<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst Calls: AA, AOL, BLK, CSCO, GOOG, INTC, JBL, JBLU, YHOO ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rsh/" rel="tag">RadioShack Corp (RSH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></a>Analyst Upgrades</strong></p>
<ul>
    <li>Intel (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) was upgraded to overweight from equal weight and Autodesk (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/autodesk-incorporated/adsk/nas">ADSK</a>) to equal weight from underweight at Morgan Stanley.</li>
    <li>Citigroup upgraded Blackrock (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/blackrock-inc/blk/nys">BLK</a>) to buy from hold.</li>
    <li>99c Only Stores (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/99-cents-only-stores/ndn/nys">NDN</a>) was upgraded to buy from hold at Deutsche Bank.</li>
    <li>PetSmart (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/petsmart-inc/petm/nas">PETM</a>) was upgraded to overweight from equal weight at Barclays.</li>
    <li>Piper Jaffray upgraded Ruth's Hospitality (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ruth-s-hospitality-group-inc/ruth/nas">RUTH</a>) and Morton's Restaurant (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/morton-s-restaurant-group-inc/mrt/nys">MRT</a>) to overweight from neutral.</li>
    <li>BioMed Realty (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/biomed-realty-trust-inc/bmr/nys">BMR</a>) was upgraded to market perform from underperform at FBR Capital.</li>
    <li>Wells Fargo upgraded Piedmont (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/piedmont-office-realty-trust-inc-class-a-common-stock/pdm/nys">PDM</a>) to market perform from underperform.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analyst Calls: AA, AOL, BLK, CSCO, GOOG, INTC, JBL, JBLU, YHOO ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/">Analyst Calls: AA, AOL, BLK, CSCO, GOOG, INTC, JBL, JBLU, YHOO ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19712704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/11/analyst-upgrades-downgrades/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AA</category><category>ACOR</category><category>Acorda</category><category>ADSK</category><category>Alaska Air</category><category>Alcoa</category><category>ALK</category><category>analyst upgrades</category><category>AOL</category><category>Autodesk</category><category>BBG</category><category>Biomed</category><category>Blackrock</category><category>BLK</category><category>BMR</category><category>Cedar Fair</category><category>ChinaNet</category><category>Cisco</category><category>CLP</category><category>CNET</category><category>CSCO</category><category>downgrades</category><category>Elbit</category><category>ESLT</category><category>FLEX</category><category>Flextronics</category><category>FUN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Grainger</category><category>GWW</category><category>initiations</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jabil Circuit</category><category>JBL</category><category>JBLU</category><category>JetBlue</category><category>MRT</category><category>MSSR</category><category>NDN</category><category>PDM</category><category>PETM</category><category>PetSmart</category><category>RadioShack</category><category>RSH</category><category>RUTH</category><category>SIX</category><category>Six Flags</category><category>STRI</category><category>THOR</category><category>Thoratec</category><category>UDR</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><category>ZMH</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS tops estimates, but remains weak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/cbs-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), the famous broadcaster that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) Fox, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC, reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/cbs-corporation-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid239239153?channel=pf">Q2 earnings</a> on Thursday after the bell. If you judged the performance solely by the profit drop, you would have no choice but to feel sorry for CBS. The media company made an adjusted 8 cents per share. Last year at this time, CBS pulled in an adjusted 49 cents per share. </p>
<p>But the market looked past the significant income decline and instead seemed to focus on the fact that management beat Wall Street's expectations by a penny, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=cbs">Earnings.com</a> estimates. Shares of CBS were up over 7% during yesterday's after-hours session. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS tops estimates, but remains weak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/">CBS tops estimates, but remains weak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/cbs-corporation-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid239239153?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121925/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/cbs-tops-estimates-but-remains-weak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNET</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Fox</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS put a loss on the Q3 schedule]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) lost money in the third quarter (to see the data, you can click <a href="http://www.cbscorporation.com/news/prdetails.php?id=3783">here</a> to link to a pdf file). The loss was huge. Would you believe the red ink was equal to $18.58 per share from continuing operations? If you're a shareholder, you're probably shuddering at this point. But hold on, we're talking loss from a GAAP point of view. On an adjusted basis, excluding various charges (including the effect of the CNET purchase), CBS took in $0.43 per diluted share from continuing operations. According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/earnings-preview-cbs-not-eyeing-growth/">earnings preview</a>, analysts were looking for a number around $0.40 per share. That's more like it. Yet, there's another angle to the CBS story that won't be so reassuring. And that angle has to do with cash flow.</p>
