The New York Times (permalink) describes a Trojan condoms commercial that was rejected by both CBS and Fox:
IN a commercial for Trojan condoms that has its premiere tonight, women in a bar are surrounded by anthropomorphized, cellphone-toting pigs. One shuffles to the men's room, where, after procuring a condom from a vending machine, he is transformed into a head-turner in his 20s. When he returns to the bar, a fetching blond who had been indifferent now smiles at him invitingly.
Interesting. In a letter to Trojan, Fox wrote that "Contraceptive advertising must stress health-related uses rather than the prevention of pregnancy."
Here's what I don't understand: Isn't anyone who uses a condom for health-related issues also interested in pregnancy prevention. Is the line of thinking really "Gee. I'd like to get pregnant with this guy I don't really know, but he could have STDs." And while people can have all kinds of reasons for using condoms, even in a committed relationship, isn't the purpose of condoms for health-related issues relevant mostly for casual encounters? I guess I don't understand the distinction that FOX is making.
Maybe I'm just perplexed because this sense of traditional morality is coming from the network that wanted to run a special on how O.J. Simpson would have killed his wife and her friend, if he did.