<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Budweiser" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/bud240.jpg" />Teams have been preparing their game plans and it's time to see which of the 60 teams will win. No, not the <a href="http://www.packers.com/">Packers</a> or <a href="http://www.steelers.com/">Steelers</a> -- Go Pack! -- but PepsiCo (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>), Anheuser-Busch (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-inbev-sa-nv/bud/nys">BUD</a>), General Motors (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-mtrs-co/gm/nys">GM</a>) and all the other companies competing for the best spots in one of TV's most expensive marketing moments, costing an estimated $3 million dollars per 30 second spot.</p>
<p>For those not into football, the ads in the Super Bowl game can be more amusing than the game itself as advertising teams compete for attention, show their best efforts and even get rated by numerous <a href="http://superbowl-ads.com">online sites</a>. Last year, Doritos (owned by PepsiCo), and E-Trade (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) did well, and Anheuser-Busch seems to always have a Clydesdale horse in the running.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/">Who Will Win the Super Bowl Ad Game This Year?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19829949/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/05/super-bowl-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1984 Macintosh ad</category><category>AAPL</category><category>advertising</category><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>Apple</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BUD</category><category>Budweiser</category><category>Budweiser frogs</category><category>Chevy</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Doritos</category><category>E-Trade</category><category>E-Trade babies</category><category>ETFC</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Godaddy.com</category><category>Justin Bieber</category><category>KO</category><category>Mean Joe Green ad</category><category>PEP</category><category>PepsiCo</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>Super Bowl commercials</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Company nicknames: The General, no longer a commanding presence]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-gm-200cs080708.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is one in a series on prominent <strong>company nicknames</strong>. <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/company-nicknames">See all 25</a></strong>, and share your thoughts and memories about <strong>The General </strong>below in the comments.</em></p>
<p>"The General" does not deserve its nickname any longer. Founded in 1908, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) was the largest car company in the world for almost seven decades. It lost that distinction to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM)</a> during the last year.</p>
<p>GM has 50% of the U.S. car market at one point. That is now down to 20%. </p>
<p>"The General" still maintains a number of the most successful brands in the world: Cadillac, Buick, Chevy, and Pontiac. Years of neglect have pushed the company into a position where it does not make competitive cars in its home market. It greatest current sales successes are in the Chinese market and Latin America.</p>
<p>In 1955, "The General" was the No.1 company <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500_archive/full/2000/">in the Fortune 500</a>. It held that position until 2000.</p>
<p>Alongside <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), GM is probably the most important American corporation of the last 100 years. That won't be true going forward.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/">Company nicknames: The General, no longer a commanding presence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1277453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/company-nicknames-the-general/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buick</category><category>Cadillac</category><category>Chevy</category><category>company nicknames</category><category>Fortune 500</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>Pontiac</category><category>The General</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Fed, Office of the Comptroller scrutinize Fannie, Freddie books]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ed/" rel="tag">Consolidated Edison (ED)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The books of Fannie Mae -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Federal National Mortgage Association</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) -- and Freddie Mac -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) -- are being examined by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to review their financial condition, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121669734816172991.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121669299205472651.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> also reported that the Chevy Volt, an electric car from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), is slated to roll out in two years and it received a major boost from 36 utilities that operate in 40 states who agreed to work together to make the plug-in vehicle possible. Among the utilities are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-electric-power-company-inc/aep/nys">American Electric Power Company Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-electric-power-company-inc/aep/nys">AEP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consolidated-edison-inc/ed/nys">Consolidated Edison Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consolidated-edison-inc/ed/nys">ED</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">Duke Energy Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">DUK</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/edison-international/eix/nys">Edison International</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/edison-international/eix/nys">EIX</a>).</li>