<p>You see, CBS really promotes its dividend. For a dividend to be considered safe and strong, it needs to be backed by free cash flow. Well, during the third quarter, CBS produced no free cash. It used $38 million for its corporate activities. Before anyone panics, management was quick to point out that, for the nine-month period, free cash flow was a positive $1.4 billion. CBS paid out about $524 million in dividends. So, that should allow for some comfort. Still, for a company that likes to base itself on returning value to shareholders, that does give me pause. Yes, it's only one quarter, but we are stuck in an awful economy right now, and the advertising outlook seems pretty challenged going forward. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Wal Disney Corporation</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Fox are all in the same boat. Management does explicitly state in the earnings release that it's going to keep a strong eye on costs. I hope so. I also hope it'll keep a strong eye on the ratings of its television shows and continue to look for programming that can keep the cash coming. CBS has done well during the opening weeks of the new season. </p>
<p>Can CBS' content win the day and justify the stock's current yield? That's the big question. Since CBS' stock sports a yield of over 11%, the market is basically saying that bad things are to come. But, if management can sustain the dividend, then the yield can be considered a huge asset at this point. I'd be willing to give CBS the benefit of the doubt over the long term, but if you're thinking of trading the stock, I'd have a firm exit strategy in mind and use a tight stop. Wall Street has been in a very fickle mood lately, so anything can happen to stock prices at any moment. Executive chairman Sumner Redstone is very confident in the company. I'm not sure how big an endorsement that is, but it's something, at least, right? </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own Disney and GE; positions can change at any time.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/">CBS put a loss on the Q3 schedule</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cbscorporation.com/news/prdetails.php?id=3783>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1357782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/cbs-put-a-loss-on-the-q3-schedule/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>broadcasters</category><category>CBS</category><category>Cnet</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>Fox</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>SumnerRedstone</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Company nicknames: Tiffany Network CBS becoming The Silver Network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><em></em>
<p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-cbs-200cs080708.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is one in a series on prominent <strong>company nicknames</strong>. <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/company-nicknames">See all 25</a></strong>, and share your thoughts and memories about the <strong>Tiffany Network </strong>below in the comments.</em></p>
<p>If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS Corp.</a>'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) nickname <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBS">The Tiffany Network</a> were newly coined, I'd speculate that it referred to the long history of Tiffany's, and how the current CBS viewing public had probably begun shopping there back in the '20s. If the company has a more recently gained nickname, it would be the silver (-haired) network, due to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14cbs.html">skewing of its viewership toward the geezer crowd</a>.<br /><br />In reality, the Tiffany moniker hearkens back to the CBS of radio's heyday and the early days of television. With the likes of Edward R. Murrow reporting from London during the Blitz, Orson Wells scaring the bejebus out of listeners with his broadcast of <em>The War of the Worlds</em>, the hit multi-cultural comedy <em>I Love Lucy</em>, and the iconic western <em>Gunsmoke</em>, the network's reputation for quality was once as glittering as one of Tiffany's diamond-pav&eacute;d bracelets.</p>
<p>How the mighty have fallen. CBS, with debacles such as the Katie Couric news anchor stint, now lags behind Fox in weekly ratings.</p>
<p>The Tiffany Network is part of a massive entertainment company with fingers in television (66% of revenues), radio (remember radio?) (12%), outdoor advertising (16%), and publishing (6%). Yes, those are all very 20th century businesses. The question troubling current investors is just how the company will move into the 21st century without swapping all its diamonds for rhinestones?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Company nicknames: Tiffany Network CBS becoming The Silver Network</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/">Company nicknames: Tiffany Network CBS becoming The Silver Network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1271323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/company-nicknames-tiffany-network-cbs-becoming-the-silver-netwo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>CBS corp</category><category>cnet</category><category>company nicknames</category><category>Edward R. Murrow</category><category>entertainment companies</category><category>Gunsmoke</category><category>I Love Lucy</category><category>Katie Couric</category><category>Orson Wells</category><category>outdoor advertising</category><category>Sundance Channel</category><category>television advertising</category><category>tiffany network</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/yahoo_headquarters_victor_240.jpg" />Some people are so eager for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"> YHOO</a>) that they will do anything to make it happen -- even spread rumors to gullible members of the media. I pity the investors who <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=aiRUs2bVzYEw&amp;refer=home">bought Yahoo!'s stock on this rumor</a>.</p>
<p>Earlier today, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/24/sources-microsoft-and-yahoo-talks-back-on/">TechCrunch's Michael Arrington </a>reported that the talks were back on but also noted that "The information we have is thin, but what one source is saying that Microsoft is talking a price lower than the $33." Thin? So even Arrington was not sure whether he was being told the truth. Interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9975467-7.html">CNET's Dawn Kawamoto </a>refuted TechCrunch's post, arguing that all Microsoft wanted to do was "sweeten its previous offer" of a partial buyout of Yahoo!'s search business, citing "one major investor who has been in contact without parties."</p>
