<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[WD-40 Tops Q1 Estimates, but Needs Better Sales Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/clx/" rel="tag">Clorox Co (CLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/wd40-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />WD-40 (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wd-40-company/wdfc/nas">WDFC</a>), whose related stocks include Church &amp; Dwight (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/church-and-dwight-incorporated/chd/nys">CHD</a>) and Clorox (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-clorox-company/clx/nys">CLX</a>), did a good job of courting earnings growth through efficiency. According to yesterday's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wd-40-company-reports-22percent-increase-in-first-quarter-net-income/rfid288154608?channel=pf">post-market release</a>, the consumer products concern saw its bottom line jump 22% to 56 cents per diluted share. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wdfc">Earnings.com</a>, that was five pennies better than the expectations of Wall Street's smart guys.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, sales growth was not in the cards. The top line experienced a decrease of 7%. Furthermore, according to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60A55E20100111?type=globalMarketsNews">Reuters</a>, revenues came in softer than projections. It would have been really nice to see at least a little increase in sales, or perhaps an in-line performance, to go along with the improved bottom line. Wasn't meant to be.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WD-40 Tops Q1 Estimates, but Needs Better Sales Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/">WD-40 Tops Q1 Estimates, but Needs Better Sales Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wd-40-company-reports-22percent-increase-in-first-quarter-net-income/rfid288154608?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19312679/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/wd-40-tops-q1-estimates-but-needs-better-sales-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CHD</category><category>church and dwight</category><category>ChurchAndDwight</category><category>Clorox</category><category>CLX</category><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>featured</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>wd-40</category><category>WDFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Bears win, but cubs eat baby bulls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>The day may have closed down in negative territory for stocks, but even watching it all day didn't give one any major feel for the market's direction into the close. Today's PCE Inflation index came in at +4.1%, although traders have discounted this data as energy prices and even some food prices have started coming down from the May to June highs. Oil put in a serious drop to briefly under $120 and now traders are calling for lower levels rather than higher. You could throw up literally 5 issues affecting oil prices, but you might as well call it "air out of the bubble" rather than anything. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />DJIA  11,283.74 (-42.58)<br />S&amp;P500  1,249.01 (-11.30)<br />NASDAQ  2,285.17 (-25.79)<br />10YR T-NOTE  3.9720%  (+0.024%)<br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/08/the-52-week-l-1.html">52-WEEK LOWS</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/08/top-pre-marke-3.html">TOP ANALYST UPGRADES</a><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/08/top-pre-marke-2.html">TOP ANALYST DOWNGRADES</a><br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/humana-inc/hum/nys ">Humana Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/humana-inc/hum/nys ">HUM</a>) sent most health insurers higher after it posted $1.24 EPS versus a prior guidance of $1.15 to $1.20 EPS and above $1.18 estimates. Shares were up over 5% to $47.00 in today's final minutes.<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/church-and-dwight-incorporated/chd/nys "><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Bears win, but cubs eat baby bulls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/">Closing Bell: Bears win, but cubs eat baby bulls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1275132/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/04/closing-bell-bears-win-but-cubs-eat-baby-bulls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>church and dwight</category><category>ChurchAndDwight</category><category>health care</category><category>health insurers</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>HealthInsurers</category><category>oil</category><category>orbitz</category><category>warner music group</category><category>WarnerMusicGroup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
