My newest portfolio is my worst portfolio and the only one that is negative. How did this happen? The poison financials and my bad timing, that's how! It is embarrassing, to say the least, and I take no joy in reporting my blunders. I hope readers will appreciate the fact that I am willing to discuss everything and not just the bright spots.

Furthermore when I put my foot in my mouth I do it with style and grandeur. Take note of the story titles because they would be hysterical except for the fact that I really did buy these stocks and I still own them with one exception; so I'm not laughing too loud. I sold Washington Mutual in all but one portfolio at $36 a share. The following indicates the date of the original story. The closing prices are from Monday, November 26, 2007.

• April 11, 2007: Chasing Value: Washington Mutual - WaMu (NYSE: WM) closed at $16.81 down from $39.00: A loss of -56.9%
• April 17, 2007: Chasing Value: Bear Stearns - cheap and growing (NYSE: BSC) closed at $91.04 down from $148.00: A loss of -38.5%
• May 1, 2007: Chasing Value: IndyMac Bancorp - once in a lifetime (NYSE: IMB) closed at $7.82 down from $30.09: A loss of -74%
• June 19, 2007: Chasing Value: Bank Popular (BPOP) should be very popular (NYSE: BPOP) closed at $9.10 down from $17.00: A loss of -46.5%

No title could be more ironic and more wrong than the IMB story, unless of course your objective was to lose money. One of my older and wiser friends (A.L.) who manages money for high net worth individuals raised his eyebrows as he repeated the story title to me the day the story was posted. Now I hear his words every time I think about IMB. Had you followed my lead into the fog your average loss would be about 54%!

Continue reading Serious Money: My poison financials: WM, BSC, IMB, & BPOP

Serious Money: My poison financials: WM, BSC, IMB, & BPOP originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Although Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC) the bank, has gone on record as stating it is not in danger of going bankrupt and has plenty of liquidity to continue to operate and meet its current obligations, that could change. The bank is no doubt referring to the immediate future, like today or this week. Those who have expressed concern are thinking about next week, next month or six months out. I have no idea what the truth is, or if there are multiple truths, or if the company is dancing on the head of a pin.

• "Countrywide Home Loans is expected to service debt maturities beyond 2008 without additional debt issuance," the company said. Earlier Tuesday, a Countrywide representative told The Wall Street Journal that speculation the company may file for bankruptcy is 'absolutely false.'"

The company stock started off the year around $45 per share -- shares now trade around $9 per share. Here is a point that may be lost on the average investor: Even if there was no problem whatsoever with subprime mortgages and even if not one single mortgage holder was foreclosed on, Countrywide's business is down perhaps 80% and it is losing money -- profits are not to be found.

If people are not buying homes and condos and are not seeking traditional loans or any other kind, then Countrywide has to move fast to shrink its enterprise to match the customer demand level (which it has indeed been doing), and then start growing when the market picks up again. That means it has to be lean and mean, which means in turn that the company has to have the wherewithal to survive in a tough market for several years, not just this month.

Continue reading Countrywide says bankruptcy not a threat - do you buy it?

Countrywide says bankruptcy not a threat - do you buy it? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

For the past week, I have been making the case for the Federal Reserve Board to leave interest rates alone and protect the dollar. HEY BEN I HOPE YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENING! Today and tomorrow, the BIG meeting is going on and the world awaits which way we go. Stand your ground Ben, you have given enough breaks to Wall Street and the bankers, let them pay for the mess they created, not John Q. Public (again).

No investment bankers are giving back the multi-million dollar bonuses they received when they were pushing their CDO packages out the door as fast as the ratings agencies' (perhaps fraudulent) AAA ratings stamps dried. No way should they be given a pass on this.

I also am not that worried about home foreclosures. If speculators take a loss, they will learn a lesson (I hope) and if you bail them out they will be at it again. If the banks take a loss on the foreclosures, they will have to sell them at a lower price (current market) to other families that also need a home -- THE HOMES WILL NOT SIT EMPTY, the banks will unload them.

Continue reading Hey Ben - Leave the rates alone and don't worry about foreclosures!

Hey Ben - Leave the rates alone and don't worry about foreclosures! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

You really should watch Hilary Kramer: Market has further to fall, but there is opportunity in KDN, CBI, ACH to get some market perspective. The video was posted on August 21, 2007 and she makes some very good stock recommendations. Over the past 18 months that I have been looking at her picks versus those of James Cramer, I have found that you would have done better with Hilary.

While giving her full credit for her stock picking and market coverage I find I must strongly disagree with a statement she made. Cautioning viewers that " There is going to be a meltdown" is not overly alarming, but I take great exception to her stating that "This market can go down 25%." She shared her fear that there are 9000 hedge funds and that 3000 might close down.

It is possible that people may panic in certain circumstances and the market can stray into irrational short-term behavior once again, but I find her reasoning a little soft. Let's assume that the 9000 hedge funds own 50% of the total equity in the stock market (they don't) and one third go out of business, that would equate to a 15% collapse of value (unscientific, I know, but there is some correlation).

Continue reading Kramer said a possible 25% market collapse?

Kramer said a possible 25% market collapse? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Plenty of investment guru's have suggested buying on fear and selling when greed reaches its pinnacle. Well I think the fear side is self evident but I'm not hearing about many analysts who are brave enough to buy right now. As a matter of fact I only hear that this would be a very foolish time to invest in the financial sector, in particular, any stocks with sub-prime or "Alt-A" mortgage exposure.

For this reason, contrarian that I am, I thought I would speak out about my recent BAD CALLS, or at least very premature calls, and start tracking them for all to see -- accepting the ribbing, tomato-throwing and blunt comments about the error of my ways.

I own four of the five stocks I will be following for the next year, Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC), IndyMac Bancorp Inc. (NYSE: IMB), Popular Inc. (NASDAQ: BPOP), and Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM). I wrote favorable comments on each and in the case of WM, more than once. Needless to say, I am under water on all of them. I do not own Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC) but it will make for a fine pace car in the middle of this storm.

Continue reading Buy on fear today? Bear Stearns (BSC), Countrywide (CFC), IndyMac (IMB), Popular (BPOP), Washington Mutual (WM)

Buy on fear today? Bear Stearns (BSC), Countrywide (CFC), IndyMac (IMB), Popular (BPOP), Washington Mutual (WM) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.