<p>So, Kawamoto is taking the word of one person to make such a bold statement. This person must be very important if both Microsoft and Yahoo! are willing to confide their most inner-most confidences in him or her. Or maybe not. It's tough to tell. Dow Jones Newswires also denied Arrington's report but added that its sources "indicated the companies might be open to alternative transactions" whatever that means.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/">Media World: Yahoo! rumors spin out of control</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=aiRUs2bVzYEw&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1235641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/media-world-yahoo-rumors-spin-out-of-control/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>Dawn kawamoto</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mergers</category><category>michael arrington</category><category>msft</category><category>techcrunch</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motley Fool's 5 stocks under $10 to consider for your portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wstreet.jpg" alt="" />Some investors shy away from low priced stocks., but Rick Aristotle Munarriz thinks some stocks under $10 have nice growth potential. Here's his list of <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2008/05/19/5-stocks-under-10.aspx">five such stocks</a> to consider.</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alvarion-ltd/alvr/nas">Alvarion Ltd</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alvarion-ltd/alvr/nas">ALVR</a>) is currently at $8.98; its development trajectory looks impressive if we take into account the fact that it has gained 53% over the past two months. In addition, its quarterly earnings results and its cash-rich balance sheet point to further growth.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>), currently at $2.72, is showing a lot of potential as its subscriber base continues to increase, while reducing its quarterly losses. <span class="vcard author">Munarriz also cites the company's advantages tied to its </span>pending merger with competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>).</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/builders-firstsource-inc/bldr/nas">Builders FirstSource Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/builders-firstsource-inc/bldr/nas">BLDR</a>) is currently at $7.48, down from $23 two years ago. Despite the fact that the company's quarterly earnings numbers weren't so good, BLRD was able to gain market share and is nicely positioned for a recovery in the next couple of years.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/internet-brands-inc/inet/nas">Internet Brands Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/internet-brands-inc/inet/nas">INET</a>), currently at $6.48, is seen as a good investment in the current dot-com world. Last week's $1.8 billion decision by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) to acquire <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET Networks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) could be a sign that we should consider Internet Brands and its high traffic volume. Internet Brands has several pages that have high advertising potential, and should see this pay off in the future, or lead to a possible buyout by one of the major players.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/natuzzi-spa-ads/ntz/nys">Natuzzi</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/natuzzi-spa-ads/ntz/nys">NTZ</a>) is currently trading at $3.77. The company is facing some trouble related to its declining revenue and profit, but it is has the advantage of a lot of cash on its balance sheet.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Motley Fool's 5 stocks under $10 to consider for your portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/">Motley Fool's 5 stocks under $10 to consider for your portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 May 2008 14:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1200748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/motley-fools-5-stocks-under-10-to-consider-for-your-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alvarion</category><category>alvr</category><category>bldr</category><category>Builders FirstSource</category><category>BuildersFirstsource</category><category>cnet</category><category>CNET Networks</category><category>CnetNetworks</category><category>forecasts</category><category>inet</category><category>Internet Brands</category><category>InternetBrands</category><category>Natuzzi</category><category>ntz</category><category>siri</category><category>Sirius Satellite Radio</category><category>SiriusSatelliteRadio</category><category>XM Satellite Radio</category><category>XmSatelliteRadio</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades: Department store sector, SNDK and CNET]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jcp/" rel="tag">Penney (J.C.) (JCP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rf/" rel="tag">Regions Financial (RF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sndk/" rel="tag">SanDisk Corp (SNDK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> The Department store sector, SanDisk and CNET Networks were today's noteworthy downgrades:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Goldman downgraded the department store sector to Neutral from Attractive after raising its 2008 oil forecast to $149 from $115, as it believes higher gas prices will impact consumer discretionary spend and sentiment. Goldman downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">JC Penney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys">JCP</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">Nordstrom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">JWN</a>) to Neutral and also removed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">Kohl's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">KSS</a>) from its Conviction Buy List. <br /></li>
    <li>JMP Securities downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas">SanDisk</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas">SNDK</a>) to Underperform from Market Perform based on increased competition in NAND, a potential decline in royalty income, valuation, and lack of catalysts from flash-based solid state drives. <br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET Networks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) was cut to Neutral from Buy at Banc of America following the tender offer from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>). </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Merrill downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/regions-financial-corporation/rf/nys">Regions Financial</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/regions-financial-corporation/rf/nys">RF</a>) to Sell from Neutral. <br /></li>
    <li>B. Riley downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exar-corporation/exar/nas">Exar</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exar-corporation/exar/nas">EXAR</a>) to Neutral from Buy. <br /></li>