    <li>Struggling mortgage lender Paragon is reportedly in talks with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys">The Blackstone Group LP</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys">BX</a>) about a potential takeover by Blackstone, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4884153a-5762-11dd-916c-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/technology/22tivo.html?_r=1&amp;ref=technology&amp;oref=slogin"><em>New York Times</em></a> reported that TiVo Inc (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tivo-inc/tivo/nas">TIVO</a>) will today introduce a "product purchase" feature in partnership with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>). Under TiVo's plan, the television remote control will be turned into a tool for buying products that are advertised and promoted on talk shows and commercials.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/">Newspaper wrap-up: Fed, Office of the Comptroller scrutinize Fannie, Freddie books</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1263295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/newspaper-wrap-up-fed-office-of-the-comptroller-scrutinize-fan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AEP</category><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>American Electric</category><category>American Electric Power</category><category>AmericanElectric</category><category>AmericanElectricPower</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Blackstone</category><category>BX</category><category>Chevy</category><category>Chevy Volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>Con Ed</category><category>ConEd</category><category>Consolidated Edison</category><category>ConsolidatedEdison</category><category>DUK</category><category>Duke Energy</category><category>duke energy corp duk</category><category>DukeEnergy</category><category>DukeEnergyCorpDuk</category><category>ED</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Paragon</category><category>Tivo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors (GM): Electro-Shock Therapy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) investors, as well as auto industry trackers, will want to read Jonathan Rauch's "Electro-Shock Therapy" in the July 2008 issue of <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200807/general-motors">Atlantic Magazine</a>. Mr. Rauch was given unprecedented access to all personnel involved in GM's company-wide commitment to have a market-ready electric car by late 2010. GM personnel note the Chevy VOLT, as the car is named, will not be a hybrid per se, but will be the first mass market electric car with a range of 40 miles per charge, enough to cover the daily commute of 75% of American workers. The car's small gasoline engine will be used to recharge the battery, while only electricity will be used to power the wheels. GM is trying to wow consumers by manufacturing an affordable electric car that will sever the connection between driving and the gas pump.<br /><br />GM lost the engineering and publicity wars on electric cars to Toyota's Prius years ago. Toyota has been eating GM's lunch ever sense. According to GM's VP Bob Lutz, it's payback time. Using the same rhetoric President Kennedy used to launch the Apollo space program and race to land on the moon, GM has sectioned off the Volt division and given it complete decision-making and spending authority to reinvent not only the electric automobile, but also the company itself. In one Volt engineer's words: "Go big or go home."<br /><br />Yes, there are problems with the weight to power ratio in the battery. And yes, production of both the battery and the car body are being rushed towards production without the normal period of evaluation. But GM has staked its future on the Volt, and unlike my colleague Michael Rainey who <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/is-the-chevy-volt-a-huge-mistake-for-gm/">isn't that positive on the Volt</a>, there's reason for at least cautious optimism, a quality currently in short supply coming out of Detroit.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/">General Motors (GM): Electro-Shock Therapy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1243093/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/02/general-motors-gm-electro-shock-therapy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Lutz</category><category>BobLutz</category><category>car battery</category><category>CarBattery</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>Chevy</category><category>electric car</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ElectricCar</category><category>ElectricCars</category><category>General Motors Corporation</category><category>GeneralMotorsCorporation</category><category>GM</category><category>hybrid cars</category><category>HybridCars</category><category>Prius</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Volt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors may introduce Chevy in South Korea]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>   <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" />General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) wants to capture more market share for its imported passenger cars in South Korea. To do this, the automaker is considering launching its Chevrolet brand in that country after examining the results of a recent Korea-specific feasibility study.<br /><br />GM, which already sells its Cadillac and Saab brands in South Korea, wants to make sure that rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) doesn't get into South Korea with its extremely popular passenger cars and beat it in that market, much like it's doing in many national auto markets. Toyota is now public enemy number one for GM, and it's not getting any easier for the iconic U.S. auto brand. Although its <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2008/gb2008058_447061.htm?chan=autos_autos+--+lifestyle+subindex+page_top+stories">latest quarter was somewhat disappointing</a>, Toyota is still very much on top of its game.<br /><br />Another motivation for GM is the fact that imported car sales in South Korea <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/16/ap5018965.html">increased to 6.2% of all car sales</a> in April of this year, up from 4.9% from a year ago. GM hopes that it can double its South Korea sales this year, which sounds like a pretty hefty goal. GM is facing some headwinds though: the big three Detroit automakers saw their first-quarter car sales in South Korea shrink to 11.7% of the market, down from 2004's 15% first quarter total.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/">General Motors may introduce Chevy in South Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 May 2008 11:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/16/ap5018965.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1201638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/21/general-motors-may-introduce-chevy-in-south-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevy</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Korean imports</category><category>KoreanImports</category><category>South Korea</category><category>SouthKorea</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: Chevy vs. Ford pick-up trucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-chevy-ford-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p>When it comes to comparing the pick-up trucks of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) and Chevrolet by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), I can honestly say that I've owned both brands. I bought one F-150 off the showroom floor. I also bought one that was very well used. Both my Chevy Silverados were low-mileage, used models. I leased one of them from my dad and the other one I bought from my brother. I have also had opportunities to drive multiple specimens of each brand that were owned by friends or associates. I like both brands as far as their trucks go. Their cars are a story for another day.</p>
