<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comcast: Different channels for growth and income]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/comcast.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />For growth, utility expert <strong>Roger Conrad</strong> likes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>), while for income, he picks the cable firm's dividend-paying notes and preferreds. </p>
<p>The editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1312">The Utility Forecaster</a> explains, "Cash flow and revenue growth of 30%-plus is hardly utility like. But those are the numbers cable communications provider Comcast Corp. put up in the second quarter and has consistently for the past few years."</p>
<p>Best of all, he adds, there's no end in sight to its success. He observes, "The company added 94% more revenue-generating units in the second period than last year, a clear sign sales of its 'triple bundle' of cable TV, broadband Internet and telecom service are still accelerating."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comcast: Different channels for growth and income</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/">Comcast: Different channels for growth and income</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=1312>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/988680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/13/comcast-different-channels-for-growth-and-income/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMCSA</category><category>Comcast Corp.</category><category>ComcastCorp.</category><category>featured</category><category>Roger Conrad</category><category>RogerConrad</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><category>The Utility Forecaster</category><category>TheUtilityForecaster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Was that a much less bullish Cramer on Google?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a></p>On today's <em>STOP TRADING!</em> segment on CNBC, Jim Cramer said there is instant reaction to a whole group of stocks. MSNT/BA/ADM.....he said it's a fulcrum day and he's extremely bullish. <br /><br />3 names to discuss are Under Armour Inc. (NYSE:UA) down 7% is one that is OK. It is down because it reaffirmed instead of raised guidance.  He expects the drop to shakeout some of the weaker money. He thinks it will be down again tomorrow because there wasn't more accelerated revenue growth. He thinks if you can get it at $43 to $44 then you want look at it.<br /><br />Comcast Corp. (NASDQ:CMCSA) is down on spending $1 billion more. Cramer said he is actually impressed because it's a real growth story. He is spending his money to grow instead of to buy back stock.<br /><br />On his favorite Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) Cramer said the revenues not accelerating is why people are being shaken out. Cramer said it probably isn't done going down and could fall to $450, but now he says it's capped at $600. In prior shows he has used $650 as his number, so this is a much less bullish Cramer on GOOG than just <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/01/cramer_visited_.html">3 weeks ago</a> and this was one of his <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/01/cramers_tech_ex.html">5 tech exceptions</a> for the year recently when he panned the whole tech sector.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/">Was that a much less bullish Cramer on Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/746696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/was-that-a-much-less-bullish-cramer-on-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comcast Corp.</category><category>ComcastCorp.</category><category>Cramer</category><category>Google inc</category><category>GoogleInc</category><category>UA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
