<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Redbox is really irritating the studios, but they should calm down ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/redbox_logo_160.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/coinstar-inc/cstr/nas">Coinstar</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/coinstar-inc/cstr/nas">CSTR</a>) Redbox, a convenient movie-rental kiosk, has really shaken things up in the media industry. BloggingStocks has covered recent events surrounding this asset: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/redbox-sues-warner-home-video-over-dvd-availability/">Zac Bissonnette</a> wrote an article earlier in the month discussing the subject of litigation with certain studios, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/coinstar-cstr-to-put-paramount-films-in-redbox-kiosks/">Brent Archer</a> covered a possible options play connected to a deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>).</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/movies/Redbox_is_really_irritating_studios_they_should_calm_down'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>I won't rehash all of the details, but let me boil it down to the salient issue: studios such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) are all worried about the devaluation of physical media. Redbox charges a single dollar per day for a DVD rental. This frightens content makers. Executives at these companies believe that discs must be defended since they are an important way of amortizing costs associated with making films. Even those entities that have decided to engage the Redbox model probably aren't happy about it. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) surely doesn't enjoy the deflation of the DVD, but it is <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/redbox-and-lionsgate-sign-multi-year-distribution-agreement/rfid240717899?channel=pf">playing ball</a> nevertheless. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Redbox is really irritating the studios, but they should calm down </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/">Redbox is really irritating the studios, but they should calm down </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19144221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/29/redbox-is-really-irritating-the-studios-but-they-should-calm-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>brent archer</category><category>Coinstar</category><category>CSTR</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate</category><category>lionsgate</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Redbox</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>zac bissonnette</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Revlon up on second-quarter news -- am I wrong about the company?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rev/" rel="tag">Revlon (REV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/avp/" rel="tag">Avon Products (AVP)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/revlon_logo_160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revlon-inc-new/rev/nys">Revlon, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revlon-inc-new/rev/nys">REV</a>) is, simply put, not one of my favorite investment ideas. However, the market seems to think that the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/revlon-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid236943354?channel=pf">second-quarter report</a> is nothing less than beautiful. As I write this, shares are rallying almost 8% (although volume isn't that great, to be honest). </p>
<p>I don't know, I just don't see it. Sales declined over 12%. What's that, you want to strip out currency effects? Okay: sales went down over 7% on that basis. Net income on a reported basis was nothing, 0 cents per share. There were, however, 36 cents of charges on the books. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=rev">Earnings.com</a>, Revlon was expected to lose around 8 cents per share. Another <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSBNG44871920090730">source</a> says that 25 cents before special items was the number to hit. No matter how you slice it, I think we can say that management delivered a significant beat today. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Revlon up on second-quarter news -- am I wrong about the company?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/">Revlon up on second-quarter news -- am I wrong about the company?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/revlon-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid236943354?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19114680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/revlon-up-on-second-quarter-news-am-i-wrong-about-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avon</category><category>AVP</category><category>beauty products</category><category>BeautyProducts</category><category>brent archer</category><category>BrentArcher</category><category>REV</category><category>Revlon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intuitive investing, gut instincts, or how I'm not like Warren Buffett]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ltd/" rel="tag">Limited Brands (LTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lux/" rel="tag">Luxottica Group ADS (LUX)</a></p><p><img height="246" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/panning-for-gold-by-dbking.jpg" width="220" align="right" />Regular BloggingStocks readers know by now that my investment strategies are fairly conservative and relatively coarse. Please don't begrudge me that. Although I don't track my picks in a portfolio, I do mentally track the general performance of the companies I tout, and I believe that overall I've done fairly well.</p>
<p>There are two major differences between my stock-picking efforts and what I perceive to be Warren Buffett's style. First, Mr. Buffett has years of experience that I myself do not have. Second, Mr. Buffett likes to have a greater working understanding of the nature of the businesses he chooses to investment in than I do. I choose my companies of favor with what I call my "big picture" strategy. All that means is that I use a broader view than most of my contemporaries who like to dig right down to the very roots of their picks.</p>
<p>I like to think that my strategy provides solid conservative support, which shall then free an investor to do some aggressive speculating with their profits.</p>