    <li>Albermarle (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/albemarle-corporation/alb/nys">ALB</a>) was lowered to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/">Analyst downgrades: Department store sector, SNDK and CNET</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 11:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1197485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/analyst-downgrades-department-store-sector-sndk-and-cnet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alb</category><category>albermarle</category><category>analyst</category><category>cnet</category><category>downgrade</category><category>exar</category><category>jc penney</category><category>jcp</category><category>JcPenney</category><category>jwn</category><category>kohls</category><category>kss</category><category>nordstrom</category><category>regions financial</category><category>RegionsFinancial</category><category>rf</category><category>sandisk</category><category>sndk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Viacom have bought CNET?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/viacomlogo.jpg"  alt="" />So the big news on Thursday was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>' (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) hefty $1.8 billion purchase of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>). Douglas McIntyre already explained why this was such a "weird deal" in an excellent article that you can <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/">read here</a>. I'd like to expand on that thinking a bit by asking if it should have been <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), as opposed to CBS, in the buying seat.</p>
<p>Remember "old Viacom"? Old Viacom was composed of CBS and "new Viacom", the latter being the Viacom of today. I know, confusing, but that's how things are when a big media conglomerate splits in two. Anyway, there was a general mandate given to both companies, one that basically stated the logic of CBS being an entity that focuses on cash flows and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/is-cbs-just-an-income-play/">dividend increases</a> while new Viacom would focus on acquisitions to promote capital appreciation of the company's stock. Sure enough, the yield on CBS tells the tale perfectly.</p>
<p>So, I have to ask, what gives? I mean, a check of CBS' latest 10K shows that the broadcaster generated $2.2 billion in operational cash flow in 2007. I think paying $1.8 billion for anything, let alone a questionable asset vis a vis CBS' core media competencies, might be too much given CBS' mission to return a lot of value to shareholders over the long-term in the form of dividends. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Viacom have bought CNET?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/">Should Viacom have bought CNET?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 May 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/is-cbs-just-an-income-play/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/16/should-viacom-have-bought-cnet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>CNET</category><category>dividendinvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>Douglas McIntyre</category><category>DouglasMcintyre</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Peter Cohan</category><category>PeterCohan</category><category>Tom Taulli</category><category>TomTaulli</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Economic data and deals power gains]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a></p>The markets got some extra relief today as weekly jobless claims only rose by 6,000 to 371,000. The Philly Fed also showed that manufacturing contracted slower than expected as output fell by 0.7% in April. Below are the unofficial closing prices for major index levels:<br />
<ul>
    <li>DJIA  12,988.91  +90.53  +0.70%</li>
    <li>S&amp;P500  1,423.28  +14.62  +1.04%</li>
    <li>NASDAQ  2,533.73  +37.03  +1.48%</li>
    <li>10 Yr Bond(%)  3.8430%  -0.0950</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/05/the-52-week-l-6.html">52-WEEK LOWS</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/05/top-10-pre-m-10.html">TOP ANALYST CALLS</a></li>
</ul>
<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-architectural-engineering-inc/rch/ase">China Architectural Engineering, Inc.</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-architectural-engineering-inc/rch/ase">RCH</a>) enjoyed another massive day as its stock rose another 23% to $10.17 late in the day based on construction, architecture, and engineering needs that will be necessary in China after that earthquake.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Economic data and deals power gains</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/">Closing Bell: Economic data and deals power gains</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196858/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/closing-bell-economic-data-and-deals-power-gains/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>CNET</category><category>EMC</category><category>INTC</category><category>RCH</category><category>SLRY</category><category>VMW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media old fogies spend big on New Media]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/cbs.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Over the past couple weeks, I've attended several conferences, such as <a href="http://www.warrillow.com/index.aspx">Warrillow</a> and <a href="http://www.digitalhollywood.com/">Digital Hollywood</a>. Of course, a big topic is New Media - and how it will somehow kill Old Media.</p>
<p>But, it seems that Old Media is still alive and well. In fact, this week we've seen some <a href="http://www.contentinople.com/author.asp?section_id=430&amp;doc_id=153985">key media deals</a>; that is, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS'</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) $1.8 billion deal for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET Networks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) $175 million purchase of Plaxo. </p>
<p>Funny enough, yesterday I had breakfast with a big-wig from Comcast (from the ecommerce division). While he said that his revenue line was still modest - compared to the rest of the organization - it was still growing at a rapid clip.</p>
<p>He was also a big fan of email marketing and mentioned that experimentation was critical (and, with Plaxo, I think he'll need a lot of creativity to make the deal work). Yet, he also extolled the virtues of synergy ... between Old and New Media.</p>
<p>If anything, I think Old Media can bring some discipline to web properties. For example, CNET is a bloated organization and could use some aggressive cost cuts.</p>