<p>To me, Chevy trucks always seem a bit more solid, with interior appointments a little more lush and inviting. Ford trucks seem to focus more on utility and usability within a bit roomier interior. The Chevy trucks always exhibit deep power, easily delivered upon demand. Fords trucks always seem a bit more spunky with their aggressiveness always close under foot. Chevy trucks appeal to the gentleman in me but they've always done any job I asked of them. Ford trucks appeal to the workman in me and they sometimes seem immortal.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Battle of the Brands: Chevy vs. Ford pick-up trucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/">Battle of the Brands: Chevy vs. Ford pick-up trucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 May 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1171970/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/04/battle-of-the-brands-chevy-vs-ford-pick-up-trucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>brand comparison</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>Chevy</category><category>F</category><category>F-150</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>pick-ups</category><category>Silverado</category><category>trucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM may have to cut brands]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) now has eight car brands. Since some models are built off similar platforms, a sedan from Saturn may not be much different from one sold by Chevy. The problem is GM may not be taking sales from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>). It may be taking sales from itself. </p>
<p>Last year, GM introduced three crossovers, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120456874600508063.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">according to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>--<em> </em>the Saturn Outlook and GMC Acadia, which are all but identical, and the more luxurious Buick Enclave. There are, of course, only a limited number of crossover buyers. Strong sales for the GMC crossover may hurt Buick.</p>
<p>GM thinks it can manage all of its brands but in a falling domestic car market there is little evidence to show that the company's plan will work.</p>
<p>It is time to kill some of GM's brands, save marketing money, and stop most of the competition among cars built by the same parent company. The firm's weakest brands by sales and falling units are Buick and Saturn. Most of their models are matched by cars in the Chevy, GMC, and Pontiac lines. </p>
<p>Shutting down brands is hard, an admission of defeat. But it is time for GM to let some of its model lines go.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/">GM may have to cut brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120456874600508063.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1130731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/gm-gm-may-have-to-cut-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buick</category><category>Chevy</category><category>gm</category><category>GMC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pontiac</category><category>Saturn</category><category>tm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM to shock market with 60,000 Volts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/chevyvolt2.jpg"  alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atR4ArJR__OI&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg.com reported today</a> that unnamed sources privy to Chevrolet's plans for their version of the hybrid, the Volt, say that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GM</a>) hopes to build as many as 60,000 of the vehicle in the first year of production, 2010-11.<br /><br />In its current iteration, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/07/gm-refocuses-on-volt-thinks-2010-sales-are-doable/">car would be capable of traveling up to 40 miles on its lithium-ion battery alone</a>, or 640 miles between gasoline fillups. A (much more expensive) fuel cell version is also in the works for the Chinese market.<br /><br />Industry experts are skeptical of the company's ability to reach such lofty goals. The process will be expensive -- GM expects to spend a least half a billion dollars in bringing the vehicle to market. The plan compresses GM's normal development cycle, and will test its corporate flexibility. The projected quantities also represent a real gamble on the car's popularity.<br /><br />Chevy is also <a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/chi-sun_volt_0819aug19,0,3407899.story">depending on the timely development of a new type of battery</a> to power the E-Flex system. This system would allow the car to cruise at highway speed on battery alone, and could be recharged via house current, overcoming the limitations of current hybrids from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">Honda Motor Ltd.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">HMC</a>).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/">GM to shock market with 60,000 Volts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://farm1.static.flickr.com/208/469119346_06071dab1a_m.jpg>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/971177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/gm-to-shock-market-with-60-000-volts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cheverolet Volt</category><category>CheveroletVolt</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevy</category><category>Chevy Volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>electric cars</category><category>ElectricCars</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>green cars</category><category>GreenCars</category><category>HMC</category><category>hybrid cars</category><category>hybrid vehicles</category><category>HybridCars</category><category>HybridVehicles</category><category>TM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
