Not long ago, institutions and sovereign wealth funds salivated over the opportunity to invest in private equity operations. But, as seen by the lowly stock prices of the Blackstone Group LLP (NYSE: BX) and Fortress Investment Group (NYSE: FIG), things are much gloomier now.

Interestingly enough, TPG has spent some time trying to drum up interest in an equity stake. And, it looks like there were serious talks with the Kuwait Investment Authority, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System. However, according to a report in the Financial Times, it appears that negotiations have ended.

Here's a novel idea: Pay someone only if they are providing better performance than no one -- not anyone, no one -- could provide.

Well according (subscription required) to The Wall Street Journal, the California Public Employees Retirement System (Calpers) is contemplating doing just that with the money managers it hires: "Calpers' investment staff plans to present to the board a system in which the pension fund's global stock managers would receive a fee only if they outperformed certain benchmark indexes. Managers whose returns failed to beat the index would be paid nothing for that period."

This makes perfect logical sense. Why pay a management fee to someone who's doing worse than an index fund? But the possible risk is that paying strictly for performance would induce managers to take bigger risks -- possibly increasing the incidence of blow-ups and rogue traders.

But these kinks could probably be worked out with careful monitoring of risk, and tailoring the bonuses to the level of risk a manager assumed. But it's time for money managers to be paid for performance. Too often, it seems they are paid just for having a pulse.

It is not a secret that Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) has been criticized in the past for being a little "behind the times" in their stance on global warming. Well, there is an effort to get rid of the chairman of the company's public issues committee, Michael Boskin, and now the nation's largest public pension fund is joining the fight.

According to The California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), Mr Boskin, is not fit to lead the company's committee and should be removed from his position. CalPERS claims that Boskin is not fit due to his lack of communication with shareholders regarding the business risks that go along with the current climate changes.

CalPERS owns 30 million shares of Exxon Mobil, so you can be sure that their view on Mr. Boskin is going to have some weight in whether or not Boskin will be able to continue to head the company's public issues committee. With Exxon Mobil being one of the few big oil companies to refuse to accept the role of fossil fuel burning and the impact it has on the environment, it really shouldn't come as too much of a shock when the company declines to candidly discuss the issue with its shareholders.