<p>Oh, and Old Media still has a ton of money to throw around. So I suspect we'll see lots more dealmaking.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" width="1" border="0" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" width="1" border="0" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.mergerbook.com">MergerBook.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/">Media old fogies spend big on New Media</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 15:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/media-old-fogies-spend-big-on-new-media/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>Plaxo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option Update: CNet Networks volatility low as CBS agrees to buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>CNet Networks</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) closed at $7.94 Wednesday. <br /></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) announced it agreed to buy CNET for approximately $1.8 billion, or $11.50 a shares. CBS says the acquisition will make CBS one of the 10 most popular Internet companies in the United States. <br /></p>
<p>CNET overall option implied volatility of 50 is below its 26-week average of 55 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/">Option Update: CNet Networks volatility low as CBS agrees to buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/option-update-cnet-networks-volatility-low-as-cbs-agrees-to-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>cnet</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sometimes, you just have to relent ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the value guys threw this party, so respect the hosts.</span> <br /><br />  Sometimes you just feel beaten into being positive. You just say, "OK, enough, I will accept the positives as they are being put out, not as I believe they are."  <br /><br />  That's how I felt yesterday about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=FRE" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>). The company put out financials yesterday that looked better than expected, and for once I didn't question whether they were.  <br /><br />  I didn't because the earnings from so many of the feckless players -- the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie</a>s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=FNM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>), the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">Washington Mutual</a>s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=WM" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA</a>s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=MBI" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac</a>s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=ABK" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) -- are all being greeted with a bizarre positive response, so bizarre that I bought into the "better than expected" rhetoric because I don't want to fight the value guys who are in control right now.  <br /><br />  Elsewhere on the site, Doug Kass has been putting up some very strong arguments that numbers from the likes of Freddie are less than meets the eye. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sometimes, you just have to relent </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sometimes, you just have to relent </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 09:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sometimes-you-just-have-to-relent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abk</category><category>ambac</category><category>cbs</category><category>cnet</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>featured</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mbi</category><category>mbia</category><category>washington mututal</category><category>WashingtonMututal</category><category>wm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS to buy CNet: Who's next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gJhY4Kr55gJTx2vDfDj3WrHahIJwD90M25F80">The Associated Press</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) is buying <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNet Networks Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) for $1.75 billion. This $11.50 a share deal is a 45% premium over Wednesday's closing price</p>
<p>CNet's Web sites include News.com, TV.com, Mp3.com, MySimon and GameSpot. And CBS expects to use CNet to tap into the Internet advertising market. This deal raises the question of whether any CBS competitors will decide to get into the game of buying Internet content companies.</p>
<p>Here are three possible targets:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>) - This provider of business, investment and ratings content has $65 million in sales and a market cap of $236 million.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/techtarget-inc/ttgt/nas">TechTarget</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/techtarget-inc/ttgt/nas">TTGT</a>) - This provider of online content for buyers and sellers of corporate information technology (IT) products has $95 million in sales and a $531 million market cap.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/webmd-health-corp/wbmd/nas">WebMD Health Corp</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/webmd-health-corp/wbmd/nas">WBMD</a>) - This provider health information services to consumers, physicians and other healthcare professionals, employers and health plans has $332 million in sales and it's market capitalization is $1.7 billion</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>I think traditional media companies buying Internet ones could become a trend. It would only take two more such deals to make it one.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/">CBS to buy CNet: Who's next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-to-buy-cnet-whos-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cbs</category><category>cnet</category><category>cnet networks</category><category>CnetNetworks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>techtar</category><category>techtarget</category><category>thestreet</category><category>thestreet.com</category><category>tscm</category><category>ttgt</category><category>wbmd</category><category>webmd</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: CBS, CNET, IACI, UAUA, INTC, PALM, MSFT]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" /><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-futures-higher-as-investors-await-data/">Before the bell: Futures higher as investors await data</a><br /><br />CBS Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) announced Thursday it has <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/cbs-inks-deal-buy-cnet/story.aspx?guid=%7B14FC0294%2D677A%2D497E%2D88AC%2D938C0692BEE0%7D">signed a deal to buy</a> CNet Networks Inc. (NASDAQ: CNET) for $11.50 a share in cash. CNet operates not only the CNET site, but also ZDNet, GameSpot.com, TV.com, mp3.com and others. The deal values CNet at about $1.8 billion and push CBS to among the 10 most popular Internet companies in the United States. CBS shares are down 2.9% in premarket trading while CNET shares are of course up over 42% to $11.31.