<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="" />The dismal jobs front got a bit more good news, following the release of a report showing the nation's employers last year cut the fewest number of workers in more than a decade. Further, the findings showed 2010 ended on a high note, with December recording the lowest number of monthly cuts since 2000.</p>
<p>The slowdown in cuts follows an uptick in activity in 2009 when downsizing reached a seven-year high, according to the 2010 year-end job-cut report, released Wednesday by job-services firm Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas. Last year, employers announced plans to eliminate 529,973 positions, the lowest number since 1997.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/">Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19787630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>career</category><category>careers</category><category>challenger</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>employees</category><category>employers</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>joblessness</category><category>jobs</category><category>john challenger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cash-wad.jpg" />For CEOs, 2009 was a return to stability, according to the latest study from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. CEO turnover fell to its lowest level in five years, a sharp turn from the record highs experienced the year before.<br />
<br />
"The 17 percent drop in CEO turnover this year may be due partly to efforts by some companies to try to keep top management stable until the status of the economy became clearer. The economy may have turned a corner around mid-year, but it is still in a fragile state, which helped maintain this stability through the second half of 2009," said John Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/">Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19316555/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Half of Job Hunters Have No Idea When They'll Be Working Again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />Nothing comes easily to the job seeker in this market. Though there are signs of stability, unemployment isn't expected to turn the corner until sometime this summer. A new survey that <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> revealed to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> finds that 16% of would-be employees believe their hunts will take more than a year. More than half aren't sure when they'll find new positions. The survey was conducted by phone during the 24th annual two-day free job search advice call-in on December 28 and 29. <br />
<br />
This year, 81% of the callers were unemployed, an increase from 76% a year earlier and a more modest 55% in 2007. And, confidence was down. Last month, only 12.4% of the callers felt they'd be able to find a job in up to three months, off from 27% in 2008. Those who thought it would take between four and seven months fell from 31% in 2008 to 12.2% in 2009.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Half of Job Hunters Have No Idea When They'll Be Working Again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/">Half of Job Hunters Have No Idea When They'll Be Working Again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19313236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/half-of-job-hunters-have-no-idea-when-theyll-be-working/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGray</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>economy</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>job market results</category><category>JobMarket</category><category>JobMarketResults</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seasonal Retail Hiring Up 42%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/walmart-employees-240x160.jpg" alt="" />Despite some early concerns that the action would be slow, seasonal hiring spiked 42% for the retail sector in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/retailers-post-solid-december-but-consumer-still-strapped/" target="_blank">Even though growth was modest</a> -- and based on the depressed baseline set last year -- 547,400 holiday workers showed up at stores across the country to help handle the increased foot traffic and what eventually became a small gain in sales. A year earlier, holiday hiring fell to a 22-year low of 384,300, according to an analysis revealed to BloggingStocks by <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seasonal Retail Hiring Up 42%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/">Seasonal Retail Hiring Up 42%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19310717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/10/seasonal-retail-hiring-up-42/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>Christmas</category><category>employment</category><category>holiday hiring</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[December Layoffs Lowest in a Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />The job market looked grim at the beginning of 2009, but as we crossed into 2010, there seems to be a glimmer of hope. We still aren't seeing jobs added yet, but at least the cuts are headed in the right direction. Last month, according to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, announced layoffs fell 10% to 45,094. This is the lowest level seen since December 2007, exactly two years earlier, when there were only 44,416 job cuts. The most recent tally is also off 10% from November's 50,349, making it the fifth month in a row that layoffs have decreased. Since July, the stat has fallen 14% a month, on average.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>December Layoffs Lowest in a Year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/">December Layoffs Lowest in a Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19304909/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>featured</category><category>job market</category><category>job market results</category><category>layoffs</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More Companies Hiring, But That Doesn't Mean Recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />Although it's unlikely that a lot of hiring will happen next year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BS11P20091229">the latest study from CareerBuilder shows that it's not for lack of trying</a>. Employers in the U.S. plan to hire more in 2010 than they did this year - which isn't terribly hard to achieve - with 20% of them intending to add full-time employees. That's up from 14% in 2009, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.careerbuilder.com">CareerBuilder</a> reports. Only 9% plan to cut positions this year, which is much better than 2009's 16%.<br />
<br />
It can be pretty easy to misinterpret this data.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More Companies Hiring, But That Doesn't Mean Recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/">More Companies Hiring, But That Doesn't Mean Recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BS11P20091229>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19296682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/more-companies-hiring-but-that-doesnt-mean-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job Market on the Mend, but Wait for 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />The job market shifted in 2009 from the heaviest cuts in almost a decade to one in which signs of recovery were, though limited, struggling to be seen. It isn't turning around yet, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> could still go higher, but it seems that the worst is behind us.