<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/downicemay7240.jpg" alt="May 6 flash crash" />After nearly five months, federal regulators have been able to dissect the events of May 6, the day when the Dow plunged almost 1,000 points.</p>
<p>A joint report issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pieced together that day's events and came up with this finding, as reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. A computerized trading program run by a Waddell &amp; Reed trader automatically sold 35,000 e-mini S&amp;P contracts. These contracts mirror the larger S&amp;P contracts. The trader's program was triggered at 9% of the trade volume.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/">Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19657944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>electronic trading</category><category>featured</category><category>flash crash report</category><category>inthenews</category><category>May 6</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Waddell Reed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hollywood Stock Exchange: Betting on the Box Office]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hollywood-sign.jpg" />Think you can tell which upcoming motion pictures will be blockbusters and which will be bombs? If so, you may get the chance to put your money where your mouth is.</p>
<p>For years, Wall Street investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald has been operating a so-called <a href="http://www.hsx.com/">Hollywood Stock Exchange</a>, which allows players to trade faux stocks in upcoming films; specifically, "investing" in box office futures. Cantor Fitzgerald is now seeking permission from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to <a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/02/subprime-goes-hollywood">allow players to invest for real</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hollywood Stock Exchange: Betting on the Box Office</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/">Hollywood Stock Exchange: Betting on the Box Office</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19357658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/hollywood-stock-exchange-betting-on-the-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>Cantor Fitzgerald</category><category>CFTC</category><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>Hollywood Stock Exchange</category><category>HSX</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Media Derivatives</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FTC plans a crackdown on market manipulation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/federal_trade_commission.jpg" />Here's a bit of juicy news. According to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124957616259511513.html">Wall Street Journal</a></em> (subscription required), The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plans to crack down on market manipulators. They have decided to levy fines up to $1 million dollars per violation a day. The rule covers both physicals and futures. </p>
<p>The crackdown involves mainly the oil traders. Specifically, the language reads as follows: It bans oil market players from issuing "false public announcements of planned pricing or output decisions, false statistical or data reporting, and wash sales intended to disguise the actual liquidity of a market or the price of a particular product." The rules would also prohibit "material omissions from a statement that, although true, is misleading under the circumstances."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FTC plans a crackdown on market manipulation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/">FTC plans a crackdown on market manipulation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124957616259511513.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121759/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/ftc-plans-a-crackdown-on-market-manipulation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CFTC</category><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>Federal Trade Commission</category><category>FTC</category><category>market manipulation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cotton price spike mystifies traders, prompts inquiry]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="cotton"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/cotton_usda_160.jpg" />Add another case study to the controversy over speculators and market manipulation.<br /> <br />The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is investigating whether cotton prices were 'artificially inflated' in early March, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> reported Wednesday (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121857778719434667.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">subscription required</a>). The March 4 price spiked from about 70 cents per pound to an intra-day high of $1.09 and closed at 93.1 cents.<br /><br />In Wednesday morning trading, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">cotton</a> rose about four-tenths of one cent to 70.070 cents per pound.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Journal</span> reported that the price spike in early March was unusual and baffled traders because cotton inventories were at their highest level in four decades, towel and fabric demand was weakened by the housing slump, and global supplies were high.
