<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Retail Sales Fall in December, Surprising Analysts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/shoppingswoosh200cs1214.jpg" />Despite all the hype and wishful thinking, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/retailsales/">retail sales</a>, reported Thursday morning, fell in December. This came as a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/early-estimates-for-retail-sales-favor-online/">surprise to analysts</a>, many of whom forecasted increases of 2% or more, though there were some calling for declines of up to 3%. The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34857381/ns/business-retail/">holiday season wasn't enough</a> to overcome cautious consumer spending, which has been driven largely by an unemployment rate that remains stubbornly high at 10%. </p>
<p>Data from the Commerce Department released Thursday puts the decline in retail sales from November to December at 0.3%, while expectations were for an increase of 0.5%. Excluding auto sales, the drop was 0.2%, still weaker than the 0.3% increase anticipated by analysts. This decline follows an increase of 1.2% in October and 1.8% in November. In September, retail sales fell 2% from August.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail Sales Fall in December, Surprising Analysts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/">Retail Sales Fall in December, Surprising Analysts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19317789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/retail-sales-fall-in-december-surprising-analysts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mco</category><category>Moodys</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Trade Gap Widens in November]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/chinatrade.jpg" />Do you want the good news (if there is any) or the bad news? Following Alcoa's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">AA</a>) earnings <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/stocks-in-the-news-alcoa-chevron-electronic-arts/19313249/">disappointment</a> and the warnings from Chevron (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>) and Electronic Arts (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>), the Commerce Department reported that the trade deficit with China <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-trade-gap-widens-in-nov-2010-01-12" target="_blank">widened more than expected during November</a>. <br />
<br />
The deficit grew 9.7% in November to $36.4 billion, outpacing the consensus forecast for a deficit of $34.8 billion. Exports increased for the seventh straight month; unfortunately, imports increased at a faster pace during November.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Trade Gap Widens in November</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/">U.S. Trade Gap Widens in November</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19313350/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/12/u-s-trade-gap-widens-in-november/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commerce Department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>TradeDeficit</category><category>U.S. trade deficit</category><category>U.s.TradeDeficit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Housing starts rose in September, but applications for new construction fell]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="housing market" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/homebuilders.jpg" width="220" height="220" />The Commerce Department reported Tuesday that housing <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/housing-starts-rise-in-sept-wholesale/719129">starts rose a bit in September</a>, helped by a rise in single-family home construction, but this bit of good news came with some bad news that applications for new home construction were down in the month.</p>
<p>According to the report, construction of new homes and apartments rose by 0.5% in the month, to an annualized rate of 590,000 units. While any growth for housing starts comes as good news in the current market, it is not as good as it appears at first glance, considering that analysts had been expecting to see the annualized rate increase to 610,000 units.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Housing starts rose in September, but applications for new construction fell</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/">Housing starts rose in September, but applications for new construction fell</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/housing-starts-rose-in-september-but-applications-for-new-const/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>building</category><category>commerce department</category><category>construction</category><category>homes</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>permits</category><category>recession</category><category>tax incentive</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales hint at jobless recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mall-stores-200a060308.jpg" />Retail sales gained a seasonally-adjusted 2.7% in August, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32855201/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">according to the U.S. Department of Commerce</a>. This follows a 0.2% decline in July. The August results beat analyst expectations soundly, lending support to talk of a recovery. The Cash for Clunkers program is cited as contributing to August sales.</p>
<p>Without autos, sales increased 1.1%, still ahead of the anticipated 0.4% gain. Take gas out of the measure, as well, and retail sales grew 0.6%.</p>
<p>Inventories fell in July, for the twelfth month in a row, with the 1% decline a tad higher than the 0.9% anticipated by many economists.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales hint at jobless recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/">Retail sales hint at jobless recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19163260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/retail-sales-hint-at-jobless-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>department of commerce</category><category>department of labor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor department</category><category>labor markets</category><category>retail sales</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wholesale prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil falls on weekly inventory report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="oil inventory report" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/fallingoil.gif" />Oil prices dropped a bit today, after a government report showed that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56T3EA20090826">inventories unexpectedly rose last week</a>.<br /><br />According to today's report from the Commerce Department, oil inventories rose by 200,000 barrels last week. Going into today's report analysts had forecast a 1.1 million barrel drop in supplies.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil falls on weekly inventory report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/">Oil falls on weekly inventory report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19141725/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/oil-falls-on-weekly-inventory-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>oil</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>oil supplies</category><category>OilInventories</category><category>OilSupplies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Construction of single family homes rises in July]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="single family home construction" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/homebuilders.jpg" width="220" height="220" />There was in increase in <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/single-family-building-up-for-5th-month/528658">construction of single family homes</a> in July, marking the fifth straight month for such an increase.