right" vspace="4" />Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has been pawing through the data on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) post-bailout bonus payments, and he's uncovered a bit of a discrepancy. Blumenthal says that the bonus payments totaled $218 million -- more than 30% higher than the widely reported $165 million figure.<br /><br />Blumenthal said he isn't sure of the reason behind the discrepancy, and AIG denies that the discrepancy exists. Either way, Blumenthal isn't happy about it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Connecticut AG says AIG bonuses higher than reported</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/">Connecticut AG says AIG bonuses higher than reported</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aqoxOvvxmRMU&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1494805/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/connecticut-ag-says-aig-bonuses-higher-than-reported/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>Bailout</category><category>Bonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[After announcing job cuts, Macy's announces bonus payments]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/macys-m-logo.jpg" />Suddenly, I have found myself playing the role of Don Quixote tilting at the windmills of poor executive decisions. I didn't intend to play this role, but the inhabitants of boardrooms and the corner offices are making the job so easy. <br /><br />The latest example of poor decisions and announcement comes courtesy of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys" target="_blank">Macy's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys" target="_blank">M</a>). The retailer announced on Monday that it would lay off roughly 7,000 workers and cut its dividend in half in hopes of saving money. So, what is the next announcement that the company makes? If you guessed performance bonus payments to executives, give yourself a pat on the back.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>After announcing job cuts, Macy's announces bonus payments</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/">After announcing job cuts, Macy's announces bonus payments</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1450198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/after-announcing-job-cuts-macys-announces-bonus-payments/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>business practices</category><category>BusinessPractices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Macys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Struggling Huntington Bancshares cuts jobs, bonuses, and 401(k) match]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><a href="https://www.huntington.com/"><img title="Huntington" height="37" alt="Huntington" hspace="4" src="https://www.huntington.com/images/layout/huntington_logo.gif" width="172" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Ohio-based regional bank <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/huntington-bancshares-incorporated/hban/nas">Huntington Bancshares</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/huntington-bancshares-incorporated/hban/nas">HBAN</a>) reported today a series of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0350819020090203?rpc=33">drastic measures</a> meant to reduce costs by $100 million in 2009. Huntington will cut 500 jobs, or about 4% of its workforce; freeze salaries at 2008 levels; eliminate executive and incentive awards for 2008; and discontinue the company's 401(k) match contribution.</p>
<p>"It is important that our customers and shareholders know that we are well-positioned to deal with this challenging environment," said Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Stephen Steinour in a statement. "Our liquidity position is strong." </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Struggling Huntington Bancshares cuts jobs, bonuses, and 401(k) match</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/">Struggling Huntington Bancshares cuts jobs, bonuses, and 401(k) match</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/struggling-huntington-bancshares-cuts-jobs-bonuses-and-401-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>hban</category><category>huntington bancshares</category><category>HuntingtonBancshares</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>sentiment</category><category>stephen steinour</category><category>StephenSteinour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ambac pays execs $3 million in undeserved bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="" />Over the past 12 months, shareholders in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) have lost more than 90% of their investments as the bond insurers ill-advised forays into structured finance have resulted in massive losses.<br /><br />But for some reason the company's compensation committee <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aAhc55xw2ysE">deemed that performance worthy</a> of $3 million in bonuses for 4 of Ambac's top executives. The company's latest proxy statement shows that CFO Sean Lenorard received a $950,000 cash bonus and Executive Vice President Douglas Renfield-Miller got $550,000. Chairman Michael Callen received $975,000 and Chief Executive Officer David Wallis took home $500,000<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ambac pays execs $3 million in undeserved bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/">Ambac pays execs $3 million in undeserved bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aAhc55xw2ysE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/ambac-pays-execs-3-million-in-undeserved-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac</category><category>Bonuses</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Despite public outcry, bank bonus reform may have to take a back seat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />With public indignation and Congressional outcries building concerning large Wall Street bonuses while the U.S. taxpayer bails out the same industry that contributed to the financial crisis, efforts to limit or eliminate excessive compensation may hinge on whether the Obama administration wants to use political capital to do it. <br /><br />The public attention-grabbing incidents are certainly there to keep the U.S. Congress focused on the issue: Wall Street allocating its sixth-highest level of bonuses during the investment banking sector's worst year since the Great Depression. Former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain's decision, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/john-thain-to-repay-1-2-million-for-87-783-rug-and-other-offic/">since reversed</a>, to use $1.22 million in company money to redecorate his office, is one example. Another is Robert Rubin receiving more than $100 million in compensation from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), a bank that's receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in government guarantees and other, direct financial assistance.