<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Pony sues Nike, is the pot calling the kettle black?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/pony1.gif" />Footwear manufacturer <a href="http://sportsonesource.com/news/fbu/fbu_article.asp?section=8&amp;Prod=5&amp;id=27351">Pony is suing </a>much larger (and presumably richer) foe Nike (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>). Pony contends that Nike has infringed on its <a href="http://www.sneakerfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/spud-webb-pony-dunk-contest.jpg">"iconic logo"</a> (<a href="http://alltalksports.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/nike-air-jordans-i.jpg">look familiar?</a>) in Nike's new <a href="http://limitedhype.com/2009/03/nike-v-for-victory/">"V for Victory" soccer advertising campaign</a>. </p>
<p>Pony contends that the chevron seen on the player's chests is far too close to its chevron-based logo, which the company has used for 35 years. </p>
<p>Pony stated, "The key distinguishing feature of the [Nike] campaign is the use of a chevron mark, which is identical or virtually identical to the registered trademarks owned by Pony." <br /><br />Does Pony have a point? Yes, but I have some problems I feel I should address here. First, I am no legal or design expert, but isn't Pony's original chevron logo a bit similar to Nike's iconic swoosh? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Pony sues Nike, is the pot calling the kettle black?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/">JockStocks: Pony sues Nike, is the pot calling the kettle black?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1513787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/jockstocks-pony-sues-nike-is-the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Air Jordan</category><category>AirJordan</category><category>copyrightinfringement</category><category>food</category><category>infringement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>logos</category><category>Nike</category><category>Pony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bait and snitch: BayTSP spies on YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p>BayTSP, a small start-up, makes it money by <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118653300178391145.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">checking video</a> (subscription required) on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) YouTube to find material that infringes on copyrights from major media companies One of its largest clients is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) which has a huge case pending against the world's largest video sharing site. </p>
<p>When BayTSP finds video that should not be on YouTube, it sends e-mail to the company to have it taken down. At one point earlier this year, the company identified over 100,000 video clips which Viacom is using as part of its $1 billion lawsuit claiming Google willfully ignores copyright laws. </p>
<p>But, efforts from the service could cut both ways in the lawsuit. YouTube does take down the clips that have been identified, and does so quickly. It is Google's view that the responsible parties are the users who post the videos and not YouTube. The fact that clips are removed on request may play in Google's favor in the court case.</p>
<p>The abilities of the service raises another interesting possibility which is that content companies could bring suits against private individuals who post proprietary content.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/">Bait and snitch: BayTSP spies on YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118653300178391145.html?mod=todays_us_page_one>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/960567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/08/spying-on-youtube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BayTSP</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>YouTube</category><category>YouTube snitching</category><category>YoutubeSnitching</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom has had it -- sues Google for $1 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p>It seems that Viacom Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) has had it. After the media conglomerate had asked Google Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) -- very nicely too -- to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/20/youtube-faces-some-real-competition/">remove some 100,000 clips</a> from its recently purchased video-sharing site YouTube, it is now saying: no more!<br /><br />As Beth Gaston Moon <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/">mentioned</a>, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/viacom-sues-google-over-youtube-clips/20070313093609990001">Viacom is now suing Google</a> for more than $1 billion in damages over these unauthorized clips and the use of its programming online. Viacom also seeks an injunction to prevent future and further violations.<br /><br />Many have worried that with Google's deep pockets, this is exactly what would happen once the company purchased YouTube. While some saw dollar signs from potential advertising revenue on the popular video-sharing site, others were concerned with the blatant copyright infringements.<br /><br />The original number of 100,000 clips Viacom claimed in the past it asked Google to remove is now in the neighborhood of 160,000. These were viewed more than 1.5 million times.<br /><br />Google is used to providing everything for free. In fact, this is its business model -- offer free products, increase traffic and then benefit from the advertising. This model is fine as long as Google offers its own products for free. Once it offers others', it becomes a different -- and potentially hazardous -- story.<br /><br />GOOG shares are down over 2% to $445.53, while VIA shares are up nearly 1.2% to $40.03. It seems investors have already decided which way this one goes.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/">Viacom has had it -- sues Google for $1 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/viacom-sues-google-over-youtube-clips/20070313093609990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/851659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-has-had-it-sues-google-for-1-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>copyright</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>via</category><category>via.b</category><category>viacom</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom sues YouTube]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><img height="143" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/mtv.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />There are many of us who are guilty of the following scenario - miss Al Gore on <em>The Daily Show</em>? Or need just one more shot of Justin Timberlake bringing sexy back to the Video Music Awards? Hop on over to YouTube, and you will most certainly find satisfaction. <br /><br />Today, Viacom (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VIA</a>), the parent of MTV, Comedy Central, Nickelodeon, and other major networks, is tired of this pattern. The conglomerate has <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17592285/">sued </a>Google (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and its YouTube unit for more than $1 billion, citing unauthorized use of copyrighted material. <br /><br />In addition to more than $1 billion in damages, the suit, filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeks an injunction against further violations. VIA alleges that almost 160,000 unauthorized clips of company-owned programming has been uploaded onto YouTube and viewed more than 1.5 billion times. <br /><br />GOOG representatives have so far failed to comment. The stock has dropped nearly one percent in trading so far today; VIA shares have gained nearly one percent.<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/">Viacom sues YouTube</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17592285/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/851631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/viacom-sues-youtube/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comedy Central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>copyright infringement</category><category>CopyrightInfringement</category><category>Nickelodeon</category><category>Viacom</category><category>you tube</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
