<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Google Making Money off Typos]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif" />A new study shows that Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) may be <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18542-typos-may-earn-google-500m-a-year.html">profiting from typosquatting</a>, NewScientist's Tech page reports. Typosquatting is the act of registering or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from someone else's trademark. Typosquatting is when someone registers a domain name, hoping for typos from those looking to go to certain domains. This action is based on common misspellings, typing errors, a different domain name, or a different top-level domain. <br />
<br />
Here is the thing about typosquatting, if people make a mistake enough times, the typosquatter could profit thanks to ads placed on their page. How many times have you accidentally typed a domain name that is a letter off of the original? Or what about a flat-out typo? You are sent to a page that looks like a search page, except that it has sponsored ads that will make the site money if you follow the link. What is interesting is that Google may also be profiting from this.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Making Money off Typos</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/">Google Making Money off Typos</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19363355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/google-making-money-off-of-typos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cybersquatting</category><category>goog</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>typosquatting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Squats on Cybersquatters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img height="175" alt="msft" src="http://static.flickr.com/68/224619213_ca4ec2a29c_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" /></a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> is using its heft to go after so-called cybersquatters and typosquatters. Basically, these are firms that buy domain names that look similar to a major brand name, say <a href="http://www.starbucks.com">Starbucks</a> or <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple</a>. Often, these domain names have misspellings.</p>
<p>In other words, this is a cheap way to get lots of traffic. And, then with things like <a href="http://www.google.com">Google's </a>AdWords, you can make a good amount of money from pay-per-click ads.</p>
<p>Example: When Microsoft announced news about Zune, there were thousands of purchases for similar-sounding domain names.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, if the domain names do not generate lots of revenue - or the revenue burns out - then they typically wind up on auction sites. Yes, there is a whole ecosystem to cybersquatting and typosquatting.</p>
<p>Well, Microsoft is now serving some of these firms with lawsuits - claiming trademark infringement. Apparently, one of Microsoft's top researchers, Yi-Min Wang, has built a pretty cool piece of software (called "Strider") that hunts down cybersquatters and typosquatters. Micorosft says about 2,000 domains a day are registered using the company's brands. </p>
<p>I talked to John Gotts, a big-time domain name buyer who <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/18/would-you-pay-2-8-mil-for-wiki-com/">recently</a> paid $2.8 million for <a href="http://www.wiki.com">Wiki.com</a>. According to him: "You might also wonder why a company with the resources of MSFT wouldn't just buy the typos of its domains."</p>
<p>He points out that if, while using Internet Explorer, you type in a non-registered domain name, you will get a Microsoft default page that asks you if you want to buy it. He gives the example of <a href="http://www.miiicrosssoft.com">www.miiicrosssoft.com</a>:</p>
<p> </p>
<a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://sea.search.msn.com/dnserror.aspx?FORM=DNSAS&amp;q=www.miiicrosssoft.com"><img height="326" alt="search page" src="http://static.flickr.com/62/224617234_f83956ac58.jpg" width="500" /></a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/">Microsoft Squats on Cybersquatters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/659124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/25/microsoft-squats-on-cybersquatters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple</category><category>Cybersquatting</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>Typesquatting</category><category>Wiki.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
