BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Why President Obama will be good for the economy]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/why-president-obama-will-be-good-for-the-economy/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/why-president-obama-will-be-good-for-the-economy/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/why-president-obama-will-be-good-for-the-economy/#commentsFiled under: , ,

In November, Barack Obama will be elected president. People are fed up with George Bush and the Republican candidate wants to continue his policies -- tax cuts for the rich (even though he opposed them before), 100-year war in Iraq, etc. Americans know we can't afford a third Bush term.

President Obama will offer a middle class tax cut and raise the capital gains rate. This change will put more money into the pockets of consumers which account for 70% of GDP growth. And it will help balance the budget -- Bush's tax cuts have helped hit a record $410 billion deficit. Obama will also veto earmarks and implement pay-go rules which require a balanced budget.

These fiscally sound policies will strengthen the dollar which will help drop the price of gasoline and food. Obama will also create incentives to encourage investment in alternative energy. America knows that high oil prices enrich the enemy -- 15 of 19 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia -- our second biggest oil supplier. The sooner we can free ourselves of that devil's bargain, the safer we'll be.

For the sake of our economy, January 2009 can't arrive soon enough.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

Why President Obama will be good for the economy originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>campaigneconomyfeaturedobamaPresident Bushpresident2008PresidentBushWed, 04 Jun 2008 09:00:00 EST<![CDATA[Wanted: Rich Republicans to run for office. Desperation?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/wanted-rich-republicans-to-run-for-office-desperation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/wanted-rich-republicans-to-run-for-office-desperation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/wanted-rich-republicans-to-run-for-office-desperation/#commentsFiled under: ,

Normally, a political party would look for certain characteristics when scouting out possible candidates for elected office: experience, intelligence, integrity, charisma, connections, etc.

But faced with a large fund-raising gap between itself and the Democrats, the Republican Party will settle for a candidate who has a ton of money and is willing to finance his or her own campaign.

According to the New York Times, "At this point, strategists for the National Republican Congressional Committee have enlisted wealthy candidates to run in at least a dozen competitive Congressional districts nationwide, particularly those where Democrats are finishing their first term and are thus considered most vulnerable. They say more are on the way."

The Times also notes that "The most recent figures show that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has raised $56.6 million and has $29.2 million at its disposal. By contrast, the National Republican Congressional Committee has raised $40.7 million with a cash balance of $2.5 million."

Here's the problem for the GOP: Instead of focusing on finding good candidates, the party is finding itself actively recruiting candidates who are simply wealthy. Is that going to lead to electable leaders? And if they do get elected, is that going to lead to strong leaders?

It's hard to imagine this strategy working. It may help to close the funding gap but it will lead to races featuring the Democrats' best candidates against whatever guy the GOP could find who was willing to spend big. That could lead to some interesting and lopsided debates.

Wanted: Rich Republicans to run for office. Desperation? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>CampaignDemocratGOPPoliticsRepublicanMon, 26 Nov 2007 17:19:00 EST<![CDATA[Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head...]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/obama-vs-wal-mart-someones-in-over-his-head/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

When I first read this article from CNN Money.com, regarding the Obama/Edwards tag team against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), my brain yelled, "Huh? What? Who?"

What are two liberal socialist Democrats doing taking potshots at Wal-Mart of all things? Egads, couldn't they even wait until after Christmas before tossing their first '08 presidential campaign grenade?

Illinois senator Barack Obama(D) and former Democratic vice presidential hopeful John Edwards, drew the sword Wednesday along with Wal-Mart watchdog group WakeUpWalMart.com to denounce Wal-mart Corporation regarding the treatment of their employees. The two politicians had to "back door" their appearance by going through the union assembled public group because it is perhaps bad form and too controlled to directly address the union through normal channels. The entire event was obviously exploited by Obama and Edwards in an attempt to gain increased appeal to the minimum wage sector.

I'm not a big fan of Wal-mart, but I don't like this political pawn pushing either. If Obama and Edwards are looking for grassroots brownie points, they've picked a pretty rude way to get them.

Continue reading Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head...

Obama vs. Wal-Mart: Someone's in over his head... originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>2008barack obamaBarackObamacampaignobamapresidentpresidential campaignPresidentialCampaignwal-martwalmartwmtFri, 17 Nov 2006 09:26:00 EST