<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. gross domestic product contracts by 5.7% in the first quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>We have some good news and some bad news. The bad news first: <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c50aaf66-4c48-11de-a6c5-00144feabdc0.html">The U.S. Gross Domestic Product</a> declined by 5.7% in the first quarter, compared with a drop of 6.1% last month. This was a slight improvement over the 6.3% decline in the fourth quarter. The last six months have been the weakest in the past 51 years. Pulling the economy down were plunging exports, business inventories and the collapse of spending for non-residential construction.</p>
<p>Now for the good news: Corporate profits surged 3.4% to $1.307 trillion, after plunging 16.5% in the fourth quarter. The financial sector led the way with a jump of 94.9% compared with a drop of 18% last quarter. It is believed that the massive stimulus spending has prevented the economy from spiraling downward any further.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. gross domestic product contracts by 5.7% in the first quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/">U.S. gross domestic product contracts by 5.7% in the first quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 May 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c50aaf66-4c48-11de-a6c5-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19051650/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/us-gross-domestic-product-contracts-by-5-7-in-the-first-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporate profits</category><category>CorporateProfits</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil: Don't waste money on global warming -- no to the Rockefeller's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/annual-meetings/" rel="tag">Annual Meetings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p>As was reported in <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/rockefeller-family-takes-exxon-mobil/rfid98562583">AP online</a>, "Members of the Rockefeller family are pressuring <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) to focus more on renewable energy. The family members, who say they are the oil giant's longest continuous shareholders, say Exxon is too focused on short-term gains from sky-high oil prices. They also argue splitting the roles of chairman and CEO will help the company be more flexible in the future." </p>
<p>Last time I checked, companies had a responsibility to provide value for shareholders, and no one has done it better than the oil giant. It has been producing record earnings quarter after quarter, and that is exactly what it is supposed to do. Corporations are not supposed to be politically correct organizations that throw money around at the latest fad. Maybe Exxon doesn't believe that there is a global warming problem? Or maybe it wants to see a lot more scientific evidence of the problem before committing billions and billions of dollars to research. If I were a shareholder, I would want management to take the exact approach that it has been taking. The fact that it is the most profitable company in the world means something. It should be commended for providing shareholder value.</p>
<p>In fact, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&amp;sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg</a> has an article that says that ocean cooling will stop global warming. Moreover, the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&amp;sid=aU.evtnk6DPo&amp;refer=home">article</a> indeed mentions that the authors tried to spin the article because of Exxon. "We thought a lot about the way to present this because we don't want it to be turned around in the wrong way," Keenlyside said. "I hope it doesn't become a message of Exxon Mobil and other skeptics." </p>
<p>Sounds to me that they are right to be skeptical.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 5/1/08</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/">Exxon Mobil: Don't waste money on global warming -- no to the Rockefeller's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/rockefeller-family-takes-exxon-mobil/rfid98562583>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1182754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/exxon-mobil-dont-waste-money-on-global-warming-no-to-the-ro/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporate profits</category><category>CorporateProfits</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>glob</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>no global warming</category><category>responsibility to shareholders</category><category>Rockefeller</category><category>shareholder value</category><category>ShareholderValue</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Alcoa (AA) makes some good and bad moves]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ach/" rel="tag">Aluminum Corp of China ADS (ACH)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/alcoa.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Today <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">Alcoa Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">AA</a>) announced some <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/alcoa-to-take-charge-closes-in-on-sale/n20071004193209990009">restructuring plans</a> that will trim down (SELL) some under-performing consumer packaging and automotive castings divisions. It will be taking some charges to the tune of $845 million as well, and intends to gear up for expansion into higher margin areas. Alcoa also said it raised cash by selling its 7% stake in Chalco, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aluminum-corp-of-china-chalco/ach/nys">Aluminum Corp China ADS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aluminum-corp-of-china-chalco/ach/nys">ACH</a>) and bringing in $2 billion dollars on what was initially a $200 million investment -- <em>"A ten bagger."</em></p>
<p>It is this latter decision that is not smart, and without further explanation from management I have to question selling a winner. If you look at all of the things that Alcoa did in the last 10 years you will find that the Chalco investment was the smartest, and more importantly, the most profitable, thing it has done. For many years Alcoa stock has been adrift. Since it sold the stock it has only gone up further and as I write these words and look at the price now, ACH is trading up over 5% more to $75.70.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Alcoa (AA) makes some good and bad moves</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/">Serious Money: Alcoa (AA) makes some good and bad moves</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/chasing-value-aluminum-company-of-china-driving-me-nuts/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/05/serious-money-alcoa-aa-makes-some-good-and-bad-moves/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 stock picks</category><category>2007StockPicks</category><category>AA</category><category>ACH</category><category>Alcoa Inc (AA)</category><category>AlcoaInc(aa)</category><category>Aluminum</category><category>Aluminum Corp of China ADS (ACH)</category><category>AluminumCorpOfChinaAds(ach)</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</category><category>BerkshireHathaway(brk.a)</category><category>Chalco</category><category>Chasing VAlue</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>China</category><category>Corporate profits</category><category>Corporate restructuring</category><category>CorporateProfits</category><category>CorporateRestructuring</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