<p>On the other side of argument, one which argues that market forces set the price, some cotton merchants themselves were trading aggressively; a little-used exchange rule suddenly required merchants to unwind sell orders; and financial investors, including pension and hedge funds, started to enter the market, which generated an eight-fold jump February 19-26 in net buying, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Journal</span> reported, citing CFTC data.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cotton price spike mystifies traders, prompts inquiry</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/">Cotton price spike mystifies traders, prompts inquiry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1283258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/cotton-price-spike-mystifies-traders-prompts-inquiry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>cotton</category><category>futures</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>hedgers</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pension funds</category><category>speculation</category><category>speculators</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hedge funds reduced positions in oil futures as prices rose, probe started]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oil-pit.jpg" />Hedge funds and speculators reduced positions in oil by 80% as prices rose to records and as U.S. regulators started investigating trading, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=alYVlHUmKbF4&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Monday,</a> citing government data.<br /><br />Net long positions decline to 25,867 contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange in the week ended May 27, 2008 from a record 127,491 contracts on July 31, 2008 according to a U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission report.<br /> <br />Last week, the CFTC, under pressure from Congress, <a href="http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2008/pr5503-08.html">announced that it had expanded an investigation of oil's price rise and oil futures contracts.</a> Oil has increased about 100% in the past 12 months, and about 480% since 2002. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> rose $1.50 to $128.50 per barrel in mid-day Monday trading.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hedge funds reduced positions in oil futures as prices rose, probe started</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/">Hedge funds reduced positions in oil futures as prices rose, probe started</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1212356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/hedge-funds-reduced-positions-in-oil-futures-as-prices-rose-pro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CFTC</category><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment funds</category><category>NYMEX</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>pension funds</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.s.Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regulators to probe possible price manipulation in oil market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>U.S. regulators Friday disclosed a broad nationwide <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121209222219630359.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">investigation into potential oil-market manipulation</a> and said they are expanding surveillance of energy markets, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported Friday.</p>
<p>The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announcement of an ongoing and widening inquiry occurs amid <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSN3029995020080530">a 4-year rise in crude oil prices</a> in which gasoline, diesel, and heating oil prices hit record highs, Reuters reported Friday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> closed Friday up 73 cents to $127.35 per barrel. Oil has risen about 100% in the past 12 months.</p>
<p>Many Congressional officials and consumer groups have been arguing for a systematic investigation into futures prices, asserting that institutional investors and other speculators have manipulated oil prices and driven them "artificially higher."</p>
<p>Others, including economists and oil executives, argue that the price increases have more to do with the sector's bullish fundamentals, including inadequate crude oil production growth amid rising demand.</p>
<p><strong>Oil Analysis:</strong> Strong evidence suggests that the bulk of oil's 4-year bullish run is rooted in fundamentals, with the reduction in the global safety cushion -- the spare oil between daily global oil supply and demand -- accounting for today's near-record oil prices. Still, that's not to say a rigorous inquiry would not yield compelling data or new insights. One area of interest that the inquiry will explore: whether oil storage operators have issued <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSN3029995020080530">misleading information about oil in their tanks</a> to profit from oil trades, Reuters reported Friday.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/">Regulators to probe possible price manipulation in oil market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 May 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1211073/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/regulators-to-probe-possible-price-manipulation-in-oil-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>energy crisis</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil futures</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil sector</category><category>oil shock</category><category>OPEC</category><category>pension funds</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inflation up, will the Plunge Protection Team step in today?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>The market was looking like it would open up this morning. That is, until 8:30 a.m. when the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B66A64FF4%2DF345%2D48DC%2D8F68%2D894FBCBBF667%7D&amp;siteid=mktw">wholesale inflation report</a> came in at more than twice the rate economists had expected. Now the market is expected to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/15/markets/stockswatch/index.htm">drop</a>. Will the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/blackm/plunge.htm">Plunge Protection Team</a> (PPT) step in as it may have done yesterday?</p>
<p>The reason the market reversed is that with higher than expected inflation, the Fed is less likely to cut interest rates. The Fed wants to keep core inflation between 1% and 2%, but when the PPI rises 1.3% in a month -- instead of the expected 0.6% -- investors fear that the Fed will need to raise rates to keep inflation within its target range. Is the Fed serious though? Last week, a productivity report noted that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a8ktjkKVssTk&amp;refer=home">unit labor costs rose 6.6%</a> in the last quarter of 2006. Although bonuses figured into the statistic, the slower growth in productivity suggests that wage inflation could be a future concern.</p>
<p>My guess is, though, that the Fed has a more complex goal -- it's torn between the desire to control inflation and the need to avoid sinking the economy too much. As this report from <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/14/magazines/fortune/sanon.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007031413"><em>Fortune</em></a> suggests, people with adjustable rate mortgages can get into trouble quickly when those rates rise. With two-thirds of economic growth coming from consumer spending, a rise in interest rates could then reduce the heavily leveraged consumer's ability to keep spending.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inflation up, will the Plunge Protection Team step in today?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/">Inflation up, will the Plunge Protection Team step in today?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B66A64FF4%2DF345%2D48DC%2D8F68%2D894FBCBBF667%7D&amp;siteid=mktw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/inflation-up-will-the-plunge-protection-team-step-in-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>CommodityFuturesTradingCommission</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>plunge protection team</category><category>PlungeProtectionTeam</category><category>ppi</category><category>producer price index</category><category>ProducerPriceIndex</category><category>productivity</category><category>ronald reagan</category><category>RonaldReagan</category><category>sec</category><category>Secretary of the Treasury</category><category>SecretaryOfTheTreasury</category><category>unit labor cost</category><category>UnitLaborCost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:42:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
