<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/playboy_logo_200.jpg" />Playboy (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys" target="_blank">PLA</a>) tends to be associated with the magazine and sex. Not the hardcore, nasty kind, of course -- Playboy has always been more than a tad distinguished, staying above board while the adult entertainment industry has chosen to compete in ways that my editor would delete if I even attempted. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" target="_blank">With Iconix said to be interested in acquiring Playboy</a>, it needs to think about where it can win with the ailing brand. The smart move may be to ditch the magazine and move away from sex -- it can't compete in either of these markets. Then, it needs to figure out how to make the brand relevant to everyone not in the Boomer generation ... or treat Playboy as an investment with a clock on it.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/">Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249566/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/iconix-could-make-playboy-work-kill-the-mag-take-the-sex-out-o/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>baby boomers</category><category>boomers</category><category>branding</category><category>brands</category><category>gen x</category><category>gen xers</category><category>gen y</category><category>generation x</category><category>Generation Y</category><category>Gradient Analytics</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>Hustler</category><category>icon</category><category>iconix</category><category>magazines</category><category>maxim</category><category>penthouse</category><category>playboy</category><category>virginia commonwealth</category><category>vivid</category><category>vivid entertainment</category><category>wicked</category><category>Wicked Pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart expands store-brand food deals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/walmart_logo203.jpg" />Looking to capitalize on the flight to affordability, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) is planning to reintroduce its 'Great Value' private label food brand with new packaging and more aggressive marketing.<br /><br />Wal-Mart is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=afVJJxZ4oCtY&amp;refer=news">reportedly hiring</a> (haven't heard that word in awhile, have you?) 75 people for its private-label business, and there would seem to be no better time for expanding this investment. Consumers are always willing to pay a premium for nationally-known brands but in this economy, that premium could be extremely low, giving Wal-Mart an opportunity to increase its private label revenue by a lot -- and keep a great chunk of its food sales in-house.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart expands store-brand food deals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/">Wal-Mart expands store-brand food deals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=afVJJxZ4oCtY&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1465599/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/wal-mart-expands-store-brand-food-deals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>generic</category><category>private label</category><category>PrivateLabel</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-brand-castoff..jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>There have always been brand decisions that seem to come out of left field. Some make you wonder what they were thinking, while others make you wonder what took so long. The year 2008 was no exception.</p>
<p>It came as something of a surprise when in June <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) announced that it would <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/as-exxon-xom-exits-retail-gas-business-avoids-bad-pr/">sell off many of its retail gasoline stations</a> to local owners. While Exxon continued to post record quarterly earnings, and fuel prices spiked to all-time highs earlier this year, gasoline retailers in fact have faced razor-thin margins and fierce competition. It would take a significant boost in prices to make gas stations profitable, a notion that didn't seem to worthwhile back in June. Wonder what they think of that decision now that gasoline prices have fallen to a multiyear low?</p>
<p><iframe height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" width="205" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157426&amp;pollId=157706&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance"></iframe>I recall when Kinko's, the photocopying and faxing service provider with the catchy name, seemed to explode out of nowhere. And it seemed a little sad when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FedEx Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) gobbled up the successful upstart. But it was probably inevitable that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/kinkos-it-was-nice-knowing-you/">Kinko's name would be phazed out</a>. It took quite a while, but FedEx finally announced eariler this year that it would just that. The newly christened FedEx Office (not so catchy, is it?) wants to shed itself of the image of a photocopying and faxing place to that of a back-office services provider for small to mid sized businesses. But will that turn out to be worth the $891 million they estimate the name change would cost? Time will tell.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>brands</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>Exxon</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>featured</category><category>FedEx</category><category>FedEx Office</category><category>fuel prices</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Kinkos</category><category>LG Group</category><category>Mars</category><category>Wrigley</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big company, small town: Winnebago Industries, Forest City, Iowa]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/small-big-winnebago-forest-city-iowa-200-cs061708.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/small-towns-big-companies">Big Company, Small Town</a></strong> series, featuring large companies and the small towns in which they are headquartered.</em></p>
