<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why is the SEC backing management entrenchment?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-SEC-Investor-Access.html">According</a> to the <em>New York Times</em>, "Federal securities regulators appear primed to allow companies to bar shareholders from access to ballots for board elections, a move that major pension funds and governance advocates say could make corporations less responsive to investors' interests."<br /> <br /> I have to tell you: It is a sad day for corporate governance in America when the commission that was designed to protect small investors is playing a role in further entrenching boards of directors in corporate America.<br /><br />Does anyone seriously think that too much accountability for directors and corporate officers is a problem in America right now? In the past few months, we have watched the heads of major banks leave in shame after losing billions of dollars on ill-advised subprime loans. So much for accountability: They headed back to the Hamptons with 9-figure severance packages.<br /><br />The SEC should be playing a leading role in giving dissident shareholders more options for effecting change.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/">Why is the SEC backing management entrenchment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-SEC-Investor-Access.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-is-the-sec-backing-management-entrenchment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporate governance</category><category>corporate oversight</category><category>CorporateGovernance</category><category>CorporateOversight</category><category>governance</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