<br /><br />IAC/InterActiveCorp (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>)'s <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/askcom-acquires-dictionarycom-other/20080515063909990001">Ask.com has bought Lexico</a> Publishing Group LLC, the parent of Dictionary.com, Thesaurus.com and Reference.com among other sites. Earlier this year, Lexico already agreed to be sold to Answers Corp (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/answers-corporation/answ/nas">ANSW</a>), but the latter couldn't secure the necessary funds. Now, Lexico sold itself to Ask.com, for an undisclosed amount, although the number people are throwing around is $100 million. Could this acquisition help IACI gain -- even a little -- on market leader Google?<br /><br />United Airlines (NASDAQ: UAUA) and Continental Airlines Inc. (NYSE: CAL), dropping ideas of a merger, are now talking about <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/ap-source-united-continental-in-alliance/n20080514211809990003">forming an alliance</a> to still gain some benefits of working together. United appears relentless in its attempts to help its bottom line through a merger or an alliance. While talking to Continental about an alliance, it is still negotiating with US Airways Group (NYSE: LCC).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: CBS, CNET, IACI, UAUA, INTC, PALM, MSFT</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/">Before the bell: CBS, CNET, IACI, UAUA, INTC, PALM, MSFT</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 08:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/before-the-bell-cbs-cnet-iaci-uaua-intc-palm-msft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>answ</category><category>cal</category><category>cbs</category><category>cnet</category><category>goog</category><category>iaci</category><category>intc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lcc</category><category>msft</category><category>palm</category><category>rimm</category><category>uaua</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pre-market movers  (CBS) (CNET) (BCS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) is up over 45% on news of a buy-out from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sina-corporation/sina/nas">Sina</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sina-corporation/sina/nas">SINA</a>) is up about 10% on an analyst upgrade.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">Barclays</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) is off 3% on weak earnings and high write-offs.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ctrip-com-international-ltd-american-depositary-shares/ctrp/nas">Ctrip.com</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ctrip-com-international-ltd-american-depositary-shares/ctrp/nas">CTRP</a>) is off 8% over worries about the impact of the earthquake in China on its business.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_newsletter.html">Ten Stocks Under $10.</a></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/">Pre-market movers  (CBS) (CNET) (BCS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 07:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/pre-market-movers-cbs-cnet-bcs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BCS</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNET</category><category>CTRP</category><category>SINA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS to buy CNET: Weird deal of the year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), a television network, is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/cbs-corporation-to-acquire-cnet-networks/rfid103528657">buying</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>), a collection of technology websites. Other than the fact that the deal makes no sense, it is perfect.</p>
<p>CBS is even paying a premium for the privilege of owning a company that no one else seemed to want. Jana Partners and other activist investors have been pushing for a sale or break-up of CNET, but the news must be beyond the wildest dreams. CNET is up almost 50% on word that CBS will pay $11.50 for a stock which was trading at under $8.</p>
<p>Management's case for the buy-out is that "The acquisition will make CBS one of the 10 most popular Internet companies in the United States, with a combined 54 million unique users per month, and approximately 200 million users worldwide," according to the company. </p>
<p>However, CNET has had trouble making money on its large audience of internet users, to some extent because those readers are spending time with online tech blogs. The firm does have a large software download business, but quarterly statements do not indicate that it is a large or profitable business.</p>
<p>Perhaps no one will ever understand the CBS motives. The company is controlled by Sumner Redstone, who has done odd things before.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/">CBS to buy CNET: Weird deal of the year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 May 2008 07:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/cbs-corporation-to-acquire-cnet-networks/rfid103528657>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1196207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/15/cbs-cbs-to-buy-cnet-cnet-weird-deal-of-the-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>CNET</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner takes stake in Meebo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>Meebo, a web-based service that allows multiple and simultaneous instant messaging accounts, has raised $25 million, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN3037638720080501">according to</a> <em>Reuters,</em> to expand the revenue potential of the business, especially in Asia. Investors include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>), Japanese-focused Jafco Ventures and co-investor KTB Ventures, the U.S. arm of Korea's largest private equity shop, KTBnetwork.