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, the job market should come around in 2010, as job creation finally pulls ahead of job losses. Increased hiring, which is expected to gain momentum next year, may take a while to move the needle on unemployment, though, since there are millions of people who have been out of work so long that they are no longer counted as unemployed for the official number that now sits at 10%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job Market on the Mend, but Wait for 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/">Job Market on the Mend, but Wait for 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/job-market-on-the-mend-but-wait-for-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>job market</category><category>subprime meltdown</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Christmas bonuses are back!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/gifts_160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />There might be something extra in your paycheck this month. A survey of 100 human resource executives, conducted by <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, found that 64% of companies are planning to pay holiday bonuses this year, even though they're still worried about expenses in a market that remains difficult. We've clearly come a long way over the past 12 months. Hiring may not have resumed yet, but at least employers are showing that they appreciate their employees ... and are worried about losing them. At this time last year, only 54% were planning to toss a little extra to the staff for the holidays.</p>
<p>And, the bonus checks are getting bigger, at least for a few people. Eight percent of respondents indicated that they are amping up bonus pay, compared to none a year ago. But, 16% say they aren't paying bonuses this year, up from 13% in December 2008. Another 4% are cutting bonus check sizes.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Christmas bonuses are back!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/">Christmas bonuses are back!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19274429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/christmas-bonuses-are-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>Christmas</category><category>christmas bonus</category><category>ChristmasBonus</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday bonus</category><category>Holiday season</category><category>HolidayBonus</category><category>holidays</category><category>HolidaySeason</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/banalities-briefcase.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />CEO turnover is starting to stabilize, suggesting that recession-impacted companies have been through the worst of the corner-office shuffling. The number of top dogs leaving their posts by November 2009 fell almost 18% compared to the same 11 months last year, according to a report supplied to BloggingStocks by outplacement consulting firm <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. Only 94 CEOs left their posts last month, a slight up-tick from October's 89, but 10% lower than the 104 recorded in November 2008.
<p>Through the end of November, 1,122 CEOs have moved on, a decline of 17.6% year-over-year. Last year, 1,361 departures were seen by this point. If the trend continues, CEO turnover could reach its lowest level since 2004, when only 663 occurred.</p>
<p>The health care industry experienced the most changes, with 22 CEOs leaving their posts, bringing the total to 181 for the sector this year, topping all industries. The government and non-profit sector comes next with 148 this year, 18 in November. The financial services industry lost 116 CEOs, with only 10 happening last month.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/">CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19272731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>Chief Executive</category><category>ChiefExecutiveOfficer</category><category>ChiefExecutives</category><category>employment</category><category>financial services</category><category>government</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonprofits</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img height="145" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Planned job cuts fell to 50,349 in November, the lowest level in nearly two years. The 9.6% decline from October, according to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, is the fourth month in a row in which layoffs fell. Also, from November 2008 to November 2009, planned reductions plunged 72% from 181,671. November was the worst month of 2008.</p>
<p>Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas sees companies slowing down the axe-swinging, a trend that has continued through the back half of 2009. Since July 1, 2009, employers have cut an average of 69,252 jobs each month. Through the end of June, the average was 149,446. The aggressive layoff pace in the first two quarters of 2009 have pushed this year's total ahead of 2008, with the year-to-date planned reduction total reaching 1,242,936 last month. That beats the 2008 full-year total of 1,223,993 and tops the November 2008 amount of 1,057,645 by 17.5%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/">Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="143" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/linkedin_profile.jpg" />An <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 10.2% means that serious jobseekers are using every tool they can find. So, it's not at all shocking that social networking tools top the list, with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/LinkedIn/">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> leading the charge. Openings are being tweeted, hints of a new position are being monitored and hot candidates are being hit up directly, even if they aren't saying they're on the prowl for a new gig. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Socialmedia/">Social media</a> is a tool to use in a job hunt but not necessarily the only one, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. Instead, it makes sense to balance a search with many tools.</p>
<p>John Challenger, CEO, says, "The job search has changed radically over the last two decades with the advent of electronic mail, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/internet/">internet</a>, social networking, smart phones, etc. However, it is important to remember that all of these technologies simply enhance the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/jobsearch/">job search</a>; they will never replace the face-to-face connections that are critical to a successful search." But, he continues that "we feel that these new networking tools are essential and now advise all of the job seekers going through our program to open LinkedIn accounts and to consider other services such as Facebook and Twitter.<br /> <br /> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/">Job hunting in a social media world: 95% LinkedIn, 59% Facebook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19243198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/job-huting-in-a-social-media-world-95-linkedin-59-facebook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook.com</category><category>featured</category><category>Forrester</category><category>Forrester Research</category><category>ForresterResearch</category><category>hiring</category><category>jobsearch</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>pew internet and american life project</category><category>PewInternetAndAmericanLifeProject</category><category>recruiting</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>SocialNetworkingSites</category><category>twitter</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEO turnover down, not out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" alt="" />It's still a tough time to be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CEO/">CEO</a>. In October, 89 top dogs moved on (by choice   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/CEO_turnover_Down_but_not_out'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    or not). Though this is 15% lower than the 105 in September and 29% off the whopping 125 CEOs who turned over a year earlier, it's still a sign that "stability" doesn't equal "recovery."
