<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Today's technical outlook: Still looking for a signal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/1sams-chart.jpg" alt="" />Technicians continue to bemoan that, despite the oversold internal indicators and sentiment numbers that show record levels of fear, the market continues to sell off. Normally at such oversold levels of the key indicators we should expect a rally -- but not lately.<br /><br />A rally may be overdue but, so far, all we seem to get is one or two days up and then down again. The mood is best described by a Standard &amp; Poor's market strategist who on Friday said, "We think the market is in desperate need of a washout to at least turn the tide for awhile back to the upside. We have been looking for a counter-trend rally, but all we are seeing are one-day wonders."<br /><br />So where is the bottom -- or bottoms?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Today's technical outlook: Still looking for a signal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/">Today's technical outlook: Still looking for a signal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1483739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/10/todays-technical-outlook-still-looking-for-a-signal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>fibonacci</category><category>fibonacci numbers</category><category>FibonacciNumbers</category><category>s and p 500</category><category>sam collins</category><category>SamCollins</category><category>SAndP500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Today's technical outlook: Consumers 'not buying' market support]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/sams-chart.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Tuesday's sell-off may have been a classic case of buy the rumor/sell the news -- heightened a bit by the president's anticipatory remarks at his first press conference on Monday.</p>
<p>Whatever the reason for Tuesday's sell-off, it will no doubt terrorize the public and have the letter writers running for even deeper cover. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Today's technical outlook: Consumers 'not buying' market support</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/">Today's technical outlook: Consumers 'not buying' market support</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/todays-technical-outlook-consumers-not-buying-market-support/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>sam collins</category><category>SamCollins</category><category>szk</category><category>trade of the day</category><category>TradeOfTheDay</category><category>UltraShort Consumer Goods ProShares</category><category>UltrashortConsumerGoodsProshares</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/gavel.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research In Motion</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) are locked in <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/new-blackberry-not-taking-anything-by-storm.html">their battle</a> for smartphone supremacy, a new entry into the market has grabbed headlines.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">Palm</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) brand new touch-screen smartphone -- the Pre -- was the surprise event at this year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES). Among other things, the Pre uses the Palm's Web OS, which supposedly can consolidate data from multiple Web sources.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/">Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>palm pre</category><category>palm web os</category><category>palm webos</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>PalmWebos</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><category>pre</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BlackBerry Storm vs. Apple iPhone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p>A recent <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/new-blackberry-not-taking-anything-by-storm.html">ChangeWave smartphone survey</a> of 3,800 cell phone owners measured customer reaction to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research In Motion's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) newest touch-screen phone, the BlackBerry Storm. </p>
<p>The survey was conducted just weeks after the Storm went on sale. </p>
<p>We also compared the Storm's favorability rating to those of the original <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1232548136625*/">AAPL</a>) iPhone, taken from a 2007 ChangeWave survey conducted a few weeks after the iPhone's release.</p>
<p>The original iPhone's "very satisfied" rating (77%) was more than double that of the Storm (33%). </p>
<p align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/storm-vs-blackberry.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Moreover, the original iPhone's unsatisfied rating (5%) was three times lower than that of the Storm (14%).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BlackBerry Storm vs. Apple iPhone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/">BlackBerry Storm vs. Apple iPhone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1436143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/blackberry-storm-vs-apple-iphone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>blackberry</category><category>blackberry storm</category><category>BlackberryStorm</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>changewaveresearch</category><category>iphone</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><category>rimm</category><category>storm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/cell-phone-angry.jpg" />Dropped calls have been a nuisance since the dawn of cell phones. But which cellular service provider has the best record in terms of the fewest dropped calls?</p>
<p>In a recent survey, ChangeWave asked 3,800 cell phone owners to estimate the percentage of their calls that were dropped during the past 90 days. </p>
<p>The survey, which was conducted Dec. 9-15, 2008, produced a clear winner: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) has the fewest dropped calls of all.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/">Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1429812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>alliance data systems</category><category>AllianceDataSystems</category><category>cell phone</category><category>cell phones</category><category>CellPhone</category><category>CellPhones</category><category>cellular phones</category><category>cellular service</category><category>cellular service providers</category><category>CellularPhones</category><category>CellularService</category><category>CellularServiceProviders</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>dropped calls</category><category>DroppedCalls</category><category>featured</category><category>fewest dropped calls</category><category>FewestDroppedCalls</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 10/23/06: AAPL breaks $80 barrier]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/snipshot_bol9t7khf.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) ended the day up $1.51, or 1.89%. This put the stock's price at $81.46, breaking the $80 barrier quite nicely. This was nice momentum due to last week's incredible earnings report and figures of both iPods and computers shipped.<br /><br />The other good news for Apple is a new survey by <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20061016/bs_ibd_ibd/20061016tech;_ylt=AlRjq.PGlhBn.mcTWLaBXfUxVrIF;_ylu=X3oDMTBjMHVqMTQ4BHNlYwN5bnN1YmNhdA--">ChangeWave Research</a> that shows lots of switchers are getting ready to move to Apple this holiday season. After surveying members the company sees that planned purchases of Apple computers will be up for the holidays. While ChangeWave's members are a bit more tech-oriented, the percentage of members wanting a Christmas Apple have shifted from 19% last year to 37% this year, and ChangeWave thinks it's the start of  big market-share shift.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/">Apple after the bell 10/23/06: AAPL breaks $80 barrier</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/689697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/apple-after-the-bell-10-23-06-aapl-breaks-80-barrier/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Apple market share</category><category>AppleMarketShare</category><category>ChangeWave Research</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>holiday buying patterns</category><category>HolidayBuyingPatterns</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:06:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