<br /><br />This is the third round of funding for Meebo for a total of $37.5 million. The CEO, Seth Sternberg, 29, plans to use the funding to expand into Asia markets and to build a sustainable revenue model. Additionally, he wants to add Meebo chat rooms to Time Warner sites, including <em>People</em> magazine. Recently, Meebo hired Carter Brokaw as its chief revenue officer. He formerly worked at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET Networks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>)<br /><br />Meebo has 30 million users per month and includes instant messengers such as Yahoo! Messenger from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc. </a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), AOL Instant Messenger, Google Talk from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and ICQ. It was estimated by alleyinsider.com that Meebo is worth $220 million.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a producer and editor for the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_discounted.html">"10 Stocks Under $10"</a> weekly newsletter for 247WallSt.com.</em><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/">Time Warner takes stake in Meebo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSN3037638720080501>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1183482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/time-warner-takes-stake-in-meebo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Meebo</category><category>TWX</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings highlights: PepsiCo, Toyota, News Corp., ADM, Toll Bros. and others]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adm/" rel="tag">Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yum/" rel="tag">Yum Brands (YUM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wen/" rel="tag">Wendy's Intl (WEN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/alu/" rel="tag">Alcatel-LucentADS (ALU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tol/" rel="tag">Toll Brothers (TOL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wu/" rel="tag">Western Union (WU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rl/" rel="tag">Polo Ralph Lauren'A' (RL)</a></p><p>The earnings crunch continues, and here are a few of the highlights of this past week's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/">earnings coverage</a> from BloggingStocks:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcatel-lucent/alu/nys"><strong>Alcatel-Lucent</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcatel-lucent/alu/nys">ALU</a>) posted its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/before-the-bell-futures-point-to-weaker-open/">biggest quarterly loss</a> since its creation in 2006. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/archer-daniels-midland-company/adm/nys"><strong>Archer Daniels Midland Co.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/archer-daniels-midland-company/adm/nys">ADM</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/archer-daniels-adm-second-quarter-profit-rises-on-strong-deman/">missed earnings estimates</a> despite revenue up 50%. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biogen-idec-incorporated/biib/nas"><strong>Biogen Idec Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/biogen-idec-incorporated/biib/nas">BIIB</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/biogen-biib-fourth-quarter-profit-surges-84/">fourth-quarter profit</a> soared on strong sales of Avonex and Tysabri. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys"><strong>Chevron Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>) reported <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/ad-revenue-hurts-gannett-oil-prices-lift-chevron/">record profits</a> due to surging oil prices. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas"><strong>CNET Networks Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/">revenue rose</a> but the forecast was not encouraging. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/data-domain-inc/ddup/nas"><strong>Data Domain Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/data-domain-inc/ddup/nas">DDUP</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/data-domain-wants-to-be-the-guerrilla-of-storage/">third-quarter revenues</a> spiked due to aggressive overseas expansion. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/elizabeth-arden-inc/rden/nas"><strong>Elizabeth Arden Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/elizabeth-arden-inc/rden/nas">RDEN</a>) benefitted from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/elizabeth-arden-rden-profits-up-31/">overseas growth</a>, which offset weak holiday sales. </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc/gsk/nys">GlaxoSmithKline</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc/gsk/nys">GSK</a>) warned that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/option-update-2-7-08-glaxosmithkline-volatility-flat-following/">2008 earnings</a> would be affected by competition from generics. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harris-corporation-del/hrs/nys"><strong>Harris Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harris-corporation-del/hrs/nys">HRS</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/harris-corporation-hrs-shares-forming-bullish-flag/">beat estimates</a> and raised its guidance. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/micros-systems-inc/mcrs/nas"><strong>Micros Systems</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/micros-systems-inc/mcrs/nas">MCRS</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/micros-systems-mcrs-shares-consolidating-in-bullish-pennant/">beat expectations</a> and offered guidance in line with estimates. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys"><strong>News Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) fell <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/news-corp-disappoints-wall-street/">short of earnings expectations</a> despite strength in MySpace and Fox News. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys"><strong>PepsiCo Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) results <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/pepsico-slakes-investors/">met estimates</a> and it announced further share buybacks. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/polo-ralph-lauren-corporation/rl/nys"><strong>Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/polo-ralph-lauren-corporation/rl/nys">RL</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/polo-ralpoh-lauren-rl-soars-on-lifted-gidance/">beat estimates</a> and raised its guidance. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirf-technology-holdings-inc/sirf/nas"><strong>SiRF Technology Holdings Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirf-technology-holdings-inc/sirf/nas">SIRF</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/garmin-grmn-way-lower-on-poor-sirf-earnings/">missed expectations</a> due to a seasonal decline. