<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast's Slow Climb Continues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/comcast-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Cable/communications giant Comcast Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) took the long way home, to quote Supertramp, to get to $20, but it's arrived. <br />
<br />
Comcast, which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/26/comcast-s-key-cable-system-subscribers/">on April 22, 2009</a> at a price of $14.05 will likely post a 2010 revenue increase of 5-7%, with a similar increase in 2011, propelled higher by increased multi-service customers, higher video services revenue, and a rebound in advertising revenue. Margins should improve slightly.<br />
<br />
Comcasts' most compelling metric? Subscribers: 22.9 million video, 16.7 million high speed internet, and 8.4 million digital phone. Comcast has also formalized its plan to buy a 51% joint-venture stake in NBC Universal (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), which will contribute programming.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comcast's Slow Climb Continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/">Comcast's Slow Climb Continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19730937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/comcast-s-slow-climb-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>GE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Douglass Winthrop picks for 2008: Nestle, Legg Mason, Comcast, Markel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p>Jay Winthrop of Douglass Winthrop Advisors LLC, a $250 million (assets under management) New York registered investment advisory firm, likes to buy stocks whose prices are so low that the odds of them benefiting from a positive surprise exceed those of losing from a negative one. Douglass Winthrop is ahead of the S&amp;P year-to-date and has delivered "positive, tax-efficient results since inception in 2002." Through its 10% to 15% stock turnover, it offers investors lower expenses and taxes than its higher turnover "fast money" peers. As Winthrop summed it up: "Good things happen to cheap stocks."</p>
<p>Four stocks that he mentioned particularly caught my attention:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nestle-s-a-s-adr/nsrgy/nao"><strong>Nestle S A</strong></a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nestle-s-a-s-adr/nsrgy/nao">NSRGY</a>). Nestle has benefited from its investment in emerging markets -- giving it a strong brand and distribution presences in countries experiencing rapid growth. A significant share of its profits are generated in developing markets. And its core food business is cheap when its strategic investments are backed out. Nestle trades at a mere 13x to 14 x operating earnings -- which is lower than the value of stocks in its peer group. Finally, Nestle is capitalizing on the profitable and growing health and wellness trend. </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/legg-mason-inc/lm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Legg Mason</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/legg-mason-inc/lm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LM</a>). Legg Mason is a pre-eminent asset manager with $1 trillion under management. But its stock has declined due to temporary problems. Its Value Trust fund -- which had long outperformed the market under its manager Bill Miller -- has had two sub-par performing years in a row. And it's had troubles integrating a merger with <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a></strong>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) mutual fund unit. Winthrop also thinks Legg Mason has been hit by the overall decline in financials. However, he argues, Legg Mason trades at 1% of assets under management which is far below the 2% industry average. And its valuation is much less than that of newly public alternative investment managers. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Douglass Winthrop picks for 2008: Nestle, Legg Mason, Comcast, Markel</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/">Douglass Winthrop picks for 2008: Nestle, Legg Mason, Comcast, Markel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1062873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/douglass-winthrop-picks-for-2008-nestle-legg-mason-comcast-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Douglass Winthrop</category><category>Jay Winthrop</category><category>Legg Mason</category><category>LM</category><category>Markel</category><category>MKL</category><category>Nestle</category><category>NSRGY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cable shares punished by Major League Baseball deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>Cable stocks were down a bit with the market this morning as Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX), Time Warner Cable (TWC), and Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) are all lower. The one bit of possibly troubling news is the potential agreement between Major League Baseball getting the exclusive "Away-Game" pact with DirectTV Group, Inc. (NYSE:DTV). The weak stock market is hurting even DirecTV, with DTV shares down over 1% right after the open. <br /><br />For a satellite company to get an exclusive on away-games is simply flabergasting. This deal is certain to have many critics.  DirecTV sent a letter to the FCC on Friday detailing its $700 million deal over a 7-year period starting in 2009. Senator John Kerry has also asked the FCC to investigate the deal. <br /><br />The away-game package has been available through iNDemand for some time, but this would be exclusive to DirecTV and via the league's website. INHD is available as part of the high-def offerings from cable operators and is owned by INDEMAND Networks, whose shareholders are Comcast INDEMAND Holdings, Inc., Cox Communications Holdings, Inc., and Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership.<br /><span style="font-style: italic;" /><span style="font-style: italic;"><br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/">Cable shares punished by Major League Baseball deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/845789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/05/cable-shares-punished-by-major-league-baseball-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMSA</category><category>DTV</category><category>FCC</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Satellite TV</category><category>SatelliteTv</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good stocks, lousy reputations: HAL, XOM, CMCSA, GM, MO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p>If you're looking for a good stock, buy shares in a company with a lousy reputation.</p>
<p>The <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117019715069692873-search.html?KEYWORDS=microsoft&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month">Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required] reports this morning on a Harris Interactive study of 60 corporate reputations that lists Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT), Johnson &amp; Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), 3M Company (NYSE: 3M), Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), and The Coca Cola Company (NYSE: KO) as enjoying the top five corporate reputations in 2006. But reputation does not translate into good stock performance -- these five were up an average of 12% while the S&amp;P 500 rose 13% in the last year. </p>
<p>Moreover, the bottom five -- Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL), Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE: XOM), Comcast, (NASDAQ: CMCSA), General Motors (NYSE: GM), and Altria Group (NYSE: MO) -- were up an average of 20% -- 8% better than the top five. Here's the reputation rank and last 12 month's stock performance for these lousy reputation companies:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>60. HAL -29%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>59. XOM +16%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>58. CMCSA +58%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>57. GM +34%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>56. MO +19%</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>Why do these five companies have lousy reputations and why did their stocks do well?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Good stocks, lousy reputations: HAL, XOM, CMCSA, GM, MO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/">Good stocks, lousy reputations: HAL, XOM, CMCSA, GM, MO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/wsj-reputation-study-ranking-not-linked-to-performance/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/745703/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/31/good-stocks-lousy-reputations-hal-xom-cmcsa-gm-mo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3M</category><category>CMSA</category><category>GM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>HAL</category><category>JNJ</category><category>KO</category><category>MO</category><category>MSFT</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
