<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! shareholders are delusional?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/microsoft.jpg" alt="" />Since the onset of the credit crunch, it's been hard times for merger arbitrageurs. Simply put, there have been a variety of high-profile deals that have imploded.</p>
<p>And, of course, we have a new one: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>)'s abandonment of its proposed $47.5 billion buyout of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). </p>
<p>Yet, if you look at the stock price of Yahoo!, it looks like the arbitrageurs are still optimistic that a deal will happen. In fact, there is speculation that an activist fund will launch a proxy fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! shareholders are delusional?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/">Yahoo! shareholders are delusional?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 May 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1190385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/08/yahoo-shareholders-are-delusional/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arbitrageurs</category><category>Buyout</category><category>Craig Mundie</category><category>CraigMundie</category><category>merger arbitrageurs</category><category>MergerArbitrageurs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer matters less than anyone in business?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="steve ballmer doesn't matter" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/ballmer_dontmatter.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer can't get no love. His <a href="http://www.ntk.net/media/dancemonkeyboy.mpg">famous "monkey boy" performance</a> is crazy-popular among those who thrive on poking fun at (and re-mixing) Ballmer's sweaty antics. He's being marginalized as Ray Ozzie and Craig Mundie are groomed to replace Gates (and, we imagine, Ballmer as well) -- and reporters&nbsp;and analysts&nbsp;are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/">jostling to get past him and talk to Ozzie</a>, who<em> everyone</em> seems to adore.</p>
<p>Now the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/10dontmatter.biz2/index.htm">worst possible judgment, from <em>Business</em> <em>2.0 Magazine</em></a>. He just doesn't matter. And what's more: he matters less than anyone in business. Ouch.</p>
<p>In conjunction with the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/peoplewhomatter/index.html">mag's "50 Who Matter Now" list</a> (featuring Ray Ozzie and competitive leaders Steve Jobs, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and worst of all for Ballmer's ego, Bill Gates himself), Ballmer headlines the "10 People Who Don't Matter" segment. "Let's face it: The head of the world's biggest software company is a lame duck," the judgment begins.</p>
<p>A lame duck who decides what happens with billions of investors' -- of <em>your</em> -- cash. Somehow, that's not very comforting.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/">Steve Ballmer matters less than anyone in business?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/10dontmatter.biz2/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.0</category><category>ballmer</category><category>business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>ceo</category><category>craig mundie</category><category>CraigMundie</category><category>don't matter</category><category>Don'tMatter</category><category>matter</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft ceo</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>ozzie</category><category>people who matter</category><category>PeopleWhoMatter</category><category>ray ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>web 2.0</category><category>Web2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:16:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