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toll-brothers-inc/tol/nys"><strong>Toll Brothers Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toll-brothers-inc/tol/nys">TOL</a>) expects to report its seventh straight <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/toll-brothers-looking-for-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/">quarterly revenue decline</a>. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys"><strong>Toyota Motor Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) attributed <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/toyota-tm-benefits-from-emerging-markets/">solid earnings</a> to growth in China, Russia, emerging markets. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wendy-s-international-inc/wen/nys"><strong>Wendy's International Inc.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wendy-s-international-inc/wen/nys">WEN</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/wendys-wen-lower-as-q4-earnings-miss-estimates/">missed earnings estimates</a>, despite beating revenue forecast. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-western-union-company/wu/nys"><strong>Western Union Co.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-western-union-company/wu/nys">WU</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/07/western-union-company-wu-shares-defining-bullish-flag-conso/">posted results</a> just ahead of Wall Street estimates. </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yum-brands-inc/yum/nys">Yum! Brands</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yum-brands-inc/yum/nys">YUM</a>) posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/a-tasty-year-for-yum-brands/">solid results</a> on overseas growth and share buybacks. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings highlights: PepsiCo, Toyota, News Corp., ADM, Toll Bros. and others</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/">Earnings highlights: PepsiCo, Toyota, News Corp., ADM, Toll Bros. and others</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/09/earnings-highlights-pepsico-toyota-news-corp-adm-toll-bros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADM</category><category>Alcatel-Lucent</category><category>ALU</category><category>AMAT</category><category>Applied Materials</category><category>Avonex</category><category>BIIB</category><category>Biogen</category><category>Chevron</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>CNET</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>Coke</category><category>Concast</category><category>CVX</category><category>Data Domain</category><category>DDUP</category><category>DE</category><category>Deere</category><category>Doug McIntyre</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>Elizabeth Arden</category><category>Fox News</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GlaxoSmithKline</category><category>GM</category><category>GSK</category><category>Harris Corp.</category><category>HRS</category><category>KO</category><category>MCRS</category><category>Micros Systems</category><category>MySpace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>PepsiCo</category><category>Polo Ralph Lauren</category><category>RDEN</category><category>record earnings</category><category>RL</category><category>SiRF</category><category>TM</category><category>TOL</category><category>Toll Bros.</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Tysadbri</category><category>WEN</category><category>Wendy's</category><category>Western Union</category><category>WU</category><category>YUM</category><category>Yum Brands</category><category>Zac Bissonette</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: 2-8-08; CNet Networks call volume, volatility &amp; share price Up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>CNet Networks</strong></a>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) is recently up 54c to $8.22. Thomas Weisel Partners has a 12-month price target of $10 on CNET. JANA Partners LLC announced on January 7, 2008 that it will nominate seven people for election to CNET's Board of Directors at the next annual shareholder meeting. CNET call option volume of 19,148 contracts compares to put volume of 514 contracts. CNET March option implied volatility of 95 is above its 26-week average of 48 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/">Option update: 2-8-08; CNet Networks call volume, volatility &amp; share price Up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1110289/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/option-update-2-8-08-cnet-networks-call-volume-volatility-and-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>CNet Networks</category><category>CnetNetworks</category><category>JANA Partners LLC</category><category>JanaPartnersLlc</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No recovery for CNET]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/cnetlogo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) is dodging corporate raiders who would like to replace its board. The company needed to post good results for the last quarter and a strong forecast. </p>
<p>Part of what CNET needed to accomplish happened. Revenue for the fourth quarter was $125.5 million, an 11% increase compared with the same period of 2006. Operating income totaled $20.9 million during the fourth quarter, up from $8.2 million in the year-ago quarter</p>
<p>The CNET net income results were strong, but they were helped by a $203 million tax gain.</p>
<p>On the negative side of the ledger, CNET's CFO moved on, without much explanation. And guidance for this year did not look very good. <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/02/05/cnet-q4-beats-street-q1-2008-guidance-look-light-cfo-mazzota-out-replaced-by-svp-lurie/">According to</a> <em>Barron's</em>, "for Q1, the company sees revenue of $91 million to $95 million, with a pro forma EPS loss of 4-5 cents a share; the Street was looking for $98.7 million and a loss of a penny."</p>
<p>The weak forecast gives investors who want the board and management out more ammunition.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/">No recovery for CNET</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/02/05/cnet-q4-beats-street-q1-2008-guidance-look-light-cfo-mazzota-out-replaced-by-svp-lurie/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/06/no-recovery-for-cnet-cnet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activist investors</category><category>ActivistInvestors</category><category>CNET</category><category>interrnet advertising</category><category>InterrnetAdvertising</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>technology media</category><category>TechnologyMedia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