<p>The latest study that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> revealed to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a></em> reports that October was the eighth month this year in which CEO turnover was down year-over-year. Through the end of last month, 1,028 CEO positions changed hands -- down 18% from the 1,257 by the same point in 2008. In fact, the tally for the first 10 months of 2009 is the lowest since 2004, when the big office found only 561 new inhabitants. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialindustry/">financial industry</a> remains the toughest place for CEOs, with 19 leaving the job last month. Even though the situation has gotten easier, this industry still has the highest turnover. For the year, approximately 10% of all CEO departures (106) have been in the financial sector. "The financial industry is still incredibly volatile, as both October and September saw major announcements from leading companies including <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and last month's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankruptcy/">bankruptcy</a> of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CITGroup/">CIT Group</a>, which led to the exit of CEO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/JeffreyPeek/">Jeffrey Peek</a>," John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, says. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO turnover down, not out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/">CEO turnover down, not out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceo compensation</category><category>ceo pay</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>cit group</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>financial industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeffrey peek</category><category>JeffreyPeek</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>jpmorganchasejpm</category><category>turnover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holiday hiring slow for retailers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/marksspencer.jpg" width="200" height="163" alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Retailhiring/">Retail hiring</a> for the holiday shopping season was expected to be slow, and now we have the data to confirm it. According to data from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BureauofLaborStatistics/">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> (supplied to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank"><em>BloggingStocks</em></a> by <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>), the retail sector added only 63,500 jobs in October -- in data that appropriately was not seasonally adjusted. <br /></p>
<p>This is only slightly better than the 59,100 retail jobs added in October 2008. In the fourth quarter of last year, retail employment increased by a mere 384,300 jobs, with the retail industry turning in its worst <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/holidayshopping/">holiday shopping</a> season employment stats since 1989 (when it added 380,500 workers).</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Holiday hiring slow for retailers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/">Holiday hiring slow for retailers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231084/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/holiday-hiring-slow-for-retailers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bureau of labor statistics</category><category>challenger</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>featured</category><category>hiring</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday hiring</category><category>holiday season</category><category>holidays</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>retail industry</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>temp work</category><category>temp workers</category><category>temporary</category><category>temporary workers</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="145" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" /></p>
<div> </div>
<p>Employers are planning to cut fewer jobs for the third month in a row, according to a new report that   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Layoffs_slowing_down_but_upturn_isn_t_coming_yet'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  <a href="http://www.challengergray.com/" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> has supplied to <em>BloggingStocks</em>. </p>
<p>The executive outplacement firm says that the number of planned reductions fell 16% in October to 55,679 positions -- from 66,404 in September. Last month's level was the lowest seen since March 2008, when 53,579 layoffs were planned. And, it's 51% lower than October 2008's 112,884 result. Planned staff reductions have fallen in eight of the past 10 months.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/">Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227245/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>auto sector</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>downsizing</category><category>job creation</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" alt="" />Layoff announcements hit their lowest level since March 2008 last month, signaling market stabilization. Global outplacement consulting firm <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com/">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas Inc.</a> put the number of cuts at 66,404 for September, a 13% decline from July's 76,456. Year-over-year, the number of layoffs announced is down 30%, and September was the fourth month in a row in which job cuts fell relative to the same month a year earlier. </p>