<p>Ever taken a road trip in an RV? If you have, there is a good chance that you were inside a Winnebago recreational vehicle. The name Winnebago has been synonymous with the large RV for as long as I can remember. With such a rich history, one would think Winnebago is located somewhere next a major interstate corridor or airport. Otherwise, how would it receive in its raw materials and ship out its finished product?</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/winnebago-industries-inc/wgo/nys">Winnebago Industries, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/winnebago-industries-inc/wgo/nys">WGO</a>) is actually based in Forest City, Iowa, founded in 1958 in Winnebago County (that's where the company's name comes from). From its inception, the company has been involved with travel trailers. It used names from Native American tribes to name its different lines of trailers, and in the 1970s and early 1980s, made smaller trailers as gas prices spiked upward. In fact, come this summer, one of Winnebago's manufacturing plants in Charles City, Iowa, will be closed due to drastic changes in Winnebago's market due to higher gas prices and declining demand. The company has already laid off 200 employees from its headquarters in Forest City.</p>
<p>Unlike many American companies these days, Winnebago still makes the majority of its products in the United States, most of which are built on top of chassis units made by Ford or Chevy. The term <em>Winnebago</em> has made itself, after more then 40 years, into a brand name completely associated with RVs and trailers. Do you blow your nose with a Kleenex or tissue? Drink Coke or a soft drink? Go on vacation in a Winnebago or travel trailer? There's the brand power the company continues to have today, even with the hard times its experiencing.</p>
<p><em>Be sure to check out more <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/small-towns-big-companies">Big Company, Small Town</a></strong> posts.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/">Big company, small town: Winnebago Industries, Forest City, Iowa</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1225489/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/23/big-company-small-town-winnebago-industries-forest-city-iowa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>Charles City</category><category>Forest City</category><category>Iowa</category><category>RVs</category><category>small town</category><category>travel trailers</category><category>winnebago</category><category>winnebago industries</category><category>winnebagos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can ghost brands be brought back to life? One company thinks so]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>A few days ago, something -- I don't remember what -- reminded me of one of best parts of going back to school when I was a youngster in the early to mid-1990s: the <a href="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/318566/">Trapper Keeper</a>.</p>
<p>I hadn't seen one in years, but a quick internet search revealed that while Mead discontinued the product, it reintroduced a <a href="http://www.trapperkeeper.com/">new version of the Trapper Keeper</a> in 2007. I might have to get one. So that got me thinking about old brands that I miss and I wondered: Companies spend millions to develop brands into household names only to discontinue them after a rough patch or merger. Might there be some value in the brands -- even years after they've been removed from shelves.</p>
<p>Turns out I'm not as creative as I thought. A cool company called <a href="http://www.riverwestbrands.com/brand_properties.php">River West Brands</a> does nothing but acquire, incubate and launch long-dead brands. The current portfolio includes Coleco, Salon Selectives, and Brim coffee. The company also acquired -- and has since relaunched and sold -- other brands including Nuprin and Structure.</p>
<p>Rob Walker's feature story for <em>The New York Times Magazine</em> takes <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/magazine/18rebranding-t.html?ref=magazine&amp;pagewanted=all">a look at River West</a>, and it's one of the best business stories I've read this year. It's a fascinating look at reviving brands, marketing, and the tricks our minds play on us that make us remember products we've never seen before fondly.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/">Can ghost brands be brought back to life? One company thinks so</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 18 May 2008 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1198667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/can-ghost-brands-be-brought-back-to-life-one-company-thinks-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brands</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marketing</category><category>River West</category><category>Rob Walker</category><category>Trapper Keeper</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T (T) branding to get facelift and new color]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/att-logo.jpg" />Age-old telecom company and brand <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atand-38-t-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atand-38-t-inc/t/nys">T</a>) is launching a new advertising campaign to convince younger customers that the company is hip. Naturally, the new ads will be edgier and flashier, which apparently everyone in the 18-34 age bracket responds to according to most marketing mavens. But can a company just put some pizazz in their marketing and instantly gain younger customers, or are those customers smarter than these companies realize? Maybe a little of both, right?