<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/gary-e-sattler/"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intuitive investing, gut instincts, or how I'm not like Warren Buffett</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/">Intuitive investing, gut instincts, or how I'm not like Warren Buffett</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/gary-e-sattler/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/08/intuitive-investing-gut-instincts-or-how-im-not-like-warren-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>Brent Archer</category><category>BrentArcher</category><category>conservative investment</category><category>ConservativeInvestment</category><category>DE</category><category>diversity</category><category>fundamentals</category><category>Gary Sattler</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>innovation</category><category>John Deere</category><category>Limited Brands</category><category>LTD</category><category>luxottica</category><category>name recognition</category><category>NameRecognition</category><category>profit margins</category><category>value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle Q4 2007 earnings preview: A bargain or a sucker's bet?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/orcl-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Since its upside surprise when it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/21/oracle-becoming-stronger-and-stronger/">reported last quarter</a>, enterprise software giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) has continued with its philosophy of growth through acquisition by <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oracle-buys-lodestar/n20070424081009990003">acquiring LODESTAR Corp.</a>, which supplies software solutions to utilities, as well as <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oracle-to-buy-product-lifecycle/n20070515174209990019">product lifecycle management</a> leader <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/agile-software-corporation/agil/nas">Agile Software Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/agile-software-corporation/agil/nas">AGIL</a>). And the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas/charts?dr=3&amp;symbs=&amp;ag=mov_avg_50&amp;index=&amp;te=mountain&amp;se=default&amp;vl=on&amp;ss=on&amp;hs=on&amp;vs=on&amp;sym=ORCL&amp;exch=USA&amp;state=1&amp;settings=1&amp;vl1=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;hs1=on&amp;vs1=on&amp;scs=0&amp;daysb4=0&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;freq=1&amp;timeframe=20">share price has been trending upward</a> the past three months.</p>
<p>But it hasn't all been peaches and cream. Billionaire <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/16/soros-likes-microsoft-should-you/">George Soros</a> recently shifted his focus away from Oracle and some other tech stocks in favor of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). BloggingStocks contributor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/georges-yared/">Georges Yared</a> thinks <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/google-and-apple-the-new-leaders/">Oracle's glory days</a>, in terms of growth, may be behind it, and even that it may be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/professional-portfolio-managers-stocks-for-suckers-list/">stock for suckers</a>.</p>
<p>Oracle's rivalry with Germany-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sap-aktiengesellschaft/sap/nys">SAP AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sap-aktiengesellschaft/sap/nys">SAP</a>) continues, of course, not only in the courtroom -- Oracle recently added <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oracle-files-amended-complaint-against/n20070601132209990048">copyright infringement</a> to its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/23/its-war-oracle-and-sap-let-the-games-begin/">theft charges against SAP</a> -- but also into <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/sap-oracle-rivalry-continues-to-small/n20070605111209990003">small and medium-sized companies</a>, where some early indicators suggest Oracle may have the edge. Oddly enough, there has been speculation that <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/2007/06/01/germany-market-rumor-markets-equity-cx_vr_0601markets15.html">Oracle may try to acquire SAP</a>, unlikely though that may be, after it was rumored that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&amp;sid=a0Zwk9B98Wvg&amp;refer=germany">Oracle has been purchasing SAP stock</a>.</p>
<p>But Oracle remains <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/12/news/companies/msft.fortune/index.htm">part of the Fortune 500</a>, and BloggingStocks contributor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/brent-archer/">Brent Archer</a> thinks the stock <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/bargain-hunting-oracle/">might be a bargain</a>. One <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/14/analyst-upgrades-6-14-07-expe-kss-orcl-shoo-and-thi/">analyst upgraded Oracle</a> just last week. According to <a href="http://ec.thomsonfn.com/DomesticEarnings/CompanyEarnings?transform=estimates-de&amp;pid=Mzg0UVU5TUxURT1QJFkEQUALSTO&amp;ticker=ORCL">Thomson Financial</a>, Wall Street consensus rates ORCL a buy (12 strong buy, 11 buy, 12 hold). When Oracle <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oracle-sets-the-date-of-its-fourth/n20070604160809990018">reports earnings on June 26</a>, analysts expect earnings per share for this quarter to come in at 35 cents, compared to 25 cents actual from last quarter, and 25 cents a year ago. Its market cap is $96.8 billion, and its P/E ratio is 18.95 (the industry average is 23.49). The consensus price target is $21.25; the 52-week low was $13.77 in July of 2006 and $19.95 last week. It closed Tuesday at $19.88.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/">Oracle Q4 2007 earnings preview: A bargain or a sucker's bet?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/21/oracle-becoming-stronger-and-stronger/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/917826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/oracle-q4-2007-earnings-preview-a-bargain-or-a-suckers-bet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>Agile</category><category>Agile Software</category><category>Brent Archer</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>databases</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>Fortune 500</category><category>George Soros</category><category>Georges Yared</category><category>GeorgesYared</category><category>larry ellison</category><category>LarryEllison</category><category>Lodestar</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Q4 2007</category><category>quarterly reports</category><category>SAP</category><category>software</category><category>software developers</category><category>takeover rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