<p>Planned job cuts reached 240,233 for the third quarter of 2009, according to Challenger, its lowest level since the first quarter of 2008, when there were 200,656 planned layoffs. For the third quarter of this year, job cuts fell 24.5% from the previous quarter's 318,165, and it's off 16.3% from 287,142 in the third quarter of 2009. At the beginning of 2009, the planned layoff rate reached a seven-year high of 578,510. Since then, the planned layoff rate fell 58.5%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/">Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19180598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto industry</category><category>automotive</category><category>automotive industry</category><category>challenger</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>government jobs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>layoffs</category><category>retail industry</category><category>retail jobs</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment rates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />The Automatic Data Processing (ADP) employment report was released before the opening bell Wednesday morning, showing that the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-aug-adp-employment-down-298000-2009-09-02-822460">private sector lost 298,000 jobs during August</a>. Expectations called for a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/01/news/economy/job_cuts/index.htm?postversion=2009090208">loss of 255,000 jobs</a>, but the loss was better than the revised 360,000 jobs lost during July. <br /><br />A spokesperson for ADP noted a "gradual improvement in labor markets" because "monthly losses are diminishing." That said, the group did note that job losses are likely to continue for "several more months." <br /><br />In addition to this news, Challenger Gray &amp; Christmas reported that layoffs planned by major U.S. corporations <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/job-cut-announcements-off-in-july-challenger-gray-2009-09-02">fell 21%</a> from July to August. The 76,456 layoffs in August were the second-lowest amount cut in 2009. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adp</category><category>adp jobs data</category><category>AdpJobsData</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2.9 million college kids unsure of career plans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/princeton.jpg" alt="" />Across the country, college classes are starting. In each of these classrooms, students are struggling with calculus, trudging through <em>Candide,</em> and wondering just what the hell they're going to do with their degrees upon graduation. The last of these is characteristic of every college student, especially those of us, with the <strike>foresight</strike> <strike>fortitude</strike> <strike>recklessness</strike> zeal to major in liberal arts fields (in my case, Philosophy). </p>
<p>The anxiety is a bit higher this year, given a high rate of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a>, the likelihood of a "jobless recovery" and the fact that it could take years for destroyed value to be recovered.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2.9 million college kids unsure of career plans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/">2.9 million college kids unsure of career plans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19145166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/31/2-9-million-college-kids-unsure-of-career-plans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>attorney</category><category>attorneys</category><category>biomedical</category><category>bls</category><category>bureau of labor statistics</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>engineering</category><category>green</category><category>human resources</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>law</category><category>lawyer</category><category>lawyers</category><category>legal</category><category>litigation</category><category>marketing</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Challenger says U.S. employers' January job cuts increase 19% from year ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Job cut announcements by U.S. corporations increased 19% in January 2008 compared to a year ago, according to a survey the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0uvVLhql0II&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Monday</a>. Corporations announced 74,806 job cuts in January, up from 44,416 in December 2007, and up 19% from the previous January.<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Monday that while the Challenger survey is a sample and not a comprehensive survey, the report, in conjunction with other data on jobs, helps economists form a picture of overall labor force conditions.<br /><br />"I use the report in conjunction with the ADP payroll data and U.S. Labor Department job data. When the three flash negative or positive for more than two months, that's usually indicative of a labor force trend," Langan said. Last Friday, the U.S. Labor Department announced the nation <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/">lost 17,000 jobs</a> in January 2008.<br /><br />Langan said the January 2008 Challenger report is consistent with a U.S. economic slowing, and cutback in employer hiring. <br /><br />"Thus far we're not seeing mass lay-offs across the economy, but hiring clearly has tapered off," Langan said. "Companies are taking a wait-and-see stance given the substantial economic slowing and legitimate concerns about future business activity."<br /><br />Langan said the February and March jobs 2008 data across surveys/samples will provide a more-accurate picture of hiring conditions in early 2008, as they are away from the often-volatile holiday hiring season.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/">Challenger says U.S. employers' January job cuts increase 19% from year ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0uvVLhql0II&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1105771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/04/challenger-says-u-s-employers-january-job-cuts-increase-19-fr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>corpoarte hiring</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:39:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