<br /><br />Truth is that marketing is what makes most economies go 'round, and <a href="http://news.com.com/ATT+ad+campaign+gets+edgy/2110-1039_3-6207281.html?tag=nefd.hed">AT&amp;T glitzing it up in this department</a> is a testament to that claim. AT&amp;T's purchase of the Cingular brand (and company, heh) earlier in 2007 meant that the company sees the future coming from wireless services and other areas instead of landline telephones and older technology that 10 years from now younger customers won't even know existed. <br /><br />In a move back to the power of the Cingular brand (which AT&amp;T dumped unceremoniously), the color orange will also be used as the company's primary corporate color instead of blue. The blue AT&amp;T 'world swirl' logo has been around for decades in one form or another, and in addition to changing the color, will AT&amp;T change the corporate logo as well? Maybe it is time to make this move, since many youngsters connect the current AT&amp;T logo <a href="http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2005/11/att_updates_dea.html">with the Death Star</a> from Star Wars. That's not a good thing to have in mind when you're buying a phone.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/">AT&amp;T (T) branding to get facelift and new color</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/ATT+ad+campaign+gets+edgy/2110-1039_3-6207281.html?tag=nefd.hed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/986664/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/atandt-t-branding-to-get-new-facelift-and-color/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>branding</category><category>brands</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marketing</category><category>mobile communications</category><category>mobile phones</category><category>MobileCommunications</category><category>MobilePhones</category><category>T</category><category>wireless</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Product packaging works harder, gets weirder]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ul/" rel="tag">Unilever ADR (UL)</a></p><p>The conventional wisdom used to be that shoppers went looking for their favorite brands and that consistency of product packaging assured customer loyalty. Apparently marketers now have decided that good old reliable product packaging is making those products invisible to consumers. According to the <em>New York Times</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">Pepsico</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>), known for its resistance to label design changes throughout its long history, is now <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/product-packages-shout-to-get-attention/20070810105809990001">changing some label designs every few weeks</a>. </p>
<p>The problem is that, with the internet and hundreds of television channels, it's becoming increasingly harder for marketers to get their messages out to customers. Product packaging now has to do more than simply identify the goods within, but actually reach out and grab your attention. Hence, <a href="http://www.greenlabelart.com/">Mountain Dew bottles</a> that appear to have been tagged by graffitti artists, or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unilever-n-v-n-y/un/nys">Unilever's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unilever-n-v-n-y/un/nys">UN</a>) shampoo bottles shaped like video game joysticks. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>) has been in the forefront of bringing eye-catching advertising to its themed store aisles.</p>
<p>There are other motives for this experimentation with product packaging as well. Some companies are searching for ways to reduce container sizes and to have less environmental impact. Some household product manufacturers are looking to make their once utlitarian packaging so pleasing that people may be willing to display it in their homes. </p>
<p>And it looks like things are only going to get weirder. Pepsi has a plan in the works for cans that spray a pleasing scent when opened. And you know that product packaging that talks to you can't be that far down the road. If you thought pop-up ads and TV commercials were annoying, just wait for the day you go into the shop and all the products are screaming for your attention.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/">Product packaging works harder, gets weirder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/963080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/11/product-packaging-works-harder-gets-weirder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>customer loyalty</category><category>CustomerLoyalty</category><category>label design</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>Pepsico</category><category>product packaging</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>UN</category><category>Unilever</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell's main 'category' sinking and taking brand with it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p>Are consumers attached to "brands" like baby koala bears are to their mothers? At first sight, there is a good case for saying this. The words "Apple" and "Nike" and "Kleenex" are all brands that describe product categories. But, do customers love the categories of brands represented by the brands -- or the brand names themselves? Dell, here in the middle of 2007, seems to be a boring brand from many perspectives. Perhaps it is just participating in a boring product category?<br />