<br /><br />It should come as no surprise, after we learned yesterday that homebuilder confidence had rose to a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/homebuilder-confidence-hits-12-month-high/">new 12-month high</a>. According to the commerce department, construction on new single family homes rose 2%, and permits for future construction jumped an impressive 6% during July.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Construction of single family homes rises in July</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/">Construction of single family homes rises in July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/construction-of-single-family-homes-rises-in-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apartments</category><category>commerce department</category><category>Congress</category><category>construction</category><category>economy</category><category>homes</category><category>incentives</category><category>Obama</category><category>real estate</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[June housing construction makes unexpected jump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/clipart-house01-by-g.e.sattler.jpg" alt="new home construction" />We get a second piece of positive news out of the housing industry in as many days today as the Commerce Department announced this morning that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-housing-starts18-2009jul18,0,7089520.story">new home construction jumped 3.6%</a> in June.<br /><br />No one is going to put forth the argument that the housing market is all of a sudden in good shape again, but we are starting to see signs that things could be at least leveling off, which is the first step that needs to be made.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>June housing construction makes unexpected jump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/">June housing construction makes unexpected jump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19102236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/june-housing-construction-makes-unexpected-jump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>construction</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>home buyers</category><category>home starts</category><category>homebuilders</category><category>HomeBuyers</category><category>HomeStarts</category><category>housing</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><category>tax incentives</category><category>taxes</category><category>TaxIncentives</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail sales make surprising jump in January]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/escalators_shoppers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After a long six months of watching retail sales continue to slip, we get a bit of good news today, as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aA7IaN46fZBk&amp;refer=home">January retail sales actually moved a bit higher</a>.<br /><br />Before today's announcement, analysts had been expecting that January would be the seventh straight month of falling retail sales, and the consensus was that we would see around 0.8% in the month. The good news is that retail sales were indeed higher in January, with a reported 1% jump during the month.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail sales make surprising jump in January</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/">Retail sales make surprising jump in January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/retail-sales-make-surprising-jump-in-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>clothing</category><category>Commerce Department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>economy.com</category><category>electronics</category><category>food and beverage</category><category>FoodAndBeverage</category><category>furniture</category><category>gasoline</category><category>inthenews</category><category>January sales</category><category>JanuarySales</category><category>Moodys</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>SCott Hoyt</category><category>ScottHoyt</category><category>sporting goods</category><category>SportingGoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home construction hits record low - could be good news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/house_renovation.jpg" />When you read the stories today about <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/us-home-construction-sinks-to-new-record/253798">home construction hitting its lowest level since 1959</a>, you probably think it's just more bad news -- but it's actually good news. <br /><br />The only way we're going to even get near the bottom of the housing price drop is for the backlog of available homes to be sold. We'll only see prices start to climb back up when demand is higher than the available supply. We're still a long way off from that scenario, but if builders stop building, we'll get there a lot faster.<br /><br />Based on the new numbers released today by the Commerce Department, the pace of new construction will put the U.S. on track to build the fewest new homes and apartments since the end of World War II. Commerce reported that construction of new homes and apartments dropped to 791,000 on an annual basis. Prior to today's report the slowest pace since World War II was in January 1991. This was the fourth straight monthly drop and I doubt it's the last one. There are still too many homes waiting to be sold.<br /><br />The declines were led by a 31% drop in the Northeast and 13.7% drop in the Midwest. There were modest increases in the South (1.5%) and the West (7.5%). Given that the South and the West were the hardest hit at the beginning of the housing bubble burst, this could be good news that these hard hit areas are nearing their bottom.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home construction hits record low - could be good news</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/">Home construction hits record low - could be good news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/us-home-construction-sinks-to-new-record/253798>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376864/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/home-construction-hits-record-low-could-be-good-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>builders</category><category>Commerce Department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>home construction</category><category>HomeConstruction</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed should like moderate Q4 GDP growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/fly-logo-live.gif" /></a>The U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.5% in Q4, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Thursday, slightly above the 2.2% consensus estimate. <br /><br />The stat represents the U.S. government's final revision for Q4 GDP. The government's initial estimates had projected 3.5% growth for the last quarter of 2006. Hence, the 2.5% stat represents a substantial under-performance by the world's largest economy.<br /><br />Slowing corporate earnings growth and business investment, combined with initial signs of a pull-back in consumer spending, and sub-prime loan defaults have economists concerned that the U.S. economy may slow too much in the first half of 2007 -- perhaps flirting with a recession. In 2006, the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/press/monetary/2007/">U.S. Federal Reserve increased short-term interest rates</a> to slow the U.S. economy and take pressure off commodity prices, which had helped feed inflation. <br /><br /><strong>Fly Analysis: </strong>The Q4 stat provides further evidence that the U.S. Federal Reserve has slowed the U.S. economy, as intended. The 2.5% stat represent moderate, sustainable growth -- one that in and of itself should not accelerate pressure on prices. It's an acceptable growth rate for the Fed -- not too fast and not too slow -- and one that further supports the Fed's neutral short-term interest rate policy stance to date in 2007. Along with upcoming inflation data, the Fed will now await further statistics for Q1 to determine if the economy is continuing to slow, of in growth has started to re-accelerate -- factors that will help determine monetary policy as 2007 progresses.  <br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/">Fed should like moderate Q4 GDP growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/862996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/fed-should-like-moderate-q4-gdp-growth-stat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commerce Department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>economic growth</category><category>EconomicGrowth</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Story You Didn't Read: Digital killed the TV star]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><em>Ben Berkowitz is the business news editor at AOL. His weekly column highlights business stories with significant implications that were overlooked at first glance.</em> </p>