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Despite public outcry, bank bonus reform may have to take a back seat</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/">Despite public outcry, bank bonus reform may have to take a back seat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/despite-public-outcry-bank-bonus-reform-may-have-to-take-a-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>bank rescue</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bonuses</category><category>Claire Mccaskill</category><category>Congress</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Obama administration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="160" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/moneyroll.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />One of the questions that I spent this week discussing is this: What was Wall Street thinking? Whether it's using taxpayer money to pay itself <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003665.html">$18.4 billion</a> in bonuses or to buy a $50 million corporate jet after posting <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/wall-street-loses-35-billion-in-2008-uses-tarp-for-18-4-billi/">$35 billion</a> in losses, people are wondering whether Wall Street gets it. The answer is yes. Wall Street gets that nobody stopped it from paying bonuses when it took our money, so it took what it could. Unless we limit how Wall Street spends taxpayer money, it will keep paying itself big bonuses.</p>
<p>Wall Street is a place where the people at the top are trained to grab as much as they can out of the hands of the other graspers. At least $200 billion worth of TARP money went to Wall Street with no strings attached. If you put that much money into the hands of a culture that believes firmly in taking what it can get -- it usually pays half of its revenues to employees -- you end up with Wall Street taking as much as it can from the taxpayers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/">Is there a new reality on Wall Street pay?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1446417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/is-there-a-new-reality-on-wall-street-pay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>corporate jet</category><category>corporate jets</category><category>CorporateJet</category><category>CorporateJets</category><category>tarp</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street bailout</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetBailout</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama's empty rhetoric on Wall Street bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-barack-obama-200x267.jpg" />President Barack Obama is expressing outrage over the $18.4 billion in bonuses recently paid out by Wall Street banks, using phrases like "the height of irresponsibility" and words like "shameful."<br />
<p>"There will be time for them to make profits, and there will be time for them to get bonuses," <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2009/01/obama_now_is_not_the_time_for.html">he said</a>. "Now is not that time."</p>
<p>He's completely right: It is indeed shameful that these banks are paying any bonuses at all while they beg for government money and send their shareholders to the poorhouse. But the fact is that the United States government had an opportunity to put stiffer limits on bonuses before it started handing out the TARP money and decided not to do that. So what do people expect? We know that America's banks are managed poorly by arrogant and entitled bureaucrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama's empty rhetoric on Wall Street bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/">Obama's empty rhetoric on Wall Street bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123326820233830623.html?mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/obamas-empty-rhetoric-on-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bailout</category><category>Bonuses</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thain's $1.2 million office redecorating may prompt Congress to act on executive compensation  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img height="231" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/merrill-lynch-john-thain.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain's decision <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-01-22/john-thains-87000-rug/">to spend $1.22 million to redecorate his office</a> will probably put the issue of executive compensation limits back in play for the U.S. Congress, most likely for only bailout fund recipient companies, but quite possibly for other business arrangements, as well. <br /><br />The compensation issue was considered politically dead for this year, but Thain's audaciousness could serve as the type of catalyst necessary to get a controversial bill through a review process that's designed to defeat or delay legislation. Thain was put in charge of Merrill's trading, investment banking, and brokerage operations after the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) acquired Merrill.<br /><br />Further, Thain's $1.22 million splurge of the company's money is the type of action voters will notice, prompting them to place pressure on U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators to act. Thain's gratuitous redecorating has surfaced alongside <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/thain-to-resign-from-bank-of-america/314788">Merrill's distribution of bonuses</a> despite massive losses at the former investment banking and brokerage giant.<br /><strong><br />Board of directors oversight?</strong><br /><br />Some will argue that executive and employee compensation is a matter for a corporation's board of directors, not the U.S. Congress. Economist Peter Dawson said that's precisely the reason Congress should intervene. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Thain's $1.2 million office redecorating may prompt Congress to act on executive compensation  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/">Thain's $1.2 million office redecorating may prompt Congress to act on executive compensation  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/thains-1-2-million-office-redecorating-may-prompt-congress-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>board of directors</category><category>bonuses</category><category>Congress</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>featured</category><category>John Thain</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>Thain</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
