Shares of radio broadcaster Clear Channel Communications Inc. (NYSE: CCU) were slightly up in early trading after the company posted higher first-quarter profit boosted in part by gains in its outdoor advertising unit. Though, the company was not able to beat analysts' predictions as the weak economy put pressure on the overall advertising market.

Clear Channel Communications announced that its quarterly profit surged to $799.7 million, or $1.61 per share. The income figures were definitely something to cheer about. During its first quarter last year, the company had net income of $102.2 million or 21 cents per share. Excluding one-time items, earnings for the quarter would have been $0.19 per share. Analysts' forecast (which typically exclude one-time items) was for $0.21 per share, according to Thomson Reuters.

The media and advertising display company also said that quarterly revenue rose 3.9% to $1.56 billion, compared with $1.51 billion reported in the same period a year ago, helped by favorable foreign exchange rates; excluding the effect of the week dollar, revenue rose only 1%. Analysts had been expecting to see slower sales of $1.53 billion.

It's a scary thing for investment bankers: the "credit crunch." It has essentially depleted the industry, as dealmaking has shrunk significantly.

In fact, according to Bloomberg, there was a 35% drop in M&A fees for Q1.

True, the M&A business is known for its "feast-famine" cycles, but this time it looks like things could be particularly bleak – and perhaps long lasting. Just look at the break-down of the $19.5 billion buyout for Clear Channel Communications (NYSE: CCU).

Basically, financial institutions are in the process of repairing their balance sheets, and as a result, don't have the firepower to finance deals -- especially large ones. In fact, these firms need to find ways to deal with more than $200 billion in LBO loans.

There is also likely to be a slowdown in strategic acquisitions. That is, as the US economy slows down – which may impinge the global economy – where buyers are likely to get jittery. Why take big risks in such an environment?

Now, there are offsetting factors such as the emergence of mega sovereign wealth funds. However, they may get some political pushback.

In other words, don't expect a comeback anytime soon.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates DealProfiles.com.

In November of 2006, Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital announced that they were pursuing a deal for Clear Channel Communications (NYSE: CCU). It took a few months to reach an agreement, but in May 2007 buyout terms were reached, and shareholders approved the deal in September. The deal is worth nearly $20 billion, one of the largest buyouts in history.

As of noon today, Clear Channel is trading at $33.94, a significant discount to the buyout price of $39.20. This suggests that there is considerable -- and growing -- skepticism about the deal. Concerns include the weak track record of recent big buyouts as well as the uncertain prospects of commercial communications companies like Clear Channel, which face growing competition from internet-based services and MP3 devices.

The Financial Times, via MSN.com, is reporting that while bankers involved in the deal still think it will probably go through, there is some resistance. One banker is quoted as saying, "there are a lot of undercurrents, including the fact that the returns for the sponsors are terrible and the break-up fee isn't huge." The 'not huge' break-up fee is $500 million -- not a small amount for your average music lover, but small enough when compared to massive losses on a $20 billion deal.

Time can be the enemy of buyout deals. It gives the parties more time to think about things -- or get frustrated. Just look at what happened with the Harman International Industries, Inc. (NYSE: HAR) implosion.

But, in the case of the buyout of Clear Channel (NYSE: CCU), the deal somehow appears to be mostly complete (the process took about 10 months). That is, today the company announced that its shareholders approved the transaction. As a result, the company's buyers -- Bain Capital Partners, LLC And Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. -- will become the new owners of the radio powerhouse.

In fact, during the buyout process, Clear Channel increased the price tag two times. There was also another interesting feature added along the way; that is, the shareholders have the right to roll over some of their equity into the private entity.

But, ultimately, the key takeaway is that radio has proven to be quite resilient. Despite competition from satellite providers and the Internet, the fact remains that traditional radio continues to be a big part of people's lives -- and more to the point, a nice cash-cow business.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates DealProfiles.com.

The Nielsen/Net Rating recently began reporting a new metric for internet advertisers: the total minutes each page is viewed. Online content providers are panicking, as this threatens to overturn their customary pay per page view model that has been so lucrative.

This caused me to wonder if such a change isn't due in more traditional ad venues. For example:

Outdoor advertisers -- Companies such as Clear Channel (NYSE: CCU) have long charged by number of cars passing by a location, but what if the speed of the traffic were factored in? On some of California's crawlways, a single billboard might be in view for half an hour. Why should it cost no more than one on freeways that actually flow?

The $19.5 billion buyout of Clear Channel (NYSE: CCU) is still not very clear. Even when its buyers -- Thomas H. Lee and Bain Capital -- boosted the price to $39 from $37.50, some of Clear Channel's investors were not convinced.

But Clear Channel is not stopping. In fact, the firm is already paving the way for major changes.

This week, the firm sold its TV group for $1.2 billion to private equity firm Providence Equity Partners. The deal includes 56 stations.

There are also plans to sell off radio stations.

Basically, these actions are needed to pass muster with the antitrust authorities. Moreover, the cash will be helpful when debt is loaded on the balance sheet.

Yet, for Clear Channel to get its own buyout deal completed, it needs to secure a two-thirds vote from shareholders. That's a tough hurdle -- given the current stock price of $35.75, it looks like the mega deal probably won't happen.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.

To the tune of just $12.5 million, the Federal Communications Commission on Friday wagged a white-gloved finger at four top radio broadcasters -- Clear Channel Communications Inc. (NYSE: CCU), CBS Radio (NYSE: CBS) (not CBS's best week), Entercom Communications Corp. (NYSE: ETM) and Citadel Broadcasting Corp. (NYSE: CDL) -- resolving a two-year payola investigation. "A breakthrough and a milestone" in the war on payola, FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein called the settlement.

The FCC's longstanding regulations don't actually prohibit the pay-for-play system, they merely require its disclosure at the time of broadcast. Said Adelstein, "These rules are based on the basic principle that listeners and viewers are entitled to know who is seeking to persuade them so they can make up their own minds about the content."

Such a principle is hardly "basic," and ignorance of sponsorship gives no pass to indiscriminating radio listeners. Marketing pays our fare at every turn; we've become resigned to the notion that behind every song we hear, every TV image we view, every word we read (including these), a dollar sign usually lies quietly. The trick to Adelstein's basic principle is not in knowing who's paying the piper -- or who the piper's paying, in this case -- but in quieting one's cynicism enough to hear the music.

Consumer electronics retailer Best Buy (NYSE:BBY) said today that online and on-air auctions of PlayStation 3 and Nintendo Wii gaming consoles raised $470,000 for Toys for Teens.

Best Buy, in association with Clear Channel Communications (NYSE:CCU), sponsored a program -- called Toys for Teens -- that is part of the Marine Toys for Tots Foundation. According to Best Buy officials, every dollar raised by the auction will go directly to Toys for Teens. The program provides age-appropriate holiday gifts for teenagers in need all over the nation.

The VP in charge of the Marine Toys for Tots program for the U.S. Marines said that "We'd like to thank all the consumers who logged on and tuned in to Clear Channel Radio's stations to bid on a PlayStation 3 or Nintendo Wii ... the generosity of the auction bidders will bring a tremendous amount of joy to kids ages 12 through 15."

Although Clear Channel and Best Buy sometimes get put through the ringer for merchandising and programming choices (deservedly so in many cases I've seen), this is one example of both companies lending a hand to assure teens in need have the chance to enjoy something new and that is their own when they need it most, and I applaud both companies for the generosity displayed here.