<p>The story you didn't read this week but should have is the news that the Commerce Department is going to make <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/all-in-us-eligible-for-tv-box-coupons/20070313074209990001" target="_blank">$40 coupons available</a> to people with TVs that can't tune digital signals and aren't hooked up to satellite or cable.<br /><br />This is important because, in less than two years, analog TV as we know it will end in the United States. From February 17, 2009, stations must broadcast in digital only. The reason of course is money; it takes a lot less spectrum to broadcast digital signals than analog, and all those analog airwaves are worth untold billions of dollars.<br /><br />So it's in Uncle Sam's best interest to ensure that the switchover happens, and the best way to do that is to do the heavy lifting (financially) for those who still love their rabbit ears.<br /><br />Here's the funny part though (funny as in "oh geez not again," not "hah hah" funny): to get one of these $40 coupons from Uncle Carlos (AKA Commerce Secretary Gutierrez), <a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2007/DTVfinalrule_031207.htm" target="_blank">all you have to do is ask.</a><br /><br />Even if you don't need one, you can still go to a special National Telecommunications and Information Administration Web site starting Jan. 1, 2008 and request up to two $40 coupons per household. (Each converter will be about $50). The best part is this: if the initial $990 million in coupons runs out, the NTIA can ask Congress for $510 million more.<br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Story You Didn't Read: Digital killed the TV star</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/">The Story You Didn't Read: Digital killed the TV star</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/854136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/the-story-you-didnt-read-digital-killed-the-tv-star/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Carlos Guiterrez</category><category>CarlosGuiterrez</category><category>Commerce Department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>Freeview</category><category>NTIA</category><category>USDTV</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Berkowitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Still undecided if housing is slowing down?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="houses for sale in manzanita" id="vimage_2" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/homes_sarahgilbert_manzanity.jpg" />The housing market got some more bad news recently. A <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/housing-construction-plunges-in-october/n20061117090009990007?cid=403">new report</a> from the Commerce Department Nov. 17 reported a dramatic decline in the construction of new single-family homes and apartments during October.<br /><br />According to the report, construction of new single family homes and apartments fell 14.6% from their September level to an annual rate of 1.486 million units. The market has not seen a percentage decline this steep for the last 19 months; we're not back to the activity levels of July 2000.<br /><br />We are still going to have to play the waiting game to find out if the housing slowdown is going to be enough to pull America into a recession, but it is surely going to be something to contend with over the next year. We have already started to see the impact during July through September when economic growth came in at a 1.6% percent rate. The weakening housing market was blamed for shaving a full percentage off the rate. <br /><br />But on a brighter note, the report indicates that builder sentiment has risen for the last two months -- so hopefully we are seeing at least a leveling-off in the housing market, and we are not looking ahead towards a more dramatic downside. However, new building permit applications fell again for the eighth straight month by 6.3%.<br /><br />This year's activity during October was 27.4% lower than October last year, mostly led by a weakening in the South which saw new construction fall 26.4%. The Midwest had a drop of 11.7% and the West fell 2.1%. The situation in the Northeast was the anomaly, where new construction was on the rise, with an increase of an impressive 31%.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Michael Fowlkes has worked as a stock trader for seven years and spent the last 2 years working as an analyst and portfolio manager for the online investment advisory service <a href="http://investorsobserver.com/index.asp">Investor'sObserver</a>.</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/">Still undecided if housing is slowing down?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/703682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/17/still-undecided-if-housing-is-slowing-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>housing</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Slow income and consumption growth in September]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>The Commerce Department <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/consumer-spending-incomes-rise-in/n20061030084809990006?cid=403">reported today</a> that personal income was up 0.5 percent, slightly higher than August's revised 0.4 percent, but personal consumption slowed to just 0.1 percent in September, less than the revised 0.2 percent for August. These numbers are exactly the opposite what many economist were expecting. Economists expected to see a 0.4 percent increase for personal income and a 0.2 percent increase for consumer spending.</p>
<p>This report reflects the trend we saw in last week's GDP report from the Commerce Department which showed that economic growth was the weakest in three years. It also reinforces the Fed's decision to hold short-term interest rates steady amid signs that the economy is slowing. </p>
<p>Spending on durable goods -- those designed to last three years or longer -- increased by 1.6 percent, which is much better than August's 1.4 percent decline. But spending on non-durable goods declined by 1.2 percent after gaining in August by 0.2 percent. </p>
<p>Personal savings continues to be in the negative with a drop of 0.2 percent. That's now 18 months that savings has been in the red. I suspect personal income growth would need to increase much more dramatically to see the savings rate turnaround.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/">Slow income and consumption growth in September</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/consumer-spending-incomes-rise-in/n20061030084809990006?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>consumption</category><category>personal income</category><category>PersonalIncome</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