<p>Branding experts and marketing professionals like to believe that the brands they represent are what the consumer is looking for. <a href="http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2007/07/consumers-dont-.html">Hmm, not quite</a>. Is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell/nys">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) in the midst of being turned around because it is a brand in trouble? To <a href="http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2007/07/consumers-dont-.html">this writer's point</a>, I have to agree somewhat that Dell represents a category in trouble. It sells <a href="http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2007/07/consumers-dont-.html">more desktop computers than anything else</a>, and that is a dying category (and has been). Does Dell need to supercharge its laptop computer category during the final half of 2007 and really attack the retail presence outside of selling <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/dells-coming-effect-on-retail-computer-sales/">"dying" desktop PCs at Wal-Mart</a>? If you're a Dell shareholder, you should be asking this question as Dell sits precariously during the latter half of 2007.<br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dell's main 'category' sinking and taking brand with it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/">Dell's main 'category' sinking and taking brand with it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.brandingstrategyinsider.com/2007/07/consumers-dont-.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/dells-main-category-sinking-and-taking-brand-with-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>retail brands</category><category>RetailBrands</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Liz Claiborne's big cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/liz/" rel="tag">Liz Claiborne (LIZ)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/liz-claiborne-inc/liz/nys">Liz Claiborne</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/liz-claiborne-inc/liz/nys">LIZ</a>) will sell 16 of its 36 brands in a move that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118411798145562863.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">will cut</a> [subscription required] about $800 million of the company's $5 billion revenue. </p>
<p>The move is very risky. The company believes that by moving out of brands that have modest profits it can focus more on its core brands. A difficult environment in department-store sales is behind the company's thinking for focusing on a fewer number of product lines. </p>
<p>To get around problems with slow department-store sales, the company will also open 300 of its own outlets by 2010. </p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, however, points out that the brands Liz will cut are not necessarily the slowest growing brands. The company has not said whether they are less profitable than the ones to be retained or not.</p>
<p>That is why the strategy may make little sense. Having a larger number of brands would appear to give the company more leverage at the retail level.</p>
<p>Well, perhaps the management knows something Wall Street does not know. Earnings over the next couple of quarters will bear watching.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/">Liz Claiborne's big cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118411798145562863.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/937716/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/liz-claibornes-big-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>cuts</category><category>department-stores</category><category>liz</category><category>liz claiborne</category><category>LizClaiborne</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JetBlue finally replaces Neeleman as CEO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>In a long overdue move, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jetblue-airways-corporation/jblu/nas/charts?dr=999">JetBlue Airways Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jetblue-airways-corporation/jblu/nas/charts?dr=999"> JDBLU</a>) replaced founder <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/jetblue-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/n20070510100909990011">David Neeleman</a> as chief executive officer. Shares of the discount airline soared 6 percent.</p>
<p>Neeleman, who will remain as chairman, was replaced by chief operating officer Dave Barger, who will remain president. Barger certainly has his work cut for him.</p>
<p>As I've argued <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/13/southwest-vs-jetblue-battle-of-the-brands/">before</a>, JetBlue's brand has been damaged by service snafus that left thousands of passengers stranded on airport runways for hours on planes that didn't take off.</p>
<p>In response to the negative press, Neeleman established the "Customer Bill of Rights" which promises vouchers for future flights for passengers that find themselves in the same situation. I'm not sure if people that have experienced poor service on an airline would want to fly that same airline again even with a discount.</p>
<p>When it comes to customer service, talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. If Barger can convince the flying public that the "Bill of Rights" really means something, then JetBlue will be able to expand into other markets and be a serious competitor to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">Southwest Airlines Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">LUV</a>).</p>
<p>But that's a big if.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/">JetBlue finally replaces Neeleman as CEO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 May 2007 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/jetblue-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/n20070510100909990011>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/893057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/10/jetblue-finally-replaces-neeleman-as-ceo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline competition</category><category>airline service</category><category>AirlineCompetition</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineService</category><category>brands</category><category>jblu</category><category>JFK Airport</category><category>JfkAirport</category><category>luv</category><category>marketing</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are you paying more for stuff from the same factory?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>I was happy to see that today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> was taking a closer look at what I considered the most interesting part of the pet food recall: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117867462888496739.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">101 Brand Names, 1 Manufacturer</a>. It turns out that Menu Foods was the manufacturer for everything from discount private label brands to some of the most expensive premium brands: Everything from Wal-Mart's Ol' Roy to the Science Diet stuff that I buy at the vet for my elderly lab with digestive problems.</p>
<p>And apparently it's the same in lots of other industries: Kellwoods sews clothes for Calvin Klein and Sag Harbor, a much cheaper label. Of course, the industry spokespeople say that they are all made from different recipes and whatnot and that the products  vary in quality. But what else are they going to say?</p>
<p>I'm still suspicious about this: I always buy store brands if they're cheaper and I don't notice the difference. But hey, maybe I'm just not sophisticated.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/">Are you paying more for stuff from the same factory?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 May 2007 20:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117867462888496739.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/892551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/are-you-paying-more-for-stuff-from-the-same-factory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brands</category><category>Dog Food</category><category>DogFood</category><category>Factories</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 20:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2006's Top Brand? Of course, it's Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/youtube.bmp" alt="" /></p>
<p>The online magazine, <a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/">brandchannel.com</a>, has released its 2006 survey on top brands. It should be no surprise that Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) got the top spot - even beating out Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), which was #2.<br /><br />Then again, it helped that Google bought the super-hot brand, <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>. Actually, this was ranked #3 on the list.</p>
<p>As for #4, it's another upstart: <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p>No doubt, the internet world is getting lots of mindshare. And, these top brands are fairly new companies. What's more, for companies like Wikipedia and YouTube, there was minimal advertising dollars.</p>
<p>In other words, it was really the loyal users that helped to build the brand. It's also notable that Wikipedia and YouTube rely on user-generated content.</p>
<p>You can read <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&amp;storyID=2007-01-26T100007Z_01_L24304971_RTRIDST_0_BRANDS-GLOBAL-WINNERS.XML&amp;rpc=66&amp;type=qcna">more</a> about the brandchannel.com survey at Reuters.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/">2006's Top Brand? Of course, it's Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/743042/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/2006s-top-brand-of-course-its-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brands</category><category>Wikipedia</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford loses $1B in fake auto parts, consumers can lose much more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xrx/" rel="tag">Xerox Corp (XRX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p>If a yet <a href="http://www.markenbusiness.com/en/news.php?newsid=4627">unpublished study</a> by the OECD is right, then 2% of worldwide trade, or $176 billion, is lost to brand piracy every year. This is a lower figure than the previously estimated 5-6%, but it is estimated the problem is only growing.<br /><br />Regardless of the exact worldwide figure, <span class="storytext">the auto parts industry estimates $12 billion of counterfeit parts are sold worldwide, with $3 billion in phony auto parts sold in the United States alone.</span> Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) says its <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070122/AUTO01/701220335/1148">losses amount to $1 billion</a> per year. That's a staggering amount.<br /><br />The U.S. Chamber of Commerce did a study about counterfeiting that will be officially released today, looking at cases also involving Merck &amp; Co (NYSE:MRK), New Balance athletic shoes, and Xerox Corp. (NYSE:XRX). According to the study, "Many businesses, particularly small and medium-sized companies, do not fully appreciate the bottom-line cost of lax supply chain security and adverse impact it has on brand value." For example, Ford may not only lose on the sale of these counterfeited parts, but may also lose on replacing them under warranty repairs.
<p> According to Ford, the company started an aggressive campaign worldwide to attack the problem with agents raiding and seizing fake parts, especially in China and India, but also in the U.S.</p>
<p>General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GM) also said it is combating the problem around the world, but hasn't released a figure of estimated losses due to phony parts.</p>
<p>Counterfeit goods can also harm consumers. Fake auto parts may have low durability that can cause serious car failure and safety concerns. Consumers don't always know repair shops use these parts to save cost. In other cases there could health and other ramifications if sub-standard cosmetic products, medical goods, clothing and electrical items are bought. While the FBI is also trying to stop the phenomenon, with legal action outside the U.S. often fruitless, the effort mostly seems like treading water.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/">Ford loses $1B in fake auto parts, consumers can lose much more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070122/AUTO01/701220335/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/740819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/ford-loses-1b-in-fake-auto-parts-consumers-can-lose-much-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brands</category><category>counterfeit goods</category><category>CounterfeitGoods</category><category>f</category><category>ford</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>mrk</category><category>xrx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Limited Brands is offering a direct stock purchase plan!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ltd/" rel="tag">Limited Brands (LTD)</a></p><p>One of my favorites, <a href="http://www.limitedbrands.com/index.jsp">Limited Brands Inc.</a> (NYSE: LTD,) has announced a direct stock purchase plan to provide an affordable means for investors to purchase their common stock. Its plan called <a href="http://www.limitedbrands.com/investor/investor_services/dividend_reinvest.jsp">BuyDIRECT</a> is being facilitated by <a href="http://www.stockbny.com/">The Bank of New York</a> and is available to anyone. An initial minimum investment of just $200 is required but after that, purchases as small as $50 may be transacted. A one time enrollment fee of $10 is applicable at time of first purchase.</p>
<p>The plan offers enough flexibility to be both interesting and useful. Shares may be held in book entry form or you may have stock certificates issued directly to you. Be advised that having hard copy stock certificates issued generally involves extra cost so you'll need to weigh that into your decision when choosing what to do. Additionally, Limited Brands offers you the option of reinvesting all or some of your dividends earned, which can have significant tax advantages. Alternatively, you may have your dividends paid directly to you. Holders of shares already in certificate are allowed to have any portion of those shares transferred to their plan account and are welcome to withdraw or transfer at any time.</p>
<p>Limited brands has a <a href="http://www.limitedbrands.com/pdf/dividend_reinvest_plan_brochure.pdf">plan brochure</a> available and it invites you to have a look. The plan will be available 24 / 7 through Bank of New York. This plan looks like an excellent way for a newbie investor like me to grab a chunk of some exciting stock. I see limited Brands as a good, solid company group and I think I'll start my portfolio with it. When that happens I'll be sure to let you know!</p>
<p>You may get current information on Limited Brand's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys?freq=1">stock performance here.</a></p>
<p>You may read my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/gary-e-sattler/">other articles here</a> .</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/">Limited Brands is offering a direct stock purchase plan!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/738152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/limited-brands-is-offering-a-direct-stock-purchase-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bath n' body works</category><category>BathN'BodyWorks</category><category>brands</category><category>express</category><category>limited</category><category>limited brands</category><category>LimitedBrands</category><category>the limited</category><category>TheLimited</category><category>victoria's secret</category><category>Victoria'sSecret</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AOL name change: America IS Online now, after all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>America is all Online now, right? TimeWarner says that its division, American Online, has now accomplished its eponymousmission and managed to get America, from purple mountains to fruited plains, on the Internet. Thus the division ischanging its name officially to "AOL LLC."<br /><br />The "LLC" organization will reflect <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/03/30/google-formalizes-5-aol-stake/">the 5% stake Google purchased lastweek</a>.<br /><br />According to an email sent to all employees (including yours truly), "consumers already knowus by our initials and believe that AOL stands for a more  contemporary Internet company." I can't imagine thisnews will have much of an impact on the consumer experience -- I mean, when was the last time you said "AmericaOnline"? -- but it's interesting to hear the rationale behind it.<br /><br />(And, as an aside, this news comes atabout the same time the company rolls out all new business cards for its AOL employees - they're pretty and vertical and<em>so</em> much better than the old ones. I wonder if there's any correlation between vertically-oriented businesscards and stock price?)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/">AOL name change: America IS Online now, after all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/605308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/03/aol-name-change-america-is-online-now-after-all/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>5%</category><category>5% stake</category><category>5%Stake</category><category>aol</category><category>aol llc</category><category>AolLlc</category><category>brand</category><category>branding</category><category>brands</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google and aol</category><category>GoogleAndAol</category><category>legal organization</category><category>LegalOrganization</category><category>limited liability companies</category><category>limited liabity company</category><category>LimitedLiabilityCompanies</category><category>LimitedLiabityCompany</category><category>llc</category><category>name change</category><category>NameChange</category><category>organization</category><category>timewarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
